F.E.A.R. Demo Thread


Recommended Posts

:angry: WTF? This game is constantly causing my Virtual Memory to run low. Really screwing up the experience. Here are my specs:

Intel 875PBZ w/ 3ghz CPU

1Gb Corsair TwinX 3200LLPT

Ati X800XT 256DDR AIW

I checked my page file settings, and it is set to 512mb on my secondary drive.

Other than that, I am not sure I like the gun sounds so much. I have a pretty decent stereo setup, and the guns dont have that much bass. At first I thought I had lowered it, but it was maxed out. When I used the slow motion, my room basically shook while I was entering and exiting that mode.

586336351[/snapback]

LOL yes 512mb is a bad setting.... Your pagefile should be at least 1.5 x your ram

ie. 1gb ram = 1.5gb page file

Oh and the game is great, loved it. I just need widescreen support, sucks to have to use svideo on a HDTV :( This should be a standard thing nowadays, people who play these kind of games generally have some fancy hardware/displays.. why wouldn't that be supported?? Come on people...

One part I did get the chills over was at a part when I went to climb down a ladder and as soon as the camera faced in the direction of the ladder, I saw a sillouette of that small girl walking towards me.

586335718[/snapback]

hah, yeah thats about the part where i decided i don't want a heart attack this early in the day and quit.

:ninja:

i think it plays better on nvidia. most of the settings were on medium/high with my 6600 gt but it was only 1024x768

Those of you experience performance issues at 640x480, some questions:

-Do you have a P4 with hyperthreading on and Folding@Home or some other distributed client running? If so, turn the client off.

-For some reason, (I suspect compatability) game makers like to set sound to "Software" by default. This kills the CPU. If you have any sort of hardware accellerated sound (Audigy, Audigy 2, Live!, etc.), make sure this is set.

Those seem to be the two biggiest killers of performance when all of the obvious is covered. Hope it works for some of you...

AMD64 3200@3500, 6800GT @ Ultra, 2 gigs of PC3200, game runs fine and dandy here (it better) much better than the MP beta actually.

And you guys can't tell me, those segements of the game after you go into the building and you get "Incoming transmission - Unknown origin" and hear weird sound and even time seems to slow down for a moment you didn't get a chill??? And that one part where you walk near that health thingie near the ladder and the screen really slows down and you see the little girl pass in front of you and she giggles, omg awesome stuff!

I can't believe the performance is so bad... it hasn't improved much since the MP Beta. The gameplay is nice, much nicer than the MP Beta, and is also very challenging. Graphics look quite good too, but I can't believe how crappy it runs! It is 10x worse than Doom 3 in terms of performance, and I have a X800XTPE and can only run at bare medium settings at 1024x768 to have it run smooth but not even smooth enough to make it 100% great in the more intense parts! C'mon, learn to make a decent game engine... I can't believe how these people think. Not everyone can shell out half a grand or more for a graphics card upgrade every couple months! Even with a 7800GTX you wouldn't be near close to being able to max this thing out. Doom 3 was OK... you could play that on most systems and have it look good, and max it out with the right hardware, but this is horrid.

Let's hope we get some good driver updates and some game patches to get this thing running up to standards.

post-74594-1123356008_thumb.jpgso beleave  t or  not the  demo runs  on my  P3/650mhz system with 392megs ram and a  GeForce FX  5600  card with  most everything on medium i think.i get between  21 and  37FPS  and i t runs in DX8 mode sahders  it does run evan better.

586336498[/snapback]

Are you joking me? That looks better than on my computer! Faster FPS, too... and I have nice rig!

Edit: Can you post all the settings (or a config file) for what you used?

AMD64 3200@3500, 6800GT @ Ultra, 2 gigs of PC3200, game runs fine and dandy here (it better) much better than the MP beta actually.

And you guys can't tell me, those segements of the game after you go into the building and you get "Incoming transmission - Unknown origin" and hear weird sound and even time seems to slow down for a moment you didn't get a chill??? And that one part where you walk near that health thingie near the ladder and the screen really slows down and you see the little girl pass in front of you and she giggles, omg awesome stuff!

586336535[/snapback]

I agree the incoming transmission thing was a little creepy.. but it didn't really do much other than display that msg. but it did scare me at first.

made me turn my sound down.. :blush:

For the people wiht LCD's that can't get 1280x1024 heres how to set it http://forums.vugames.com/thread.jspa?threadID=865&tstart=0

586336731[/snapback]

Thanks, will keep this for when the game is released.. too bad i didn't find this earlier already finished the demo, i was looking for WS res...

I was truely astonished by the demo. - I found it quite challenging too. But what struck me (as it struck others) was it's major performances issues.

1 thing they've done right is release a demo BEFORE they release the game. Wise move.

My system specs are as follows:

AMD Athlon 64 3200+

1GB GeiL 3200 RAM

X850XT PE

and it runs rather laggish in certain areas.

That AI was awesome.. I love the particle fx when you are shooting enemies and objects in slow motion.

The graphics were good.. the particle fx and destruction were awesome... but for environments and character models, I think Source engine is still best.

Ran a little slow for me too in certain areas.. but I ran everything maxed @ 1600x1200 res.

Are you joking me? That looks better than on my computer! Faster FPS, too... and I have nice rig!

Edit: Can you post all the settings (or a config file) for what you used?

586336787[/snapback]

well i dont knwo if the ris a config file it makes based on are settings but all look and i know it sounds unbleavable but remeber that game devlopers only test on what is commonly known as mimimal hardware of the time of testing so the fact is i run the game same with Halflife 2 demo i run it as well also

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
    • Windows 11 gets new audio improvements in the latest builds by Taras Buria Today's Experimental builds (26H1 and Future Platforms, formerly Canary) pack several audio-related improvements. If your device is enrolled in the Experimental Channel (26H1), you can download build 28120.2315, while those in the Future Platforms version have build 29613.1000 to try. Here is what is new in build 29613.1000: [Audio] Following up on our previous improvements, we’re making some more adjustments to Settings > System > Sounds based on your feedback. Namely, we’ve updated the “All sound devices” page so: You now have the ability to change default devices from this page. Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. We’ve adjusted the page design slightly so now you can filter whether you’re viewing input or output devices. We’ve added toggles so you can choose if you want to hide or show disabled, disconnected, and unplugged devices on this page. We’ve also updated the input and output audio properties page for devices in Settings to now include jack information for those that need it. And here is the changelog for build 28120.2315: This update includes a small number of minor bug fixes and improvements. [Accessibility] This update improves caption style responsiveness by redrawing captions immediately for caption style changes. If no current caption is visible, a sample caption string is displayed. [Audio] This update improves the reliability of the inbox HD Audio driver. You can find the official release notes for build 28120.2315 here and for build 29613.1000 here.
    • I agree with what I think you are saying, just not in the way you are saying it. Like any tool, the amount it represents your work is perorational to the effort you put into it. It is similar to why 2nd grade math students learning to add and subtract are not allowed to use calculators, but a high-school calculous student is. For the 2nd grader, that tool would completely replace the work they are doing, for the calculous student the same tool allows them to work far more effectively while in no way replacing their effort or knowable. If you spend 30 seconds writing a prompt, then the image that comes out is no more "yours" than if you found the same image with a Google Image search. However, many of these generative tools also support highly iterative processes that allow back and forth, and merging generated images with photos or human created images. I am sure you would agree that a human spending hours of time working on a project, even if AI was involved in the process, still reflects that human's work.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      575
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      189
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!