Neowin's Third Annual NFL Pick'em 2005!


Recommended Posts

I don't think so. A person who misses a week is already penalized by missing out on all the wins.

Why are we using total points as the tiebreaker at all if it doesn't apply if you miss a week?

Plus, I have never heard anyone mention this rule.

They may be 'penalized' by missing out on the wins, when in reality they should be penalized with the losses as well.

This rule has been in effect since year one. As you can see, even if you pick every week it's a close race at the top. If we had no tiebreakers, We'd easily end the year in a tie. That is why it is so important to not miss a week.

You could be picking great, miss a week, and boom, in terms of a tiebreaker, you have an advantage. "But I lose those wins" Well, you've shown yourself that that's not really an issue, as you have come back from being three weeks down. You say that's unfair, but it's how we've always done it.

Keep in mind...if someone accidently forgets to pick a winner of a certain game, we count it as a loss. We've never penalized for losses if people miss a week. Maybe we should do that next year to even out everything. If they don't pick. 12 losses. If you don't pick the points, total points are added to your score.

Heck, if my first three weeks didn't count my overall percentage would be a lot higher. The first three weeks were brutal.

:huh: Who cares about percentage?

Judging by your sig, I'd say you care about percentages.

But the rankings discriminate against people who miss weeks anyway.

Simple solution to this. Don't miss weeks.

Just wow. "You've shown yourself that that's not really an issue."

Maybe because I've been outpicking everyone since I've joined. Obviously it's an issue. I'm in 8th place instead of 1st. Wouldn't you consider that penalty enough?

You've been 'outpicking' everyone since week 3. Not week one. I'm not penalizing people who've picked since day one. You miss weeks, you fall behind. I can'd do a thing about that.

Oh and by the way...throw illicit's first two weeks out (12-20), so he picked the same amount of weeks as you? He's still beating you 172-63 against 171-64.

Anyway, I'm not the only one that has missed a week, but I seem to be getting penalized here for doing too well.

And everyone else who's missed a week is in the same boat. What makes you different here?

You can do something.

Praytell me what I can do about people who forget their picks? Give them an average? Pretend they didn't exist and give them a random score?

Enlighten us, as I cannot possibly read your mind.

Still beating me? He isn't beating me right now. And I went 18-14 the first two weeks, so no, he wouldn't be beating me assuming everything else is the same.

Well, those picks weren't made here. I suppose the saying 'If you aunt had testicles, she'd be your uncle' fits in here.

I apologize for not making that clearer, but I honestly thought it was pretty much a logical conclusion. I'll make sure it's clearer for next year.

All I'm saying is I don't understand the additional penalty, nor do I understand why BOOG bothered with tiebreakers for everyone if they don't count for some people.

Because every week you need a tiebreaker as well. Since I have to tally them all up for the season anyways, I added them up for everyone, all weeks or not, so they themselves could see how their points picks were going for the weeks they participated.

Wow.

  • 2 weeks later...

Seattle v. Pittsburgh 44

I still can't believe the degree of underdog Seattle is. I think the Steelers are good, but wow, Seattle is given no chance by most "experts".

I know. I Don't think it's going to be a close game, and I am pretty comfortable that it's going to be Seattle.

It was Bizarro week, as rap4life won, and i came in last place. :p

Congrats to illicit, this year's NFL Pick'em Champion, setting the bar to the new best record, beating last year's mark of 181-87 (68%) (by yours truly) with a new record of 185-83 (69%)

rap4life 1-0 +4

stncttr908 1-0 +7

BroChaos 1-0 +10

aessap 1-0 +10

Firen? 1-0 +11

Steffan 1-0 +13

dj6ross 1-0 +14

D!ABOL!C 1-0 +14

bigbluepride35 1-0 +15

illicit 1-0 +17

Xeonic 1-0 +17

L3thal 0-1 +10

yisman 0-1 +12

IceDogg 0-1 +13

sbweb77 0-1 +16

Toastyone 0-1 +19

BOOGSoftball 0-1 +20b>Final Playoff Standings:

illicit 9-3 +35

Toastyone 9-3 +42

dj6ross 8-4 +31

stncttr908 7-4 +22

Steffan 7-4 +29

D!ABOL!C 7-5 +26

bigbluepride35 7-5 +34

sbweb77 7-5 +39

Xeonic 6-5 +32

aessap 6-5 +58

rap4life 6-5 +71

BroChaos 6-5 +73

yisman 6-6 +29

BOOGSoftball 6-6 +43

[yt] 5-6 +17

Firen? 5-6 +29

L3thal 5-7 +24

IceDogg 4-7 +30

amadeijohn: 3-1 +39

soloredd 2-2 +9

Final Overall Standinillicit????????...185-83, +232

[yt]?????????..183-84, +265

BOOGSoftball???.?181-87, +226

Toastyone??????181-87, +266

bigbluepride35????180-88, +208

sbweb77?????..?180-88, +238

D!ABOL!C???...??.173-95, +205

yisman????..???171-65, +190

L3thal????..???..170-98, +229

dj6ross???.????.168-100, +256

stncttr98???..???.166-101, +234

Xeonic????????164-103, +248

aessap????????164-103, +251

IceDogg????..???163-104, +213

Steffan????????161-106, +213

BroChaos????.??.160-107, +309

Firen?????????151-116, +221

soloredd?????.??143-101, +163

TheFlusher????..?..138-104, +205

rap4life??????.?..131-105, +266

jmole?????????.87-61, +122

virtualmadden????....85-47, +101

kainashi????????67-49, +101

sanctified???????.54-34, +85

oddcrap????????.37-37, +75

xxpor????????.....31-29, +32

Yorak?????.??..?.31-29, +38

aznsensation18????.30-26, +69

mr_skrilla??????....19-9, +38

deron dantzler?????11-3 +14

Edge00???????.....10-4 +0

Matrix XII???????...9-7 +24

CatnipOligarthy???..?.9-23 +33

XT. ?????????.?.8-8 +18

quank1half???????.8-8 +18

redFX ????????..?7-7 +12

micro????????.?..5-11 +3

Jack31081???????..4-12 +14?????.....31-29, +32

Yorak?????.??..?.31-29, +38

aznsensation18????.30-26, +69

mr_skrilla??????....19-9, +38

deron dantzler?????11-3 +14

Edge00???????.....10-4 +0

Matrix XII???????...9-7 +24

CatnipOligarthy???..?.9-23 +33

XT. ?????????.?.8-8 +18

quank1half???????.8-8 +18

redFX ????????..?7-7 +12

micro????????.?..5-11 +3

Jack31081???????..4-12 +14

Edited by BOOGSoftball

I know it seems like I nit pick a lot, but on page 82, yisman had me at 172 wins before the Superbowl so I should have 173 afterwards. Here's the link:

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...=360982&st=1215

it's half way down.

Thanks for all your work, this was definitely fun, can't wait to play next season!

Doh..you're right. Fixing now.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • What pushed me away from edge was the massive enshitification, constantly adding more and more bloat. Coupled with the constant changes in UI, and especially in the settings. Want to change the default search from Bing to whatever, you would have use search to know the three places to go and change. Then 6 months down the road, the Edge settings area gets a major update/change and doing the same task, changing the default search is now moved to three new locations. This never stops. They do this in Azure and its so insanely irritating. I am a huge OneNote user and they have effed it up so many times in the last 5 years....same for Outlook. People walk away from Microsoft products out of exhaustion.
    • Mac does nothing of the sort. You can change the default browser very easily it does not nag you and when you do this, it does not open something still in Safari....like Windows does with Edge.
    • I do not remember anything happening to Apple and Google for bribing people not to make Apps for Windows Phone. Edge barley has a foot print to matter. If the other browser companies want more of the Pie, they need to do better. I use Brave on all my personal device. However in industry, Edge of default, as we can manage it easier with MS tools.
    • On the one hand, it shouldn't be difficult. You buy a computer, you decide what OS you want, which browser etc. Simple enough. But that's the techie side of things. My sister, my mother, wouldn't bother with such a thought. And I'm pretty sure that if you presented a window asking them what to pick they would say, "I don't care! I just want to access my Email!"
    • CPU-Z 2.20.2 by Razvan Serea CPU-Z is a freeware utility that gathers information on some of the main devices of your system. CPU-Z does not need to be installed, just unzip the files in a directory and run the .exe. In order to remove the program, just delete the files. The program does not copy any file in any Windows directory, nor write to the registry. CPU Name and number. Core stepping and process. Package. Core voltage. Internal and external clocks, clock multiplier. Supported instructions sets. All cache levels (location, size, speed, technology). Mainboard Vendor, model and revision. BIOS model and date. Chipset (northbridge and southbridge) and sensor. Graphic interface. Memory Frequency and timings. Module(s) specification using SPD (Serial Presence Detect) : vendor, serial number, timings table. System Windows and DirectX version. CPU-Z 2.20.2 changelog: Intel Arc G3 and G3 Extreme (Panther Lake)(2.20.2). AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D (Raphael) (2.20.1). AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 495, 492, 488 (Gorgon Halo). AMD Ryzen AI Max 490, 485 (Gorgon Halo). AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 495, 490, 485, 480 (Gorgon Halo). AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D2 (Granite Ridge). AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 9965X3D, PRO 9945 (Granite Ridge). AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755, PRO 9745 (Granite Ridge). AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 9645 (Granite Ridge). AMD Ryzen AI 7/PRO 450G/GE (Gorgon Point 2). AMD Ryzen AI 5/PRO 440G/GE (Gorgon Point 2). AMD Ryzen AI 5/PRO 435G/GE (Gorgon Point 3). AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 (Strix Halo). Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus (Arrow Lake Refresh). Intel Core 7 360 and 350 (Wildcat Lake). Intel Core 5 330, 320 and 315 (Wildcat Lake). Intel Core 3 304 (Wildcat Lake). Intel Core 9 273PQE, 273PTE, 273PE (Bartlett Lake). Intel Core 7 253PQE, 253PTE, 253PE, 251TE, 251E (Bartlett Lake). Intel Core 5 223PQE, 223PTE, 223PE, 221TE, 221E, 213PTE, 213PE, 211TE, 211E (Bartlett Lake). Intel Core 3 201TE, 201E (Bartlett Lake). Intel Arc Pro B70 and B65 (BMG-G31). Intel Arc Pro B60 and B50 (BMG-G21). Support of HUDIMM and HSODIMM memory modules. Download: CPU-Z 2.20.2 | Portable ~5.0 MB (Freeware) View: CPU-Z Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      469
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      245
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!