Recommended Posts

Well, I once get a 433Mhz celeron to run @ 466Mhz without touching core voltage... should I be proud of that? :D

And my old Duron 700Mhz can run almost @ 900Mhz, by increasing the FSB and core voltage changed from 1.6V to 1.85. But then the power supply gets pretty hot... :)

Too bad my recent Sempron system doesn't allow any other overclocking, than the memory clock (it's a crappy BIOS & mb). And even that makes no difference in mem clocks, cause the FSB is limited to 200Mhz. :rolleyes:

Edited by GLSii

My Opteron 165 is rock stable at 2.66ghz with the Tuniq Tower 120 and AS5. I didn't reach the maximum yet, I just stopped here at 2.66 so it could maybe do more, I'll find out when I'll have the time.

CPU-Z: http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=220198

  • 3 weeks later...
Get bent Intel fan boys here is a realistic OC! When Intel gets real about real time speed then i'll beimpressed.

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=219948

Here ya go, my 80% OC beats your 50%, done with an Intel Core 2 Duo. Intel is clock for clock better than AMD at the moment :)

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=227625

CPU-Z Database (ID : 227625)

Submitted by Jonathan Kwan

Submitted on Sat, 11 Aug 2007 03:57:00 +0200 with CPU-Z 1.40

CPU : Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 (*1)

CPU Arch : 2 Cores - 2 Threads

CPU PSN : Intel? Core2 CPU 6300 @ 1.86GHz

CPU EXT : MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 EM64T

CPU Cache : L1 : 2 x 32/2 x 32 KB - L2 : 2048 KB

Core : Conroe (65 nm) / Revision : B2

CPUID : 6.F.6 / Extended : 6.F

Freq : 3359.95 MHz (479.99 * 7)

----------------------------------

MB Brand : ASUSTeK Computer INC.

MB Model : P5K Deluxe

NB : Intel P35/G33/G31 rev 02

SB : Intel 82801IB (ICH9) rev 02

----------------------------------

RAM Size : 2048 MB

RAM Freq : 480 MHz

RAM Type : DDR2-SDRAM Dual Channel

RAM Ratio : 1:1

RAM Timings : 5-5-5-15

----------------------------------

Slot 1 : 1024MB (PC2-6400)

Slot 1 Manufacturer : OCZ

Slot 2 : 1024MB (PC2-6400)

Slot 2 Manufacturer : OCZ

ccpuzphppy5.png

On my motherboard (Gigabyte GA-K8N51GMF-9) the only overclocking features are Bus speed and Multiplyer, it manages the voltage on its own (makes things pritty easy). I'm using the Arctic Freezer64 Pro. First time i've ever fiddled with my processor too.

Athlon64 4000 SKT939 @ 2.83hz

CPU Temp under stress 46oc

CPU Temp idle 33oc

Edited by McDave

Well I have a dell so overclocking so I can't overclock my p4 (It would probably explode with this ****ty heatsink anyway). I have my 7600GS OC'd from 400/266(533) to 540/340 (680). The memory in the card is crappy and won't go much farther than 360 without bad artifacts, the core OC's like a dream though, very minimal increase in temperature.

  • 2 weeks later...

All I did was increase the vcore just a little, increase the FSB and voila! 3.55ghz and memory running at 888mhz 1:1 @ 4-4-4-12 . I was able to effortlessly reach 3.8ghz but had to raise chipset + vcore voltage and the speed increase wasn't worth the higher temps... :yes:

post-102022-1188614752_thumb.jpg

All I did was increase the vcore just a little, increase the FSB and voila! 3.55ghz and memory running at 888mhz 1:1 @ 4-4-4-12 . I was able to effortlessly reach 3.8ghz but had to raise chipset + vcore voltage and the speed increase wasn't worth the higher temps... :yes:

i got some catching up to do! havent had the time to thoroughly test anything higher atm.

check sig for results so far.

i got some catching up to do! havent had the time to thoroughly test anything higher atm.

check sig for results so far.

The RAM is probably holding you back, try running it @ 5-5-5-15, increase the FSB and see if it boots... Maybe you'll have to add +0.1v to the memory as well, make sure its within the ram voltage limits though, you dont wanna fry it :p

Also if you're using the stock heatsink, you won't reach as far...

  • 2 weeks later...

sorry for double post can't edit:

oc.jpg

I was actually getting around 500 points more before I updated a bunch of intel drivers... still a decent score for a vista pc

pc:

case: Antec Sonata III 500

mobo: gigbyte p35 ds3r

CPU: Q6600 g0 @ 3ghz

mem: 2gig kingston 667 (not oc'ed anyone know how much % performance I could gain if I oc'ed it?)

vid card: Foxconn 8800GTS OC edition 640MB

PSU: included with case, antec earthwatts 500watt

about 900 euro total this does not include a harddisk I still had one I could use. Next upgrade when money allows: physx card, another 2gb ram, raid setup.

Edited by Saito
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

currently running my old AM2 3200+ @2.7ghz / 1.45v with a passive OCZ Vindicator (getting around 51c @ full load with 27c ambient temp)

MSI K9N Platinum

4x512mb SuperTalent DDR667 @ 720mhz / 4-4-4-10 / 1.95v

Gigabyte 7300GT @580/950 w/pencil mod

yup, great stuff for a museum ^_^

  • 4 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Louis Rossmann suing Samsung over "990 Pro SSD warranty scam" by Sayan Sen Back in 2023, if you recall, Neowin reviewer Robbie Khan had a dispute with Samsung over his 990 Pro SSD, which was rapidly losing its health. After significant back and forth, the tech giant had finally released firmware to "stop" the issue. Interestingly, its previous flagship at the time, the 980 Pro was also facing problems leading to two consecutive sets of firmware fixes. Three years later, it looks like a similar conflict has now broken out between tech repair entrepreneur YouTuber Louis Rossmann and Samsung, as it has escalated into a threatened lawsuit after the company allegedly refused to appropriately replace a failing 990 Pro SSD that remained under warranty. According to Rossmann, a 4TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe SSD purchased for approximately $330 less than two years ago, began experiencing major hiccups and issues, even though he claims it had been operated under ideal cooling conditions. It was installed in a RAID 1 array and cooled by a heatsink and dual high-speed fans. However the drive reportedly started dropping out of the array, exhibiting controller-level failures that eventually became not useable in any meaningful way. Rossmann said Samsung’s support process was marked by delays and confusion from the very start. After initially contacting the wrong regional support channel, he was redirected to Samsung’s memory support division where he submitted detailed diagnostics, logs, and proof of purchase. Rossmann runs a repair company and owns an ACE Lab PC-3000 machine, which is a professional-grade data recovery equipment. As such, he had been confident in his diagnostics. Samsung even seemingly acknowledged that later. Regardless, Rossmann claims that his initial support ticket was automatically closed before a full 24-hour response window had elapsed, forcing him to reopen the case and resubmit documentation. The controversy however intensified further from here after Samsung accepted the drive for warranty evaluation but later returned it with a repair report stating that the drive had passed its testing and that the SSD had been verified as functional. Rossmann strongly disputed those claims citing that his own independent testing on PC-3000 showed write speeds reducing to as low as 40–60 MB/s before the drive failed entirely. Samsung subsequently informed him that the SSD had been reset and reflashed, passing internal stress tests. However, the company also stated that replacement units were unavailable due to an industry-wide memory shortage and suggested that a refund process could be initiated if further testing confirmed the fault. Thus, to settle, the company offered a refund of $330, the amount that was initially paid by him to make the purchase. Here, Rossmann pointed out the seeming hypocrisy of the tech giant as in how no Samsung drive was apparently allocated for warranty replacements, but they were abundantly available for retail sales especially when using business accounts. As you can see, Rossmann is indeed right, there are Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSDs on Amazon currently for $950 (shipped and sold by first-party Amazon US itself), and they are also available on Samsung's own store too, albeit for an even higher price of $1100. Thus Rossmann argues that Samsung’s inability or unwillingness to provide a replacement while the same model remains available for purchase at significantly higher market prices reflects a failure to honor its warranty obligations. He has issued a formal 60-day notice and says he intends to file suit in Texas small claims court, asserting that companies should face greater costs for denying legitimate warranty claims than for fulfilling them. You can check out the full video titled "Samsung's 990 Pro SSD warranty policy is a scam; I'm taking them to court," at the link below. Source and image: Louis Rossmann (YouTube) As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
    • Thank you. Will do. I read in the release notes that editor config might be at play here.
    • Actually, I think even Microsoft doesn't know how to control it
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!