Presenting the new Neowin Logo


Recommended Posts

For us neowin elders you have to understand how long we've (I've) waited for Neowin 4.

I know its been a long time coming. I'm so proud of the job the neowin team is doing...

PS. Thanks for 4 great years Neowin. :) https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=358038

Edited by Steven

It seems like this topic is turning into "Post your ideas for the new Neowin logo" when it really shouldn't. While your input is, I am quite sure, greatly appreciated, this topic is to discuss Flishfun's new logo, which is "set in stone" so to say, and is destined for Neowin 4, whether Timan or n30w1n's logo is better is heresay :).

this topic is to discuss Flishfun's new logo, which is "set in stone" so to say, and is destined for Neowin 4

586369490[/snapback]

OK, I just looked at this topic as a means to suggest improvements (or other similar designs), as otherwise there seems little advantage to unveiling it early.

I don't mean to offend FlishFun but I believe some of the other designs (namely Timan's and n30w1n's) are better and I would hope that, even now at this late stage, these other designs would be considered as possible replacements. Still, I will respect whatever design is chosen... I'm just voicing my opinion.

I don't mean to offend FlishFun but I believe some of the other designs (namely Timan's and n30w1n's) are better and I would hope that, even now at this late stage, these other designs would be considered as possible replacements. Still, I will respect whatever design is chosen... I'm just voicing my opinion.

586369544[/snapback]

NO, they aren't better. They both look nice individually, but wouldn't fit AT ALL with the overall look of Neowin 4. This is the point we have been trying to get across the entire thread.

OK, I just looked at this topic as a means to suggest improvements (or other similar designs), as otherwise there seems little advantage to unveiling it early.

586369544[/snapback]

Exactly, I couldn't agree more. If you guys aren't looking for our suggestions, then who cares what it looks like, just get it done and put it up. No need to bother with this topic. The only reason that could be given for a thread like this is to tease. :no:

Anyway, I think this thread was destined for disaster from the start, and if that couldn't have been anticipated before posting it, then... yeah I dunno. It was a useless topic, that could only possibly cause arguments. Don't tease people, and then yell back at them when they give suggestions. :rolleyes:

Exactly, I couldn't agree more. If you guys aren't looking for our suggestions, then who cares what it looks like, just get it done and put it up. No need to bother with this topic. The only reason that could be given for a thread like this is to tease. :no:

Anyway, I think this thread was destined for disaster from the start, and if that couldn't have been anticipated before posting it, then... yeah I dunno. It was a useless topic, that could only possibly cause arguments. Don't tease people, and then yell back at them when they give suggestions. :rolleyes:

586369554[/snapback]

It's no different than software companies releasing 'teasers' or screenshots of new games. They aren't looking for suggestions, just giving people something to look forward to.

NO, they aren't better.? They both look nice individually, but wouldn't fit AT ALL with the overall look of Neowin 4.? This is the point we have been trying to get across the entire thread.

586369552[/snapback]

How can you say they aren't better? Better is an opinion. I believe they look more pleasing to the eye, which is the point of logos, hence my belief that they are better.

What I'm interpreting from your statement is that the "worse" logo by flish goes with the site really well, which to me means that if a "bad" logo goes with a site well then maybe the overall design is "bad" as well.

I am in no way hating on or insulting anyone here. I am sure I will offend some, as peoples personal work and taste is involved, but its not my intention. Im just throwing in my 2 cents, which seems to be in line with at least a few other members.

edit: by "bad" and "worse" all I mean is in my opinion, comparing them to neow1ns.

Edited by TheTerminator
What I'm interpreting from your statement is that the "worse" logo by flish goes with the site really well, which to me means that if a "bad" logo goes with a site well then maybe the overall design is "bad" as well. 

586369602[/snapback]

lol... I think you're asking for trouble. :wacko:

I have a feeling that this thread will be shut if it continues like this, though I am intruiged as to how n30w1n's design wouldn't fit in as design wise it has a near identical layout/theme to FlishFun's. I'm dropping this now, as I'm really just knitpicking - however, would it be possible to have some of the logos contributed here as alternative themes that we can select?

Nobody likes to have their hard work criticized. Many people can take it very personally and get defensive, resentful and hold a grudge.

We should all know better than to give in to the urge to do so.

The proper response is "Thank you ma'am, may I have another"

Errr - wait - I mean "That's nice, dear"

Yeah - that's it.

It's like when a chick goes "Does this dress make me look fat"?

It's just not a place you want to go, you know what I'm saying?

:woot:

(just pokin' fun, fellas. all meant in a positive spirit)

Yeah, I'm gonna have to second closing the thread too. I don't like the way a lot of the staff is dealing with this, and the reactions from the users isn't very good.

Chad, don't tell people that their work is NOT better, or else you're just as bad as people saying the original is bad. No one's work is bad, it just may not look best to someone. They may not fit into the theme as a whole, but guess what, the majority of the people here, haven't seen the full theme. All the more reason that this thread is useless and can do nothing but cause problems.

Everyone just needs to calm down and take a step back.

art is never bad

for the new icon or wahtever, it hink it looks really great. idunno how it could be bad.

its just for other people, the design could not be everyones best choice. its like pizza, not everyone likes anchovis or however you spell it, but somepeople LOVE it. it goes same with the design, so its best not to say mean things man and perhaps maybe just give suggestions that yo umay think could improve it.

Actually, thinking about it, I think it would be good if n30w1n's logo was used for the final design... it looks very similar to FlishFun's, yet looks much more professional and is certainly more pleasant to look at. Design wise it shouldn't be too hard to incorporate as it is virtually the same in terms of design. Afterall, we should make use of the talent in the community.

Any chance of that happening?

586369432[/snapback]

i like how this has turned into a suggest logo replacements thread when nobody has seen the actual neowin design. Way to be blind guys :sleep:

move along. Logo set in stone.

I read the first 40 posts and everyone seems to like it :huh: I may be missing something sorry, but I dont see what all the hype is about it doesnt actually look all that great in my veiw, I do appreciate and respect that the FlishFun dude or whatever is putting in his own time to create this etc. "However all this hardwork" :s ? I mean honestly that looks like a vector with a blue color overlay and bevel and emboss filters applied making it around a 10 minute job maximum.

And actually I think I like the old one better :blink:

Way to be blind guys  :sleep:

586369655[/snapback]

I know we haven't seen the new design, I was just commenting that the suggested logos are very low quality and the bevel looks all out of focus and low resolution, whereas other logos contributed keep the theme but improve upon it (imo).

And actually I think I like the old one better :blink:

586369657[/snapback]

As do I, but I'm sure that's because we haven't seen the new design.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Ocenaudio 3.19.4 by Razvan Serea  Ocenaudio is a full featured, fast and easy to use audio and music editor. It is the ideal software for people who need to edit and analyze audio files without complications. Ocenaudio also has powerful features that will please more advanced users. To assist ocenaudio development, a powerful toolset of audio editing, analysis and manipulation called Ocen Framework was created. ocenaudio is also based on Qt framework, a well known library for cross-platform development. Cross-platform support ocenaudio is available for all major operating systems: Microsoft Windows, Mac OS X and Linux. Native applications are generated for each platform from a common source, in order to achieve excelent performance and seamless integration with the operating system. All versions of ocenaudio have a uniform set of features and the same graphical interface, so the skills you learn in one platform can be used in the others. VST plugins support Ocenaudio supports VST (Virtual Studio Technology) plugins, giving its users access to numerous effects. Like the native effects, VST effects can use real-time preview to aide configuration. Real-time preview of effects Applying effects such as EQ, gain and filtering is an important part of audio editing. However, it is very tricky to get the desired result by adjusting the controls configuration alone: you must listen the processed audio. To ease the configuration of audio effects, ocenaudio has a real time preview feature: you hear the processed signal while adjusting the controls. The effect configuration window also includes a miniature view of the selected audio signal. You can navigate on this miniature view in the same way as you do on the main interface, selecting parts that interest you and listening to the effect result in real time. Multiselection for delicate editions To speed up complex audio files editing, ocenaudio includes multi-selection. With this amazing tool, you can simultaneously select different portions of an audio file and listen, edit or even apply an effect to them. For example, if you want to normalize only the excerpts of an interview where the interviewee is talking, just select them and apply the effect. Eficient edition of large files With ocenaudio, there is no limit to the length or the quantity of the audio files you can edit. Using an advanced memory management system, the application keeps your files open without wasting any of your computer's memory. Even in files several hours long, common editing operations such as copy, cut or paste happen almost instantly. Fully featured spectrogram Besides offering an incredible waveform view of your audio files, ocenaudio has a powerful and complete spectrogram view. In this view, you can analyze the spectral content of your audio signal with maximum clarity. Advanced users will be surprised to find that the spectrogram settings are applied in real time. The display is updated immediately when altering features such as the number of frequency bands, window type and size and dynamic range of the display. Ocenaudio 3.19.4 changelog: Adds fallback fonts so every language and symbol displays correctly Improves autosave and session recovery stability Improves region navigation and display Fixes a crash when the level meter is used on displays with a scaling greater than 200% Fixes memory corruption when using the silence selection tools Fixes crashes when closing a file while effects are still being processed Fixes a freeze when applying effects to many files at once (macOS) Fixes crashes related to audio devices on Windows Fixes invalid file names when exporting regions whose label is used as the file name Other bug fixes and improvements Download: Ocenaudio 64-bit | Portable | ~40.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Ocenaudio for Linux and Mac OS View: Ocenaudio Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 by Razvan Serea Hasleo Disk Clone is a free and all-in-one disk cloning software for Windows 11/10/8/7/Vista and Windows Server that can help you migrate Windows OS to another disk, clone one disk to another disk or clone one partition to another location quickly and efficiently. Completely Free Windows Migration and Disk/Partition Cloning Software Migrate Windows from one disk to another without reinstalling Windows, apps. Clone one disk to another and makes the data on 2 disks are exactly the same. Clone a partition to another location without losing any data. Easily adjust the size and location of the destination partition. Convert MBR to GPT or convert GPT to MBR by cloning. Creation of Windows PE emergency disk. Extremely fast cloning speed and multi-language support. Supported OS: Windows Vista/Server 2008 or later, fully compatible with GPT and UEFI. Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 changelog: Fixed an issue that caused disk enumeration to fail Fixed an issue where WinPE created under Windows ARM64 26H1 did not work properly Download: Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 | 32.3 MB (Freeware) Link: Hasleo Disk Clone Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      555
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!