PS3 May not be fully backwards compatible...


Recommended Posts

PS3 May not be fully backwards compatible...

According to reports, a Sony spokesman said that it is hard to say if the PS3 will be completely backwards compatible, they are aiming to make it as backwards compatible as possible however.

We?ve plenty discussed Xbox 360 backward compatibility issues over the last few months, but we?ve nary addressed what?s in store for Sony?s PlayStation 3. Maybe it was the PlayStation 2?s recent difficulties in playing old (and even new) games that re-prompted the question, but it?s almost like people have been taking it for granted that the PS3 would be able to play PS2 games?especially after precedent was set by having the PS2 play original PlayStation games and they ran their it?s-gonna-be-backwards-compatible E3 launch in spite of Microsoft?s then-soft stance on the issue. But after Sony?s recent PS2 debacle overseas, it was reported that Sony spokesperson Reiko Sakamoto told the press, ?It?s hard to say the PlayStation 3 will be 100 percent backwards compatible, but as we said earlier this year we aim to make it so as much as possible.? If they?re having trouble making minor changes to the PS2 and actually leaving a bit of doubt as to whether the PS3 will work as expected, well, we?re not liking the sound of this, not one bit.

News Source : Joystiq.com

hmm another nail in the coffin for sony?

PS3 May not be fully backwards compatible...

According to reports, a Sony spokesman said that it is hard to say if the PS3 will be completely backwards compatible, they are aiming to make it as backwards compatible as possible however.

News Source : Joystiq.com

hmm another nail in the coffin for sony?

586728494[/snapback]

What coffin?

The PS2 isn't 100% backward compatible with all PS titles. And the Xbox 360 won't be with all Xbox titles.

I just don't see how a console not being 100% backward compatible will have any major negative impact.

Game consoles don't really have a history of being backward compatible. I think the way most companies see it is that it is hard to implement and digs into their profits. They don't want kids diving into bargain bins for games. They want them to buy the latest and greatest. It's where they get most of their money. Be glad they are even thinking of any backward compatability. It gives them a larger game selection to choose from at launch and that's all.

first off, i think it wont be compatible with very few games, and second, who cares? really when i bought a ps2, did i rush home and put my ps1 games in it? i think to this day i havent played a single ps1 game on my ps2. pointless, i cant look back unless its really old like my snes and genesis, but i got all that on my computer via emulation

What coffin?

The PS2 isn't 100% backward compatible with all PS titles. And the Xbox 360 won't be with all Xbox titles.

I just don't see how a console not being 100% backward compatible will have any major negative impact.

586728547[/snapback]

Well Sony has been yelling to anyone they will listen that they have backwards compatibilty so this is a biiger deal for the PS3 then say the 360.

Well Sony has been yelling to anyone they will listen that they have backwards compatibilty so this is a biiger deal for the PS3 then say the 360.

586728669[/snapback]

They still have backward compatibility, maybe just not with 100% of their back-catalogue.

Well Sony has been yelling to anyone they will listen that they have backwards compatibilty so this is a biiger deal for the PS3 then say the 360.

586728669[/snapback]

It's a bigger deal for the PS3 since they have been "yelling" about backwards compatability? Didn't XBox360 also "scream at the top of their lungs" that they would have backwards compatablility. I think it's a bigger deal for the XBox360 since they "screamed at the top of their lungs" whereas Sony has only been "yelling". :p

Nail in the coffin as sony have boasted about PS3 being "Fully" backwards compatible at E305 and they were having a go at M$ as that does not have full backwards compatibility.

More and more promises by sony are being broken, realisticly they are not very reliable anymore. Thier most successful console for me has to have been the PS1 (partially becoz there was hardly any other competition apart from the N64).

They simply say this to cover their asses. There will always be games that won't work (just like there are psx games that do not work on the ps2) and this just serves to keep expectations realistic. I don't think it'll be a problem for most of the market.

hmm another nail in the coffin for sony?

586728494[/snapback]

Oh please, you sound rediculous.

I can't think of one console or the PC for that matter that is 100% backwards compatible. The GBA has problems playing some older games, PS2 has problems with some PS1 games, the PC can't play many old games even using the DOSBox, etc. It isn't that big of a deal.

rediculous as i may sound but the way sony is handling things recently is not good.

and yes it is another blow to them as more and more feats are going to be sacrificed.

Network funtions were first to go and more were to follow.

rediculous as i may sound but the way sony is handling things recently is not good.

and yes it is another blow to them as more and more feats are going to be sacrificed.

Network funtions were first to go and more were to follow.

586729204[/snapback]

How are they handling things badly? So network functions dropped and some random PS1 and PS2 games not working are going to stop the majority of people from buying it?
How are they handling things badly?  So network functions dropped and some random PS1 and PS2 games not working are going to stop the majority of people from buying it?

586729459[/snapback]

have you been asleep in the last few days or summit. seriously wake up.

Sony is recieving negative publicity recently becase certain developers are un-happy etc etc and now this. maybe if your read other threads in the forum you would know. Also who said that people wont buy it?

if sony made something called sony sh*t then i bet people would still buy it only coz it wud have a sony logo on it. People will still buy the PS3 regardless of what it is capeble of. Maybe coz they want it to go with thier HD Sony TV and surround sound system. or maybe becoz its a sony product.....

:rolleyes:

have you been asleep in the last few days or summit. seriously wake up.
I need to wake up? You are the one who thinks backwards compatability is a nail in a console's coffin for a few games.
Sony is recieving negative publicity recently becase certain developers are un-happy etc etc and now this. maybe if your read other threads in the forum you would know.
Yes and developers were unhappy with the developing for the PS2 yet they still made games and it has the largest game library. Developers are going to develop for the console with the largest fanbase or whatever company will pay them for exclusives no matter how difficult it is to program. It is all about money for game developers, they could care less about the difficulty of programming for a console no matter how much they complain about it.
if sony made something called sony sh*t then i bet people would still buy it only coz it wud have a sony logo on it. People will still buy the PS3 regardless of what it is capeble of. Maybe coz they want it to go with thier HD Sony TV and surround sound system. or maybe becoz its a sony product.....
Did it ever come across your mind that people may like games that come out on the PS2 and that is why they bought it? Edited by Ridley Norfair

Game compatibility is not really going to bother me or many people and I dont think it will be a major selling point people will buy the PS3 because of new games and graphics. However sony lied again and yet another feature being removed from the PS3, next thing they will remove is the cell processor.lol

Everyone knew sony will do this, they make all sorts of claims a year or two before they launch a console and hype it up then slowly and systematically remove all the extra feature the sony fanboys boasted about.

Game compatibility is not really going to bother me or many people and I dont think it will be a major selling point people will buy the PS3 because of new games and graphics. However sony lied again and yet another feature being removed from the PS3, next thing they will remove is the cell processor.lol

Everyone knew sony will do this, they make all sorts of claims a year or two before they launch a console and hype it up then slowly and systematically remove all the extra feature the sony fanboys boasted about.

586729674[/snapback]

They didn't lie. They said it would be backwards compatible and it still will be. There's simply a chance that some off market game may not work in the new system due to nuances in the code. MS is saying the same basic thing.

Because some of us will still need to have two HUGE console under the TV set instead of one.

K'

586729878[/snapback]

The percentage of people who own and will care about the few off games that won't work will be too small to worry about.

It's a bigger deal for the PS3 since they have been "yelling" about backwards compatability?  Didn't XBox360 also "scream at the top of their lungs" that they would have backwards compatablility.  I think it's a bigger deal for the XBox360 since they "screamed at the top of their lungs" whereas Sony has only been "yelling". :p

586728849[/snapback]

MS hasnt been "screamed at the top of their lungs" that they'd have full compatability, they've been saying the top selling games, and then from there the games that sold less etc etc.

MS hasnt been "screamed at the top of their lungs" that they'd have full compatability, they've been saying the top selling games, and then from there the games that sold less etc etc.

586729887[/snapback]

That's correct. They plan on fully supporting the top 100 selling games. They figure if the emulator is capable of running those, it should handle most of the other games well.

first off, i think it wont be compatible with very few games, and second, who cares? really when i bought a ps2, did i rush home and put my ps1 games in it? i think to this day i havent played a single ps1 game on my ps2. pointless, i cant look back unless its really old like my snes and genesis, but i got all that on my computer via emulation

i agree with that the 1st PS1 games look so bad vs PS2, and with me about the xbox360 not play all xbox games, i dont care (i got my xbox in early 2004 so i dont have that many old xbox games)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
    • If you don’t get lucky with Valve’s Steam Machine reservation system, you can make your own Steam Machine instead. Valve says that “starting with the SteamOS 3.8 release, you can put together your own Steam Machine using whatever PC parts you want.” SteamOS 3.8.10 launched last week with a slew of updates, including “improved compatibility with recent Intel and AMD platforms.” Alongside that improved compatibility, Valve is giving gamers the green light to install SteamOS on their own desktops. In an interview with The Verge, Valve’s Pierre-Loup Griffais said Valve has been “rolling out improvements to [SteamOS] so it’s more compatible with desktop hardware,” including eventual support for Nvidia graphics. Griffais says Valve has “a growing team” working on Nvidia driver support for SteamOS, adding, “We’re collaborating with Nvidia very closely.” While he mentioned that Nvidia support might not come this year, Griffais emphasized that “it’s certainly something that we’re working on in the background.”     Subscription not needed: https://archive.fo/Tssfc Subscription needed: https://www.theverge.com/games/953411/valve-steamos-desktop-nvidia
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!