MIT Declines Free OS X for $100 Laptop. Demo Soon


Recommended Posts

A working prototype of the much anticipated MIT $100 laptop will be shown off at a U.N. technology conference on Wednesday. While there is still much development to be done, production could begin in late 2006 or early 2007, according to the Wall Street Journal.

At least two dozen countries have expressed a desire to purchase the laptop, with Brazil and Thailand the most interested. Although the device is aimed at children in developing countries, the state of Massachusetts is considering spending $54 million to give a laptop to every middle and high school student in the state.

Google, AMD, Red Hat, News Corp. and Brightstar have all pledged $2 million to a non-profit group called One Laptop Per Child, which oversees the project. Furthermore, five companies are vying to produce the system, according to officials.

Other technology players are also interested in joining the project. Microsoft chairman Bill Gates and strategy CTO Craig Mundie met with Nicholas Negroponte, MIT Media Lab's founding chairman, to discuss the project last week. While Microsoft is not formally involved with the project, discussions are ongoing to determine what role the company could play.

Apple even offered a helping hand, but it appears as if MIT was not interested. CEO Steve Jobs reportedly said Apple would provide free copies of Mac OS X for use in the laptop; however, officials declined as the operating system is not open source. It should be noted that a good deal of the Mac OS X operating system is indeed open source, as it is based on UNIX.

Full Story @ BetaNews

Apple got 0wned, Tell Jobs to shove that up his pipe and smoke it, :p

Just because he wants to spread Apples OS around why not give it for free or release OS X x86? Besides would it even run on the $100 laptop?

I think the rejection would lie in concerns that the offer may not always stand. Nothing like having it free one day and being without a supplier the next.

586814547[/snapback]

Haha..

"We'll give you free copies for the first wave. But when you start distributing them we'll make you pay XXX dollars per copy!" :x

or perhaps it might have been seen as some sort of massive advertising campaign... imagine 90% of computer users running OS X, if there is a massive production in these $100 notebooks for 3rd world students.

And yes, if you get them hooked on one type of OS, it's not exactly convenient to change it along the way, i.e. 5 years from now.

or perhaps it might have been seen as some sort of massive advertising campaign...  imagine 90% of computer users running OS X, if there is a massive production in these $100 notebooks for 3rd world students.

586814608[/snapback]

Don't you think RedHat is going to use this as an unofficial ad campaign too? No matter what, someone is going to benefit a little.

Don't you think RedHat is going to use this as an unofficial ad campaign too? No matter what, someone is going to benefit a little.

586814611[/snapback]

Well, Red Hat also donated millions of dollars and the OS WILL be 100% open source. Two things Apple didnt/doesnt bring to the table.

Nah uh. Red Hat charges for Enterprise Linux. The "free" flavour is Fedora.

586814858[/snapback]

They offer a service contract that you can pay for, but oddly enough, you can find their Red Hat Enterprise Linux offerings here: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/

No charge, of course.

^^^ Yes, there was another thread here announcing the concept was going forward. It mentioned that they were considering letting commercial manufacturers build and sell these for 'regular' consumers, at a markup - $200 was mentioned as a possible price point.

Sounds like a decent deal on a package that looks to be pretty cool (and with a hand-crank, so you can use it as long as you need to without access to a regular AC outlet). (Y)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Opinion. All you did was blame Democrats for everything. You offered nothing but a hit piece to support your pro Trump, anti union right wing ideology.
    • Excuse me for having an opinion, fella'... (Why am I not surprised?...) Congrats on your very informative post however...
    • By the sounds of that wall of Fox News propaganda gibberish attacking the Democratic Party you've already had plenty of "juices" flowing this morning. You've ruined what could have been a productive comment thread.
    • (Topic to get the juices flowing this Sunday morning!...) Actually, the situation has almost nothing to do with "lack of skills", especially since assembly-line skills can be taught to anyone, including Americans, certainly. Rather, the inadequacy-to-impossibility of large-scale tech manufacturing in America today, and the reasons why America finds tech manufacturing completely onerous in the 21st century, has to do with politically driven laws amid a plethora of non-scientific, utterly politicized "science-fact" that is patently false, punitive business taxation at every turn, an array of judicial fines of unimaginable scope and complexity, and, last but not least, American unionization strictures that serve to actually slay job creation and hobble all such manufacturing endeavors in America before they can get off the ground. Globalism emerged, they tell us, as the needed answer to American hubris and an unholy American drive to excel. Unless one is buried under mounds of political propaganda, it's easy to see the absurdity of labeling the employees of SpaceX, for instance, as "unskilled labor"... Etc. ad infinitum. At one time in the recent past, American manufacturing prowess was the envy of the world in a wide variety of technical fields! The current federal and state government roadblocks against America becoming competitive globally in tech manufacturing are considerable, it's true, as anyone with a working brain knows. But remarkably, that is only half the story! The other half of the story is, of course, the corporations themselves... Chinese tech manufacturing is simply unassailable in terms of profits, because the Chinese government wants to see its tech manufacturing second-to-none globally so that no companies/nations can compete in terms of ROI, and China has completely succeeded in that goal. Let's tic-off a few things: *Chinese tariff policies are set according to what is considered best for Chinese business, Chinese employees, and the Chinese people. Huge difference with how things are done with tariffs in the US--as the US government (SCOTUS in this case, Congress in others) plainly feels that tariffs are "unfair" for the limited number of citizens who may pay them, whereas nothing is "unfair" when Congress considers the Personal Income Tax rates to be infinitely hike-able, along with infinitely enlarging annual budget deficits. *The Chinese government boldly subsidizes Chinese companies to artificially amplify their profits. *The Chinese government deliberately refuses to avidly demonize Chinese businesses and does not consider Chinese businesses "the enemy", so very unlike American (D)s these days. *Chinese labor laws and businesses are allowed to set their own labor policies according to what Chinese companies consider is best for companies and their employees... Simply put, American workers in tech manufacturing are not allowed to set their own labor policies! * One additional problem corporations have that I also do not sympathize with is they don't want to pay to train their American employees. They could easily do so, but would rather not have to pay for it. I find that pathetic, actually. It is the height of hypocrisy for Americans to decry working conditions in China while simultaneously ensuring that American products are manufactured in China, not in the US, simply to maximize profits. There is nothing wrong with making a profit, of course, absolutely nothing. But there is plenty wrong with attempts to normalize hypocrisy of this kind! But rank hypocrisy and the (D) party in the US are longtime bedfellows... The current government in Washington is working overtime to see if it can toss out the horribly poor, failed economic policies of the past, while the (D)s still in Washington work very hard to bring back the stupidity whenever possible. With the right policies in place, America can be an infinitely competitive manufacturer.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!