Recommended Posts

Well, I'm officially at the point where I will not purchase anything else from Microsoft. It's a sad day when they come down on this community and great visual style creators like Kol. Even Apple allowed skinning community to create skins, they did prevent community from creating functionality modules that worked on PC, but allowed themes. This is how low Microsoft can get. I'm still not sure even though Kol's theme looked like Vista, how exactly it was a breach of any legal document. He did not reverse engineer any of the code nor used existing graphics (made by Microsoft). He made all of the graphics himself, Vista look is publicly available; He did not sell it or made it for any commercial benefit.

He used legally purchased software and created everything from scratch. I am very upset that a corporation sinks down this low and goes against individuals like this even though they themselves as a corporation blatantly copy every single look or good idea out there on the market.

Up to this point I purchased every single piece of software from Microsoft and in one way or the other supported their efforts to improve it, but this is simply ridiculous. Microsoft, why don't you go against Stardock for making a piece of software that is capable of emulating Vista functionality as oppose to going against young individuals that just want to make their desktops prettier by creating their own graphics. This is totally absurd.

I guarantee that as a business owner and as an IT consultant I will make sure that from this day on all of my clients and friends understand that Microsoft products are not worth it. Days or your monopoly are almost over and there is a lot of good alternatives to your software. I will make sure that everyone I know gets this message both in business and private affairs. If you think that I am nothing on the grand scale of things you are seriously mistaken. I alone was giving thousands of dollars to your corporation from MSDN subscriptions to latest versions of software and from now on I'm canceling every single subscription and you can count that I have no interest in buying anything else from Microsoft. I will make sure that my company also does not purchase a single piece of software or service from you which right now probably ranges from $50,000 to $100,000 annually. We will be switching to other methods.

This is not because of just coming down hard on Kol (a young modder), but because this shows me what exactly type of company you really are. What can I expect from you tomorrow for my business? Certainly nothing good. Your support wasn't that good anyways to begin with. Talking to people who can't even speak English properly is not what we are paying big money for.

Just keep at it and you will definitely find yourself scratching yourself on the head and asking what went wrong. That day is coming and you've just stepped closer to it with the gesture you did with one of the members of this community.

Sincerely,

EX-Microsoft user and supporter.

Have a great day.

Well, I'm officially at the point where I will not purchase anything else from Microsoft. It's a sad day when they come down on this community and great visual style creators like Kol. Even Apple allowed skinning community to create skins, they did prevent community from creating functionality modules that worked on PC, but allowed themes. This is how low Microsoft can get. I'm still not sure even though Kol's theme looked like Vista, how exactly it was a breach of any legal document. He did not reverse engineer any of the code nor used existing graphics (made by Microsoft). He made all of the graphics himself, Vista look is publicly available; He did not sell it or made it for any commercial benefit.

He used legally purchased software and created everything from scratch. I am very upset that a corporation sinks down this low and goes against individuals like this even though they themselves as a corporation blatantly copy every single look or good idea out there on the market.

Up to this point I purchased every single piece of software from Microsoft and in one way or the other supported their efforts to improve it, but this is simply ridiculous. Microsoft, why don't you go against Stardock for making a piece of software that is capable of emulating Vista functionality as oppose to going against young individuals that just want to make their desktops prettier by creating their own graphics. This is totally absurd.

I guarantee that as a business owner and as an IT consultant I will make sure that from this day on all of my clients and friends understand that Microsoft products are not worth it. Days or your monopoly are almost over and there is a lot of good alternatives to your software. I will make sure that everyone I know gets this message both in business and private affairs. If you think that I am nothing on the grand scale of things you are seriously mistaken. I alone was giving thousands of dollars to your corporation from MSDN subscriptions to latest versions of software and from now on I'm canceling every single subscription and you can count that I have no interest in buying anything else from Microsoft. I will make sure that my company also does not purchase a single piece of software or service from you which right now probably ranges from $50,000 to $100,000 annually. We will be switching to other methods.

This is not because of just coming down hard on Kol (a young modder), but because this shows me what exactly type of company you really are. What can I expect from you tomorrow for my business? Certainly nothing good. Your support wasn't that good anyways to begin with. Talking to people who can't even speak English properly is not what we are paying big money for.

Just keep at it and you will definitely find yourself scratching yourself on the head and asking what went wrong. That day is coming and you've just stepped closer to it with the gesture you did with one of the members of this community.

Sincerely,

EX-Microsoft user and supporter.

Have a great day.

:angry:

Days or your monopoly are almost over and there is a lot of good alternatives to your software.
Yes, they are going to be seriously damaged by you and your boycott. I don't know how they'll manage. Vista will probably never even see the light of day.
If you think that I am nothing on the grand scale of things you are seriously mistaken.
Yeah, right. :rolleyes: You're delusional.

Don't let the door hit you on the way out. Microsoft isn't going to miss your business.

Sincerely,

EX-Microsoft user and supporter.

Have a great day.

Have fun with that. Good luck.

where was the news about kol being prosecuted ever published? i'd like to either hear it directly from him or read the source thread

Yeah.. so would I.

where was the news about kol being prosecuted ever published? i'd like to either hear it directly from him or read the source thread

Goto the VistaXP thread. He posted they asked him to remove the VS.

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...ost&p=586914719

that's just wrong

but MS is banking on the new look to sell the OS, because alot fo the new thing's that Vista was suposed to incorperate, isnt in it, and is an addon to XP also when Vista comes out

KoL wasn't prosecuted. Microsoft e-mailed him and ask him nicely (Kols words) to remove it. So KoL has removed it and won't be updating it and asked everyone to not distribute it anymore. Meanwhile, another person is taking a Vista theme he said KoL helped him on and updating it and plans on releasing it soon. Which I think is bullcrap. This person said Microsoft e-mailed them also to not distribute the 1.0 version. But he says "they didn't say anything about 1.1" It has work done by Kol and he'll call it his own. BULL

Well, I'm officially at the point where I will not purchase anything else from Microsoft.

Piracy will be much more your thing now, because we all know you will keep using Microsoft products.

Your just an insignificant drop in the bucket and so is $50000-$100000.

Oh comon... someone copying a COPYRIGTED work is not allowed... for it to be legal you do have to do a certain amount of changes that distinquish it from the original work to claim artistic freedom to make a copy of something... Apple cracked down on people making OSX theme copies originally... They screamed at Stardock and a bunch of themers back when the pinstripe aqua theme came out... MS should be allowed to protect stuff they put a lot of money into also... if someone copied something you worked hard on and devalued you work, you'd be screaming too if it took money away from you.

That's a joke. Why don't they prohibit people who make Vista themes for Windowblinds? Or why didn't they go after people when XP themes (before XP was released) surfaced? Is their reasoning that people won't buy Vista if they can replicate the look - how stupid is that.

Not for nothing this can be seen as a good thing.

The support and name Kol will get for himself out of this can definitely be seen as a positive thing.

Just trying to see another side to it all. This can be spun into something positive IMO.

It's an image thing. KoL, Bant...those guys make Microsoft's theme design team look like freakin pre-schoolers. If I'm Microsoft I don't want somebody showing up my company either.

not really, kol copied the vista theme, if the guy from ms never made the theme then kol would have never come up with it. and im my oppionion the way microsoft has the vista theme looks better than the one kol copied off them.

i'm not bagging out kol, i like his theme, but you can't expect to copy someone with out them getting ****ed off

This is bull. Starock emulated the whole goddamn Windows Vista engine (visual). KoL emultated the theme, and just that.

Copyright dont matter as he made the images himself.

you know that stardock has deals with microsoft.

This thread is pointless. Vista is still in the beta stages and they are not sure yet what the final gui or visual style will look like. It was probably asked to be taken down due to the name. If he didn't label it vista or xp he would probably be in the clear.

honestly, how many people actually hack or use a program to change their visual style?

there are maybe 150-200 visual style makers

maybe 500,000 to 1 million people who actual know what visual styles are and change them.

it is such a smal drop in the bucket. The visual style and wb skin were very cool, but you know kol will break out with something more innovative then vista crap.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!