Presenting the new Neowin Logo


Recommended Posts

I myself am not very impressed with the new logo, and to be honest, if that's the direction the whole site is going to go...I'm worried.

It really reminds me, as others have said, of when the bevel filter was invented and EVERYTHING was beveled (hell, when I started using PS many years back I beverled everything too, it's an easy thing to get lost in)...the whole thing really screams noob photoshop skills (not to be offensive...thats just how it looks to me, nor do I think I have 1337 skillz in PS either....but this would not be my final product).

I would have expected something a lot cleaner than this, as this is very fuzzy overall and lacks an amount of overall tightness that you see in designs these days.

I think it's on the right track...just not finished. Keep working, you'll get it.

Neowin rules, and I've been here for a while now...I just want to see it get better, not worse.

Frazer

I was very skeptical about the logo, but after getting a very small peak at what's to come and how it fits in, I can assure you this logo is perfect for the job. Neowin's about to get even sexier.

586375720[/snapback]

Uhh... I already pop boners over NeoWin.

How much sexier can it get?? (tosses Vigra bottle out window) .. :rolleyes:

As I said earlier in this thread, I don't know why people are getting all excited/worked up about this. They could redo the site and colour it pink with yellow dots but I would still visit. It is the content of the site and not the way it looks that I visit for.

I neither like nor dislike the new logo, as I will not look at it that often.

As I said earlier in this thread, I don't know why people are getting all excited/worked up about this.  They could redo the site and colour it pink with yellow dots but I would still visit.  It is the content of the site and not the way it looks that I visit for.

I neither like nor dislike the new logo, as I will not look at it that often.

586377057[/snapback]

This is pink with yellow dots ...

pantti265181qj.jpg

Flish do you think maybe after the new design is out you guys can put together a neowin graphics kit maybe? When i make wallpapers for myself i like to use the the current logo.

586377300[/snapback]

That's actually a good idea for things like press relations and such.

I am also sorry for the appalling attitudes that some have displayed in this topic.

586371855[/snapback]

Which appalling attitudes might u be refering to? I personaly quite like the logo but some that have been submitted are quite cool too. Everyone's entitled to an opinion you know!

As I said earlier in this thread, I don't know why people are getting all excited/worked up about this.  They could redo the site and colour it pink with yellow dots but I would still visit.

586377057[/snapback]

That sounds wicked rad to me. I bet pink and yellow would look better than the theme they have going right now.

A sneak preview was presented to the mods and I have to say: I take my words back, now everything makes sense, the new neowin its sexy!

586378038[/snapback]

OMG man ...

This New NeoWin Had better be FANTASTIC!

I mean, serriously, ... thats like ... lol, ... sort of what you say when yer hypnotized. "It all makes sense to me now, ... I have seen the light ..."

Can one new interface be so different, new, and fantastic ...?

Can it be true? Can the new interface be so good, that it has the power to take a crappy logo, and incorporate it SO well, that all of us who think it really needs help are going to eat crow?

Enquiring minds want to know! :rolleyes:

enquirer0sr.jpg

I've even made my new sig based on the new logo!

586377964[/snapback]

I gotta say the new logo already looks good on Danellis' new sig!

I'm beginning to love it :p

I think the problem was Flish presented the logo as such a large size, it just doesn't look that good at the size and by itself

I gotta say the new logo already looks good on Danellis' new sig!

I'm beginning to love it?:pp

I think the problem was Flish presented the logo as such a large size, it just doesn't look that good at the size and by itself

586378753[/snapback]

Honestly, the logo in the sig, looks a lot diff. than the introduced one. Look again..

Edited by DarkCircuit
Honestly, the logo in the sig, looks a lot diff. than the introduced one. Look again..

586378770[/snapback]

Looks pretty close to me.... :whistle:

post-21616-1124107636.png

Just reduced the opacity a bit because the colour was very strong.

Honestly, the logo in the sig, looks a lot diff. than the introduced one. Look again..

586378770[/snapback]

I've got the PSD to prove it :whistle:

Flish as I've said I think about 4 times to far this thread, but I can't resist saying it again! I think the new logo is amazing and you've done a superb job (Y).

EDIT: If you see Chris100's sig above, I made that for the neowin sig generator. I'll be speaking to Sam and get him to put on a new version with the new logo :)

I've got the PSD to prove it?:whistle::

Flish as I've said I think about 4 times to far this thread, but I can't resist saying it again! I think the new logo is amazing and you've done a superb job(Y)).

EDIT: If you see Chris100's sig above, I made that for the neowin sig generator. I'll be speaking to Sam and get him to put on a new version with the new logo:))

586379736[/snapback]

Hey look. Im a fanboy too! LOL. :laugh::

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!