Apple 'Switchers'


Recommended Posts

I like to tinker with my stuff. Cant do that with a mac. With a PC you can make it the way you want it over time. You can train it and it can respond. If YOU screw up (that is if there is a crash becasue of USER ERROR) you can easily go and fix it.

PCs are a blank pager eady for its user (Tron?) to manipulate its keys, BIOS, and drivers.

Macs are really retarted. I think the only one that looks any good is the platinum laptop. the cinematic dispalys are sweet.

I dunno macs are just so unappealing to me. They are great for graphics / audio/film editing. FOr day to day use they only seem good for people with learing disabilities, like the people in those stupid ass commercials.

Originally posted by Kemistry

I want my machine to be like my woman.

I wanna come home to nice a machine, thats looks good, responds to my needs that I don't have to spend hours trying to under what's upset it today.

Exactly. From October through May (when my college semester ended) I spent way too much time getting XP to look good & work properly. Now that I have OS X, I won't have to be worry about doing that this fall. From my short experience already I can tell that OS X works fast and seamlessly & creates a comfortable eye-soothing working environment. It is a real joy to work with.

Originally posted by Eth3l

Macs are really retarted. I think the only one that looks any good is the platinum laptop. the cinematic dispalys are sweet.

I dunno macs are just so unappealing to me. They are great for graphics / audio/film editing. FOr day to day use they only seem good for people with learing disabilities, like the people in those stupid ass commercials.

That had to be the most uneducated opinion I've ever seen...:ermm:

Originally posted by Kemistry

P.S. Its funny how pc users never complain about how bad the speed of things like USB are... when compared to FireWire...which just about comes as standard on an Apple Mac..

Obviously you haven't heard of a little thing called USB 2.0, AKA - 480Mbps data transfer compared to 400Mbps of Firewire. USB is the way to go these days, it's cheaper (20$ for a 5 port pci card) and more hardware manufacturers implement it. The USB vs. FireWire is an endless debate...Apple will release FireWire 2, which is 800Mbps, then there will be a new version of USB...and so on. I have a 3-port firewire card which cost me 49.99 and a 4 port USB 2.0 pci card that cost me 24.99, both technologies are good.

You guys gotta admit that Intel and AMD are pushing out faster processors much sooner than Apple/Motorola can. Whatever happened to their godly G5 Processor that can run at 1.5Ghz? I don't see it, do you?

Can't do a roadmap for the Mac (anyone care to do one?)

Sure, why not?

MacOS 1 - 9: Absolute Crap

MacOS X: Slow, 99$, Good Looking

MacOS X.1: Faster, 0$, Good Looking

MacOS X.2: Even Faster, 129$, Good Looking

P.S. Its funny how mac addics can justify JUST ABOUT ANYTHING apple does. They charge 129.99 for an upgrade, and you back them. They charge 100$ a year for their ".mac" services, and you back them up. Seems like a big game of follow the leader to me... If Microsoft did any of this, you'd be lauging your @$$ess off.

I'm surprised no one has mentioned anything about the compatibility of mac/pc and hardware.

If you love tweaking your system with a bunch of misfit cards and chips and such, stick with a pc.... the 3rd party hardware is more friendly with the pc and you'll find a much bigger variety of hardware adjustments can be done on the pc than mac. If you love gaming, get a pc.

Personally I'm not sure if I want a mac. I would get one, but I'm short on cash and it just isn't on my list of things to get.. especially when I'm saving money for a car. Another problem is many programs/games you have bought over the years with the pc may not work properly or may not have been designed for the mac. If you've invested a lot of time and money with the pc already, I'd suggest sticking with it. It's not worth spending thousands of dollars on one thing and then switching to another just because it "looks cool." But if you want a mac because you like it, not for just it's looks, but for what it has... then get one. Otherwise I'd suggest being a pc guy.

Originally posted by JZolloXP

P.S. Its funny how mac addics can justify JUST ABOUT ANYTHING apple does. They charge 129.99 for an upgrade, and you back them. They charge 100$ a year for their ".mac" services, and you back them up. Seems like a big game of follow the leader to me... If Microsoft did any of this, you'd be lauging your @$$ess off.

Actually, if you look you will see that people are bitching about the prices of both .Mac and OS10.2. To some people, they have the cash, and it's a product worth buying. I can't say the same for Windows. People threw down $100 for the upgrade to ME when all it was, was Win 98 with new icons and Movie Maker. Plus, I didn't notice a speed difference between that and 98. Besides, ME was a lot buggier on my system then 98 was.

I'll be happy to throw the $100+ dollars down on OS 10.2 because of it's improved speed, stability and new apps. It's not follow the leader when you just want what's best for your system.

Originally posted by JZolloXP

P.S. Its funny how mac addics can justify JUST ABOUT ANYTHING apple does. They charge 129.99 for an upgrade, and you back them. They charge 100$ a year for their ".mac" services, and you back them up. Seems like a big game of follow the leader to me... If Microsoft did any of this, you'd be lauging your @$$ess off.

MsDos 4.0 = ?99.99

MsDos 5.0 = ?99.99

MsDos 6.0 = $99.99

MsDos 6.22 = ?49.99

Windows 3.1 = ?99.99

Windows 95 = ?99.99

Windows NT = ?199.99

Windows 98 = ?99.99

Windows ME = ?49.99 introductory ?99.99 Regular

Windows 2000 = ?199.99

Windows XP = ?99.99 Home ?299.99 Full Retail ?199.99 Upgrade

Funny how ****ing soon we forget how much Microshaft Operating Systems have cost over the years isnt it?

Someone argued earlier that the iPod was a big reason for their choice in a Mac. Well you can use the iPod with a PC. TechTv also claims there are better/cheaper players than the iPod for the PC.

http://www.techtv.com/products/software/st...3373171,00.html

Anyway, I use PC and never had any urge to use Macs until their very recent OS. Either way it is a matter of choice. This argument is going to last as long as Pro-life vs. Pro-choice, Protestants vs. Catholics, masturbation vs. letting kittens live, etc...

Long time listener, first time poster. Neowin is the coolest.

Originally posted by FlukeII

masturbation vs. letting kittens live

Lmao, quite possibly the best first post ever :D

As for the IPod, it's gonna have to work flawlessly on Windows and with musicmatch to even get close to the way it interacts with iTunes...

Originally posted by Dazzla

Lmao, quite possibly the best first post ever :D

As for the IPod, it's gonna have to work flawlessly on Windows and with musicmatch to even get close to the way it interacts with iTunes...

Musicmatch?! :ermm: Man, Does ANYONE Like that Program?! ... i never liked it!

NeYo

Originally posted by ~~NeYo~~

Musicmatch?! :ermm: Man, Does ANYONE Like that Program?! ... i never liked it!

NeYo

Back in the day..when MP3's started getting popular those of us who didn't care for Winamp much moved to MusicMatch. Granted its the best playback and ripper out there but its a lot better than what uncle Bill offers us with Media Player... I still have it on my desktop today...

But going back to the IMac Vs PC debate. Lets look at software

Is the freeness offered by Apple better than what we can get on a Windows platform. I mean looking at iTunes alone, it F-ing fantastic compared to anything found on a pc..

Its got crossfading - simply superb - its intutive and easy to use...

As a rather sexist fellow IT bod pointed out today...

Imac and Mac software are "Chick Proof"...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it by Steven Parker If you have been reading Neowin for any length of time, you may remember that I reviewed the Sound Blaster Audigy FX Pro back in April. I found it to be an excellent budget sound card, even though it lacked support for formats such as DTS over the included SPDIF port. Anyway, Creative reached out to me again asking if I was interested in reviewing the Sound Blaster AE-X. It is a card mainly targeted at headphone wearers, which I'll get into a bit later. Before we get underway, here is a disclaimer: Creative Labs provided a free sample without any review pre-approval. Here are the full specs of it: Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Dimensions: 179 x 126 x 18 mm Weight: 263g / 9.28 oz Platform: PCI-e DAC: ESS ES9039Q2M Connectivity Options Side: Rear: 1 x HD Audio Front Panel Connector, 1 x ⅛“ Headphone port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Left) port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Right) port, 1 x Coaxial SPDIF-out port, 1 x ⅛“ Mic in/Line-in port, 1 x TOSLINK SPDIF-in port Surround: No DNR / SNR: THD+N: 0.0001% Dynamic Range 130 dB Recording Resolution: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Direct Mode: Line Out (Stereo): PCM up to 32-bit  384 kHz Coaxial SPDIF Out: PCM up to 24-bit 192.0 kHz Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 384kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128, DSD256 Output Impedance: 1Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 8–600Ω, IEM: 0.5Vrms, Low: 1.5Vrms, Mid: 3Vrms, High: 6Vrms, Maximum output power: 350mW @ 32Ω (High), Maximum output voltage: 6Vrms (High) Front Panel Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128 Output Impedance: 10Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 32–300Ω, Maximum output power: 40mW @ 32Ω, Maximum output voltage: 1.9Vrms ASIO: ASIO 2.3 Total Harmonic Distortion: THD+N: 0.0006% Dynamic Range: 114 dB Scout Mode: Yes EMI shielding: No (but it passed all the FCC emission tests) Operating temperature: 0–45°C Input Power: 12V⎓0.5A Warranty: 1 Year (MSRP) Price: $179.99 / £169.99 The Sound Blaster AE-X was announced at the end of May, and it becomes clear that it is mainly for headphone wearers. I should also note that the card does not support DDL/DTS encoding technology, but it is said to support decoding through the coaxial SPDIF port. I was able to test this working with the classic Windows Sound properties, but I could not get a DTS (decode) signal through my Logitech Z906, it defaulted to 3D sound whenever I played DTS content through Plex or Emby. In addition, this card only supports two channels (stereo) over the speakers. The surround support is limited to the Headphone Amp, so before I get underway, what we have here is a card mostly intended for headphone use, especially with its SPDIF In (Toslink) port where you could connect another device like a console. So what about the highlights of this card? The AE-X is powered by the ESS SABRE DAC (ES9039Q2M), which is capable of a 130 dB dynamic range. In addition, it supports 32-bit/384 kHz playback for deeper detail and clarity. The headphone amplifier delivers up to 350 mW @ 32Ω, which admittedly far surpasses standard onboard audio, offering support for studio-grade headphones. DSD256 and ASIO 2.3 are also supported. What doesn't it have? No support for What-U-Hear, Super X-Fi, or the SmartComms Kit No EMI shielding, but it passed all the FCC emission tests (from the FAQ) I also want to make it clear that I am no audiophile. For me, it's purely subjective and it should just "work" out of the box. First impressions As I said in the introduction, I was a bit sad to see that the AE-X only supports stereo output, meaning it would not be on par with my ALC1220 over my speakers, as I mentioned it seems like this card is marketed toward headphone users. Since I am not an avid gamer that would rule me out as a potential customer, but I can still test its capabilities! The card arrived in a nice-looking box, as shown above. It's quite a bit larger than the Audify FX Pro that I reviewed back in April, and at first I thought the covering meant that it was EMI shielded, but it isn't as mentioned above in the highlights section. What's in the box: 1 x Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe card 1 x 3.5 mm CTIA TRRS to Dual TRS Headset Splitter Cable 1 x Quick Start Guide Aside from the Quick Start Guide, which someone at my age (I guess) needs a magnifying glass to read thanks to the tiny fonts, Creative Labs also has the manual online, which first requires you to prove that you're human in order to access it (so I can't direct link it). Anyway, the box is mostly made up of cardboard, and the only plastic in it is the anti-static bag for the card itself. Design Top Bottom The card itself looks pretty cool and actually wouldn't look out of place in an all-white build. There's only one connector, and for some reason it is awkwardly placed on the side (front-facing) that is for the front panel audio connector, which will let you use the headphones through the front PC audio jack. Since the front panel Headphone Amp has fewer capabilities than the rear headphone port, I decided not to use it. Rear of card PCI-e interface The rear of the card is completely open and is normally where you would find the front panel connector. The PCIe interface side is completely covered, which initially made me think it was EMI shielded. I/O panel Side (front-facing) with Front panel connector On the outer rear bracket side we have the TOSLINK SPDIF in, Coaxial SPDIF out, RCA line out (Right), RCA line out (Left), Headphone out, and Mic/Line in ports. On the front facing portion of the card itself is the F-panel connector. Usage Test System Our test system consists of the following: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER (BIOS F12) Corsair RM1000x (2024) Thermal Grizzly Kyronaut (33x33x0,2mm) 2x 32GB Kingston Fury Beast RGB DDR5 6000MT/s CL36-38-38-80 T-Force Z540 2TB (PCIe Gen5) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (NVIDIA) Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Windows 11 25H2 Pro I installed the card into the Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER which includes the RealTek ALC1220 onboard audio. For our subjective listening tests, I used the Coaxial SPDIF port to my Logitech Z906 speakers. For headphone tests I used the OneOdio Studio Max 2 Wireless DJ Headphones that I reviewed last month. After installing the audio driver, I installed Creative Nexus, which is a relatively new app designed for the latest Sound Blaster cards. Then I discovered the AE-X needed both a driver update from 1.00.15.0001 to 1.01.09.000 and a firmware update from 1.00.06.0000 to 1.00.06.0002, then I was set to go. It should be noted that the card did not work without the driver (not Plug and Play). As you can see above, you can manage the firmware, driver, and inputs via Advanced Settings on the Device tab. By default Nexus enabled "Direct Mode". Upon clicking on Acoustic Engine, the Equalizer can be enabled and set to four different presets, which are: Gaming Music Movies Footsteps Enhancer There's also a dedicated Scout Mode for gamers. I mainly used Tidal and Spotify in the past week to listen to some of my Liked Songs (which now total over 700) in Shuffle mode; there were no pops or interference that I could hear. I also found a 5.1 Surround Music playlist on Tidal that sounded really great over Studio Max 2 headphones. When I reviewed the Audigy FX Pro, I went out and purchased a Logitech Z906 set second-hand for €100 specifically to use with the card, but in this instance all I could get on the AE-X was the 3D output of surround sound through Coaxial SPDIF and although it still sounded great, it isn't quite as good as DTS Interactive via my onboard Realtek ALC1220. Conclusion So what have I learned? The AE-X lacks multi-channel support for 5.1/7.1 setups and drops support for modern surround technologies like Dolby or DTS, functioning strictly as a stereo output device. So to really benefit, you will need Studio-grade headphones to "hear" the benefits of this card. With that being said, I can imagine it will appeal to gamers who are switching between console and PC. By utilizing the SPDIF in port, you could just plug your headphones into the AE-X (front or rear port) and then switch between PC and Console without having to move the headphones to a different port. As I said in the Sound Blaster Audigy review, the EQ in the Creative Nexus app offers safe presets, which allows a user to further tweak the lows, mids, and highs for a personal listening experience. Of course it all depends on the headphones you hook up to it. Speaking of headphones, I kind of wish I had higher-quality Studio-grade headphones to really test this card with; I'm not usually wearing headphones in my day to day duties. The only time I will wear them is if I want to listen to music very late at night and I don't want to disturb my neighbors, so my rating (verdict) is based on this fact. Someone with a PC/Console setup and wears headphone religiously to game, and consume media will benefit much more than I from the high-quality Headphone Amps that are included in the AE-X. Once again, I do feel like Creative could have gone the extra mile to support the S/PDIF port a bit more. Why include it if you're not supporting the main popular digital formats? It seems like the decision was more of a legacy-based one, offering uncompressed 2-channel PCM audio, for users with high-fidelity audio systems and external DACs. Maybe I will be lucky enough to review a card that truly includes all these features in the future. I am sure readers with far more knowledge on audio systems than me will correct me in the comments below. I'll just say I am happy to learn what I don't know! Where to buy The Sound Blaster AE-X is available to purchase now in preorder for $179.99 on the U.S. Creative website, or for £169.99 on the Creative UK website and will start shipping to customers from June 25.
    • $80 or 90%, anything else would be financial suicide one way or another.
    • Or... just use Bitwarden. Free, and has on-prem option as well. Works both on desktop and mobile, wherever you are. The age of local password files is over.
    • Thanks
    • I actually got to use one of those so called "backup codes" once. It was for a customer, I choose the backup code option, and by the grace of god, they actually hade them printed out. Imagine my surprise, when after using the backup code, Google then told use we had to enter a code they just sent to the gmail address we currently did not have access to. I was not amused, Google backup codes should be the end all get out of jail free card, because you had to have access to the account to even get them.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!