PS3 May not be fully backwards compatible...


Recommended Posts

It's a bigger deal for the PS3 since they have been "yelling" about backwards compatability?  Didn't XBox360 also "scream at the top of their lungs" that they would have backwards compatablility.  I think it's a bigger deal for the XBox360 since they "screamed at the top of their lungs" whereas Sony has only been "yelling". :p

586728849[/snapback]

I have been following all 3 consoles very close, and I don't remember MS ever yelling it. If I recall correctly, they have stated from the beginning it will support the top games. Sony is the one that has been yelling out all its features from the beginning

You're all right, this isn't really that big an issue, and PS3 will probably still lead the market in the next gen. But what really bothers me is that stuff like this happens from time to time with Sony, proving that they're not a reliable company. They just like to create a huge hype, trash the competition, promise a lot of stuff, and then little by little taking stuff away, and when reality hits, it's not so big a thing as they promised (they should consider a career in politics). And the sad part is that people don't realise it, but instead ignore it, as "ooh, it's Sony, it makes you cool, I don't care if they trash this or that, even though they promised".

Anyway, that's my opinion, I just wishpeople would open their eyes a little. The PS3 will still be a very good console, and prolly get many good games, but if people would start to complain when they pull off stuff like his, they (Sony) would prolly try and do a better job to please the market and make their console better.

MS hasnt been "screamed at the top of their lungs" that they'd have full compatability, they've been saying the top selling games, and then from there the games that sold less etc etc.

586729887[/snapback]

Ummm, if you would notice I was mocking the previous poster and his use of the word yelling.

Edited by mufdvr3669
I have been following all 3 consoles very close, and I don't remember MS ever yelling it. If I recall correctly, they have stated from the beginning it will support  the top games. Sony is the one that has been yelling out all its features from the beginning

You're all right, this isn't really that big an issue, and PS3 will probably still lead the market in the next gen. But what really bothers me is that stuff like this happens from time to time with Sony, proving that they're not a reliable company. They just like to create a huge hype, trash the competition, promise a lot of stuff, and then little by little taking stuff away, and when reality hits, it's not so big a thing as they promised (they should consider a career in politics). And the sad part is that people don't realise it, but instead ignore it, as "ooh, it's Sony, it makes you cool, I don't care if they trash this or that, even though they promised".

Anyway, that's my opinion, I just wishpeople would open their eyes a little. The PS3 will still be a very good console, and prolly get many good games, but if people would start to complain when they pull off stuff like his, they (Sony) would prolly try and do a better job to please the market and make their console better.

586730212[/snapback]

I agree, you summed up my thoughts pretty much, except I think Xbox360 will be the new console king

I agree, you summed up my thoughts pretty much, except I think Xbox360 will be the new console king

586730480[/snapback]

Maybe, but it's going to be hard. Xbox doesn't have as many exclusives, which in my opinion is what makes you decide on a console, but then again, all PS exclusives come from third parties, so, if MS pays ...

Personally, I think what you're seeing is a response to the different philosophies of these two companies.

Microsoft aims to underpromise and overdeliver.

Sony aims to make as much hype as possible as early as possible and what they actually ship is a secondary concern.

Thing is, out of the 1000 XBOX games(according to GS) there are, 360 will only support the top 100 of them.

Now let's see. PS2 has 1900 games. And... PS1 has 1800 games. So out of 3700 Sony's PS2 doesn't support about 50 of them. In other words the PS2 supports about 98.6% of the games on Playstation 1 and 2. While the 360 has 10%. Now let's say, the PS3 doesn't support 200 games additional games. That'll be 93% of all the games on PS1, and PS2.

That's pretty damn good if you ask me, better effort that Microsoft is making anyways.

Sony Magic.  Only crappy consoles like the 360 use emulation.  Stupid piece of crap 360.

586730060[/snapback]

Hmm... do you even know the advanges of emulation?

Higher Resolutions.

Higher Frame Rates.

Crisper Textures.

If you have any experience with this stuff you will know.

Thing is, out of the 1000 XBOX games(according to GS) there are, 360 will only support the top 100 of them.

Now let's see. PS2 has 1900 games. And... PS1 has 1800 games. So out of 3700 Sony's PS2 doesn't support about 50 of them. In other words the PS2 supports about 98.6% of the games on Playstation 1 and 2.  While the 360 has 10%. Now let's say, the PS3 doesn't support 200 games additional games. That'll be 93% of all the games on PS1, and PS2.

That's pretty damn good if you ask me, better effort that Microsoft is making anyways.

586730553[/snapback]

Umm... where did they ever say the X360 would only support 100 Xbox games? Oh wait, they didn't, and you just made that up.

i dont care tbh, gamers always say "oh i want backwards compatability" but after 3 months or so nobody plays the older games anyway (other than people who took those games majorly seriously) and for those classic games but thats it really.

its not that important.

Umm... where did they ever say the X360 would only support 100 Xbox games?  Oh wait, they didn't, and you just made that up.

586730744[/snapback]

well microsoft did say, EXCLUSIVE xbox games, so that would be.... Halo and Halo 2, YEY!!!! im so looking forward towards this system....

Gears of War is gonna be crayzeh!

Umm... where did they ever say the X360 would only support 100 Xbox games?  Oh wait, they didn't, and you just made that up.

586730744[/snapback]

I could have swore someone said Microsoft would support only the top selling 100 games. o.o;

And: http://www.joystiq.com/entry/1234000607062969/

I guess we'll know next week what the number really is. Highly doubt it's more than 50% though.

I could have swore someone said Microsoft would support only the top selling 100 games. o.o;

And: http://www.joystiq.com/entry/1234000607062969/

I guess we'll know next week what the number really is. Highly doubt it's more than 50% though.

586731674[/snapback]

Yes, that was mentioned, but they didn't say "we are only support the top 100 titles" they said "it will support atleast the top 100 titles"

Meaning on release day the top 100 titles should work fine, not that no game except for the top 100 would work

if sony made something called sony sh*t then i bet people would still buy it only coz it wud have a sony logo on it. People will still buy the PS3 regardless of what it is capeble of. Maybe coz they want it to go with thier HD Sony TV and surround sound system. or maybe becoz its a sony product.....

:rolleyes:

586729528[/snapback]

That is the sad damn truth :(

I need to wake up?  You are the one who thinks backwards compatability is a nail in a console's coffin for a few games.

Yes and developers were unhappy with the developing for the PS2 yet they still made games and it has the largest game library.  Developers are going to develop for the console with the largest fanbase or whatever company will pay them for exclusives no matter how difficult it is to program.  It is all about money for game developers, they could care less about the difficulty of programming for a console no matter how much they complain about it.

Did it ever come across your mind that people may like games that come out on the PS2 and that is why they bought it?

586729563[/snapback]

THERES THE PROBLEM; Sony (as a company) is suffering economically. Thats another reasons experts are saying that Sony wont be able to deliver at 100% their super console.

Will the PS3 actually do anything to improve the graphics in PS1/2 Games. I know the PS2 did a crappy job of cleaning up PS1 games...

586729855[/snapback]

Games are written for a certain hardward. You just cant magically improve them

and how do you think the ps3 is going to run the older games? Emulation of the ps2's hardware.

586730025[/snapback]

Accually PS2 had PS1 elements in it to "emulate" hardware wise PS1 games...

Thing is, out of the 1000 XBOX games(according to GS) there are, 360 will only support the top 100 of them.

Now let's see. PS2 has 1900 games. And... PS1 has 1800 games. So out of 3700 Sony's PS2 doesn't support about 50 of them. In other words the PS2 supports about 98.6% of the games on Playstation 1 and 2.  While the 360 has 10%. Now let's say, the PS3 doesn't support 200 games additional games. That'll be 93% of all the games on PS1, and PS2.

That's pretty damn good if you ask me, better effort that Microsoft is making anyways.

586730553[/snapback]

I honestly dont belive that Xbox has 1000 games and the PS2 has 1900....There is something wrong with those numbers.

and how do you think the ps3 is going to run the older games? Emulation of the ps2's hardware.

586730025[/snapback]

No. The same of the PS2: embeded hardware to control I/O (PS1 processor).

Sony don't need emulation, because is excelence in hardware.

if sony made something called sony sh*t then i bet people would still buy it only coz it wud have a sony logo on it. People will still buy the PS3 regardless of what it is capeble of. Maybe coz they want it to go with thier HD Sony TV and surround sound system. or maybe becoz its a sony product.....

:rolleyes:

586729528[/snapback]

Maybe people are buying the system because it has good games on it. If I like the games that they are providing, why does it matter if I can't play the 50 or so previous system games? I already own a 360 (and waiting for it to come here), and I plan on getting the other systems. Just because people buy the system does not make them as dense as you are.

have you been asleep in the last few days or summit. seriously wake up.

Sony is recieving negative publicity recently becase certain developers are un-happy etc etc and now this. maybe if your read other threads in the forum you would know. Also who said that people wont buy it?

if sony made something called sony sh*t then i bet people would still buy it only coz it wud have a sony logo on it. People will still buy the PS3 regardless of what it is capeble of. Maybe coz they want it to go with thier HD Sony TV and surround sound system. or maybe becoz its a sony product.....

:rolleyes:

586729528[/snapback]

If MS made something called MS poop then i bet people would still buy it only coz it wud have a MS logo on it. People will still buy the XBox360 regardless of what it is capeble of. Maybe coz they want it to go with thier MS Computer and media center. or maybe becoz its a MS product.....

I never knew making stupid fanboy posts was so easy. :woot:

Maybe people are buying the system because it has good games on it. If I like the games that they are providing, why does it matter if I can't play the 50 or so previous system games?

maybe people do buy them for the games... maybe? but there are quite a few cross playform games these days do i wouldnt be 100% sure on that statement. Sometimes certain exclusives do clinch it like FF series for the PS and Halo for the xbox....

I already own a 360 (and waiting for it to come here), and I plan on getting the other systems. Just because people buy the system does not make them as dense as you are.

ohh please spare me your crap, i currently own a PS1, PSP, sold my ps2 for my xbox, i have pre-ordered an xbox360 and im waiting on more info on the rev and PS3 as i am thinking of purchasing them when more info is availible and playable content is released for them.

Dense? i think not i do like to keep my options open and i hopefully will have all 3 major consoles next year or the year after.

Any queries take a look at my sig

:rolleyes:

hmm another nail in the coffin for sony?
have you been asleep in the last few days or summit. seriously wake up.

Sony is recieving negative publicity recently becase certain developers are un-happy etc etc and now this. maybe if your read other threads in the forum you would know. Also who said that people wont buy it?if sony made something called sony sh*t then i bet people would still buy it only coz it wud have a sony logo on it. People will still buy the PS3 regardless of what it is capeble of. Maybe coz they want it to go with thier HD Sony TV and surround sound system. or maybe becoz its a sony product.....

:rolleyes:

I know Sony has been shouting about it, but not having full backward compatibility will neither kill Sony's PS3, nor will kill the X360. For a person who says they are open-minded about the new systems, you certainly do a lot of PS3 bashing.

Edited by Hova
If MS made something called MS poop then i bet people would still buy it only coz it wud have a MS logo on it. People will still buy the XBox360 regardless of what it is capeble of. Maybe coz they want it to go with thier MS Computer and media center. or maybe becoz its a MS product.....

I never knew making stupid fanboy posts was so easy. :woot:

586732014[/snapback]

very original. you deserve a medal. But i think you are missing the point and you have no decent come back apart from just rewording what i wrote.

M$ is not as diverse as sony is. M$ makes windows and MCE and other stuff like Xbox.

Sony on the other hand makes almost every single electronic item, including PC's (sony viaos) which ironically have windows on them. So whose ya daddy.

:laugh:

I know Sony has been shouting about it, but not having full backward compatibility will neither kill Sony's PS3, nor will kill the X360. For a person who says they are open-minded about the new systems, you certainly do a lot of PS3 bashing.

586732029[/snapback]

Sorry mate if i put my self accross in that way, as for the PS3 bashing, well its just counter attacking the overhype created by sony. I have nothing against sony apart from that they over promise and under deliver.

very original. you deserve a medal. But i think you are missing the point and you have no decent come back apart from just rewording what i wrote.

586732043[/snapback]

Point. You had a point to your first post??? Did you ever think people bought a console cause they like the games??? Not because it was a certain brand and they had to be #1 fanboy to deal with some kind of e-penis inferiority complex. Maybe you was missing the point to my reply in how easy it is to come up with some overly exaggerated fanboy garbage.

Edited by mufdvr3669
well microsoft did say, EXCLUSIVE xbox games, so that would be.... Halo and Halo 2, YEY!!!! im so looking forward towards this system....

Gears of War is gonna be crayzeh!

586731479[/snapback]

They never said it would only be exclusive games.

They said the top-selling games. And they said that support for additional Xbox 1 games will be provided over time.

There should be a list pretty soon, and I'm expecting it to be pretty extensive.

Point.  You had a point to your first post???  Did you ever think people bought a console cause they like the games???  Not because it was a certain brand and they had to be #1 fanboy to deal with some kind of e-penis inferiority complex.  Maybe you was missing the point to my reply in how easy it is to come up with some overly exaggerated fanboy garbage.

586732100[/snapback]

i think the console comes first then the games. NO console = no games. its as simple as that. Before any games are announced i think the console gets announced first, correct me if im wrong. So obviously people will buy a console on what it is capeble of and not only its games. And just for the record i did not say games are not a factor when peoiple purchase consoles, where you have got that idea from i dont know but clearly you seem to be delusional

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
    • If you don’t get lucky with Valve’s Steam Machine reservation system, you can make your own Steam Machine instead. Valve says that “starting with the SteamOS 3.8 release, you can put together your own Steam Machine using whatever PC parts you want.” SteamOS 3.8.10 launched last week with a slew of updates, including “improved compatibility with recent Intel and AMD platforms.” Alongside that improved compatibility, Valve is giving gamers the green light to install SteamOS on their own desktops. In an interview with The Verge, Valve’s Pierre-Loup Griffais said Valve has been “rolling out improvements to [SteamOS] so it’s more compatible with desktop hardware,” including eventual support for Nvidia graphics. Griffais says Valve has “a growing team” working on Nvidia driver support for SteamOS, adding, “We’re collaborating with Nvidia very closely.” While he mentioned that Nvidia support might not come this year, Griffais emphasized that “it’s certainly something that we’re working on in the background.”     Subscription not needed: https://archive.fo/Tssfc Subscription needed: https://www.theverge.com/games/953411/valve-steamos-desktop-nvidia
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!