Revolution Graphics Will Be Equal To Competitors


Recommended Posts

300pxrevconscreen0014wx.jpg

Much of the rumours and speculation around the Nintendo Revolution have been aimed at its graphics capabilities. Many have said that Nintendo?s next-gen console will not compete with the impressive power of the Playstation 3 and the Xbox 360

A Spanish website called MeriStation conducted an interview with Nintendo big wig, Jim Merrick recently, in which he quickly put to rest some of the misinformation surrounding Nintendo?s place amongst Microsoft and Sony.. In the interview, Jim addressed one question that has been in the back of the minds of many a Nintendo fans - How good will the Nintendo Graphics be? Jim explained a ?difference will not exist? between the Nintendo Revolution and the competition.

The statement is reassuring in light of the many game screens shots and video clips for both the Xbox 360 and the PlayStation 3 already available online.

Of course, until Nintendo and game publishers release their own screen shots and video clips we are still unable to form our own opinions.

With the Xbox 360scheduled for release on November 22nd Nintendo has a great deal of ground to make up in order to win over the anxious game fans who will have already had a taste of the next generation gaming

Source: JoyStiq

nintendo has always approached marketing differently. famously stating the capabilities of the gamecube in terms of fully effected/textured pixels or polygons, as opposed to sony and microsoft stating their capabilities with unaffected/untextured pixels or polys. the numbers came out lower. but then when you look at what the gamecube is capable of compared to the ps2, are they really that different? ps2 might push more polys, but it doesn't have shaders.

nintendo also likes to take the intelligent, and considered approach to hardware design, again look at the size of the gamecube compared to the original ps2 and xbox. astounding really.

on past form it's not hard to imagine revolution's capabilities being around the same sort of levels as it's competitors. especially in terms of the kind of graphical effects that can be pushed out by the console - if not in terms of raw number crunching power. but then nintendo have always been about the games, not the technology.

i think the difference will be almost as good as the others 2 but not better or the same(i think Graphics will not be bad but not as good)

_____________________________

how do people get the things at the bottom like RichieNine9?(family guy fan)

Though I'd like this to happen, I doubt it will; that is, unless the time gap between 360 launch and Revolution launch is enough for Nintendo to make up for the "subordinate" tech specs---compared to 360, specifically. There's no way Revolution will come close to PS3 tech specs since they'll likely be launched around the same timeframe so Sony and Big N will have the same pool of technology to fill their consoles with. (Iwata recently confirmed that Revolution won't launch before the end of March/end Nintendo's fiscal year, check cube.ign.com, so that'll give Nintendo at least four months to regroup).

Merrick may have also chosen his words carefully, as Nintendo reps always do. His response was to a question about "graphics" and not tech specs, so Nintendo may bust out with another attempt at using lackluster tech to produce graphics that are on-par with the competitors' (as they did with Gamecube... yes XBOX graphics are naturally more impressive but sometimes there is little difference esp. for cross-platform games. Remember how RE4 came out which defied everyone's expectations as far as Gamecube's graphical potential).

Screw graphics.  I'd get a Revolution for the new controller.  The only game could be Super Mario 64 and I'd still get a Revolution.

I'm probably the only one here with the kahunas to say "Screw graphics.", but...  that's how I feel.

586751556[/snapback]

Screw graphics.

Graphics are good enough for me currently.

Oh and GoogleNinja = post 666.

that's a really ignorant statement. Until we find out how the new control performs under real world conditions i'd be happy if you kept your trap shut. For all we know nintendo has set yet another industry standard, such as the D-pad, analog joystick, shoulder buttons, dance pads, and rumble feature.

Oh yeah, give me a gimmicky controller over actual power anyday  :rolleyes:

586751563[/snapback]

i rather great gameplay over graphics anyday. nothing worse than great graphics in a game you don't want to play. it doesnt have to be bleeding edge graphics if you ask me. if i'm compelled or engrossed in the game the graphics need only to support that. if i wanted pretty pictures i'd go to a museum and not buy any console.

and rap4life, not sure how he got that sig but its way to big for neowin. he needs to cut that down a bit.

Well somehow I believe this is possible - High Def does take quite a bit more power both from the GPU & CPU, thus we may see a performance hit and lower frame rates since HD requires more power. However, since Revolution isn't outputting in HD it should have more power to available for graphics and thus allowing it to a have a higher frame rate. Also on IGN, some developers were saying the same thing.

This isn't impossible

I can't tell the difference between the Game Cube and the XBrick's graphics.

And it's like a 30 pound difference.

586751784[/snapback]

Yeah, considering the Xbox only weighs a little over 8 pounds :whistle:

hehe.. you know if the Revolution's graphics are any where near the X360's, Nintendo would've over hype it as better than the competitions, just as how Sony is hyping the PS3. They wouldn't say it is equal to the competition. This means that the Revolution's graphics is not as good as the X360's.

doubtful but hopeful

586751508[/snapback]

Ditto, but ...

Screw graphics.  I'd get a Revolution for the new controller.  The only game could be Super Mario 64 and I'd still get a Revolution.

I'm probably the only one here with the kahunas to say "Screw graphics.", but...  that's how I feel.

586751556[/snapback]

... Screw graphics indeed. In my opinion, the current state of GCN is enough for me. I mean, what more detail could you want out of Mario Sunshine (beautiful water and sunsets!), Metroid Prime, and even Zelda (both TP and WW). Perhaps maybe a few better textures and stuff, but it would maybe require 2 or 3 times the current power, which is pretty much what they are saying it will be.

I doubt it will be equal. But if Revolution can produce graphics close to the competition and deliver a whole new gamingexperience..., they can in fact do very strong.

What do 360 and PS3 deliver for the next-gen other than improved graphics? Very little actually. And they also target a more spesific group than Nintendo does. This could give Nintendo the edge over its competition.

But it's to early to say since none of the systems is out yet and the gap between the 360 and Revolution/PS3 is rather wide... I don't see the PS3 doing strongly since it's simular to the 360 in terms of graphics. And of the buyers realise that, I think they will go for a 360 and a Revolution instead of waiting for the PS3.

Edited by [X]-bYtE

Not that its impossible, but just as others are saying... The revolution is more about the gameplay rather than graphics.

And for those who are saying its not possible, I don't see why not. It may not be as powerful in terms of processor speed (as far as we know at this moment) but the graphics card is pretty high end.

How do you figure?

586752066[/snapback]

Wel. Sony and MS are targeting hardcore and core gamers. You can simple figure that out by looking on what they are marketing the consoles for, graphics. While Nintendo appeal to more non-gamers, core gamers and casual gamers than its competition (next-gen).

Nintendo is trying to expand their marked by appealing to other than its core and hardcore -gamers. While both Sony and MS is looking more in the direction of their previous gamers that bought their last consoles.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!