Presenting the new Neowin Logo


Recommended Posts

Please don't take this to harshly, but if you didn't want to see it, why would you click on this topic. It's pretty easy to avoid things you don't want to see, when they are titled correct. Which this one was pretty obvious.

586372208[/snapback]

Okay, I'm a big fan of telling people not to click something if it's just to be negative, but that gets taken too far sometimes. First off, my first thought of clicking on this topic was positive. Then I didn't much care for how it looked, which was fine, I posted what I thought honestly. There wasn't a problem until opinions started getting attacked, and we were yelled at telling us this is how it is no matter what anyone thinks. There was much too attacking of a stance taken by the staff. Secondly, this is something that will affect me eventually, so not clicking on the post doesn't really apply.

Anyway, telling someone not to click on a topic if they "didn't want to see it" only makes sense if the whole point of clicking on a topic is to share negative thoughts, which I by all means did not come into this topic with. I've replied several times, and unless you've read it all, you may not understand where I was coming from with my latest post, so don't think I just started out that way heh :p

Edit: Also, bravo lav-chan, you said that perfectly. If you post a teaser, expect opinions. If you don't want opinions, don't bother posting something 2 months ahead of time. And stop telling us what it will look like in the final theme, because, as I said before, the majority of the people here don't know what the final looks like, and this is our opinion on the logo, which is what this topic IS about.

erm vector just saw your sig and avatar and think they are sexual, base the new logo on that!!

or use bants avatar on a larger scale and minus the bant!

anyway im not bothered about the neowin logo, if it was a forum about graphic design it might be more important but seeing as its not who gives a poo :huh:

so let me get this straight...you wanted this logo posted for us to see, but you didn't want any feedback?

if that was so then it should have been posted and closed instantly and pinned.

you can't expect to post something like this and get no opinions. I just think it's funny that almost all the staff members have said they like it so much, but the majority of the members posting here say they don't like it.

the fact that you say you don't care at all what we think tells me a lot about this forum as a whole. and i honestly don't know how long it will last if you keep up with this attitude. the members here are the reason why the majority of you are even on the staff. without members you would not even be needed.

I do understand that much time was put into the designs but to disregard the opinions of everyone here and take all the comments as a complete rip on your ability is wrong. I agree that we should not judge the logo until we see it fit with the entire design, but if the full page is filled with even half the bevels and things in that logo there is no chance i will use it.

the fact that you say you don't care at all what we think tells me a lot about this forum as a whole. and i honestly don't know how long it will last if you keep up with this attitude. the members here are the reason why the majority of you are even on the staff. without members you would not even be needed.

586373433[/snapback]

For once I agree. I was one of the few in staff who didnt like it.

Flish said that we need to see it as an overall design. As a designer I agree but I am afraid that his meaning was like "it blends perfectly because the new version its full of bevels" :no:

the fact that you say you don't care at all what we think tells me a lot about this forum as a whole. and i honestly don't know how long it will last if you keep up with this attitude.

586373433[/snapback]

Well... they've kept up with it from the beginning, which was 5 years ago, and it's only been growing, so....

...  It's their vision, I'm just the one making it for them (and trust me, on some things, our visions and styles don't sync up, and I go with what they want).  That's all.

586371521[/snapback]

So what Im hearing is, .. that you think it's a step backwards into some poo too? :laugh:

So what Im hearing is, .. that you think it's a step backwards into some poo too?  :laugh:

586373559[/snapback]

No, I don't. What I'm saying, is that I don't want people thinking that I have 100% creative control over it, and while I have some, Steve has the final say. I quite enjoy the current mockup I have. :happy:

@adav - Nope nope nope! :p hehe

I can vouch for him, I worked at a company last year where the IT department would head up projects, but marketing would try to dictate every aspect of the design and text, you would be forced to do things against your will. In my case, marketing was wrong, they had no clue how to market to people on the web and ruined a lot of projects that would have greatly helped the company. You can argue all you want but your not going to win..

I have not been here since the beginning but to me it is just a logo. Some of you need to realize that and move on with your lives. It's sad that the simple changing of a logo could cause such a division around here. It doesn't say much for the members of Neowin or the staff for that matter. If you ask me a revamping of the site should start with removing some of the jerks and idiots that get to post here freely. Thin the herd, and then show the logo, I'll bet that the reaction will be slightly different.

On second thought who really cares? Nice logo.

Steve just wanted me to post it so everyone could see.  That's all.  No asking for feedback, it's not even implied.  I don't mind people posting their opinions, since they haven't seen the final product.  The only thing that bugs me, is people who say this isn't hard work.  I've made tons of versions of the logo and the new site, and it takes a lot of my time to get it so that Steve (and the other Admins) like it. 

While it might look unprofessional, people should know that I'm a bit better at making things than I may be given credit for... I'm working for the Administrators of Neowin.  If they want a beveled black square, it's not my job to make a masterpiece, it's my job to make them their beveled black square.  Some of my style is rubbing off on the site, but when is all said and done, it's still going to be what Steve (and the other Admins) think looks good.  It's their vision, I'm just the one making it for them (and trust me, on some things, our visions and styles don't sync up, and I go with what they want).  That's all.

586371521[/snapback]

No, I don't.  What I'm saying, is that I don't want people thinking that I have 100% creative control over it, and while I have some, Steve has the final say.  I quite enjoy the current mockup I have.  :happy:

586373587[/snapback]

@The subject of feedback: I think if you posted it in a very feedback-positive forum with the subject not closed, you would presume you are going to recieve some sort of feedback anyway. If you didn't want feedback, why didn't you lock the topic and say "Feedback prohibited."

Well I personally believe if you are a designer, or have a designing responsibility of some sort, you should have a judgement on creating, editing or approving of a piece of work that appeals to both you, your client (in this case Steve it may seem), and the public in general.

I understand you are under management pressures to follow someone else's design requirements, but I've worked with very strict and bossy clients before that demanded very ugly designs, however I could still work with those constraints and think outside the box to achieve something that not only satisfies them, but everyone else who might view the design.

The moral of my post is, even if you don't have 100% of creative control over it and even when yourself think the design is not the best you could have published, there is that at least moral if not professional obligation to resolve the matter by either consulting with your client or try to push the limit of those constraints.

No, I don't.? What I'm saying, is that I don't want people thinking that I have 100% creative control over it, and while I have some, Steve has the final say.? I quite enjoy the current mockup I have.:happy:py:

@adav - Nope nope nope!:p :p? hehe

586373587[/snapback]

Flish, ...

To start with, I mean no harm, insult or injury.

I am just speaking my mind , and by the look of this entire thread, it would seem to me at the least, the members and patrons of NeoWin sort of have a slight fear of doing that, but honestly want do that just as much.

You know Flish, It's not that the logo is horribly bad. Honestly, it is not. To me and many others (as you can see) it is a disspointment. That being said, Im sure I can speak for all of us (make that most of us), here when I say that we all appreciate the effort, time, and hard work that NeoWin has put in to make this a very structured, and well put together place.

Being a member since 02, I can say that I have enjoyed this board, it's comments, the layout, and the "bigness" of it. What I have really enjoyed however, are the people on NeoWin.

Yes, the board is YOURS. Yes, Mod's can say "This is not a democracy, it's our board .. and if you dont like it too bad" ... and thats fine, but it's like telling loyal cutomers at your hotel, that if they hate the wallpaper, and that it makes the place look pretty cheap, ... the reply is "ey, fluck you, Im the hotel moderator. If you dont like it, then leave. And by the way, you keep telling me you dont like something about the hotel? Ill just kick you out". Thats slum lord mentality.

Well, thats cool. I can always leave, and "not cause any ruckas", but untill I do, Im here, and want to voice my oppinion just like the rest of us.

I think as of late, a lot of mods have been saying things that have really opened the eyes of some members.

"Thats the way it goes, its not going to change even if you guys hate it, this is not your board it's ours, you guys are just guests, we dont care about subscribers thoughts, subscriptions are more for the users than for us ..." ... wtf mate?

And Im just picking a few of the things that have been said in the last day or two that can really make even the most die-hard fanboy ****ed off.

What kills me, is not so much the fanboy-mod wannbe-neowin defenders ... it's that they are fighting others who think that they should have a say in how the community as a whole looks. Fighting the very people that love the board and want to feel at home with it. You must understand this. You must. You have to know that a few people here visit this place more often than they do a bar, or hang out with friends even. It's a hobby, and "enthusiast" board.

I have heard mods say .. Neowinnians, Neophiles, Our community.

Well how can I be a neowinnian, if its not my home? If Im just an unwanted intruder. How anyone here can sit back, take crap for speaking their minds, say that others should shut up for it, is just stupid.

K, ... with that said, again, and you can flame me if you want, move my post, delete it, ... I expect that. But am I completely wrong here guys? Do you not want me to say a thing? Does anyone else here feel a but like that, because now Im keeping count. Lets see where you stand. Id like to see that.

The artists / designers are so talented on this board. The vast ammount of creative thinking here makes this place a mecca of ideas. To ignore them all is as one person here put it "just selfish", but more than that, just ignorant.

This is the last post Im going to make in this thread, unless asked a question or addressed directly, and even then, Im keeping it super short.

But of course ... this is all IMHO.

I am also sorry for the appalling attitudes that some have displayed in this topic.

586371855[/snapback]

There's no need for you to be sorry. Some people just dont have respect for the Graphics guys here at neowin, who work hard in developing the graphical interface of this site. It's a shame, it really is. Very nice flish btw, time for a :beer:

I would suggest you guys read the whole post, not just the first sentence.  Reading is great, but comprehending what you read is just as important.

Not surprisingly, this is the same thing I said but in different words.  Again, comprehension is important here guys.  The other logo's do not look better with the whole look of the page.  They may be nice individually, but they certainly do not go with everything else.

586372180[/snapback]

Funny that, it was my intention to post the same thing you did. With the difference being I didn't have to be so condescending to members whilst doing it...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The Persuasion Engine: How Any Business Can Use AI-Powered Neuromarketing —was $28 now free by Steven Parker Claim your complimentary copy (worth $35) of "The Persuasion Engine: How Any Business Can Use AI-Powered Neuromarketing to Understand and Win Customers" for free, before the offer ends on June 24. Description The Persuasion Engine, by neuromarketing and behavioral science expert Roger Dooley, solves the most pressing challenge faced by every marketer: how to figure out why customers make the decisions they do when 95% of their thought processes occur at an unconscious level. Dooley explains how artificial intelligence democratizes sophisticated neuromarketing tools that were once available only to Fortune 500 companies, making powerful customer insight and persuasion techniques accessible to businesses of any size. The book walks you through the evolution of traditional neuromarketing into ”Neuromarketing 2.0,” where AI-powered tools eliminate the need for expensive lab studies and human behavioral science experts. It offers a comprehensive roadmap for implementing eye tracking, facial coding, biometrics, implicit testing, and advanced AI behavioral techniques that dramatically improve marketing effectiveness while reducing costs and time investment. Inside the book, you’ll find: Revolutionary AI prompting strategies that bring world-class behavioral science expertise to your desktop Practical frameworks for leveraging attention, emotion, credibility, and decision architecture to boost conversions Step-by-step guidance for implementing biometric tools and implicit testing without laboratory resources Advanced techniques for creating scarcity, urgency, and FOMO that drive immediate customer action Comprehensive methods for auditing and enhancing empathy in customer communications Perfect for marketing professionals, business owners, entrepreneurs, and anyone with a stake in customer acquisition and retention, The Persuasion Engine provides actionable strategies that will transform your approach to marketing. Whether you're working on a shoestring or managing enterprise campaigns, you'll discover how to use your customers' non-conscious motivations and create compelling marketing that work on real people in the real world. How to download for free Please ensure you read the terms and conditions to claim this offer. Complete and verifiable information is required in order to receive this free offer. If you have previously made use of these offers, you will not need to re-register. Was $28, but is now FREE | Below free offer link expires on June 24. The Persuasion Engine: How Any Business Can Use AI-Powered Neuromarketing to Understand and Win Customers The below offers are also available for free in exchange for your (work) email: The Vibe Coding Playbook: Building Your Tech Business with AI ($35 Value) FREE - Expires 6/23 The Persuasion Engine: How Any Business Can Use AI-Powered Neuromarketing to Understand and Win Customers ($28 Value) FREE - Expires 6/24 How to Do More with Less: Future-Proofing Yourself in an AI-driven Economy ($28 Value) FREE - Expires 6/30 Cloud Security Fundamentals: Building the Foundations for Secure Cloud Platforms ($131.95 Value) FREE - Expires 7/1 The Complete Free AI Learning: Master ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini & More ($21 Value) FREE How to Build an AI Design Workflow with Gamma ($21 Value) FREE The Ultimate Linux Newbie Guide – Featured Free content Python Notes for Professionals – Featured Free content Learn Linux in 5 Days – Featured Free content Quick Reference Guide for Cybersecurity – Featured Free content We post these because we earn commission on each lead so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. Other ways to support Neowin The above deal not doing it for you, but still want to help? Check out the links below. Check out our partner software in the Neowin Store Buy a T-shirt at Neowin's Threadsquad Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: An account at Neowin Deals is required to participate in any deals powered by our affiliate, StackCommerce. For a full description of StackCommerce's privacy guidelines, go here. Neowin benefits from shared revenue of each sale made through the branded deals site.
    • All versions is correct. The bug appears on any version of Windows with KB5094126 installed. It's a little insane to expect the author to explain that systems that can't possibly have that patch installed, will not experience the bug. If you have any gripe about the title, it would be that it doesn't mention the update at all, but I wouldn't agree with that either. A title is not expected to be a full summery of the article.
    • (Can't see if he's still wearing the clompy clown shoes though)
    • I'd say the first one failed to be as popular as Apple anticipated, but the easy adjustment here is to make fewer of them next time around. It would only be a "flop" if it isn't possible for Apple to recover the design and factory tooling costs given the number of units sold, which I doubt would be the case. It isn't like no one bought them; it just failed to become the new hot phone of the year.
    • You're right that it does not follow the plain meaning of the word, but in this context, it is a legal term defined in 49 U.S.C. Kind of how "wire fraud" laws apply even if a physical wire was not used. Given that it is codified in law, and it isn't just automotive journalists that don't understand evolving technology, I highly doubt congress would change a well understood term just because technology makes the term slightly less actuate.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      589
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      76
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!