So Can you actually play videogames on Linux?


Recommended Posts

Of course you can. The selection is more limited than Windows, but you can. If you're a heavy gamer that has to have all the latest games, I would recommend keeping windows around for that though. The games that do work in linux generally work extremely well though.

*Technically* Video Games are by definition not on computers, but on consoles.

Pedanticness aside:

Many games written in OpenGL include linux support, such as UT2004, Doom 3, Quake 3 (and 4?) and a couple others.

DirectX games don't, though there is a directx wrapper of some sort available, but i've never really looked into it.

Yea cedega kicks ass lets you play all your windows games. Some work better than others, but hey I'm not that picky. The games I play are officially supported by transgaming which is why I am going to switch completely to Linux. I didn't know such a program existed till a couple of months ago. Oh and the price isn't bad only $15 or less for 3 months. The guys at transgaming hard hardworking at making gaming under Linux better so they deserve every penny!

Yea cedega kicks ass lets you play all your windows games. Some work better than others, but hey I'm not that picky. The games I play are officially supported by transgaming which is why I am going to switch completely to Linux. I didn't know such a program existed till a couple of months ago. Oh and the price isn't bad only $15 or less for 3 months. The guys at transgaming hard hardworking at making gaming under Linux better so they deserve every penny!

You might also want to check out Wine (winehq.org)

Cedega was built off an extremely old version of Wine, before they changed licenses. The Wine dev's have been working hard at adding DX support, and it's been progressing very nicely. Many DX games will now work under wine, which is a much better & faster solution than Cedega (And it's free).

That said, you can expect a minor FPS loss for games that you have to run with Wine or Cedega, however I've personally had the graphics quality end up being significantly better. Games like World of Warcraft don't even compare - It looks 5x better (No blur), and it's actually faster, even though it's being run under Wine. I probably notice this a bit more than most due to my resolution, but try it out, you won't be disappointed. WoW running at 1920x1200 with a 6800 Ultra, running max quality @ 30-40fps via wine.

Transgaming has a program called Cedega that lets you run DirectX games on linux.. supports a lot of games, only bad thing is it's a paid monthly. Link below

http://www.transgaming.com/

Its GPL so they can't charge for the code. You can download it for FREE from the CVS server.

http://www.linux-gamers.net/modules/wfsect...hp?articleid=45

^Tells you how!

Its GPL so they can't charge for the code. You can download it for FREE from the CVS server.

http://www.linux-gamers.net/modules/wfsect...hp?articleid=45

^Tells you how!

Hey thanks for that link!

Its GPL so they can't charge for the code.

Yes you can charge for GPL code.

http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#D...heGPLAllowMoney

The "GPL Quiz" link in my sig might be an interesting way to check your knowledge of the GPL. It is a tough quiz!

  • 3 weeks later...

The restriction is just that you need to provide the source code isn't it?

There are a good number of games for linux. I'm not a big gamer, so quake 4 and unreal tournament 2004, plus some other small dumb games (professor fizzwizzle is pretty fun =). there are also many free games for linux, like crack-attack.

Most older games run perfectly under wine, some newer ones (and some old ones too) might not work; so you'll have to use cedega. Although I haven't personally used it. (Linux native applications are fine for me, 90% of the time)

Cedega is _not_ GPL, just like Wine. Wine is LGPL (which allows linking of closed source applications), and was MIT-licensed a few years ago. The MIT license, just like the BSD license, allows closed-source modifications. Cedega is based on old, MIT-licensed Wine sourcecode, and even though Transgaming licensed a few of their improvements under the MIT license for a few more months after the fork, pretty much all major improvements on Cedega are closed source since 2003. The Cedega/ WineX from CVS is extremely outdated and doesn't come with most of the interesting features (D3D9 and copyprotection support, DIB engine, new scheduler...).

Just a note, and it seems to be newly announced on transgaming.org's site as of 12 Dec 2005, that Cedega has a 14-day free trial of the full version available here: http://www.transgaming.com/products_linux.php

You can see for yourself the gaming difference between wine & cvs to the commercial version of Cedega.

  • 2 weeks later...
That said, you can expect a minor FPS loss for games that you have to run with Wine or Cedega, however I've personally had the graphics quality end up being significantly better. Games like World of Warcraft don't even compare - It looks 5x better (No blur), and it's actually faster, even though it's being run under Wine. I probably notice this a bit more than most due to my resolution, but try it out, you won't be disappointed. WoW running at 1920x1200 with a 6800 Ultra, running max quality @ 30-40fps via wine.

I wish I knew how people achieved this. I've had fairly intensive experiences with Linux over the past year or two, various distros and the such, but until nVidia released the 1.0-8xxx drivers I couldn't really use any because of a very annoying hard-crash when closing X. With the newer drivers though, I get a significant decrease in framerate under Linux. I play WoW at 1600x1200 with max settings on Windows and normally run between 40 and 60 FPS, under Linux I'm lucky to hit mid 20's with the same settings (literally, running the same copy of WoW).

There's nothing I'd like more than to ditch Windows totally, it's just a shame I can't seem to get the performance that others seem to :blink:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!