Best All Time Gaming Platforms!


Best All Time Gaming Platforms  

945 members have voted

  1. 1. Next Generation

    • Microsoft Xbox 360
      268
    • Sony PS3
      207
    • Nintendo Wii
      139
    • Personal Computer
      313
    • Other (Specify Below)
      18
  2. 2. Current Generation

    • Microsoft Xbox
      138
    • Sony PS2
      279
    • Nintendo Gamecube
      46
    • Personal Computer
      393
    • Nintendo DS
      60
    • Sony PSP
      17
    • Other (Specify Below)
      12
  3. 3. Previous Generation(s)

    • Sega Dreamcast
      64
    • Sony Playstation
      169
    • Nintendo 64
      157
    • Game Boy Advance & SP
      11
    • Personal Computer
      196
    • Game Boy (Orig / Pocket / Color / Original Adv) (Specify Below)
      21
    • Nintendo NES
      65
    • Super Nintendo
      215
    • Sega Saturn / Genesis (Specify Below)
      31
    • Other (Specify Below)
      16


Recommended Posts

Well, I grown up in the 90's, which means I'm more a new-generation guy. Even if NES was a superb console, won't I get the retro feeling playing it. My first console was a Nintendo 64, and I loved it - and I still do actully. For what you call the current generation (outdated) I voted Xbox. Had many, many nice times with that console. Later on I switched to Xbox 360 - which I think is the best console ever made (for my use). I understand why you old guys around here (20-30+) vote for the good old NES and SNES, but I didn't have the times with those consoles, and if I try them now I wont get the "WOW" feeling you did back in the 80's.

So I ended up voting Xbox 360 for next-gen, Xbox for "current" gen and Nintendo 64 for the old-gen.

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

The Wii got my vote as it is so revolutionary, then the DS for the same reasons. Then b4 that I voted for the N64 mainly due to games like Goldeneye and Mario64, coz they were much better than the rest of the competition at the time and are still very playable today.

I probably sound like a big Nintendo fan, but that isnt true. I actaully want a PS3 next opposed to a Wii, but felt the Wii deserved my vote.

  • 2 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Now (7th Gen): PS3

6th Gen:PS2/Dreamcast

5th Gen:Playstation/N64

4th Gen:Mega Drive/SNES

Using your generation guide, my votes would be:

7th Gen Xbox 360

6th Gen Dream Cast (though I think this is closer to 5th Gen)

5th Gen Nintendo 64

4th Gen SNES

All Time Super Nintendo Entertainment System!

No DC is considered the very first console of the 6th gen. It rivalled a lot of games when the PS2 first came out in terms of gfx. Plus, it was the first console to come standard with a modem and web browser. That's why it's seperated from the 5th gen :yes: It was the DC vs PS2, Gamecube & Xbox. 5th Gen it was between Saturn, PS1 & N64 (not going to count the 3DO etc :p).

  • 3 weeks later...

Well even though I own a PS3, I'll give the 360 the edge for "next-gen". However, Home could change things if it ever comes out.

Last gen, PS2 hands down. I think it's hard to argue that one.

All-time: The original NES. I mean, I grew up with it. I love it!

  • 3 weeks later...

Okay, I bought a 360, sold it for a PS3, and then got back my 360. And I can tell you one thing for sure: The PS3 is a LOT more premium experience than a 360. The XMB is very clean, lean and highly streamlined as compared to the cluttery, crammed up and a very AVERAGE interface of the 360 which also is not as productive for me. The PS3's xbo is so much smoother and less jittery when compared to the 360s interface. Put it simply: The PS3 feel likes driving a BMW, while the 360 feels like a modified ricer.

Even the controller, I thought I;d like the 360s controller more, due to my liking of FPSes, but after actually trying to play Halo, I came to a certain conclusion: Controllers will always suck for FPSes. Nothing matches the keyboard + mouse. (A KB+mouse will beat the crap out of a controller in a FPS multiplayer, any day.) So discounting that, I ended up liking the PS3 Controller much, much more. It's smaller, lighter and the controls are right there and not to spread out like on the 360s controller.

And finally; on games: Both the consoles seem to have their fair share of good games, so there isn't much to debate about here, though I have to mention that the PS3's titles seem more nice and unique. I raelly like titles like God of War and Lair, and games like Little Big Planet are just nice. PS3's games seem to be made with the more "out of the box" thought.

Now you might ask, why did I get the 360 back? Simply because the PS3 games, as they're not officially sold here, are a lot more expensive the the same games that come out for the 360. I might invest in a PS3 again later when the prices come down and when God of War 3 is released.

I always liked the XMB from when I first got my PSP. The transition from PSP to PS3 was quite natural and very easy. I never liked the Xbox dashboard, as I always though of it like "Fisher Price: My First UI". Yes it is functional but I don't think it has that 'upmarket' feel the xmb has.

The inprovements implemented for the PSN store has further reinforced that feeling, as before the web browser based store felt clunky and tacked on.

Xbox 360, for one reason only; it has the greatest joypad ever invented. The PS3 would otherwise have taken it as I love the xbar interface and media capabilities.

Xbox, XBMC on my soft-modded xbox was the coolest **** ever.

Dreamcast, just for sheer innovation and balls. Plus I loved Metropolis Street Racer, the precursor to the Project Gotham series.

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...

SNES/PS2/PC.. These would have to be my fav.. Hard to judge tho as I still own my Atari 2600 up to my PS2 and a lot in between.. (About 20 consoles in boxes stored in the basement) Never got into current gen hardware yet.. PS3 might be my choice tho.. :) Maybe my answer will change then. :p lol

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!