Recommended Posts

MajinDark.... i hate to say this.......... REFORMAT!!!!!! And no i am not trying to make you laugh or anything, but this is the only way that i can see if you disabled your system restore. And next time do not disbale your system restore becuase this will not be the first and only time that you will try this type if software.

586329605[/snapback]

Well that sucks... :ermm:

MajinDark.... i hate to say this.......... REFORMAT!!!!!! And no i am not trying to make you laugh or anything, but this is the only way that i can see if you disabled your system restore. And next time do not disbale your system restore becuase this will not be the first and only time that you will try this type if software.

***By the way i like your avator!!!!!!! I am a huge FireFox Fan!! :yes:

BUGS!!! LMAO!!!! These are potholes! Its easy the uninstaller does not uninstall the entire program and plus you cannot without the service pack back up file in the windows folder metion in the previous replies on page 2 to 3. Second the actual decreases the performace by 25%+ by using up alot of resource. Finally the login/logoff screens show up white emply boxes as well.

BUGS!!! LMAO!!!! These are potholes! Its easy the uninstaller does not uninstall the entire program and plus you cannot without the service pack back up file in the windows folder metion in the previous replies on page 2 to 3. Second the actual decreases the performace by 25%+ by using up alot of resource. Finally the login/logoff screens show up white emply boxes as well.

586330058[/snapback]

If you don't wanna use it, then don't use it but pleas don't tell **** like this!

The uninstaller should rebuild the the dll's with the ".backup" files.And replacer make from every file which should be replaced a backup!If some person mean they've to delete those files it's not our problem mabe you should read the readme!:

"THE AUTHOR SHOULD NOT BE LIABLE FOR INDIRECT,

COSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THE USE OR INABILITY

TO USE THE SOFTWARE EVEN IF THE AUTHOR HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY

OF SUCH DAMAGES OR CLAIMS.THE USER OF THIS SOFTWARE BEARS ALL RISK AS TO THE QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE."

there should be a warning placed for this download, obviously it wasnt fully tested. i wasnt able to fully uninstall either.

586330440[/snapback]

Tested or not, you should always take precautions when installing this type of thing. The most obvious one is to create a system restore point before installing. Does the installer create a system restore point itself? If it does, then just use that. If it doesn't, then the creators should add that in to the installer.

This thing is a piece of sh*t. To the ones who made it you obviously didn't test it on many computers. By "many computers" did you mean the same 2 over and over since you have to format your computer or use system restore just to uninstall or get rid of it?

This new one better uninstall it from my system because I'm going to be ****ed if I have to format my computer because I ran system restore and THAT didn't even get rid of it. You people need to learn how to make programs that actually work.

Besides the 2 who said they made it I've only seen one other post where someone said it worked fine.

One other thing...just becuase it was downloaded 200 times doesn't mean it worked for 200 people. I'm sure 200 people messaged you afterwards saying it worked, yeah right

This thing is a piece of sh*t. To the ones who made it you obviously didn't test it on many computers. By "many computers" did you mean the same 2 over and over since you have to format your computer or use system restore just to uninstall or get rid of it?

This new one better uninstall it from my system because I'm going to be ****ed if I have to format my computer because I ran system restore and THAT didn't even get rid of it. You people need to learn how to make programs that actually work.

Besides the 2 who said they made it I've only seen one other post where someone said it worked fine.

One other thing...just becuase it was downloaded 200 times doesn't mean it worked for 200 people. I'm sure 200 people messaged you afterwards saying it worked, yeah right

586331250[/snapback]

worked fine here mate I even customized it :)

Well here's 1 reason why it doesn't uninstall. If any of you dual boot like me. Windows 98 on my C: drive and XP on my D: drive. The "uninstaller" looks for "runme.bat" on drive C: (c:\windows\system32\runme.bat) where it should be looking at d:\windows\system32\runme.bat.

Now I have to format just to get this PURE CRAP off my computer. Worthless software. I should've waited for future postings on what people thought about it before downloading it.

By the way...I've downloaded the new one which seems a lot like the original just renamed.

This isn't anywhere near stable or anything to have been released and has no reason to be on the net. Who knows how many people have formatted there computers over this thing.

Hopefully some other program fixes all my default icons and login screens to save me from formatting.

YOU NEED TO TAKE IT OFF THE NET BEFORE OTHER SYSTEMS ARE SCREWED

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Meta will now use data from outside businesses to personalize AI responses by David Uzondu In an update that's rolling out globally (except in a handful of countries), Meta will use your data from outside businesses to personalize your AI responses and your primary feeds. Meta already utilizes your shopping activity to target ads, but the company now plans to expand this tracking to personalize other "parts of your experience" like feed algorithms and AI assistant chats. The company is replacing the two settings ("Your activity off Meta technologies" and "Activity from other businesses") that currently let you disconnect off-platform activity with a single, renamed setting called Activity from other businesses. If you don't want Meta to manipulate your feed and AI responses using your outside history, you can just turn the Activity from other businesses setting off in your account settings. This toggle resides within your Accounts Center, applying your choice to every connected profile. Turning this off will not stop companies from sending your data to Meta. The company will still collect your web interactions, but it only uses them to train products, while still accessing external accounts you connect. When The Verge spoke to Meta spokesperson, Emil Vazquez, the representative said that this update will exclude several locations at launch including the European region, the UK, Brazil, Thailand, South Africa, Turkey, South Korea, Ecuador, Nigeria, and Kenya. The new update comes at a time when the social media giant is recovering from a major PR disaster involving generative AI. Last week, there was a huge security issue on Instagram where attackers figured out a way to exploit a prompt injection vulnerability. Hackers managed to trick Meta AI into handing over account ownership (even if the victim had 2FA enabled). Some of the affected accounts include the dormant Obama White House profile, cosmetics brand Sephora, the Chief Master Sergeant of the Space Force, and security researcher Jane Manchun Wong. Internally, the company also had to scale back plans on its Model Capability Initiative (MCI), an employee-monitoring program designed to train corporate AI models by recording worker keystrokes and screen activity, after employees raised privacy concerns and complained about severe battery life drain.
    • JetBrains is working to cut false positives in RustRover 2026.2 by David Uzondu Recently, JetBrains released the fifth EAP build of its dedicated IDE, RustRover 2026.2, bringing improvements like a Run gutter icon for criterion_main! macro benchmarking and a feature that alerts you when there are unused traits in your current scope. Now, the company is out with a blog post addressing one of the "most common" complaints from users: false positives. In RustRover, a false positive occurs when the editor incorrectly highlights something as an error even though the project compiles and runs successfully. This mismatch flags a gap between the IDE's internal intelligence and the actual compiler. When the editor flashes red warnings over perfectly valid code, developers lose trust in the tool, which stalls momentum. Traditionally, RustRover runs cargo check to detect compiler errors and warnings, but it also relies on its own code analysis engine to power real-time features. To provide quick feedback, this engine parses your source code into a syntax tree while inferring types and resolving names as you type. Because this engine must work on broken, half-written code and react instantly, its logic sometimes diverges from the compiler's, producing false positives that do not exist in the compiler's eyes. JetBrains said that it has a "dedicated task force" focused specifically on identifying and fixing false positives by analyzing user reports and examining large-scale open-source projects. To speed up this process, the team built an internal system modeled after Crater, the famous Rust project that compiles and runs tests for every single crate published on crates.io. This automated pipeline compares the diagnostics from RustRover's analysis with actual compiler output to catch discrepancies before they reach users, ensuring smoother workflows. RustRover, for those who're unaware, is a dedicated IDE designed specifically for Rust developers. It's been around for a couple of years now, providing features like built-in debugging via LLDB, seamless cargo integration, advanced macro expansion, and HTML support. JetBrains distributes the app under two licensing models: a paid commercial subscription and a free option for non-commercial use.
    • Last year I bought the 2TB variant for $114 on Amazon. That's crazy that the 1TB is now 67% more expensive for half the storage, even with the newer T9 already on the market. And that's considered a good deal.
    • You can disable all non needed features from Brave. There is also Brave Origin which removes them entirely and it is free for Linux.
    • I wish I could use Brave but the tab suspension feature is horrible. It doesn't suspend them like Edge does. Even after 2h open with 70+ tabs (same as Edge), it has 2GB more consumption than Edge for no reason.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Primer1st earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Experienced
      JayZJay went up a rank
      Experienced
    • Reacting Well
      Sir_Timbit earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      rubentuben8 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ARaclen earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      512
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      229
    3. 3
      Edouard
      135
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      87
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!