Apple 'Switchers'


Recommended Posts

I like to tinker with my stuff. Cant do that with a mac. With a PC you can make it the way you want it over time. You can train it and it can respond. If YOU screw up (that is if there is a crash becasue of USER ERROR) you can easily go and fix it.

PCs are a blank pager eady for its user (Tron?) to manipulate its keys, BIOS, and drivers.

Macs are really retarted. I think the only one that looks any good is the platinum laptop. the cinematic dispalys are sweet.

I dunno macs are just so unappealing to me. They are great for graphics / audio/film editing. FOr day to day use they only seem good for people with learing disabilities, like the people in those stupid ass commercials.

Originally posted by Kemistry

I want my machine to be like my woman.

I wanna come home to nice a machine, thats looks good, responds to my needs that I don't have to spend hours trying to under what's upset it today.

Exactly. From October through May (when my college semester ended) I spent way too much time getting XP to look good & work properly. Now that I have OS X, I won't have to be worry about doing that this fall. From my short experience already I can tell that OS X works fast and seamlessly & creates a comfortable eye-soothing working environment. It is a real joy to work with.

Originally posted by Eth3l

Macs are really retarted. I think the only one that looks any good is the platinum laptop. the cinematic dispalys are sweet.

I dunno macs are just so unappealing to me. They are great for graphics / audio/film editing. FOr day to day use they only seem good for people with learing disabilities, like the people in those stupid ass commercials.

That had to be the most uneducated opinion I've ever seen...:ermm:

Originally posted by Kemistry

P.S. Its funny how pc users never complain about how bad the speed of things like USB are... when compared to FireWire...which just about comes as standard on an Apple Mac..

Obviously you haven't heard of a little thing called USB 2.0, AKA - 480Mbps data transfer compared to 400Mbps of Firewire. USB is the way to go these days, it's cheaper (20$ for a 5 port pci card) and more hardware manufacturers implement it. The USB vs. FireWire is an endless debate...Apple will release FireWire 2, which is 800Mbps, then there will be a new version of USB...and so on. I have a 3-port firewire card which cost me 49.99 and a 4 port USB 2.0 pci card that cost me 24.99, both technologies are good.

You guys gotta admit that Intel and AMD are pushing out faster processors much sooner than Apple/Motorola can. Whatever happened to their godly G5 Processor that can run at 1.5Ghz? I don't see it, do you?

Can't do a roadmap for the Mac (anyone care to do one?)

Sure, why not?

MacOS 1 - 9: Absolute Crap

MacOS X: Slow, 99$, Good Looking

MacOS X.1: Faster, 0$, Good Looking

MacOS X.2: Even Faster, 129$, Good Looking

P.S. Its funny how mac addics can justify JUST ABOUT ANYTHING apple does. They charge 129.99 for an upgrade, and you back them. They charge 100$ a year for their ".mac" services, and you back them up. Seems like a big game of follow the leader to me... If Microsoft did any of this, you'd be lauging your @$$ess off.

I'm surprised no one has mentioned anything about the compatibility of mac/pc and hardware.

If you love tweaking your system with a bunch of misfit cards and chips and such, stick with a pc.... the 3rd party hardware is more friendly with the pc and you'll find a much bigger variety of hardware adjustments can be done on the pc than mac. If you love gaming, get a pc.

Personally I'm not sure if I want a mac. I would get one, but I'm short on cash and it just isn't on my list of things to get.. especially when I'm saving money for a car. Another problem is many programs/games you have bought over the years with the pc may not work properly or may not have been designed for the mac. If you've invested a lot of time and money with the pc already, I'd suggest sticking with it. It's not worth spending thousands of dollars on one thing and then switching to another just because it "looks cool." But if you want a mac because you like it, not for just it's looks, but for what it has... then get one. Otherwise I'd suggest being a pc guy.

Originally posted by JZolloXP

P.S. Its funny how mac addics can justify JUST ABOUT ANYTHING apple does. They charge 129.99 for an upgrade, and you back them. They charge 100$ a year for their ".mac" services, and you back them up. Seems like a big game of follow the leader to me... If Microsoft did any of this, you'd be lauging your @$$ess off.

Actually, if you look you will see that people are bitching about the prices of both .Mac and OS10.2. To some people, they have the cash, and it's a product worth buying. I can't say the same for Windows. People threw down $100 for the upgrade to ME when all it was, was Win 98 with new icons and Movie Maker. Plus, I didn't notice a speed difference between that and 98. Besides, ME was a lot buggier on my system then 98 was.

I'll be happy to throw the $100+ dollars down on OS 10.2 because of it's improved speed, stability and new apps. It's not follow the leader when you just want what's best for your system.

Originally posted by JZolloXP

P.S. Its funny how mac addics can justify JUST ABOUT ANYTHING apple does. They charge 129.99 for an upgrade, and you back them. They charge 100$ a year for their ".mac" services, and you back them up. Seems like a big game of follow the leader to me... If Microsoft did any of this, you'd be lauging your @$$ess off.

MsDos 4.0 = ?99.99

MsDos 5.0 = ?99.99

MsDos 6.0 = $99.99

MsDos 6.22 = ?49.99

Windows 3.1 = ?99.99

Windows 95 = ?99.99

Windows NT = ?199.99

Windows 98 = ?99.99

Windows ME = ?49.99 introductory ?99.99 Regular

Windows 2000 = ?199.99

Windows XP = ?99.99 Home ?299.99 Full Retail ?199.99 Upgrade

Funny how ****ing soon we forget how much Microshaft Operating Systems have cost over the years isnt it?

Someone argued earlier that the iPod was a big reason for their choice in a Mac. Well you can use the iPod with a PC. TechTv also claims there are better/cheaper players than the iPod for the PC.

http://www.techtv.com/products/software/st...3373171,00.html

Anyway, I use PC and never had any urge to use Macs until their very recent OS. Either way it is a matter of choice. This argument is going to last as long as Pro-life vs. Pro-choice, Protestants vs. Catholics, masturbation vs. letting kittens live, etc...

Long time listener, first time poster. Neowin is the coolest.

Originally posted by FlukeII

masturbation vs. letting kittens live

Lmao, quite possibly the best first post ever :D

As for the IPod, it's gonna have to work flawlessly on Windows and with musicmatch to even get close to the way it interacts with iTunes...

Originally posted by Dazzla

Lmao, quite possibly the best first post ever :D

As for the IPod, it's gonna have to work flawlessly on Windows and with musicmatch to even get close to the way it interacts with iTunes...

Musicmatch?! :ermm: Man, Does ANYONE Like that Program?! ... i never liked it!

NeYo

Originally posted by ~~NeYo~~

Musicmatch?! :ermm: Man, Does ANYONE Like that Program?! ... i never liked it!

NeYo

Back in the day..when MP3's started getting popular those of us who didn't care for Winamp much moved to MusicMatch. Granted its the best playback and ripper out there but its a lot better than what uncle Bill offers us with Media Player... I still have it on my desktop today...

But going back to the IMac Vs PC debate. Lets look at software

Is the freeness offered by Apple better than what we can get on a Windows platform. I mean looking at iTunes alone, it F-ing fantastic compared to anything found on a pc..

Its got crossfading - simply superb - its intutive and easy to use...

As a rather sexist fellow IT bod pointed out today...

Imac and Mac software are "Chick Proof"...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • No news articles about the Arch Linux repo being majorly infected with malware?!?
    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
    • And with SO much better perf than the laggy mess that is Files.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      598
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      79
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!