So Can you actually play videogames on Linux?


Recommended Posts

Of course you can. The selection is more limited than Windows, but you can. If you're a heavy gamer that has to have all the latest games, I would recommend keeping windows around for that though. The games that do work in linux generally work extremely well though.

*Technically* Video Games are by definition not on computers, but on consoles.

Pedanticness aside:

Many games written in OpenGL include linux support, such as UT2004, Doom 3, Quake 3 (and 4?) and a couple others.

DirectX games don't, though there is a directx wrapper of some sort available, but i've never really looked into it.

Yea cedega kicks ass lets you play all your windows games. Some work better than others, but hey I'm not that picky. The games I play are officially supported by transgaming which is why I am going to switch completely to Linux. I didn't know such a program existed till a couple of months ago. Oh and the price isn't bad only $15 or less for 3 months. The guys at transgaming hard hardworking at making gaming under Linux better so they deserve every penny!

Yea cedega kicks ass lets you play all your windows games. Some work better than others, but hey I'm not that picky. The games I play are officially supported by transgaming which is why I am going to switch completely to Linux. I didn't know such a program existed till a couple of months ago. Oh and the price isn't bad only $15 or less for 3 months. The guys at transgaming hard hardworking at making gaming under Linux better so they deserve every penny!

You might also want to check out Wine (winehq.org)

Cedega was built off an extremely old version of Wine, before they changed licenses. The Wine dev's have been working hard at adding DX support, and it's been progressing very nicely. Many DX games will now work under wine, which is a much better & faster solution than Cedega (And it's free).

That said, you can expect a minor FPS loss for games that you have to run with Wine or Cedega, however I've personally had the graphics quality end up being significantly better. Games like World of Warcraft don't even compare - It looks 5x better (No blur), and it's actually faster, even though it's being run under Wine. I probably notice this a bit more than most due to my resolution, but try it out, you won't be disappointed. WoW running at 1920x1200 with a 6800 Ultra, running max quality @ 30-40fps via wine.

Transgaming has a program called Cedega that lets you run DirectX games on linux.. supports a lot of games, only bad thing is it's a paid monthly. Link below

http://www.transgaming.com/

Its GPL so they can't charge for the code. You can download it for FREE from the CVS server.

http://www.linux-gamers.net/modules/wfsect...hp?articleid=45

^Tells you how!

Its GPL so they can't charge for the code. You can download it for FREE from the CVS server.

http://www.linux-gamers.net/modules/wfsect...hp?articleid=45

^Tells you how!

Hey thanks for that link!

Its GPL so they can't charge for the code.

Yes you can charge for GPL code.

http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#D...heGPLAllowMoney

The "GPL Quiz" link in my sig might be an interesting way to check your knowledge of the GPL. It is a tough quiz!

  • 3 weeks later...

The restriction is just that you need to provide the source code isn't it?

There are a good number of games for linux. I'm not a big gamer, so quake 4 and unreal tournament 2004, plus some other small dumb games (professor fizzwizzle is pretty fun =). there are also many free games for linux, like crack-attack.

Most older games run perfectly under wine, some newer ones (and some old ones too) might not work; so you'll have to use cedega. Although I haven't personally used it. (Linux native applications are fine for me, 90% of the time)

Cedega is _not_ GPL, just like Wine. Wine is LGPL (which allows linking of closed source applications), and was MIT-licensed a few years ago. The MIT license, just like the BSD license, allows closed-source modifications. Cedega is based on old, MIT-licensed Wine sourcecode, and even though Transgaming licensed a few of their improvements under the MIT license for a few more months after the fork, pretty much all major improvements on Cedega are closed source since 2003. The Cedega/ WineX from CVS is extremely outdated and doesn't come with most of the interesting features (D3D9 and copyprotection support, DIB engine, new scheduler...).

Just a note, and it seems to be newly announced on transgaming.org's site as of 12 Dec 2005, that Cedega has a 14-day free trial of the full version available here: http://www.transgaming.com/products_linux.php

You can see for yourself the gaming difference between wine & cvs to the commercial version of Cedega.

  • 2 weeks later...
That said, you can expect a minor FPS loss for games that you have to run with Wine or Cedega, however I've personally had the graphics quality end up being significantly better. Games like World of Warcraft don't even compare - It looks 5x better (No blur), and it's actually faster, even though it's being run under Wine. I probably notice this a bit more than most due to my resolution, but try it out, you won't be disappointed. WoW running at 1920x1200 with a 6800 Ultra, running max quality @ 30-40fps via wine.

I wish I knew how people achieved this. I've had fairly intensive experiences with Linux over the past year or two, various distros and the such, but until nVidia released the 1.0-8xxx drivers I couldn't really use any because of a very annoying hard-crash when closing X. With the newer drivers though, I get a significant decrease in framerate under Linux. I play WoW at 1600x1200 with max settings on Windows and normally run between 40 and 60 FPS, under Linux I'm lucky to hit mid 20's with the same settings (literally, running the same copy of WoW).

There's nothing I'd like more than to ditch Windows totally, it's just a shame I can't seem to get the performance that others seem to :blink:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why? Does anybody actually want this? The constant need to close all browser sessions and wait for a new version to install, just so that there’s a integrated coupon manager feels like a waste of everyone’s time
    • I remember when Louis used to just do interesting Mac/iPhone repairs, now he's boring and just launches "crusades" every week
    • A shame it don't allow people to bypass the MS account, I will stick to using Rufus.
    • Microsoft about to radically change how often your Edge browser updates by Paul Hill Microsoft has just announced that starting with Edge 152, it will be moving to a two-week release cycle for faster, smaller updates. This faster release cadence will begin on August 27. This change comes just several months after Microsoft switched Visual Studio Code to weekly updates. The company said that the Extended Stable releases will remain on an eight-week cycle and that no admin changes are needed to experience the faster release cycle on the Stable channel. The new two-week release cycle will enable the faster delivery of security updates and platform improvements, all while reducing the size and complexity of individual updates. Microsoft claims that organizations will benefit from this change as it offers predictable validation cycles. For organizations that prefer a “more deliberate pace”, the Extended Stable channel remains an option. This change will affect Edge Stable releases on Windows, macOS, Linux, and mobile. The Extended Stable channel will continue to be updated every eight weeks, or every fourth Stable release, for example: versions 152, 156, 160, and 164. The Extended Stable could be a good option for organizations that don’t want the latest updates twice a month and don’t want as much hassle constantly updating browsers. In the case of Visual Studio Code, many of the updates being pushed by Microsoft are AI-related. As we all know, Microsoft Edge has a lot of AI features, so we could see Microsoft pushing more AI, thanks to the faster cycles. On the flip side, quicker releases could mean faster security updates, which is beneficial in a world where AI systems are hunting for software exploits. What do you think? Let us know in the comments. For more updates on Edge, be sure to follow Neowin's coverage. In May alone, we reported on Edge offering in-browser pop-ups to assist users with website compatibility issues, that Edge was losing Copilot Mode, and that Microsoft had fixed a plain-text password bug in Edge. Source: Microsoft 365 Admin Center
    • not yet, because at the moment it is not a threat to MS, if and I mean if it did become a threat to MS Office, then it may be a different thing. MS don't like competition
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      159
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!