Recommended Posts

All Credits go to Chris123NT of Winbeta.

Windows Vista On SATA: Can't be done? Think Again!

Boot into setup from the Vista DVD.

Proceed through the various setup screens as usual until you get to the screen with the various harddrives and the "Load Driver" button (i.e., Where

do you want to install Windows?).

At this screen, press Shift+F10 to open a command prompt.

You'll need to use the command prompt to find 2 things:

The drive letter of the DVD drive containing the Vista DVD

The path to the location of your 3rd-party storage driver(s) on whatever media they're located on.

The easiest way to find these paths is to open Notepad (notepad.exe) at the commandline, go to File | Open, then click Computer on the dialog's breadcrumb bar to get a view of all your (currently available) drives.

Alternatively, you can do a "dir" on various drive letters until you get what you're looking for.

After you have both paths, exit notepad (if necessary) and go back to the commandline. You can use Alt-Tab if it has moved out of view.

At the commandline type:

<DVD Drive Letter>:\drivers\DPInst.exe /PATH <Drivers Disk Drive Letter>:\<Driver Files Path>

In my case, my DVD Drive was on G: and my storage drivers were on a USB key in H:\i386\.

So at the commandline, I typed:

G:\drivers\DPInst.exe /PATH H:\i386\

/PATH is a switch telling DPInst.exe you are giving it a directory path. It is not a variable, so don't replace it.

After you execute DPInst.exe, a Driver Wizard will appear. Click Next, and t will show that the storage driver you just added was installed. Click Finish. If you have other storage drivers to load, repeating this process should work (I just had one). After you finish with the wizard, click "Refresh" on the "Where do you want to install Windows?" screen. The harddrives that required the storage driver(s) should now appear in the list. Continue installing Vista as normal and I hope this solution works well for everyone.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/375782-vistasata-now-possible/
Share on other sites

Thanks for the tip, but this process didn't work for me. The drivers load correctly and the setup is able to go forward until the reboot, then I get the standard BSOD.

BTW, I have onboard VIA SATA (not RAID) on ASUS A8V Deluxe and have tried both 5.10a and 4.3C drivers. Also, to get the VIA drivers to even install you have to use the /F to force install the drivers, otherwise Vista setup just says at the end of driver install that your already available driver (which doesn't actually exist) is newer than the one you were trying to load.

Also, I'm trying this on x86 Vista -- x64 Vista would load the correct x64 drivers, but clicking refresh till the end of time wouldn't bring up any drives to install on.

Anyone with any more ideas, or who has successfully used this process on a VIA SATA controller, I would appreciate the help.

Thanks for the tip, but this process didn't work for me.  The drivers load correctly and the setup is able to go forward until the reboot, then I get the standard BSOD.

BTW, I have onboard VIA SATA (not RAID) on ASUS A8V Deluxe and have tried both 5.10a and 4.3C drivers.  Also, to get the VIA drivers to even install you have to use the /F to force install the drivers, otherwise Vista setup just says at the end of driver install that your already available driver (which doesn't actually exist) is newer than the one you were trying to load.

Also, I'm trying this on x86 Vista -- x64 Vista would load the correct x64 drivers, but clicking refresh till the end of time wouldn't bring up any drives to install on.

Anyone with any more ideas, or who has successfully used this process on a VIA SATA controller, I would appreciate the help.

586566696[/snapback]

same here with same board :(

i managed to get my sata raid working fine... just put in a regular drive and just installed vista to my raid. the other drive stays unchanged apart from maybe a little change to the boot.ini file if it had an os on it  :cool:

586568675[/snapback]

huh? ya lost me. :blink: :no: :huh:

i managed to get my sata raid working fine... just put in a regular drive and just installed vista to my raid. the other drive stays unchanged apart from maybe a little change to the boot.ini file if it had an os on it?:cool::

586568675[/snapback]

you've made your ATA drive the active one then load the drivers and installed vista on de sata one?

jadedraverla it seems that if you just put the SATA on the promise controler (the lower sata controller) you can install it that way will try it later cause for now I have to go to work:))

A8V Promise Raid controller with SATA works. (Need to enable raid only if one HD is installed)
Edited by NesTle
you've made your ATA drive the active one then load the drivers and installed vista on de sata one?

586569029[/snapback]

yep, i kept gettin bsod everytime i tried to install by booting from the cd, however when i put in a ata drive it seemed to let me start installing. i didnt change any data on the ata drive myself or install any part of vista to it. the only change made to it was the boot.ini file on it as it had win xp on it (i borrowed it from another pc) but thats easy to fix in notepad.

jadedraverla it seems that if you just put the SATA on the promise controler (the lower sata controller) you can install it that way will try it later cause for now I have to go to work :)

586569029[/snapback]

Well, no go for me, although I'm somewhat confused on the directions you quoted on enabling RAID. Basically, using RAID mode I get no hard disks detected by BIOS (I don't want to create an array and wipe everything out) and using IDE mode I get drives detected to BIOS, but none to Vista setup, evev after installing the drivers.

Will keep looking.

Thanks.

That method only installs the driver during the setup process on WinPE, when the computer reboots it boots into the real Windows Vista environment, which the drivers were not installed, therefore you get the BSOD.

Simply put: no workaround/solutions at this moment, just wait for Beta 2 or the October build man...

The older SATA controllers already have a good deal of support in the Vista installer. For instance, the VIA SATA controller in the VT8237 Southbridges, which cover a number of their chipsets.

586570702[/snapback]

Actually, this is the controller used in my system and those of many having problems (ASUS A8V Deluxe motherboard), but it has NO Vista support in the current version, and was only able to be installed from driver disk in previous builds.

Oh well. I guess I'm giving up until October CTP (if there really ends up being anoother CTP before beta 2).

using my WD SATA drive on my mobo (noted below in red) I had NO problems installing straight to HDD. No drivers needed (that I had to put a disk in) ... it was just like installing 98 or XP or 2003.

i have an asus a8v deluxe using via sata vt8237 controller and build 5048 works, no drivers needed. Build 5219 however, doesn't :( ...

i tried the methods of installing the drivers from the previous page but i only get a bsod on restart. i have tried installing from build 5048 to 5219 but that results in a big waste of time.

i guess i have to get an ide hd since thats the only way i can see it working. i have tried the same thing but using my promise controller on the mobo and no go either. although i didn't spend too much time on this controller cuz i don't use it often.

any tips or things to try or drivers to download?

I have 3 SATA drives on an Intel ICH6R RAID/AHCI controller (925X chipset). 2 Raptors which are in a RAID0 array, and a cheap Maxtor drive that is in there for Linux, Longhorn etc. None of the drives are detected, even when I load the appropriate driver using the above method. That is, unless I turn the RAID features off in the BIOS and set it to a pure AHCI controller. Then, everything works fine out of the box - except my RAID array is detected as two individual drives, which doesn't help. Oh well, it does install though.

Hope this helps some of the Intel folks - bottom line, turn your RAID off and set the controller to pure AHCI or ATA, whichever applies to you.

I have 3 SATA drives on an Intel ICH6R RAID/AHCI controller (925X chipset). 2 Raptors which are in a RAID0 array, and a cheap Maxtor drive that is in there for Linux, Longhorn etc. None of the drives are detected, even when I load the appropriate driver using the above method. That is, unless I turn the RAID features off in the BIOS and set it to a pure AHCI controller. Then, everything works fine out of the box - except my RAID array is detected as two individual drives, which doesn't help. Oh well, it does install though.

Hope this helps some of the Intel folks - bottom line, turn your RAID off and set the controller to pure AHCI or ATA, whichever applies to you.

586587051[/snapback]

They can turn RAID off as long as they don't value anything thats on them :wacko:

They can turn RAID off as long as they don't value anything thats on the:wacko:o:

586587066[/snapback]

Doing this on an Intel/Dell board is non-destructive, as long as you don't install to one of the drives in the array. As always, check with your hardware manufacturer before changing settings, yadda yadda.

I'd also like to note that, once Vista is installed, you can set the controller back to RAID and it will still boot fine. I would suggest disabling in BIOS and/or unplugging drives involved in your RAID array while installing Windows Vista.

But, we're all geeks here, and I made the assumption that we would all know these things.

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi guys, I've got a similar problem. I'm running two SATA 160GB Seagate HDDs on my computer and I am trying to install 5219 on one of them. If I launch the installer from Windows, it will detect the drives and I can begin the installation process -- but when the PC reboots and continues its installation routine, I'll get a "Error copying files" error.

So, I decided to try this method of booting from the setup DVD and loading the drivers for my SATA drives. I can get the driver installation wizard to start but the driver installation always falls (giving me an "install failed" status message).

Any ideas?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • BrowserOS 0.46.0 by Razvan Serea BrowserOS is a free, open-source Chromium-based browser that runs AI agents natively, offering a smarter, more productive browsing experience. It supports Chrome extensions and integrates AI agents to automate tasks, fill forms, and streamline workflows. Your data stays on your computer: you can use your own API keys or run local models via Ollama, making it a privacy-first alternative to tools like Perplexity, Comet, or Dia. With built-in productivity tools and app integrations, BrowserOS boosts efficiency while keeping control firmly in your hands. Being Chromium-based, BrowserOS lets you effortlessly import your bookmarks, passwords, and Chrome extensions in just a few clicks. BrowserOS works with OpenAI GPT models, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, and local AI models via Ollama or LMStudio. You can use your own API keys and effortlessly switch between providers. BrowserOS Agent Your AI productivity assistant that organizes and manages your browsing effortlessly Quickly list, group, or close tabs Save and resume browsing sessions Search your history and organize bookmarks Switch instantly to the tab you need BrowserOS Navigator – Automate web tasks with ease Navigate websites and search automatically Interact with pages without manual effort Handle repetitive tasks in seconds What makes BrowserOS special Feels like home - same familiar interface as Google Chrome, works with all your extensions AI agents that run on YOUR browser, not in the cloud Privacy first - bring your own keys or use local models with Ollama. Your browsing history stays on your computer Open source and community driven - see exactly what's happening under the hood MCP store to one-click install popular MCPs and use them directly in the browser bar (coming soon) Built-in AI ad blocker that works across more scenarios! BrowserOS 0.46.0 changelog: Run Claude Code & Codex right in your browser — We've extended the agent harness to bring full coding agents into BrowserOS. Claude Code and Codex now come bundled and plug straight into the assistant, so you can drive your browser with the agent — and the subscription — you already use. A brand new experience — A redesigned new tab, a calmer composer, and a rebuilt command center for switching between agents. The whole assistant is cleaner, faster to reach, and easier to live in. New MCP tools — We rebuilt the browser tool surface from the ground up — a tighter, more reliable set of tools for agents to drive the browser. Plus one-click install of BrowserOS as an MCP server into the agents you already run, with automatic URL sync. Chromium 148 — Updated to the latest Chromium base with all recent upstream fixes and security patches. Streamlined — We've pulled back a few features that weren't getting much use — Skills, Soul, and Memory — so we can focus and ship better versions of them soon. Download: BrowserOS 0.46.0 | 181.0 MB (Open Source) Download: BrowserOS for macOS | 485.0 MB Links: BrowserOS Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft finally admits its default Windows 11 25H2, 24H2 action broke key legacy component by Sayan Sen Microsoft last week released Windows 11 KB5094126 and KB5093998 as the latest Patch Tuesday updates. Following that the company also published the accompanying dynamic updates under KB5094149, KB5095971, and KB5094156. So far the company has acknowledged two known issues that have popped up after the release which include bugged-out Office apps as well as the Recycle Bin; though there could be more at play too. Speaking of bugs and issues, Microsoft seems to have finally acknowledged a problem that probably has been around for close to a year. That's because back in July of 2025 the company made a default change to the latest Windows 11 versions, wherein it switched to JScript9Legacy on Windows 11 24H2 and later releases. Hence following the release of version 25H2 in October 2025, JScript9Legacy also remained default-enabled. As a result there has been a compatibility issue ever since then. For those wondering, by switching to JScript9Legacy Microsoft intended to improve the security of modern Windows PCs by reducing vulnerabilities tied to legacy scripting like cross-site scripting (XSS), among others. XSS exploits can allow cyber-attackers to attach malicious code onto legitimate websites and use them to execute the code when a potential victim loads such a website. Hence the new JScript9Legacy engine enforced stricter execution policies and improved object handling, which should help mitigate such attacks. Microsoft today has published a new support article detailing the problem. Neowin spotted it while browsing. The company says that JScript global definitions and execution context may fail to persist across scripts, potentially breaking older dependent apps and web-based components that relied on this legacy behavior. In the article Microsoft has confirmed that the issue stems from its move away from the older jscript9.dll engine in favor of jscript9legacy.dll. As mentioned above, while the newer engine was designed to address vulnerabilities and strengthen security it also changes how JScript handles execution context. As a result functions and definitions loaded by one script could no longer remain available to subsequent scripts once execution ended. The company notes that some applications worked correctly on earlier Windows versions because the older JScript engine automatically retained global definitions and execution state between scripts. Under the newer model though that behavior is disabled by default causing certain legacy workloads and polyfill-dependent scripts to fail. Microsoft says it addressed the problem via the KB5077241 update though the fix had not been enabled automatically in the following updates. As such admins must explicitly turn on persistent JScript execution context using a Registry setting that the tech giant shared today. The configuration can be applied to individual processes or system-wide through the FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE registry key. The steps have been outlined below: Run the following command to create the feature control registry key: reg add "HKLM\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\FeatureControl\FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE" Under this key, create a new DWORD (32-bit) value. Configure the value as follows: To enable persistence for specific processes only: Set the value to 1 for each target process name. To enable persistence for all processes: Add * as the key name and set its value to 1. You can find the official support article here on Microsoft's website.
    • The possibility that milk gathers back into a glass implies that gravity can be 'reversed'.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      590
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!