Recommended Posts

Ubuntu 5.10 "Breezy"

Theme ~ Clearlooks

Icons ~ SmoothGnome

Wallpaper ~ ParkBench posted by FiREFLi

gDesklets ~ iWeather, Rhythmbox "I like Cover Art", Calendar

desktoptn.jpg

586753552[/snapback]

Just wondering how you got that transparency on your applets. Is that real or simulated?

Distro: Slackware 10.2

WM: XFCE 4.2

Color theme: Sigel-Dark

BG: Baldy! (I wonder if anyone here has been there besides me?)

Icons: Misc found on InterfaceLift

Apps showing: Gkrellm and one other that yall can guess..

Anything look out of place? :D

http://www.resnet.trinity.edu/avaselaa/ss.jpg (1280x1024)

http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a148/Rus...son/horsies.png (1024x768, resized by the bucket)

Distro: Fedora Core 4

with, Some GNOME theme the doesn't have a name... :huh:

http://www.hedweb.com/animimag/horses-snow.htm <=teh wallpaper

And, no fancy icons or programs. Just the stock stuff Fedora gave me, with modded panels. Well... XMMS didn't come stock, neither did Limewire or Xine.

Remember, I'm a first time *nixer, a month and a half in. :)

Distro:  Slackware 10.2

WM: XFCE 4.2

Color theme:  Sigel-Dark

BG: Baldy! (I wonder if anyone here has been there besides me?)

Icons:  Misc found on InterfaceLift

Apps showing:  Gkrellm and one other that yall can guess..

Anything look out of place? :D

http://www.resnet.trinity.edu/avaselaa/ss.jpg (1280x1024)

586767230[/snapback]

Foobar2000 in wine? :laugh:

Mmmkay, here's my desktop. I just finished making a few modifications to it. :)

desktop.2005-11-06.jpg

Click for the full shot

Running Gentoo Linux with KDE 3.4.1

The widgets on the desktop are all Superkaramba themes;

- Amaroker for the cd case (more info pops up on mouse over)

- Dynbar for the "dock" (I can't find the original, but there is a modified version)

- SuperMonitor for the info in the bottom left

The icons are all from the Crystal Clear theme by Everaldo, and the window decoration is Knifty.

My current desktop is a theme based on an XP style called Royal Inspirat SE.

Screenshot-Royality-20051107-400x300.png

Icons are from the graphite suite, wallpaper is something I found using google image search.

Running Gnome 2.13.

I may or may not release the theme, depending on how I feel about it's readiness for public consumption and if I get permission to release it from the original author.

My current desktop is a theme based on an XP style called Royal Inspirat SE.

Screenshot-Royality-20051107-400x300.png

Icons are from the graphite suite, wallpaper is something I found using google image search.

Running Gnome 2.13.

I may or may not release the theme, depending on how I feel about it's readiness for public consumption and if I get permission to release it from the original author.

586779434[/snapback]

Hey thats cool, may i ask how u made that docking bar at the bottom of the page?, it would be much appreciated as i am new to linux.

This is not my desktop but... this is toooooo hot, plz try this (KDE) http://kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=30789

http://kde-look.org/content/pre1/30789-1.jpg

pd: screenshot on the way.

* over-sized inline image converted to a link *

Edited by markjensen

Lest day with ubuntu, very good distro.. but maybe debian/ubuntu is not for me.

trying SUSE in the morning (its 10:20 PM... mail service is closed right know :p )

snapshot8cq.th.jpg

Ubuntu 5.10

XFCE 4.2.2

etique/qttique XFCE with nautilus, menu and audio mod, by me.

how i do this horse that says stuff?

This is not my desktop but... this is toooooo hot, plz try this (KDE) http://kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=30789

http://kde-look.org/content/pre1/30789-1.jpg

pd: screenshot on the way.

* over-sized inline image converted to a link *

586786618[/snapback]

It looks nice but the Mac OS style menu bar doesn't work with all apps so it's not very usefull.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!