Presenting the new Neowin Logo


Recommended Posts

For us neowin elders you have to understand how long we've (I've) waited for Neowin 4.

I know its been a long time coming. I'm so proud of the job the neowin team is doing...

PS. Thanks for 4 great years Neowin. :) https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=358038

Edited by Steven

It seems like this topic is turning into "Post your ideas for the new Neowin logo" when it really shouldn't. While your input is, I am quite sure, greatly appreciated, this topic is to discuss Flishfun's new logo, which is "set in stone" so to say, and is destined for Neowin 4, whether Timan or n30w1n's logo is better is heresay :).

this topic is to discuss Flishfun's new logo, which is "set in stone" so to say, and is destined for Neowin 4

586369490[/snapback]

OK, I just looked at this topic as a means to suggest improvements (or other similar designs), as otherwise there seems little advantage to unveiling it early.

I don't mean to offend FlishFun but I believe some of the other designs (namely Timan's and n30w1n's) are better and I would hope that, even now at this late stage, these other designs would be considered as possible replacements. Still, I will respect whatever design is chosen... I'm just voicing my opinion.

I don't mean to offend FlishFun but I believe some of the other designs (namely Timan's and n30w1n's) are better and I would hope that, even now at this late stage, these other designs would be considered as possible replacements. Still, I will respect whatever design is chosen... I'm just voicing my opinion.

586369544[/snapback]

NO, they aren't better. They both look nice individually, but wouldn't fit AT ALL with the overall look of Neowin 4. This is the point we have been trying to get across the entire thread.

OK, I just looked at this topic as a means to suggest improvements (or other similar designs), as otherwise there seems little advantage to unveiling it early.

586369544[/snapback]

Exactly, I couldn't agree more. If you guys aren't looking for our suggestions, then who cares what it looks like, just get it done and put it up. No need to bother with this topic. The only reason that could be given for a thread like this is to tease. :no:

Anyway, I think this thread was destined for disaster from the start, and if that couldn't have been anticipated before posting it, then... yeah I dunno. It was a useless topic, that could only possibly cause arguments. Don't tease people, and then yell back at them when they give suggestions. :rolleyes:

Exactly, I couldn't agree more. If you guys aren't looking for our suggestions, then who cares what it looks like, just get it done and put it up. No need to bother with this topic. The only reason that could be given for a thread like this is to tease. :no:

Anyway, I think this thread was destined for disaster from the start, and if that couldn't have been anticipated before posting it, then... yeah I dunno. It was a useless topic, that could only possibly cause arguments. Don't tease people, and then yell back at them when they give suggestions. :rolleyes:

586369554[/snapback]

It's no different than software companies releasing 'teasers' or screenshots of new games. They aren't looking for suggestions, just giving people something to look forward to.

NO, they aren't better.? They both look nice individually, but wouldn't fit AT ALL with the overall look of Neowin 4.? This is the point we have been trying to get across the entire thread.

586369552[/snapback]

How can you say they aren't better? Better is an opinion. I believe they look more pleasing to the eye, which is the point of logos, hence my belief that they are better.

What I'm interpreting from your statement is that the "worse" logo by flish goes with the site really well, which to me means that if a "bad" logo goes with a site well then maybe the overall design is "bad" as well.

I am in no way hating on or insulting anyone here. I am sure I will offend some, as peoples personal work and taste is involved, but its not my intention. Im just throwing in my 2 cents, which seems to be in line with at least a few other members.

edit: by "bad" and "worse" all I mean is in my opinion, comparing them to neow1ns.

Edited by TheTerminator
What I'm interpreting from your statement is that the "worse" logo by flish goes with the site really well, which to me means that if a "bad" logo goes with a site well then maybe the overall design is "bad" as well. 

586369602[/snapback]

lol... I think you're asking for trouble. :wacko:

I have a feeling that this thread will be shut if it continues like this, though I am intruiged as to how n30w1n's design wouldn't fit in as design wise it has a near identical layout/theme to FlishFun's. I'm dropping this now, as I'm really just knitpicking - however, would it be possible to have some of the logos contributed here as alternative themes that we can select?

Nobody likes to have their hard work criticized. Many people can take it very personally and get defensive, resentful and hold a grudge.

We should all know better than to give in to the urge to do so.

The proper response is "Thank you ma'am, may I have another"

Errr - wait - I mean "That's nice, dear"

Yeah - that's it.

It's like when a chick goes "Does this dress make me look fat"?

It's just not a place you want to go, you know what I'm saying?

:woot:

(just pokin' fun, fellas. all meant in a positive spirit)

Yeah, I'm gonna have to second closing the thread too. I don't like the way a lot of the staff is dealing with this, and the reactions from the users isn't very good.

Chad, don't tell people that their work is NOT better, or else you're just as bad as people saying the original is bad. No one's work is bad, it just may not look best to someone. They may not fit into the theme as a whole, but guess what, the majority of the people here, haven't seen the full theme. All the more reason that this thread is useless and can do nothing but cause problems.

Everyone just needs to calm down and take a step back.

art is never bad

for the new icon or wahtever, it hink it looks really great. idunno how it could be bad.

its just for other people, the design could not be everyones best choice. its like pizza, not everyone likes anchovis or however you spell it, but somepeople LOVE it. it goes same with the design, so its best not to say mean things man and perhaps maybe just give suggestions that yo umay think could improve it.

Actually, thinking about it, I think it would be good if n30w1n's logo was used for the final design... it looks very similar to FlishFun's, yet looks much more professional and is certainly more pleasant to look at. Design wise it shouldn't be too hard to incorporate as it is virtually the same in terms of design. Afterall, we should make use of the talent in the community.

Any chance of that happening?

586369432[/snapback]

i like how this has turned into a suggest logo replacements thread when nobody has seen the actual neowin design. Way to be blind guys :sleep:

move along. Logo set in stone.

I read the first 40 posts and everyone seems to like it :huh: I may be missing something sorry, but I dont see what all the hype is about it doesnt actually look all that great in my veiw, I do appreciate and respect that the FlishFun dude or whatever is putting in his own time to create this etc. "However all this hardwork" :s ? I mean honestly that looks like a vector with a blue color overlay and bevel and emboss filters applied making it around a 10 minute job maximum.

And actually I think I like the old one better :blink:

Way to be blind guys  :sleep:

586369655[/snapback]

I know we haven't seen the new design, I was just commenting that the suggested logos are very low quality and the bevel looks all out of focus and low resolution, whereas other logos contributed keep the theme but improve upon it (imo).

And actually I think I like the old one better :blink:

586369657[/snapback]

As do I, but I'm sure that's because we haven't seen the new design.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Zed 1.7.2 has landed with updated OpenCode models, bug fixes and other improvements by David Uzondu Zed 1.7.2 recently landed on the stable release channel, bringing a host of AI-related features including automatic context compaction and settings-based skill management, along with other things like better Markdown preview rendering and custom git commands in the graph view. Starting with the AI stuff, the developers introduced "/compact", a command that basically summarizes your conversation history on demand. This tool prevents your active chat window from hitting token limits by compressing older parts of the dialogue into a brief overview. In addition to that, the team relocated skill management to the settings UI, improving how the application communicates errors regarding those skills, and updated the OpenCode model roster to support DeepSeek V4 Flash, MiniMax M3, Qwen 3.7 Plus, and Nemotron 3 Ultra Free. External agent users can also monitor context window cost metrics and delete individual sessions directly from their history. Right-clicking ref labels in the git graph now opens a context menu that runs different actions against selected targets, kind of how VS Code does it. Here are some of the bug fixes this new release brings: The active agent fails to auto-select when creating a new git worktree. A scrollbar unexpectedly appears on wrapped code blocks in the agent chat. Collapse indicators for project headers appear when performing sidebar searches. Bracketed ellipsis title prefixes fail to show the ellipsis icon properly. Project icons render incorrectly in the recent projects picker. Diff hunk controls appear inside non-editable commit view multibuffers. The software update button hangs indefinitely on the downloading stage. Restoring an agent terminal in a remote project triggers a sudden crash. Splitting a pane that contains an active commit view causes a crash. Linux Wayland freezes when trying to read the clipboard from laggy external apps. Zed is a "newish" code editor trying to break the massive stronghold VS Code has on the developer community. Funny enough, the editor was created by former GitHub employees who worked on the Atom text editor (which Microsoft killed in 2022, several years after it bought GitHub). The project officially hit version 1.0 back in April, introducing platform parity for Windows and Linux alongside deep support for DeepSeek-V4-Pro.
    • 26H2 absolutely will support ARM Windows just not on devices that came with 26H1. This is evident by the fact I am running 26H2, which on my MacBook Neo and Surface Pro 12 (inch), within a VM.
    • Mp3tag 3.35 by Razvan Serea Mp3tag is a powerful and yet easy-to-use tool to edit metadata (ID3, Vorbis Comments and APE) of common audio formats. It can rename files based on the tag information, replace characters or words from tags and filenames, import/export tag information, create playlists and more. The program supports online freedb database lookups for selected files, allowing you to automatically gather proper tag information for select files or CDs. Mp3tag supports the following audio formats: Advanced Audio Coding (aac) Free Lossless Audio Codec (flac) Monkeys Audio (ape) Mpeg Layer 3 (mp3) MPEG-4 (mp4 / m4a / m4b / iTunes compatible) Musepack (mpc) Ogg Vorbis (ogg) OptimFROG (ofr) OptimFROG DualStream (ofs) Speex (spx) Toms Audio Kompressor (tak) True Audio (tta) Windows Media Audio (wma) WavPack (wv) Mp3tag 3.35 changelog: This version introduces a new Files options page, enhanced toolbar customization, support for RF64 WAV files, improved Discogs and MusicBrainz tag sources, and many other improvements and fixes. See the Release Notes for more details. Download: Mp3tag 64-bit | 5.7 MB (Freeware) Download: Mp3tag 32-bit | 5.2 MB Link: Mp3tag Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • The FIFA World Cup is not US centric.
    • It’s amusing how Microsoft is pushing IT admins as if this was a major, game-changing update. In reality, it’s just an enablement package that bumps the build number, which is disappointing compared to the more substantial 22H2 and 24H2 releases. Technically, 25H2, 26H1, and the upcoming 26H2 are essentially the same, differing only in support schedules. They could have included the Windows K2 improvements here, but chose not to. The era of Windows being in the backburner continues, and this 26H2 release feels like an afterthought. Shame, Nadella, shame.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      523
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!