PS3: Unreal Tournament 2007

By yankee lion
in Gamers' Hangout

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

icecaveman

Posted
Posted

I'm confused.........will this game also come out for X360 or no?

That's not confirmed yet but Epic promised Microsoft 5 exclusive games, Gears Of War in one of them, Unreal Championship 1+2 I guess do count so that means there are at least 2 titles they are going to announce so why would they not throw in UT2007? They could easily do it, hardware is very capable and they already have UE3 up and running and the on-line services of x360 is very suitable for UT. Perhaps they would just call it Unreal Championship 360 and have it very similar to UT2007.

But nothing has been confirmed yet so...

Grand Master

iconboy

Posted
Posted

Halo2 rules and there is nothing wrong in having a sig like that :p MasterChief owns all of us :D

even though this was like a page back i just want to clarify, i was pointing out that people that usually have game specific or console specific things in their sigs or avatars, usually are bias that way and i was just pointing that out... like a person with halo 2 in their sigs, saying something about PSM's sources... wooww :rolleyes:

Experienced

yankee lion

Posted
  • Author
Posted

That's not confirmed yet but Epic promised Microsoft 5 exclusive games, Gears Of War in one of them, Unreal Championship 1+2 I guess do count so that means there are at least 2 titles they are going to announce so why would they not throw in UT2007? They could easily do it, hardware is very capable and they already have UE3 up and running and the on-line services of x360 is very suitable for UT. Perhaps they would just call it Unreal Championship 360 and have it very similar to UT2007.

But nothing has been confirmed yet so...

You know, since MS and Sony have made coding so universal this time around, I think this gen is going to be the "Generation of the Ports".

I really see Nintendo up there with some kickass exclusive games this time around.

Grand Master

iconboy

Posted
Posted

You know, since MS and Sony have made coding so universal this time around, I think this gen is going to be the "Generation of the Ports".

I really see Nintendo up there with some kickass exclusive games this time around.

yeah but if it were on bother platforms, then it wouldnt be "exclusive" to 360 now would it?

Community Regular

cau

Posted
Posted

u know the funny thing is, that they are saying PS3 equals a PC + Nvidia 7800 GTX Graphics which both will be obselete by Fall 2006, release of PS3

And what's funny about that is the fact that PS3 is a little bit more powerful than Xbox 360 so that means Xbox 360 isn't quite as powerful as a current day PC. :p

But power isn't everything. And I'm not only saying that because Rev turned out to be GC 1 & ? in terms of power.:whistle::

Grand Master

BajiRav

Posted
Posted

And what's funny about that is the fact that PS3 is a little bit more powerful than Xbox 360 so that means Xbox 360 isn't quite as powerful as a current day PC. :p

But power isn't everything. And I'm not only saying that because Rev turned out to be GC 1 & ? in terms of power.:whistle::

although I am not saying anything against Nintendo (have never played one so I have no opinion)...I seriously don't subscribe to "power isn't everything" way of thinking...

forget graphics...even with 1990s graphics (not really:pp but just imagine),

more power

=better physics

=better AI

==> better gameplway

and since all I play is FPS (and a few racers) I am strongly in favor of more power is better for gaming.

Greed is good.:shiftyninja::

Grand Master

magik

Posted
Posted

even though this was like a page back i just want to clarify, i was pointing out that people that usually have game specific or console specific things in their sigs or avatars, usually are bias that way and i was just pointing that out... like a person with halo 2 in their sigs, saying something about PSM's sources... wooww :rolleyes:

Actually, you couldn't be more off. I am just a fan of the Halo series (loved it on PC so had to get Halo 2 for Xbox).

And if you think that PSM is a reliable source you really need to stop, take a deep breath, try to avoid bias and think.... it's PLAYSTATION Magazine. Why do you think they were the first to interview the developers about UT 2007 and actually play it for the PS3? Because they'd obviously praise the game and the console, it's in their name!

Now if a similar title was reviewed for the first time (very early) on the Xbox 360 by XBM (Xbox Magazine) then I'd say the exact same thing.

Now stop assuming that people with gaming sigs are biased towards any particular console just because it's exclusive to that console, I happen to own a PS2 (of which the dvd laser died :angry: so I dont really play with it anymore). So please, instead of assuming things like that, why not ask why I think PSM is an unreliable source. I mean, come on, UT2007 might be a great game (I was a big fan of Unreal on the PC a few years back and I'd love to see this game regain its ground seeing as how the last few editions have been very sub-par IMHO), but think about where the review is coming from before assuming it's the next big thing. :shiftyninja:

So everyone can see from example, THIS is trolling.

Your comment begs the question: Do you know what trolling is?

Veteran

b mitchell

Posted
Posted

Actually, you couldn't be more off. I am just a fan of the Halo series (loved it on PC so had to get Halo 2 for Xbox).

And if you think that PSM is a reliable source you really need to stop, take a deep breath, try to avoid bias and think.... it's PLAYSTATION Magazine. Why do you think they were the first to interview the developers about UT 2007 and actually play it for the PS3? Because they'd obviously praise the game and the console, it's in their name!

Now if a similar title was reviewed for the first time (very early) on the Xbox 360 by XBM (Xbox Magazine) then I'd say the exact same thing.

Now stop assuming that people with gaming sigs are biased towards any particular console just because it's exclusive to that console, I happen to own a PS2 (of which the dvd laser died :angry: so I dont really play with it anymore). So please, instead of assuming things like that, why not ask why I think PSM is an unreliable source. I mean, come on, UT2007 might be a great game (I was a big fan of Unreal on the PC a few years back and I'd love to see this game regain its ground seeing as how the last few editions have been very sub-par IMHO), but think about where the review is coming from before assuming it's the next big thing. :shiftyninja:

Your comment begs the question: Do you know what trolling is?

Hmm. lets see. This thread is about UT2007, not online console gaming. The article is in reference to the PS3, but makes little to no mention of online issues. This is certainly not a thread about the 360's online capabilities. So why is that you are trolling with "Because PS3 "Live" = ??". Your only contribution was trying to knock sony because they didn't copy MS's Live program that you would bash as a copy if they did indeed copy it...Yea...its not like you were trolling or anything.

Grand Master

magik

Posted
Posted

Hmm. lets see. This thread is about UT2007, not online console gaming. The article is in reference to the PS3, but makes little to no mention of online issues. This is certainly not a thread about the 360's online capabilities. So why is that you are trolling with "Because PS3 "Live" = ??". Your only contribution was trying to knock sony because they didn't copy MS's Live program that you would bash as a copy if they did indeed copy it...Yea...its not like you were trolling or anything.

Wrong.

The poster asked why would you play UT offline? Simply because you can't really play it online with PS3 unless the developer supports it himself because Sony's online capabilities are nonexistent otherwise.

Now, breathe... :cool:

Experienced

yankee lion

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Wrong.

The poster asked why would you play UT offline? Simply because you can't really play it online with PS3 unless the developer supports it himself because Sony's online capabilities are nonexistent otherwise.

Now, breathe... :cool:

And you would know this because you're the President of Sony. Oh wait...

Seriously, we don't know anything but rumors about the PS3's online capabilities.

Veteran

+vlsi0n Subscriber¹

Posted
  • Subscriber¹
Posted

Zzzzzzzz, nice trolling. :sleep:

You expected different? some people never change.

Wow, they really did assemble for damage control. Amazing.

I'm guessing it's because it's a first gen game. I've heard PGR3 doesn't run at 'real' 720p or something like that. It's upscaled? Here we go.

http://www.playfeed.com/index.php/playfeed...rules-11151243/

http://www.ferrago.com/story/6880

http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=0...2110226&tid=211

"That's right, PGR3 renders at 1024X600 rather than 1386X720. Then the 360 hardware upscales to 720p. That works out to 614,000 pixels instead of 985,000. A significant difference. And we're still only getting 30 frames per second? Bah, humbug I say."

They, you mean person really did, assemble? No, reply so jmole flames dont go to common belief... :rolleyes:

Where did they say that?

It happens every PS3 thread.

It happend in this thread after YOU brought it up, its like you're trying to start things, (lol, in your own words) "It happens every PS3 thread."

Anyway, good news about Ut2k7, but the PC version will be better if just for the mod's.

:)

Veteran

b mitchell

Posted
Posted

Wrong.

The poster asked why would you play UT offline? Simply because you can't really play it online with PS3 unless the developer supports it himself because Sony's online capabilities are nonexistent otherwise.

Now, breathe... :cool:

Completely supported if the developer wants, and you are stupid enough to think Epic wouldn't? Come on, I know you can figure this one out. Dont be naive to think EPIC of all developers isn't going to do online for the PS3. Naughty Dog even did online for the PS2, of course Epic will with its size.

You know and knew that Epic will support online for PS3. It is only logical. Your comment was a pure flame bait to get people who are PS3 fanboys to get fired up over your lack of knowledge and cheapshot at Sony.

Grand Master

Laughing-Man

Posted
Posted
QUOTE(jmole @ Dec 7 2005, 20:05) *Where did they say that?

It happend in this thread after YOU brought it up, its like you're trying to start things, (lol, in your own words) "It happens every PS3 thread."

What are you talking about? I asked him where did Sony say all the games would be in the resolution he mentioned.

It's like your responding to a completely different question that no one asked.

Grand Master

magik

Posted
Posted

Completely supported if the developer wants, and you are stupid enough to think Epic wouldn't? Come on, I know you can figure this one out. Dont be naive to think EPIC of all developers isn't going to do online for the PS3. Naughty Dog even did online for the PS2, of course Epic will with its size.

Please re-read my post. I never said the developer wouldn't support it. But either way, you really cannot compare anything a developer can create for their individual games with the unified system that Microsoft has put forth. Sony fanboy or not, Microsoft fanboy or not, PC fanboy or not.

Veteran

b mitchell

Posted
Posted

Please re-read my post. I never said the developer wouldn't support it. But either way, you really cannot compare anything a developer can create for their individual games with the unified system that Microsoft has put forth. Sony fanboy or not, Microsoft fanboy or not, PC fanboy or not.

Ignore your initial comment all you want. It was flame bait. Next time, dont do it.

Grand Master

Laughing-Man

Posted
Posted

Please re-read my post. I never said the developer wouldn't support it. But either way, you really cannot compare anything a developer can create for their individual games with the unified system that Microsoft has put forth. Sony fanboy or not, Microsoft fanboy or not, PC fanboy or not.

PS3 will let you play online like everyone has been doing for the past 10+ years on PCs. It's not that big of deal if it is unifed or not.

Grand Master

magik

Posted
Posted

Ignore your initial comment all you want. It was flame bait. Next time, dont do it.

Your comment is meaningless without something to back up your claim. Haven't you ever written a persuasive essay before? Come on, you can do better than that. :p

Surrieall:

There is a difference between reviewing a game (opinion based) and reporting on a feature of an upcoming system from a reliable source (Epic's Mark Rein, who works closley with Sony of course). Thank you, come agian. :)

Veteran

+vlsi0n Subscriber¹

Posted
  • Subscriber¹
Posted

PS3 will let you play online like everyone has been doing for the past 10+ years on PCs. It's not that big of deal if it is unifed or not.

But its night and day between the differences in a unified online service, and a online service like for example, the PS2's. I'd say that's a big deal, and would rather not branch off into the pro's and cons of each type of online service, that battles been fought.

PS3 will let you play online just like the PC, but like it says on the ratings for the games, Online Experiences may Vary. ;)

(in my last quote of you Jmole, I was getting at how you were saying fanboi's assemble, but after re-reading it didnt make sense as to what I was trying to say)

Grand Master

magik

Posted
Posted

PS3 will let you play online like everyone has been doing for the past 10+ years on PCs. It's not that big of deal if it is unifed or not.

Tell that to the millions of Xbox Live subscribers.

But its night and day between the differences in a unified online service, and a online service like for example, the PS2's. I'd say that's a big deal, and would rather not branch off into the pro's and cons of each type of online service, that battles been fought.

PS3 will let you play online just like the PC, but like it says on the ratings for the games, Online Experiences may Vary. ;)

(in my last quote of you, I was getting at how you were saying fanboi's assemble, but after re-reading it didnt make sense as to what I was trying to say)

lol, "Online experiences may vary" is for the rating of the game. A game rated T for teen could change to an M for mature because of people online (cursing, etc). That's why games say that, not because of the difference between a unified system and a stand-alone system.

Grand Master

Laughing-Man

Posted
Posted

But its night and day between the differences in a unified online service, and a online service like for example, the PS2's. I'd say that's a big deal, and would rather not branch off into the pro's and cons of each type of online service, that battles been fought.

My last thing about this because this is getting way derailed. I know I am not alone when I say if I am playing a game like Unreal Tournament 2007 on a console, which I wouldn't anyway, I would just want to select multiplayer on the menu, have a server browser pop-up, which would let me select a game to play along with a favorites\friends list. That is it, no extra bl0at, no extra crap for me to deal with. I could care less about match making, the market place, messenging, , etc. Just like the way Unreal Tournament's multiplayer is on the PC.

Tell that to the millions of Xbox Live subscribers.
2 million Xbox live subscribers don't even come close to the amount of people who play PC games or probably even PS2 online gamers for that matter.
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5

      By Copernic · Posted

      Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 by Razvan Serea Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) is a utility for completely removing AMD/NVIDIA/INTEL graphics drivers and related packages from your system, attempting to eliminate all leftovers (including registry entries, folders and files, driver store). Though AMD/NVIDIA/INTEL drivers can usually be removed via the Windows Control Panel, this uninstaller tool was created for situations where standard uninstall fails, or when you need to fully remove NVIDIA or ATI graphics card drivers. After using this driver cleaner, your system will behave as though it’s the first time you’re installing a new driver—similar to a fresh Windows installation. As with all such tools, we recommend creating a restore point beforehand, allowing you to undo changes if issues arise. If you're having trouble installing an older or newer driver, try it—there are reports that it resolves such problems. Recommended usage: The tool can be used in Normal mode but for absolute stability when using DDU, Safemode is always the best. Make a backup or a system restore (but it should normally be pretty safe). It is best to exclude the DDU folder completely from any security software to avoid issues. You do NOT need to uninstall the driver prior using DDU. Requirements: .NET Framework 4.8 Compatible with Windows 7, 8, 8.1, 10, and 11 (32-bit or 64-bit) Note: Using on Insider Preview builds is at your own risk. Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 changelog: Added 'Reset to recommended' button for the Options. General fixes and improvements. Download: Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 | 1.7 MB (Freeware) Download: DDU Portable | 1.2 MB Links: Display Driver Uninstaller Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview

      By Copernic · Posted

      WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview by Razvan Serea WACUP (WinAmp Community Update Project) is a modern, enhanced version of the classic Winamp music player, designed for better stability, performance, and compatibility. Built for Windows, WACUP retains the familiar Winamp interface while adding 64-bit support, bug fixes, and new features like improved audio format support, customizable skins, and optimized playlist management. Unlike bloated alternatives, WACUP focuses on lightweight performance and regular updates, making it the best choice for fans of the classic Winamp experience. Basically, if you miss the good old days of Winamp and want a modern upgrade that doesn’t mess things up, WACUP is for you! WACUP key features: Classic Winamp Feel – Keeps the familiar interface and functionality. Bug Fixes & Stability – Fixes old Winamp issues and improves performance. 64-Bit Support – Works better on modern systems. More Formats & Plugins – Supports additional audio formats and third-party plugins. Customizable UI – Skins and tweaks for a personalized look. Better Library Management – Improved playlists, media organization, and search. No Bloat – Focuses on performance without unnecessary extras. Regular Updates – Community-driven development with new features and fixes. WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview changelog: Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when doing some of the drag + drop actions within the media library window Fixed a loading crash seen related to a problem with some of the artwork cache image files being restored which should now be better handled allowing for the bad image to be removed without it failing Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when the internal metadata cache clearing is triggered which could block the main ui thread for too long with this now being moved to a background thread Fixed some performance issues with some of the methods related to determining artwork support which mainly affected the local library import / refresh (this is still slower for some compared to other players because there's more data & artwork aspects being checked for which means doing more processing on a single file despite the best of attempts to reduce duplicate / heavy processing where possible) Fixed a crash with the JTFE based missing files hotkey which no one seems to have used for an age for this to appear (maybe it's time to seriously consider stripping out features that aren't being used) Fixed how some of the file types which use extra information to reference their sub-songs is handled which was preventing some from being correctly resolved back to their base file (noticed fixing above) Fixed an issue with the handling of files with underscores in their filepath which wasn't being correctly handled causing some of the filename to be lost when shown as the title if title reading is delayed Fixed a few things that might be behind NotSoDirect not being stable for some setups though am still not certain that the changes done for this are going to fully resolve the problem from the crash reports Fixed the OS toast handling when there's no prior shortcut in the OS start menu to now create the shortcut (needed to allow the yes/no buttons for the new build / post-release toast) to be done as a hidden one so it's less likely to cause annoyance for those not wanting to see it whilst still allowing this less than ideal OS api implementation requirement to be met to avoid toasts without the needed buttons Fixed a regression when moving from taglib1 to taglib2 which broke some of the handling in place to allow for external programs to still access files when wacup has a held open cached instance of the file Everything else Updated cppwinrt (gen_win10shell.dll) to 3.0.260520.1 (26 May 2026) Updated libcurl (libcurl.dll) to 8.2.1 (24 Jun 2026) Updated Monkey's Audio (in_ape.dll) to 13.15 (28 Jun 2026) Updated mpg123 (mpg123.dll) to 1.33.6 (6 Jun 2026) Updated OpenSSL (libcurl.dll) to 3.5.7 (9 Jun 2026) Updated pugixml to 1.16 (16 Jun 2026) Updated taglib (tag2.dll) to 2.3.0 (11 May 2026) Updated vgmstream (in_vgmstream.dll) to the latest Git commit from 28 Jun 2026 Download: WACUP 64-bit | 9.6 MB (Freeware) Download: WACUP 32-bit View: WACUP Website | Screenshots Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Dbrand thought they could get away with this Steam Machine case, Valve disagreed

      By Doli · Posted

      "over a thousand engineering hours" and started selling it but could not take a couple of minuets to send an AI email to ask permission. What an expensive lesson.
    • Can't access the forum on mobile

      By WITHOUT-ME · Posted

      just tested it yesterday, a simple page with autoloading ADS takes 60mb....just 1 page for 60 megabytes.   poor people with a limited internet never will visit neolose
    • Tor Browser 15.0.17

      By Copernic · Posted

      Tor Browser 15.0.17 by Razvan Serea Protect your privacy. Defend yourself against network surveillance and traffic analysis. Tor is a network of virtual tunnels that allows people and groups to improve their privacy and security on the Internet. The Tor software protects you by bouncing your communications around a distributed network of relays run by volunteers all around the world: it prevents somebody from watching your Internet connection and learning what sites you visit, it prevents the sites you visit from learning your physical location, and it lets you access sites which are blocked. The Tor Browser Bundle lets you use Tor on Windows, Mac OS X, or Linux without needing to install any software. It can run off a USB flash drive, comes with a pre-configured web browser to protect your anonymity, and is self-contained. Tor Browser 15.0.17 changelog: All Platforms Updated Tor to 0.4.9.11 Updated NoScript to 13.6.25.1984 Build System / All Platforms Bug tor-browser-build#41821: Update gpg subkeys for boklm Bug tor-browser-build#41827: Update morgan's keychain with renewed key Download: Tor Browser (64-bit) | Tor Browser (32-bit) | 109.0 MB (Open Source) View: Tor Browser Website | Other Operating Systems Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware

  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      530
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      55
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!