[NFL] Jason White "Retires"


Recommended Posts

Well the Heisman is a college award, not an NFL predictor. I think we should remember that. As for Jason White, he was a good college player, he really was. Sure he was part of great teams, but its not like he wouldn't have been starting for any other team out there. Both the losses to LSU and USC were really team losses, not just b/c of QB play. Personally, I'm sorry to see him retire, but we all knew his knees were going to keep him from playing in the NFL; I hope he can go be a HS coach or something and make a difference in some young guys' lives.

That's like saying Trent Green lost his job to a grocery bagger in St. Louis -- it may be true, but it's stupid to say because Trent Green obviously is still a more-than-competent NFL QB. You can't compare these things -- sometimes longshots make it. Sometimes highly-touted players don't pan out. Nothing is surefire in sports.

586380842[/snapback]

I agree, but my point was simply this: If the award that is given to the "best college football athlete" is not an good indcator of professional football success, then I think it is seriously flawed.

I agree, but my point was simply this:  If the award that is given to the "best college football athlete" is not an good indcator of professional football success, then I think it is seriously flawed.

586381217[/snapback]

I disagree. College football requires different skills than the NFL. There are fewer players in the NFL, all who are at the very peak of the football pyramid. In college, you have simpler schemes, more open and gimmicky offenses, and generally worse defenses than the NFL. Thats why you can have an option quarterback like Tommy Frazier or Eric Crouch win the heisman and presumably be the best player in the nation, when their skills don't translate to the NFL at all. They were playing against slower defenses w/ much slower linebackers and a physically weaker defensive backfield. Its the same set of rules (kinda) but its a completely different game. College is college and pro is pro. Great for the guys who can make the jump, but most never had a chance.

Edited for a typo or two ;)

Edited by costanza007
I agree, but my point was simply this:  If the award that is given to the "best college football athlete" is not an good indcator of professional football success, then I think it is seriously flawed.

586381217[/snapback]

While I agree that in an ideal world it would be a good indicator of that, it not always is. The award should be indicative of the best NCAA player (most likely on a good team that they helped get into their stature), not the most NFL-ready players.

Actually Chris Lost the starting job to Rodney Peete 3 years ago before Delhomme Joined the panthers. Then He became a 3rd stringer when Delhomme joined and became first after the comeback performance against Jacksonville..(delhomme became first not Wienke). and now hes back to 2nd after peete's retirement. Seriously tho WHY would any team pick up a 29 year old Rookie Heisman Winner when he's only got 6 at most years and 4 are done with already.

i agree. he's just another heisman choker from another overhyped team who got to play in the championship game because they play a cupcake schedule. you'd really think that the HEISMAN WINNER would at least lead his team to a field goal in that big game, right?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If you don't care to read what I said, then you prove my point. Maybe written media is beyond your attention span. Titles are not summaries my friend.
    • Nobody asked... in fact, I said "I don't care about political leanings"  
    • TLDR. Here is a far better title (just a basic example): Windows 11 26H2 to allow disabling Web search results
    • Restore will get my vote, only if to see if things are any different, doubt it though but Labour and Conservatives too out of touch and same thing over and over and over…, Lib Dem who?
    • There is nothing wrong with this title. You have completely missed the plot when it comes to "clickbait." The issue was never that a title tries to entice you to click, that is how titles have worked for over 100 years. The issue is when the title subverts expectations, getting you to click expecting something that isn't there. The classic clickbait example is "Boyfriend caught cheating, what happens next will shock you," then what happened next is the girlfriend was upset...which is probably the least shocking outcome imaginable. If sounds like what you want is for the titles to be a collection of 10-word summaries that you can skim, get the just of the story, and only click if you want more details. That is not, never has been, and never will be what titles are. You can go all the way back to print newspapers during the great depression and see the same thing. The newspaper was locked in a vending machine, all you can see is the headline, you choose to put in 5¢ to buy the paper and read the rest if you want. Those headlines were written in a way to sell the paper, not just to provide a summery. Here are two actual headlines from that time, "Wall Street Lays an Egg," or "Stocks Hit Bottom?" Maybe you'd say something like "it was wrong then and it's still wrong now." Okay, fine opinion to have, but it isn't like Neowin is doing something unjurnalistic, they are just following the age-old standards for written media.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!