Mom died day after class `joke'


Recommended Posts

Mom died day after class `joke'

Student asked about death, trial told

She and sister face murder charge

Dec. 1, 2005. 01:00 AM

BOB MITCHELL

STAFF REPORTER

A week before the end of semester, some Mississauga students kidded with a teacher about how they could get out of handing in their final assignment.

"Do we have to hand it in if we break a leg?" asked one, prompting laughter from the 20 or so classmates.

Another student asked: "What if we have the chicken pox?" Another piped up: "What if we get into a car accident?"

The teacher told her students she hoped none of those things happened and they would all be expected to complete their final assignment for their careers class instead of writing an exam.

But then a 15-year-old girl raised her hand: "What if somebody close to me or close to you dies?" she asked.

"I was taken back," the teacher testified yesterday, recalling the exchange on Friday, Jan. 17, 2003. "The whole class was. They looked at me. The laughter stopped. The questions stopped."

The next night, the student's 44-year-old mother drowned in her bathtub at home.

"When I learned about the death on the Monday, in my mind, I thought, wow, that is really strange that she said that," the teacher told the court.

Just over a year later, on Jan. 21, 2004, the teen and her older sister were charged with killing their mother after Peel police received information suggesting the death wasn't an accident.

The teens, now 18 and 19, have pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder in what legal experts say is the first case in Canada where such young girls are accused of killing their mother.

The Crown alleges the girls, 15 and 16 at the time, plotted their alcoholic mother's death and then drowned her after getting her drunk and nearly unconscious with Tylenol pills.

Internet conversations and secretly recorded communications entered as evidence suggested the girls killed their mother because her alcoholism and pill popping was ruining their lives and because they stood to inherit their share of a $200,000 life insurance policy.

The teens' identities are protected by law, as are the identities of all civilian witnesses and the victim, whose death initially was ruled an accidental drowning due to high levels of alcohol.

The teacher told the court she went to police with the information about the younger sister's classroom comments when she learned of the girls' arrests.

"It (the arrests) hit me like a ton of bricks," she said.

The teacher said she noticed a marked difference in the student about three months into the 2002-03 school year.

"She was an extremely intelligent student ... who always did her assignments," said the teacher, who worked as a guidance counsellor. "But then she started to change in November.

"She started missing and skipping classes. Her appearance totally changed. She cut her hair short, spiked and dyed it different colours. One day it was blue, the next day it was red."

Court previously heard both sisters underwent dramatic personality and appearance changes in the months before and after their mother's death.

The teacher and the school's vice-principal met with the teen on Jan. 15, 2003, to stress the importance of attending class and finishing assignments. The teacher said she had unsuccessfully tried to phone her mother at home and at her workplace.

Under cross-examination by Eugene Bhattacharya, who represents the younger sister, the teacher admitted the students' questions in class were part of a sequence of jokes to "test" her but denied the accused teen's question seemed like a joke.

Court also heard the teacher was among those who supported the girls during their bail hearing in February 2004.

"At the time you said you didn't think the girls posed a threat to the public? ... Was that true?" Bhattacharya asked.

"Yes," she replied.

"Do you still think that today?" Bhattacharya asked.

"Yes," she said.

The trial continues today.

http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentSe...ol=969483202845

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/403809-mom-died-day-after-class-joke/
Share on other sites

I can persoanlly understand the girls feelings of an acoholic mother as my stepdad was one, and I kept wishing him dead... but Id not do it.

BUT Again, that dosn't give them right to kill him! Golly gee willicurs!

If you take away life from the person who gave you life, then you're not worthy of life yourself.

What if you did it in a roundabout way? Like you report to the police that your life-giver was abusing you and the police take them away for execution. Would you still be unworthy of life? Or does it have to involve you physically taking away the life of your abuser?

anybody want to tell me wtf is wrong with new generation of kids, it looks like 95% getting dumb

Dont pretend this sort of thing hasnt always happened. It's not like its happening in every town on a daily basis, you get a sick story once in a while and you accuse todays younger generation of being "dumb" and their being something wrong with us. Forgive me if I'm wrong, but its your generation that is sending troops into Iraq over apparent Nuclear Missiles, that is struggling against or for terrorist and generally setting the path my generation is now moving into. And before that there was the gulf war, Vietnam, WW2 ect. And they are only the wars, theres hundreds of smaller examples where atrocities have been commited in the past 100 years and beyond.

I mean seriously, dont act like one generation is better than another. Every single one has commited atrocities. Yes, its the very small minority that are doing anything wrong, the one in a million or hundred thousand or anything, but it would be very easy for me to say "what is wrong with my prior generation, look at the world they have left me to live in"

Being 19 I'm kind of sick of hearing how our generation is so off the rail when really none before us have been any better and looking over history many have done alot worse. I'm not defending what has happened, but throwing out stereotypes like that is grosely incorrect and insulting to the general population that go by their daily life in the exact same manner anyone else does. Yes, what these kids have done (if they did do it at all), is sick. It's extremly upsetting but its also upsetting that their mother didnt do a better job at raising the kids and controlling her addiction. She certainly deffinetly didnt deserve to die, its just sad to hear stories of families like this.

I really do hope that the girls are in fact innocent, although I really dont believe they are unfortunatly.

Update:

Mother alive hours after 'drowning,' neighbour says

Woman asked for cigarettes, alcohol several hours after prosecutors say she was killed

Dec. 5, 2005. 02:44 PM

BOB MITCHELL

STAFF REPORTER

A Mississauga woman who drowned in her bathtub was alive at least two to three hours after her daughters are alleged to have murdered her, a Brampton court heard today.

In a stunning development in the opening day of the defence?s case at this sensational murder trial, the deceased woman?s neighbour said he spoke with her about 9 p.m. on Jan. 18, 2003.

?She asked me for a couple of cigarettes and if I had any booze,? the 46-year-old man testified today at the trial, now in its sixth week.

The testimony of the first defence witness dramatically contradicts evidence presented by crown prosecutors Mike Cantlon and Brian McGuire who allege the woman?s teenage daughters, then 16 and 15, drowned their mother in the bathtub at about 6 p.m. that night.

It also contradicts previous pathology evidence suggesting the first stages of rigor mortis had set in when the emergency personnel pulled the woman?s lifeless body from the bathtub at about 10:30 p.m. that night.

Court previously heard that rigor mortis generally begins to appear between four to six hours after death.

The sisters, now 19 and 18, have pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder in a case legal experts say is the first in Canada where such young girls are accused of murdering their mother.

On the stand, the neighbour said the woman appeared drunk when she knocked on his door the night of her death, asking him for cigarettes and booze.

?Her speech was slurred,? he said. ?She was leaning against the wall.? He said he wasn?t surprised to see her in that state because she was ?drunk 98 per cent of the time? when he saw her.

The neighbour said he went out but returned about 1 ? hours later and was standing in the driveway smoking a cigarette when the two sisters got out of a car that had pulled into their driveway.

They told him they had been at Jack Astor?s and one of them offered him a hamburger they hadn?t eaten but he declined their invitation.

A few minutes later, he said he looked out the window of his townhome and saw the girls being led into unmarked police cars. He said the next day the complex?s superintendent told him the girls' mother had ?killed herself.?

The sisters were charged almost a year later when Peel police discovered new information suggesting their mother had been murdered and didn?t accidentally drown because of heavy alcohol consumption, as initially ruled as the cause of death by a coroner.

The crown contends the sisters plotted their mother?s death and drowned her after getting her drunk and nearly unconscious with Tylenol 3 pills.

Their identities are protected by law, as are the identities of all civilian witnesses and the deceased women, who had five times the legal limit of alcohol and overdose levels of codeine in her system when she died.

Internet conversations and secretly-recorded communications entered as evidence have suggested the sisters killed their mother because her alcoholism and pill popping was ruining their lives and the life of their six-year-old stepbrother.

They also stood to inherit their share of their mother?s $200,000 life insurance policy - funds they were going to use to buy drugs and take their friends on a European vacation.

Five crown witnesses have testified they either knew about the alleged murder plot before or after the crime had been committed and that the dinner at Jack Astor?s was to play a crucial role in their alibi.

The judge-alone trial before Justice Bruce Duncan continues tomorrow.

http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentSe...ol=968793972154

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I forgot to add on my comment that when robots will take physical jobs, it's when they become more cheaper to manufacture and sell. That will be the starting point of the end to lanscaping, trash pickup, factory jobs, etc.
    • How many people can actually use a 2.5gig ethernet port? Most people do not have more than a 1gig internet connection, heck most have less than that. Most people at home do not have a switch that has multiple 2.5gig ports either.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!