Some stuff lost in the upgrade


Recommended Posts

I can name three things that were lost after the forum was upgraded:

  • Recently read topics were reset. Now ALL topics are marked as 'unread.'
  • Some recent attachments were lost. Only attachments dating from October (or before that) are retained.
  • Subscribed topics were lost.

These aren't major problems, but they are sightly annoying.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/403678-some-stuff-lost-in-the-upgrade/
Share on other sites

Recently read topics were reset. Now ALL topics are marked as 'unread.'

This was because IPB changed how it tracked read topics from a cookie on your computer to a table in our database. However, this is *really* good because now topic read information is 100% accurate. And it works between different computers. So, no more bugs related to that. If you've read it, it *will* be marked as read.

Some recent attachments were lost. Only attachments dating from October (or before that) are retained.

Marcel will have to comment on that, as he copied all that stuff over (9.2GB!). I rsynced everything between our two frontend servers, so if there is a break of NFS connectivity between the two, you won't see a lot of missing attachments like how it used to be.

Subscribed topics were lost.

Bug in the upgrader. However, we're well past that, so there's nothing we can do to fix it at this point. You'll just have to re-subscribe.

tim, theres another issue with the attachments - attachments for IPB 2.1 bug threads have been assigned to random posts throughout the forum. i assume its an ID mixup from merging them with the rest of the forum.

this may also have overwritten other attachments.

FYI ive just sorted through all of my own attachments and removed all the old ones including the ones that are affected by the above (i didnt bother re-assigning them, they weren't important). ive also reuploaded all my missing attachments.

This was because IPB changed how it tracked read topics from a cookie on your computer to a table in our database. However, this is *really* good because now topic read information is 100% accurate. And it works between different computers. So, no more bugs related to that. If you've read it, it *will* be marked as read.

Good, that used to tick me off. :D

This was because IPB changed how it tracked read topics from a cookie on your computer to a table in our database. However, this is *really* good because now topic read information is 100% accurate. And it works between different computers. So, no more bugs related to that. If you've read it, it *will* be marked as read.

Great, that was very annoying.

This was because IPB changed how it tracked read topics from a cookie on your computer to a table in our database. However, this is *really* good because now topic read information is 100% accurate. And it works between different computers. So, no more bugs related to that. If you've read it, it *will* be marked as read.

Nice to hear about that. I did notice that bug on a few occasions.

Don't know if this is a bug or a user changeable option, but all post times are in 24 hour format. Us North Americans like times in 12 hour format. ;)

Another request (I don't consider this a bug): the RTF editor, when enabled, doesn't work at all with the preview of Opera 9. Though I understand the browser is still in the preview stage (and thus buggy), I would like RTF support for Opera to be realized sometime in the following months.

Despite that, the RTF editor works quite well under Firefox. :)

Edited by rm20010

Nice to hear about that. I did notice that bug on a few occasions.

Don't know if this is a bug or a user changeable option, but all post times are in 24 hour format. Us North Americans like times in 12 hour format. ;)

Another request (I don't consider this a bug): the RTF editor, when enabled, doesn't work at all with the preview of Opera 9. Though I understand the browser is still in the preview stage (and thus buggy), I would like RTF support for Opera to be realized sometime in the following months.

Despite that, the RTF editor works quite well under Firefox. :)

I thought something about the time was different. I just didn't know what it was. :p

  • 2 months later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!