• 0

Neowin v5 promo


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
That doesn't make a single ounce of difference, would you tell your child not to enter his/her work into an art competition because you yourself find it awful? No. He posted it on here, in hope of some constructive critisism. Not to be put down as if he shouldn't even try.

Everyone starts somewhere, and to block this person from wanting to pursue further in learning, is just bullying.

586860957[/snapback]

It DOES make an ounce of difference - of course it does! The avenue in which you showcase your work makes a huge amount of difference to the response you're going to get. I agree that constructive criticism would have been better, and my comment was a light hearted one designed to provoke humour and not berate the original poster. Indeed, I agree that some posters have been unnecessarily harsh in their comments, but I still stand by my point that using the analogy of a child's artwork isn't a fair one, even if I do accept the point you're trying to make with it.

Added to which, no one has blocked him from persuing further learning - as you can see, he's updated the image using some of the suggestions given by posters.

  • 0
I take your point, but I fear we will have to agree to disagree.  At any rate, it's probably best not to get into a discussion about the usage of an analogy when we both agree on the point in hand that constructive criticism is better than simply saying that you dislike a piece  :)

586861002[/snapback]

Good man :yes: and here's a bump for the original poster hehehe :laugh:

  • 0
It DOES make an ounce of difference - of course it does!  The avenue in which you showcase your work makes a huge amount of difference to the response you're going to get.  I agree that constructive criticism would have been better, and my comment was a light hearted one designed to provoke humour and not berate the original poster.  Indeed, I agree that some posters have been unnecessarily harsh in their comments, but I still stand by my point that using the analogy of a child's artwork isn't a fair one, even if I do accept the point you're trying to make with it.

Added to which, no one has blocked him from persuing further learning - as you can see, he's updated the image using some of the suggestions given by posters.

586860972[/snapback]

No.

A child, who tries to draw, has just had their first set of try's at doing so, and as time goes on, as they grow, their skill improves. Digital artwork doesn't just immediate, nor progress from being a child. As so, he's learning from the start (as everyone does).

It makes perfect sense, and applies absolutley fine to the subject in hand.

  • 0
No.

A child, who tries to draw, has just had their first set of try's at doing so, and as time goes on, as they grow, their skill improves. Digital artwork doesn't just immediate, nor progress from being a child. As so, he's learning from the start (as everyone does).

It makes perfect sense, and applies absolutley fine to the subject in hand.

586860991[/snapback]

no, it's different.

with a young child, they dont know how to take the criticism right. if you tell them it isnt that good, they'll start crying and getting really upset.

as you can see, the author of this thread has USED our criticism to improve his work, rather than throwing a tantrum.

it is not a valid analogy.

  • 0
No.

A child, who tries to draw, has just had their first set of try's at doing so, and as time goes on, as they grow, their skill improves. Digital artwork doesn't just immediate, nor progress from being a child. As so, he's learning from the start (as everyone does).

It makes perfect sense, and applies absolutley fine to the subject in hand.

586860991[/snapback]

I take your point, but I fear we will have to agree to disagree. At any rate, it's probably best not to get into a discussion about the usage of an analogy when we both agree on the point in hand that constructive criticism is better than simply saying that you dislike a piece :)

no, it's different.

with a young child, they dont know how to take the criticism right.  if you tell them it isnt that good, they'll start crying and getting really upset.

as you can see, the author of this thread has USED our criticism to improve his work, rather than throwing a tantrum.

it is not a valid analogy.

586860998[/snapback]

I'd love to back you up, but I think you're misunderstanding the sentiments behind what he's saying.

  • 0

A dawn is breaking,

A light shining through

You're barely waking

And I'm tangled up in you

Just reminded me of that.

You can make it better if you used a light (white) color font, and centered the text.

Also I agree with the other person that the n5 logo looks too 'cut out & blended'.

  • 0
no, it's different.

with a young child, they dont know how to take the criticism right.  if you tell them it isnt that good, they'll start crying and getting really upset.

as you can see, the author of this thread has USED our criticism to improve his work, rather than throwing a tantrum.

it is not a valid analogy.

586860998[/snapback]

You mean there's critisism in this thread?

Looks for critisism

  • 0

I don't recommend blue on red, or huge lens flare effects either for that matter ;)

Blue vs red happen to be complementary colors so they can interfer quite a bit on each others. Anyway, at least you made a black glow effect around it, so it's not hurting your eyes as much as it could be. ;) I think it's best if you had chosen e.g. light blue instead of dark red though, to match with the sky color better. And a lighter glow. Just my 2 cents :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • >defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool It is not. It is the inhuman artist replacement. The human writing the prompt is the employer/manager requesting the work product of the artist -- a supervisory/descriptive job that doesn't carry with it any rights to the copyright of that work product at all. And since AI is not human itself, it can't gain copyright for anything it is asked to regurgitate or hallucinate, so it can't transfer that copyright to the employer/manager/human who asked for the output. This was all legally reaffirmed last year. So, no, while there are AI tools, AI slopware generation is NOT a "tool" in the legal definition of that word.
    • As long as i get to play GTA 6 before it ends 😂😂
    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      571
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      178
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!