MLB's Best Parks


Recommended Posts

Just saw this story on SI.com and figured it could spur some great debates here at Neowin. My Mets' Shea Stadium was voted the worst Fan Value Index in baseball and I can't really argue considering. Surprisingly, for me at least, Miller Park was ranked first despite the awful team that calls it home. I guess the stadium itself is incredible lol. Here're the rankings: SI.com Rankings You can choose each team to see how they were rated in the categories. Let the debates begin!

Edited by bigbluepride35
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/366353-mlbs-best-parks/
Share on other sites

The thing isn't based on design or anything, though. Of course people are going to love the cheaper places more. My favorite parks would have to be Yankee Stadium, Fenway, Safeco Field, and Camden Yards. Safeco is definitely the best looking, but the other 3 just have a real baseball "feel" to them that makes you really enjoy the game more, even just on TV.

Nice find... My Rockies' Coors Field is #3 :D Coors Field is a very nice ballpark, I go there atleast 4 or 5 games a year. I've also been to the Diamondbacks Stadium, The B.O.B. I think it should of ranked lower but that pool makes people all giddy. It had the most uncomfortable seats (not like any stadium has comfortable seats), they left the roof open when it was over 100 degrees outside (so you almost sweat to death), and there are so many advertisements in the outfield that it makes it hard to concentrate on baseball. When I lived in Arizona I went there one time and that was enough for me.

Fenway, Wrigley, and Yankees stadium - the classics will never be topped. There was a much better article on ESPN.com about this same topic a year or so ago - it went into a lot more detail and offered a detailed write up of each stadium, trying to weigh intagibles better than the SI article does.

Thats nothing [yt]. Me and a buddy of mine went to a Cubs @ Cards game last year during mid July. The humidity is much different out here than in Arizona. 100 degrees here is a lot different than 100 degrees there. ;)

Anyways, I agree somewhat with a few of the picks. I really am a fan of Busch, Coors, and of course U.S. Cellular. I think the renovations they've done to "The Cell" are making the stadium look a like better.

Adamb10, like the altered Cubs logo. In St. Louis we always use this

Completely

Useless

By

September.

Anyway, the current Busch stadium is coming down after this season and we are supposed to have a new ballpark for opening day next year. Will be sad in a way to see the old stadium go, but alot of the new stadiums are really nice.

Fenway, Wrigley, and Yankees stadium - the classics will never be topped.  There was a much better article on ESPN.com about this same topic a year or so ago - it went into a lot more detail and offered a detailed write up of each stadium, trying to weigh intagibles better than the SI article does.

586482827[/snapback]

http://espn.go.com/page2/s/neel/030910.html

Is this it?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The sweet release of death has never looked more appealing.
    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Doesn't DDG mainly use Bing?
    • Given the hefty price tag this thing will likely have I doubt many everyday home users will be in the market for one especially given the current climate.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      481
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      229
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      64
    4. 4
      monterxz
      56
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!