Samsung LNR238W? (23" LCD HDTV)


Recommended Posts

I have the 26" model of the TV (great TV btw) and I bought an HDMI to DVI cable to use DVI on my HTPC's DVI port and it just sucks, can't get it looking good at all. I hooked up a VGA cable and it looks GREAT. bangbang is right saying VGA is the best way, and I agree as I have the first hand experience with the line of TV's since mine is just a larger model.

I have the 26" model of the TV (great TV btw) and I bought an HDMI to DVI cable to use DVI on my HTPC's DVI port and it just sucks, can't get it looking good at all. I hooked up a VGA cable and it looks GREAT. bangbang is right saying VGA is the best way, and I agree as I have the first hand experience with the line of TV's since mine is just a larger model.

586810780[/snapback]

Great to know because.. Lmao I actually bought the 26" model myself. Bangbang already mentioned how bad the DVI to HDMI cable looks so I'm definetly thinking VGA would be a better choice.

May I ask? What brand of VGA cable did you use? A generic or something more higher quality? I'm having trouble finding both Monster's VGA cables and Belkin.. I really don't want to use a generic brand, especially on a 26" LCD TV.

Also.. Since this post is more active then the one I made for the 26" I'm wondering.. Does anyone else have issues on LCD's with colour banding? I mean truthfully I havn't tweaked the picture settings (and it has a My Colour Control where you can tweak the colours to an amazing degree) so there's probally a way to make it even less noticeable.

I only really notice it so far on STD tv (which looks ugly as hell on this tv btw lol. Not a big surprise considering the quality can't even reach 480i levels on television). Digital channels though do look better, though it's still 480i so it's not a great improvement. I also notice some colour banding in xbox games, but it's dependent on the game (Halo 2 for example very rarely has any and is a very colourful game).

I also realize the xbox is a four year old console, and the video card powering it is of the Geforce 3 family. Thus the IQ it has isn't on the same level as you're PC video card or what the Xbox360 will be able to produce. And we are talking about Component cables which are supposed to be of lesser quality then HDMI/VGA right?

On that note.. Can anyone recommend some kind of "Setup DVD" or something good for tweaking the colours and picture quality on your LCD tv?? I'm a perfectionist so I love getting the best quality possible out of my TV, however I don't have the expertise to tweak simply by looking at my TV, I need assistance ^_^.

And I know I'm bitching a bit about this TV, but truthfully so far it is amazing, even though lesser resolution doesn't look too great on it (because it's nowhere close to the native resolution of the tv) the clarity and colours are pheonominal. And there is no noticeable ghosting or issues with fast moving action. I'm very happy so far, but I won't be able to see what it truly is capable until xbox360 gets here.

Brand of VGA cable? I can't honeslty tell you, just probably one that came with something or another. It works fine and the PC looks great on the monitor. So even if is some generic cable, it still looks top notch to me, and I am not going to get another brand cause mine works great. I just have an HDMI to DVI cable now I have no idea what to do with, lmao, oh well, maybe i'll chuck it up on ebay.

Hi everyone! I'm new here.

Best Buy Canada just has the Samsung LNR238W on sale for $999 Canadian this week. I was looking into getting a new TV for Xbox360 and DVD viewing for my room.

Does anyone think this is a good price? I have heard prices are dropping on TVs... I can wait until new year, but does anyone think it'll be cheaper than this in the new year? What's the overall trend?

Just a link:

http://www.bestbuy.ca/catalog/proddetail.a...10061838&catid=

Also, I'm not sure about Best Buy, but if they offer me some 3 year warrenty, should I take it?

Another thing, please post some pros and cons of this model (or the 26 inch one)... I'd really appreciate hearing some more analysis on this model.

Thanks a bunch.

Hi everyone!  I'm new here.

Best Buy Canada just has the Samsung LNR238W on sale for $999 Canadian this week.  I was looking into getting a new TV for Xbox360 and DVD viewing for my room. 

Does anyone think this is a good price?  I have heard prices are dropping on TVs...  I can wait until new year, but does anyone think it'll be cheaper than this in the new year?  What's the overall trend?

Just a link:

http://www.bestbuy.ca/catalog/proddetail.a...10061838&catid=

Also, I'm not sure about Best Buy, but if they offer me some 3 year warrenty, should I take it?

Another thing, please post some pros and cons of this model  (or the 26 inch one)...  I'd really appreciate hearing some more analysis on this model.

Thanks a bunch.

586826107[/snapback]

That's not the 238W. It's the 237. I have no idea what the differences between the 7 series and the 8 series are but it's obviously a lesser model.

So far the lowest price for the 238W I've found is approx. $1100 from East Hamilton Radio. They also sell the 26" (which is what I bought from them) for around $1400.

That's not the 238W.  It's the 237.  I have no idea what the differences between the 7 series and the 8 series are but it's obviously a lesser model. 

Yikes, you're right. Is there any major differences between 237 and 238W? I checked samsung's site and can't really tell any differences....

Yikes, you're right.? Is there any major differences between 237 and 238W?? I checked samsung's site and can't really tell any differences....

586827161[/snapback]

Lol I have no idea! But honestly if you're close enough to East Hamilton Radio i'd just go for the 238W. It'll cost you $100 more but still.. Protects you incase there's some major difference between the two (chances are there isn't.. It's probally just an older revision of the same bloody tv lol).

Edit: I found some differences, the most being in the types of connections available:

237W:

HDMI Interface 1

Component 2(Y/Pb/Pr) in 2(480i/480p/720p/1080i)

S-Video in 1

Composite Video Inputs 2

PC input D-Sub15 pin

PC Audio in 1

238W:

Antenna in 1

HDMI in 1

Component (Y/Pb/Pr) in 2(480i/480p/720p/1080i)

S-Video in 1

A/V (RCA) in 1

PC input D-sub15 pin (VGA-WXGA)

PC Audio in Yes

Headphone out Yes

Anynet RS232 1

Seems a bit odd though.. This would mean the 237W has no tuner in it lol. Makes it a bit hard to watch tv. It also seems there's a model even above the 8W series, seems there's a 9D.. Biggest difference is 8ms timing and an ATSC tuner (HDTV tuner, though that's useless for me.. Way cable works here requires a box since the hdtv "channels" are completly digital and seperate from the analog).

Edited by MadFerIt2006
I believe the 27 lacks a tuner, as stated above. You only need a tuner if you're using an off air antenna anyway.

586830342[/snapback]

I have a question, something that might prove how much a newbie I really am lol.

I use digital cable, now the signal is pretty poor but I connect it using Coxial (SP?) to the TV. It also has composite connectors though, would that make it better quality? (it doesn't include the cables but when it comes to composite cheap and expensive cable doesn't matter too much).

Obviously the signal is coxial anyway, but maybe I'm losing out in some of the "digital box" benefits by connecting it to my tv via coxial. Maybe digital channels would look better while analog will not via composite?

I really need to switch to satellite lol, because honestly cable here is a joke.. The quality is so bloody awful not to mention if you want to get HDTV you need to buy an extremely overpriced $799 HDTV DVR (120gig drive.. I really don't think that is worth $799).

It's humourous, here in Canada we managed to get cable internet faster at much higher speeds/better prices (we still do actually).. Yet for HDTV we are getting horrid prices and poor hardware.

Thanks for helping out! Hope I'm not "hijacking" the thread...

Today I went to Best Buy and was going to buy the LNR237, but my first time buying a new TV is really hard.

There's all these brands that I haven't heard of and their image quality looks good. It's the same price, but has bigger screens.

Such as:

(Astar) http://www.bestbuy.ca/catalog/proddetail.a...498&catid=23243

(Mag) http://www.bestbuy.ca/catalog/proddetail.a...080&catid=23243

I read the LNR237 is pretty good, but what should I do in store to not be persuaded about these other ones... Or should I just run in and out with the Samsung one? lol

Thanks a lot!

Thanks for helping out!  Hope I'm not "hijacking" the thread...

Today I went to Best Buy and was going to buy the LNR237, but my first time buying a new TV is really hard.

There's all these brands that I haven't heard of and their image quality looks good.  It's the same price, but has bigger screens.

Such as:

(Astar) http://www.bestbuy.ca/catalog/proddetail.a...498&catid=23243

(Mag) http://www.bestbuy.ca/catalog/proddetail.a...080&catid=23243

I read the LNR237 is pretty good, but what should I do in store to not be persuaded about these other ones...  Or should I just run in and out with the Samsung one?  lol

Thanks a lot!

586830461[/snapback]

Well the most noticeable "lack" in the other two is the contrast ratio. Both aren't quite up to par with the Samsung tv. Now I think 3000:1 is an over-exaggeration for the Samsung, but it's definetly 1000+.

And neither sounds like a high-quality brandname to be honest.. I mean when it comes to televisions brand-name usually does mean a lot.

Another quick question... :} 

I heard about Samsung DNIe thing, is that good or bad?  any reviews on that?

586830547[/snapback]

It's supposed to improve image quality. You can't turn it off/on though.

There's a DNIE demo you can turn off/on (1/2 the screen is dnie and the other isn't).. Things look more a bit more washed out/too bright (in a bad way) with dnie off.

Honestly I can't tell you to what degree the difference is, I havn't had a chance to use anything on this TV that truly uses it's power (meaning something HD lol).

SDTV looks like crap, and Xbox is at 480p for most games so it doesn't look too great (Amped 2 is at 720p, granted internally it's much lower res, but it does look much better then 480p). I'll be getting an xbox360 on Tuesday (hopefully) and I'll post the results here.

I have a question, something that might prove how much a newbie I really am lol.

I use digital cable, now the signal is pretty poor but I connect it using Coxial (SP?) to the TV.  It also has composite connectors though, would that make it better quality? (it doesn't include the cables but when it comes to composite cheap and expensive cable doesn't matter too much).

Obviously the signal is coxial anyway, but maybe I'm losing out in some of the "digital box" benefits by connecting it to my tv via coxial.  Maybe digital channels would look better while analog will not via composite? 

I really need to switch to satellite lol, because honestly cable here is a joke.. The quality is so bloody awful not to mention if you want to get HDTV you need to buy an extremely overpriced $799 HDTV DVR (120gig drive.. I really don't think that is worth $799). 

It's humourous, here in Canada we managed to get cable internet faster at much higher speeds/better prices (we still do actually).. Yet for HDTV we are getting horrid prices and poor hardware.

586830434[/snapback]

Wow you have to pay for your cable boxes? Here in the US, we simply rent the boxes from our cable provider at a cost of about $4 a month. Anyway, it would look better on composite.

Wow you have to pay for your cable boxes? Here in the US, we simply rent the boxes from our cable provider at a cost of about $4 a month. Anyway, it would look better on composite.

586830622[/snapback]

Actually we don't "have" to buy the cable box, but typically the one that costs approx "4-10 dollars" is a huge pile of crap.

The HDTV one, with DVR is $25/month. I don't know about you but I'm not paying that much every bloody month for a box, it doesn't even include the HD channels! (I don't know about the U.S., but you have to pay for HDTV channels here! I mean the HD versions of the channels you already get).

Oh and if you decide to rent the box, you have to be with them for a minimum of 12 months.. So thats $300/year for the box alone.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Oh ok. Well actually monster is the official thirdparty cable provider this time around, and you can already order off the net the cables (they say nov.22nd release).

And you might be right about the DVI thing.. But the official site says it has HDMI, Component, Composite, S-video, DVI..

Glad to know it's worth the money though.

DVI is HDMI with enhacnments (if thats what you want to call it) its backwards compatible as long as you get the monster cable or other brands...

Ohhh it says it has PC Input D-sub 15 pin (VGA~WXGA)

That would be a normal VGA correct?

What would be better, DVI > HDMI convertor or using Analog VGA?

*EDIT* lol posted this at the same time as you. So I'm guessing that means you think VGA would work better. Alrighty :). Have any idea how good the quality is?

For the love of god don ever use the VGA or DVI/HDMI *now coughing up blood*

DVI is HDMI with enhacnments (if thats what you want to call it) its backwards compatible as long as you get the monster cable or other brands...

For the love of god don ever use the VGA or DVI/HDMI *now coughing up blood*

Lol that was a while ago, like I said in that PM I'm using the VGA for Xbox360 :p. Looks phenominal.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!