Revolution Graphics Will Be Equal To Competitors


Recommended Posts

what Tjalian said. i'm sure that Nintendo will have many great games that also utilize the interesting features of it's remote..... as well as probably some games like i mentioned. one of the things that always ****ed me off about games that had swords..... is that you never got to control WHERE the sword went when you wanted it to be there. Like one of the earlier Star Wars PC games.... think it was for Episode 1. don't remember what it did to deflect laser shots with the lightsaber...... but often times the lasers would go right passed the lightsaber and hit you anyway...... usually when you were a few shots away from death..... seemingly in spite. Plus...... all you ever see are shooters anyway. i'm sure that if people see a game where you actually roam around with swords, say even a console-based MMORPG, where you actually swing the sword the way you want, as hard as you want, guard when you must, and even do PVP, sword dueling with a REAL PERSON over net play..... people will more than likely be drawn into that. why? because it is different. Shooters on Consoles are getting real old (last good shooter i've played on a console was Goldeneye for the N64. why? cause it was simple, had great gameplay value, and was easy to play. Halo/Halo 2? pain in the arse to get used to. using one stick to aim, the other to walk around, pressing down the control stick to do another function (was it zooming?), one button to switch your weapons, another to switch your grenade type, another to throw your grenades, another to shoot the gun, another to melee, another to jump.......... one reason why Shooters aren't near as good on consoles as they are on PC's. Shooters on Revolution will be a different story due to it's controller being motion sensing, as well as a gun. no more using a control stick to aim.

Also, i don't believe Nintendo is in 3rd.... nor has it been in third i believe. if anything, PS2 and GC are about equal. many people probably say the same. and i think it'll be a slight margin between first and second for a while (between Revo and 360), because i heard a cashier at the local WalMart say that he heard PS3 has been delayed till '07 due to complications.

Nintendo WILL be able to make games that the competition won't be able to stack up to...... their controller gurantee's that, as long as game developers take full effect of what it can do. it's not opinion, it's fact. it's controller alone can do stuff that the PS3/Xbox 360 can't do even if they tried.

Edited by ElementalDragon

Well, it's in my opinion that sales clerks are generally idiots (eg. they have no more information than someone like us [probably less even] who keeps well updated on console news). And there is no firm date on the PS3, tho it sounds like it will be launched sometime 2006 anyways (with delays). The clerk at walmart is just making a guess.

Overall, I can agree with your argument, I've been waiting for a MMOFPSF (First Person Sword Fighter) Ever since seeing the first LotR movie and invisioning a game like that. So hopefully the Rev will deliver that. That game alone would make this console worth it!

revolution, the gamecube was a powerful system .

AI is more about how the programmers program it and less of what its run on .

example in the 1930's a robot caleld electro(i think it was called) had some ai and he didnt even use transistors.

he spoke. moved and everything no chips wha so ever. he was very impressive for being built in the 30's.

just because the rev doesnt have like 6 cores it doesnt mean anything. the thing that matters is the programmers.

ati has said you could even do physics on their latest batch of their gpus .

Exactly, look at quake 3 bots... turn the graphics all the way down, it'll run on a system as long as it has "mmx technology" (LOL!) And those bots will perform more human than ANY current gen B game, and even alot of the A games. And this is quake 3 we're talking about - it's ancient and could run on a 233 mHz system no problem.

just because the rev doesnt have like 6 cores it doesnt mean anything. the thing that matters is the programmers.

586773587[/snapback]

Serious? Damn, I'm gunna send off my old P75mhz and get some games developed for it then.

I would say what the developers make depends on what they're given.

Elemental Dragon:

Last time I checked, Twilight Princess was still being developed for GameCube?

i don't believe Nintendo is in 3rd.... nor has it been in third i believe.  if anything, PS2 and GC are about equal.  many people probably say the same.

586773539[/snapback]

I don't care what you believe, or what "many people probably say." The fact is that the PS2 is far and away 1st, with Xbox coming in 2nd, and GameCube coming in a close 3rd.
I don't care what you believe, or what "many people probably say."  The fact is that the PS2 is far and away 1st, with Xbox coming in 2nd, and GameCube coming in a close 3rd.

586776304[/snapback]

In terms of popularity, the XBox would be number one, PS2 in second and Gamecube in third.

In terms of how good they are, they are so close it doesn't matter. I don't glance at them and see that one is clearly inferior. The majority of games can be played on all three, and each has a good set of exclusive games that are great fun.

Personally, I have a Gamecube, because of the low price and portability. And above all, I would prefer PC.

In terms of popularity, the XBox would be number one, PS2 in second and Gamecube in third.

586776339[/snapback]

No. I'm talking about worldwide marketshare, and my rankings are correct. They're not my (or anyone else's) opinion, they're simple facts.
Pc_Madness - I'm guessing they're going to make it a Gamecube game that can play on a gamecube, but when put into a Reviolution you'll be able to use the Revolution Controller to control Link(if you want).

586774590[/snapback]

Oh crap, forget about backwards compatibility. Good point, hopefully thats possible.

The thing is, most people won't want crap like that.  I certainly don't, and I have no doubt in my mind that the Revolution will come in third place again.  I think the margin between 2nd and 3rd will be much wider this time as well.

586769686[/snapback]

I don't care what you believe, or what "many people probably say."  The fact is that the PS2 is far and away 1st, with Xbox coming in 2nd, and GameCube coming in a close 3rd.

586776304[/snapback]

I disagree. Not only does the controller allows for new and innovative gameplay elements, but even if it turns out to be a "gimmick", people will prolly like it and use it just for those elements, and the refreshing feeling it'll bring.

Also, regarding the current console's positions, you're speaking in terms of installed userbase, which would be a good metric if every console you sold made a profit, or if even if you had profits those weren't eaten by the rest of your company.

Finally, I believe that the worst case scenario for Nintendo is that even if they remain 3rd in terms of consoles sold, they'll still make a lot of money cause they'll probably benefit from each one sold, which some others can't or probably won't be able to say. And I also believe that in that same scenario, the margins won't be as wide as they are now (and let's not forget the increase of people who will own more than one console).

Anyway, this is my opinion, and everyone has theirs, lest just wait and see how stuff comes out.

EDIT: Almost forgot, also, I believe Nintendo will have an extra boost this time around, with the cooler design, DVD playback, online gaming and all the money spent on it and all the hotspots. All of these features being things that players criticized for the GCN.

Edited by nav_uno

Jeremy1: for some reason you're kinda starting to sound like a fanboy for Xbox..... or PS2...... can't quite figure out which. honestly..... who the hell do you think cares about looking at the "worldwide market share" when they think of which consoles are better? i sure don't. everybody always says that just about every multi-platform game for Xbox, PS2, and GC will play better on the Xbox. well...... Soul Calibur 2 proved that wrong. the game looked exactly the same on all 3 consoles. don't ask me why Soul Calibur 3 is a PS2 exclusive..... kinda figured they would have done the same thing they did with SC2, having special characters for each console...... but oh well.

Pc_Madness: yeah, that's what i meant. probably just tweaking things here and there to make the experience even better once Revo comes out.

btw, does anybody know if Revolution is going to be it's official name, or is it still it's codename?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!