Microsoft warns, don't use "Windows XP Service Pac


Recommended Posts

Microsoft warns, don't use "Windows XP Service Pack 3 Preview"

This is not the first time that Windows fanatics create their own "Service Pack" by collecting all available hotfixes in to one installable pack. I have posted articles about these packs over the years because I find those projects pretty cool, but am aware that it is obviouly not supported by Microsoft and should not be used in "production environments". The latest Windows XP SP3 pack caught some attention in the online press and now Microsoft have posted a statement in their newsgroups:

http://bink.nu/Article5008.bink

exactly. By calling this collection of patches a "Service Pack 3" should set off a red alert to everyone, especially Microsoft. They don't need their average consumers confused on what is released by them and what is released by Joe Blow out there.

Personally, I would never install a Windows XP "Patch" from anywhere else but Microsoft's servers. <<period>>

What about Autopatcher?

586643782[/snapback]

Autopatcher makes it clear that it's a collection of patches for Windows 2000/XP that is CLEARLY unsupported from Microsoft and UNOFFICIAL.

What this person is doing in this case is deceiving people by thinking this is the real deal, when it's not.

Autopatcher makes it clear that it's a collection of patches for Windows 2000/XP that is CLEARLY unsupported from Microsoft and UNOFFICIAL.

What this person is doing in this case is deceiving people by thinking this is the real deal, when it's not.

586643795[/snapback]

1) AutoPatcher does not refer to itself as a service pack

2) The updates with AutoPatcher are ones MS has publicly released via windows update, and for general download on their site - this 'SP3' contains unsupported hotfixes; hotfixes only designed to be used with MS' direction.

Autopatcher makes it clear that it's a collection of patches for Windows 2000/XP that is CLEARLY unsupported from Microsoft and UNOFFICIAL.

What this person is doing in this case is deceiving people by thinking this is the real deal, when it's not.

586643795[/snapback]

The real difference is that SP3 (like the link says) has the hotfixes like AP but also had private hotfixes. They are still from microsoft but the private hotfixes do not go through the same testing as the public ones, and hence may mess your machine up.

This guy is not deceiving anyone who can read. It clearly says by the download link that it is UNOFFICIAL. http://www.thehotfix.net/sp3.html

The real difference is that SP3 (like the link says) has the hotfixes like AP but also had private hotfixes. They are still from microsoft but the private hotfixes do not go through the same testing as the public ones, and hence may mess your machine up.

586643826[/snapback]

exactly

1) AutoPatcher does not refer to itself as a service pack

2) The updates with AutoPatcher are ones MS has publicly released via windows update, and for general download on their site - this 'SP3' contains unsupported hotfixes; hotfixes only designed to be used with MS' direction.

586643815[/snapback]

I never said AP was a 'service pack.' But you're right on your second point.

BTW, it looks like the amount of server timeouts are increasing. Four duplicate posts :huh:

That's why I never EVER install SP, heck the last SP on my PC is SP1, because It was slipstreamed on to a cd by a friend.

586643818[/snapback]

That's just poor PC maintanence, simple as that. SP2 is integral in maintaining the smoothest, safest XP environment as possible. This article simply asks people not to install an unofficial service pack, not avoid the one's MS would prefer you install ASAP.

I only install Offical Updates from Microsoft Windows Update, since they are developers and they know how to experience with these sort of things. Seems abit silly if people are installing updates which hasnt been put together in a service pack ready and tested In Testing Labs before the Public.

when i saw sp3 from that site i wasnt at all confused what was going on. most people who arent into computers as most of us on here probably dont even know what a service pack is. i use autopatcher tho since as stated are public hotfixes. and saves some time from ms' winupdate when i do a fresh install.

Here's our official response for now....

The Hotfix does agree with Microsoft that the "Windows XP Service Pack 3" is indeed just a collection of hotfixes and not any official SP3. We have recently updated our language on a number of pages warning users that the fixes we provide are an unofficial pack and that only expert Windows users should install them at their own will.

The being said, we disagree with Microsoft in terms of what SP3 is. Our pack is indeed a preview to what the official service pack will be, as these hotfixes will be in Service Pack 3 as proven by Microsoft's own knowledge base. Searching the keywords "kbwinxppresp3fix" and "kbwinxpsp3fix" at http://support.microsoft.com/search/?adv=1 will provide you an exact list of what we give out, nothing more, nothing less. Each of these hotfixes can be obtained for free from Microsoft by calling their support lines.

Will these hotfixes make your machine less stable? Yes, there is that possibility. Is that at the fault of The Hotfix? No. Regardless of which site these may have come from, they were created by Microsoft.

If you are a normal user, avoid the package. But if you're a Windows enthusiast, like the type of people who are website caters to, then give it a shot at your own will. Who knows, maybe it will actually fix a bug in Windows XP that should have never been there in the first place for you.

Ethan C. Allen

The Hotfix Admin

A "preview" of what Service Pack 3 will be?

OOOOOOOOOH...how exciting.

How about calling it what it is...it's a hotfix rollup. That's it. Microsoft probably wouldn't have cared or issued an official statement if they didn't believe that the intention was to decieve. And the fact that people had to go back and "update the language" on a number of pages just reeks of damage control.

A "preview" of what Service Pack 3 will be?

OOOOOOOOOH...how exciting.

How about calling it what it is...it's a hotfix rollup.  That's it.  Microsoft probably wouldn't have cared or issued an official statement if they didn't believe that the intention was to decieve.  And the fact that people had to go back and "update the language" on a number of pages just reeks of damage control.

586645389[/snapback]

Microsoft never actually made an official PR statement. The statement made was by a Microsoft Support agent in a user support group for people who need help with computer topics (meaning not computer experts). In fact, The Hotfix has not been officially contacted by Microsoft about any of this and has heard and read the post from third parties.

Regardless what some people think, there are people out there who are very happy that we're providing them these fixes, and there are people who are excited. We've seen our traffic increase by 10,000 hits per day and we're going to keep moving forward from here.

And by the way, a service pack is just that... a hotfix rollup.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The sweet release of death has never looked more appealing.
    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Doesn't DDG mainly use Bing?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      485
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      70
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      58
    5. 5
      neufuse
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!