Google formally declares war on Microsoft


Recommended Posts

Google formally declares war on Microsoft

We will fight them on the breaches

By Nick Farrell: Thursday 06 October 2005, 07:05

GOOGLE HAS confirmed that it will launch free spreadsheet and word-processing software online and take on Microsoft in one of its biggest markets.

Under the deal, Google will allow web users to access Sun's OpenOffice from a toolbar.

The other day, when Sun's Scott McNealy and his former employee now Google chief Eric Schmidt met up, Sun was wary about doing that.

When asked point blank, McNealy said it was something to be investigated. However Sun's Australian spokesman Paul O'Connor was a little more forthright about the deal which he said was "huge".

He bubbled that the deal was a wake-up call for Microsoft.

"At the moment most people are used to having to pay for software packages, but at the end of the day, the value is in the content and services ? not in the software itself," he said

http://theinquirer.net/?article=26734

586632217[/snapback]

Yawn..........

I don't know! But learning from the past I know it is not a clever thing to mess up with Microsoft. Right now if you ask me to bet, I would put money on on the death of Google, just because they took a way bigger bite they can swallow. Knowing your place in the Software industry is essential to survive and obviously Google overlook this little detail. The lack of experience in the business will cost them a lot, Microsoft is taking on the search market, the only thing Google know how to do, at the other hand, Microsoft is very good on various areas but if you consider the productivity tools market, they are the real giant and the most experienced super master of things, Google don?t have nor the experience neither the resources for bearing a long war, and if they lose a focus on the searching business they are in deep trouble. And yes it is now very sexy to be in war with the mean and bad Microsoft, but? then again sexy is not a very winner attribute in the world of business that?s one thing Google need to understand, anyway I wish good luck to both side and hope it will generate some innovation and positive value to the customers, and yes the better one will eventually win at the end.

I don't know! But learning from the past I know it is not a clever thing to mess up with Microsoft. Right now if you ask me to bet, I would put money on on the death of Google, just because they took a way bigger bite they can swallow. ...

586634344[/snapback]

I guess nobody knows this better than Google's CEO who was Netscape's CEO. He did the same mistake then (challenged Windows putting too many resource on "web") and look what Microsoft did to Netscape.

Microsoft once fully awaken might come down heavily on Google in the same way. Although this time bundling with Windows might not work. But they are not world's largest software company for nothing.

Lets see the outcome. sit back, relax & enjoy the ride. :whistle:

Personally I won't declare war on Microsoft using OpenOffice as my weapon. :rofl: :ninja: :devil:

Now, let's see if I get this straight...

1) Install Google Toolbar that contains all kind of link-reporting code that sends to Google all of my searches if I don't disable it when I install it. :huh:

2) Google Toolbar, still filled with all of that reporting code, contains links to fire-up components of OpenOffice. :unsure:

So, the logical question follows:

When I launch a OpenOffice component from my Google Toolbar, how am I do know that the Google Toolbar isn't reporting back to Google and/or Sun every time I click on those buttons on the toolbar? :o

Google & Sun would then know every tine I used their product! What an imaginative way to prove customer-share by how many users clicked on one of the OpenOffice buttons!! :no:

Until Google and Sun can prove that no such data is being sent on the usage of OpenOffice, I would stay away from this like the plague! :angry:

And you thought that Microsoft's process of sending non-identifyable info about your system was eggregious!! :woot:

--ScottKin

I like Google, but don't necessarily trust them.

It is nice, however, for people to have a choice in who they trust or not.  Better than a Microsoft monopoly. ;)

586632552[/snapback]

Alternative office applications have existed for a long time in both open source and commercial forms. You know this. The problem is that there is currently nothing better than Microsoft Office and that's a fact. There's a reason Microsoft dominates when it comes to office applications and operating systems. That's because they have superior products.

So you honestly believe the majority of Internet users search with MSN Search!? Google has practically erased MSN Search from the map in web searching, even after MS boldly released their "Google killer".

They beat MS to a pulp once again with Google Earth despite Virtual Earth, regardless if MS had TerraServer before. It doesn't matter; people loved Google Earth/Maps. They didn't like old black&white photos. MS has all reasons to monitor Google's actions closely from now on, regarding the web services business. A lot of people also like/love Google, and that doesn't go in Microsoft's favor either.

586632606[/snapback]

wel say'd :yes: :yes:

and what haves google 70miljoen dollars?

and look at microsoft the have 100BILJARD dollars or more .. i don't know realy how muth but it is in BILJARD as i'm for sure

comon ... its google right to make mony as is you'r if you go to work ....

However, Microsoft's problem has lately been that their customers don't NEED an Office suite incredibly feature packed. That's why plenty currently use Office 97 and 2000 over five years after their releases....

Perhaps but if 97 and 2000 does everything the user needs then openoffice (or staroffice from which google would be using) offer nothing that would pull users either. In the end I still think Office 12 appears at the moment to have the most compelling features and looks a much better upgrade than open office 2 is.

Ill give OoO a few more years, 2.0 is nice but I still feel its behind MS Office some bit.

wel say'd  :yes:  :yes:

and what haves google 70miljoen dollars?

and look at microsoft the have 100BILJARD dollars or more .. i don't know realy how muth but it is in BILJARD as i'm for sure

comon ... its google right to make mony as is you'r if you go to work ....

586635127[/snapback]

perhaps microsoft should just buy em out :p

If Office 97 or 2000 do everything a user needs, then why would they switch to O12?  Also, when they get other PCs, they can't install the same Office on all of them (legally, anyhow).  OO.o has an advantage there.

However, OO.o isn't for everyone.  Just good to have a choice.

586635458[/snapback]

While Office as early as office 97 may have all the features that are needed. Isn't it how the UI has been designed that makes Office 12 so useful? The features have been there, and now Office 12 makes it easier to use the tools to the maximum. I read that's the key that makes Office 12 "wow".

Perhaps but if 97 and 2000 does everything the user needs then openoffice (or staroffice from which google would be using) offer nothing that would pull users either. In the end I still think Office 12 appears at the moment to have the most compelling features and looks a much better upgrade than open office 2 is.

Ill give OoO a few more years, 2.0 is nice but I still feel its behind MS Office some bit.

586635431[/snapback]

If Office 97 or 2000 do everything a user needs, then why would they switch to O12? Also, when they get other PCs, they can't install the same Office on all of them (legally, anyhow). OO.o has an advantage there.

However, OO.o isn't for everyone. Just good to have a choice.

If Office 97 or 2000 do everything a user needs, then why would they switch to O12?  Also, when they get other PCs, they can't install the same Office on all of them (legally, anyhow).  OO.o has an advantage there.

However, OO.o isn't for everyone.  Just good to have a choice.

586635458[/snapback]

what I meant that if a user was going to change then I think Office 12 is certainly a more compelling upgrade path. Yes alot of users will sit on what they have but that doesnt help google either.

Ya What I love the Google vs Microsoft wars is that Google completely reinvents the wheel in a more pratical sensible way, EVERY time. Microsoft, is just a lost child at this point following what ever is in front of it. Have you seen the microsoft earth? Come on. Completely ripped off Google.

Microsoft is sad, they should stick to what they do best, and that's suck.

586632279[/snapback]

Microsoft is better than you at everything. Besides the fact that Apple overprices everything, but that's another story unrelated to this topic.

There's a reason why Microsoft dominates the Office market, they make a damn good product. Sure, I think it could do with a major price slash, but the companies who buy the software can afford it.

Just because something has a Google brand on it doesn't mean that it's going to be equal or better than Office. I wonder if it will ever get out of the betas stage?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Those are some popular multiplayer games. But hardly "all". Just those that don't work on Linux currently due to specific anti-cheat implementations. I think it's also fair to point out the literally thousands of games that don't work on the PS5. And it's not locked at 1080p. That's the default, which you can change.
    • Ubuntu Livepatch arrives on Arm64 to eliminate system reboots for kernel updates by Paul Hill Canonical has just announced that its Livepatch service now supports computers with Arm64 processors. For those who are not familiar, Livepatch allows users to apply important kernel updates without any service interruption or rebooting. While home users will benefit from this, it’s even more important for critical machines that absolutely should not be going offline at all. The feature is available as part of Ubuntu Core 26 for Arm64 and Ubuntu Core 20 and onwards for AMD64. According to Canonical, this will improve the security of systems that aren’t security-maintained daily or weekly, and it helps organizations work towards Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) compliance. If you are familiar with Ubuntu, you probably know that most packages can be updated without having to restart the system. There is one big exception to this, and that’s the kernel; it typically requires you to reload the system to boot into the new kernel. With Livepatch, Canonical has done something so that you don’t need to restart to begin using the new kernel. Aside from Ubuntu Core 26, users with Arm64 chips running Ubuntu 26.04 LTS can also use Livepatch. If you want to learn more about Livepatch, check out its product page. There, you can also find a button to join Ubuntu Pro (it’s free for several home devices) so that you can enable Livepatch. By linking your computer to Ubuntu Pro, you will also extend the life of your Ubuntu install from five years to ten years. If you are running Ubuntu, let us know in the comments if you have been looking forward to this feature on your ARM-based computer. If you’ve had a compatible AMD64 machine for a while and never used this feature, let us know why in the comments!
    • Meta announces a major leadership change at WhatsApp by Pradeep Viswanathan Meta has announced a major leadership change at WhatsApp, with Will Cathcart stepping down after seven years of leading the world's largest messaging platform. CRED CEO and founder Kunal Shah will take over as the next global head of WhatsApp. CRED is an Indian fintech company focused on creditworthy consumers. As part of the transition, Meta is also making a minority investment in CRED through its Series H funding round. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said Will Cathcart will remain at Meta and move into a new role focused on building new products from the ground up. Cathcart led WhatsApp during a major growth phase, helping the app reach more than 3 billion users worldwide. He also played a key role in expanding WhatsApp’s business offerings while keeping privacy and end-to-end encryption central to the product. Meta’s Chief Product Officer, Chris Cox, said Kunal Shah was selected after a search for a leader who understands WhatsApp’s global scale and future potential. In a leaked internal memo, Cox described Shah as a “serial founder” and one of India’s most respected entrepreneurs, adding that he brings “entrepreneurial energy” and a strong product mindset to the role. As part of the Series H funding round, CRED is raising ₹8,550 crore, or about $900 million, in a round led by Meta. The funding values CRED at ₹43,239 crore, or about $4.5 billion, on a post-money basis. It is important to note that this investment will not give Meta access to CRED customer information. Kunal posted the following on X regarding his new role at Meta: Although Kunal Shah will be stepping away from his operating role as CRED CEO, he will retain his personal shareholding in the company.
    • It wouldn't be hard for me to turn off my TV, if I had one. For one thing, I never scroll Instagram. The only reason I have an account is because Meta created one when it merged the account systems for its various services.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!