Recommended Posts

Over the weekend, Windows Vista build 5231 leaked to the Web, offering users a glance at some upcoming features that Microsoft will be adding to future Community Technical Preview (CTP) and beta releases. Build 5231 is highly unstable--barely usable, in fact--but an interesting preview of things to come.

Highly unstable & barely usable :blink: That doesn't sound like progress to me :no: Yes I know it is still beta, but Paul is making sound like it is worse then build 5219.

http://www.windowsitpro.com/Article/Articl...48069.html?Ad=1

Over the weekend, Windows Vista build 5231 leaked to the Web, offering users a glance at some upcoming features that Microsoft will be adding to future Community Technical Preview (CTP) and beta releases. Build 5231 is highly unstable--barely usable, in fact--but an interesting preview of things to come.

Highly unstable & barely usable :blink: That doesn't sound like progress to me :no: Yes I know it is still beta, but Paul is making sound like it is worse then build 5219.

http://www.windowsitpro.com/Article/Articl...48069.html?Ad=1

586651493[/snapback]

Has anyone tried this build? How stable is it really?

Paul Thurrot admitted it!!! :|

586651713[/snapback]

That's true, but Neowin isn't responable for his actions and we've been told:

Reminder:

...  Admitting to downloading it, helping others find it, or asking about how to get it is not allowed.

586651137[/snapback]

I will wait till it appears on connect :)

586651857[/snapback]

While it may carry the same build number of 5231, it's possible that a newer iteration of it will appear on Connect. I don't know if it will or won't be the same build exactly, just pointing out that it doesn't have to be... Much like the pre-PDC build shwon on Neowin was an earlier iteration of 5219.

Is the build unstable because of this?

First of all, let me get a few things straight: THIS BUILD WAS NOT LEAKED BY UX.Evolutions!! We won't ever leak builds on the site or where ever. The history of the leak is as following: on one way or another ChrisNT123 managed to get the 5231 nuked ISO. The ISO was nuked because all file names where truncated during the ISO creation process. ChrisNT123 managed to fix this nuked ISO partly, he just renamed all files which he saw by hand via the file properties. Though the most files still aren't fixed. When he had enough files fixed to make it run, he started to give it out to a selected group of friends.

From http://www.uxevolutions.com/

How the heck did Chris get it though? ..that is what I'm really wondering.

586652525[/snapback]

He got it from me. And i've got it from a friend of my sister's girlfriend who has an uncle that knows someone from microsoft and that guy knows someone at symantec that knows somebody from the asian microsoft department.

Really mr "L33T h3ckers" ... You will never find out, it would be stupid if you would know how he got it.

*Tired of newbies calling theirselve l33t h3ckerz"

He got it from me. And i've got it from a friend of my sister's girlfriend who has an uncle that knows someone from microsoft and that guy knows someone at symantec that knows somebody from the asian microsoft department.

Really mr "L33T h3ckers" ... You will never find out, it would be stupid if you would know how he got it.

*Tired of newbies calling theirselve l33t h3ckerz"

586652603[/snapback]

Well, don't worry, the key used to install it is unique, although the PDC Key can be used I heard, but I don't believe that. So, Microsoft will find out which one of the 10,000 employees leaked it and he or she will be fired. :)

Is the build unstable because of this?

From http://www.uxevolutions.com/

586652406[/snapback]

First of all, let me get a few things straight: THIS BUILD WAS NOT LEAKED BY UX.Evolutions!! We won't ever leak builds on the site or where ever. The history of the leak is as following: on one way or another ChrisNT123 managed to get the 5231 nuked ISO. The ISO was nuked because all file names where truncated during the ISO creation process. ChrisNT123 managed to fix this nuked ISO partly, he just renamed all files which he saw by hand via the file properties. Though the most files still aren't fixed. When he had enough files fixed to make it run, he started to give it out to a selected group of friends.

LOL :laugh: they are kidding its just working fine much better and stable then pre-beta2

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Which finger's fingernail are we talking about? I can see how not having this info can lead to massive differences in interpretation.
    • This Chinese company is reportedly developing a feature Apple and Samsung can only dream of by Hamid Ganji While companies like Apple and Samsung have been relatively conservative with their devices’ battery capacities in recent years, Chinese manufacturers have taken the competition to the next level by introducing significantly larger batteries. However, the latest report from China suggests that a local company may already be developing a smartphone with a whopping 14,000mAh battery. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claimed on Weibo that a smartphone maker is developing a device with a 14,000mAh battery. If true, it would be the largest battery ever used in a smartphone and could, in theory, provide up to a week of battery life on a single charge. The leaker did not reveal the name of the company behind the device, but there are some clues. This week, HONOR unveiled the X80 Pro Max in China with an 11,000mAh battery and 90W wired charging support. The company also launched the Honor Win in January, which packs a 10,000mAh battery. HONOR, a former subsidiary of Huawei, has a proven track record of developing smartphones with unusually large batteries. However, other Chinese brands, including Xiaomi, have also launched devices such as the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max with 7,500mAh batteries. Though Chinese users on Weibo also believe the company behind the new battery is HONOR. Interestingly, Digital Chat Station said the device with the 14,000mAh battery weighs around 220 grams, making it lighter than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 grams) and slightly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (214 grams). The iPhone 17 Pro Max currently packs a 5,088mAh battery in eSIM-only versions, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra features a 5,000mAh battery. Neither device is expected to see a dramatic increase in battery capacity in its next-generation successor. So when it comes to battery comparison, Chinese brands are unbeaten. HONOR smartphones are currently available in the EU, but the Chinese brand has no official presence in the United States due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. government.
    • Qualcomm takes on NVIDIA with new Dragonfly CPU and AI chips by Pradeep Viswanathan Microsoft, Google, Amazon, AMD, Meta, Apple, OpenAI, and several others have been developing their own chips for AI infrastructure. However, NVIDIA still remains the dominant player in the market. Today, Qualcomm announced a major expansion of its data center infrastructure portfolio to better compete with NVIDIA. The new lineup includes the Qualcomm Dragonfly C1000 CPU, Qualcomm High Bandwidth Compute technology, the Dragonfly AI300 inference accelerator, new connectivity products, and custom silicon solutions. Qualcomm claims that this new lineup improves performance per watt, token throughput, and total cost of ownership for AI data centers. The Dragonfly C1000 is a new data center CPU built with Qualcomm’s custom Oryon cores. This chip will feature more than 250 cores, frequencies above 5GHz, and a chiplet-based design. Qualcomm claims that this new C1000 can deliver more than 2x better performance per watt compared to existing server CPU offerings based on specifications. The Dragonfly C1000 will support PCIe Gen 7 with more than 2TB/s of connectivity, along with CXL, advanced RAS features, and both air and liquid cooling. Qualcomm expects the Dragonfly C1000 to be commercially available in 2028. Additionally, Qualcomm and Meta announced a multi-year, multi-generation agreement under which Qualcomm will supply Dragonfly C1000 data center CPUs for Meta’s next-generation server fleet. Qualcomm also announced High Bandwidth Compute, a new near-memory computing architecture designed to address AI’s memory bandwidth bottleneck. HBC Gen 1 will debut with the Dragonfly AI250, which is expected to sample in mid-2027. The AI250 will deliver 133TB/s per card, an 18x increase in effective memory bandwidth compared to the AI200 with LPDDR5X. The new Dragonfly AI300 with HBC Gen 2 is a rack-level AI inference platform from Qualcomm. Qualcomm claims that the AI300 can deliver 4x to 8x better performance per watt compared to existing GPU-based architectures based on memory bandwidth per watt per card. The Dragonfly AI300 is expected to be available in 2028.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      136
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!