Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

I was happy to see that the Opteron 165 I just got was so strong.

Opteron 165 at 2.88ghz Prime Stable on air (1.4v)

Patriot 2 x 1gb ddr500 @ 240 3-4-4-8

DFI LanParty UltraD HTT @ 320

39c at Idle 56c full load

The bang for the buck with these guys (assuming a good stepping) is awesome. Dual core opty @ 2.88 for $230! I got it to boot into windows at 2.93 but barfed all over itself on prime95.

  • 2 weeks later...

DFI Lanparty Nf4 Ultra-D

3000+ @ 2.65 (295x9) 1.52v

512 Corsair PC3200 @ 221FSB (Gskill PC4800 Coming Soon)

33s Super PI Screenshot

I wish I could reach that on mine.......Though I've heard DFI Lanparty are really good mobo's for overclocking.

Mine is:

Shuttle AN51S/R

3000+ @ 2.28 (228x10) 1.52v

1024 GEIL PC3200 @ 228FSB

40?C Idle --- 55?C Load

I've tried everything from lowering my multiplyer(wouldnt even pass POST at 240 FSB with a 9x multiplyer). To adding a divider on my ram(divider was also used to attempt my 9x multiplyer).

I personally think its my board although with overclocking just about anything can affect it.

  • 2 weeks later...

my old lady

the classic overclock: Athlon XP2500+ ->Athlon XP3200+ (2.2Ghz), it's a Barton FSB200 (museum piece ... :p)

Mobo: gigabyte ga7n400 (nf2)

Cooler: Arctic Cooling Copper Lite (39 idle - 55 full load)

running like that for 2.5 years now, no problemos, whatsoever (overclocking shortens CPU life, yea right ... )

cheers

P4 Northwood 2.66GHz @ 3.0 on Air (Zalman 9500 cooler)

Asus P4P800 SE

FSB from 133 up to 150 - Higher caused my system to reboot in BF2 after roughly 2 mins game time.

Temps about 40 at load under BF2

Previous to that was:

P4 Northwood 2GHz @ 2.66 on Air (Gigabyte 3D cooler)

Asus P4P800 SE

FSB from 100 up to 133

Temps about 42 under load playing Source/CoD

Opteron 146 (2GHz stock clock) @ 2726.8 MHz, with 1mb (L2) local cache memory, which is double the amount that Athlon 64s had. It's basically very similar in functional spec. to an Athlon (Venice), other then that.

The performance per watt of those product s is poor, now, though, so I may get myself a laptop with a newer Intel processor at some point.

  • 3 weeks later...

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=126360

It's actually a Denmark core, CPU-Z has always displayed the core name incorrectly. Not entirely Prime stable, but I think that 21 hours is pretty good, I never let it go that long doing massive things anyway.

post-142764-1159742483_thumb.jpg

  • 1 month later...

Pentium M (745) 1.73 GHz :no: (Hi) - 800 MHz :no: (Lo)

1.356 Vcore @ x13 (Hi) - .988 Vcore @ x6 (Lo)

(133 MHz Bus) 533 MHz FSB (Hi, Lo)

1GB DDR @ 166 MHz (2.5, 3, 3, 7)

Bus: Dram - 4:5

~ to ~

Pentium M (745) 2.509 GHz :devil: (Hi) - 1.158 GHz :devil: (Lo)

1.356 Vcore @ x13 (Hi) - .988 Vcore @ x6 (Lo)

(193 MHz Bus) 772 MHz FSB (Hi, Lo)

1 GB DDR @ 241 MHz (2.5, 3, 3, 7)

Bus: Dram - 4:5

Courtesy of ClockGen by cpuid (the makers of CPU-Z) which alters the clocks without substantial hardware modifications, excluding excessive cooling for an HP laptop...

Pentium D 945 3.4Ghz running @ 4.0 Ghz, 1.3V, 55C full load. (Zalman 7700)

Asus P5WD2-Premium @ 944Mhz FSB

OCZ 2Gb PC6400 DDR2 Dual Channel Platinum XTC Revision 2 Edition (OCZ2P800R22GK) running @ just slightly below 800Mhz, 1.9V

send PM if you have questions ;)

  • 1 month later...

Opteron 170 (2ghz - Dual Core - 2x1mb cashe)

Currently running @ 235 - Defult vcore - 235*10

Corsair XMS PC3500 (BH5) @ 235 (1:1 with HTT) @ 2.9v

Shuttle SN21G5

===

Highest was:

AMD A64 3200+ @ 2850 (285*10)

Corasir XMS PC3500 (BH5) @ 255 (forgot ratio) @ highest board v (forgot that as wel)

ASUS A8V Dlx Rev 2

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
    • Another devilish issue surrounding these certificates is what can happen with old, unsuspecting PCs that nevertheless have Secure Boot enabled. In my case, it was a Dell with a 3rd-gen Core chip (so about 13 years old). As of the last few weeks, it was suddenly BSOD'g within about 5 minutes of booting. Turns out it was because of MS's "Secure-Boot-Update" scheduled task, which is scheduled to run 5 minutes after login. It's explained in gory detail here (this is not my post, but it was where I found the answer), but the short version is that this legacy system would need fairly elaborate, manual certificate intervention since MS's automatic cert update method cannot work. How to do that is linked late in the thread. https://www.bleepingcomputer.c...od-caused-by-scheduled-task Secure Boot wasn't at all important for this particular PC, so I disabled it to be done with the problem.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      95
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!