Bald chicken 'needs no plucking'


Recommended Posts

_37942830_chicken150.jpg

Feather coverage is greatly reduced on the birds

Scientists have bred a controversial featherless chicken which they say is faster growing.

The birds, created at the Hebrew University in Israel, will not need to be plucked, saving money in processing plants.

While the researcher behind the breed concedes that they would not be suitable for cooler countries, he says that in hot climates, the birds would fare better.

However, opponents of the move say that the changes do not benefit the animals, and are in fact likely to make their lives worse.

Professor Avigdor Cahaner, who led the project, told the BBC: "This is not a genetically modified chicken - it comes from a natural breed whose characteristics have been known for 50 years.

"I am just transferring that to fast growing broiler chickens. It's a normal chicken except for the fact it has no feathers."

He said that broiler chickens were fed intensively to achieve fast growth, which meant they also tended to produce a lot of body heat; and this meant that particularly in hotter countries, they "suffer tremendously".

The featherless birds would tend to be leaner, and perhaps grow faster, he said, which would improve the quality of the meat and save producers money.

Pollution claim

Removing the plucking process would also reduce pollution, he said. The process, he claimed, produced large quantities of water contaminated with feathers and fat.

However, animal welfare groups warned that feathers were important to help protect the birds from parasites - and that the featherless chickens were likely to suffer sunburn.

In addition, male chickens might not be able to mate, they argued.

Source

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/35584-bald-chicken-needs-no-plucking/
Share on other sites

Originally posted by shockz

It was out in the sun to long and got burnt because its feathers weren't there to sheild the suns rays

They can't go in the sun because they fall over with the heat and die. The reason its red is because that is the colour of a chicken with no feathers. Its kept in a small space next to all the rest of the bald chickens, so its hot, and they rub together causing rashes and stuff, so the chicken is just one big rash!

lol

ahh colonel sanders would roll over in his grave

Im all for this idea, about time we started putting technology and genetic engineering to work for us.

/me round of appluase

I want more ideas like this

saving us money, time and putting technology to good use.

How is this cruel?

you think the chicken/rooster is in pain? not like it had feathers and they ripped them all out.

He isnt missing anything since he was never born with them

And this is important, can you fathem how much money this would save the food industry

Over 22% the cost of produicng chickens for sale be it to supermarkets/food chain eg kfc etc goes to cleaning it and removing feathers

with this brave new venture thats 22% more profit for the industry which means over the next decade

chicken prices should remain stable, more jobs, and greater effeciency in the industry.

Now thats if they picked up the technology immediately but chances are thanks to people like the above guy that wont happen for the next decade, but get use to it people because it will happen

Irrespective of wearther you want to know your chicken or turkey was featherless when it was born come Thanks giving or when ya earing ya KFC takeway the fact is, that featherless chicken saved you paying alot more for ya meal then what you would want too.

Granted where talking meager prices here except with turkeys man they cost alot, but I eat kfc on a regular basis and almost every year it goes up, so if for the next few years the prices can remain the same and there effiecency can increase im all for it.

Also the example of KFC and the turkey is just one/1.5 examples dont be so narrow to think there isnt far grehater benefits for this, think industry think economics think future, then you might have a spec of a clue to the whole picture little developments like this can have on the internation economy cycles.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Looks like the 7.1 is fake effects, can it at least do real 5.1? It says 'virtual 7.1' in all descriptions.
    • You can't, if you didn't notice, it doesn't support surround at all, it's right in the spec list.
    • Hi — I’m always interested in soundcards. Like displays, I just want to know I’m getting as much clean “sonic juice” into my brain as possible as the years take their toll. I’m not entirely sure what to take away from this review, though. It doesn’t really tell me whether the AE‑X is a good product or who it’s actually for. Most of what I’m getting is: there’s a driver to install, here’s what it looks like, and here’s what’s in the box. There’s a lot of emphasis on the SPDIF input. When you mention not needing to switch headphones between console and PC — does that mean the PC has to be powered on just to pass audio through? That seems like a fairly big waste of energy. Is this more something a streamer would use alongside a capture card? How are you testing the sound? (Also, you might want to clarify that you’re using the headphones in wired mode when you mention they’re wireless.) You mention the lack of EMI shielding — how much real‑world difference does that make compared with typical motherboard audio? On multi‑channel: what exactly isn’t supported? Does this mean Windows spatial audio (Dolby Atmos for Headphones, DTS Headphone:X, etc.) won’t work, or just that the card itself doesn’t decode surround formats? And are there any true multi‑driver “surround” headphones left that would even use that? You also highlight support for high‑impedance headphones — but what does that translate to in practice? How does it compare to driving the same headphones from a normal device, and does it make any difference for everyday, lower‑impedance models? In short, who is this card actually targeted at?
    • Yes, THIS is wordart, not the styling that can now be done. Wordart was all about those curvy words, that you could change the path of, like making words go around a circle. I don't think it can be done now, right?
    • Just saw a news report of a Waymo driving into a flooded road.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!