Recommended Posts

They should not have allowed Stardock to add the functionality to WB5 its microsofts fault for letting stardock do it when stardock perposely did it to emulate the vista look. Not Kols fault and i will continue to distribute the theme regardless of his or microsofts wishes.

BTW for all you that dont know stardock has an extremely close releationship with microsoft, so much in fact that stardock is helping microsoft design the gui for windows vista (they also partialy helped with xp but not as much as they are now. They aperantly got the "ok" to include the glass effects in eb5 from microsoft who should and would have stoped them by now if it was not ok. So microsoft needs to target the company which is enabling the skinner. not the skinner himself.

That is stupid... It wouldn't be if Stardock really made WB5 to emulate Vista, like they really made ObjectDock to emulate the OSX dock (and should be sued for), but they did not make WB5 to emulate Vista. Alpha blended title bars are not a thing of the new, and there were certainly thousands of skins which had rounded corners that could have used anti aliasing before even Windows XP and OSX, which is the real reason Stardock did this. There are lots of things Stardock did wrong, this isn't one of them. It's KoL's fault and only his, for using making both WB and MSStyles themes that copy Microsoft's UI.

I just wonder what if WB5 had Kol's VistaXP included as an official theme (along with the 4-5 themes that came pre-installed )when WB5 came out. That would have been interesting

It would be interesting and if it were so, I'd wish upon Microsoft to take Stardock out :yes: But VistaXP was not included in WB5 default.

I just wonder what if WB5 had Kol's VistaXP included as an official theme (along with the 4-5 themes that came pre-installed )when WB5 came out. That would have been interesting

Stardocks owner screenshoted a theme called Arrow (a nocoff of Aero) it has the vista look, just wasnt as sexy as Kol's thats close enough in my book.

https://www.neowin.net/index.php?act=view&id=31613

screenshot down on the page : http://www.stardock.com/news/templa45.jpg

and also the first comment is incriminating enough:

#1 Posted by R3zZo on 04 Dec 2005 - 13:02 Reply to this comment

Look really good the Arrow (~Vista) skin.

thanks, i want buy this version.

the community knows its not Kol at fault but its really microsoft and their poor choice of people to attack. They should attack only stardock or no one.

Edited by divertom15
so much in fact that stardock is helping microsoft design the gui for windows vista

I'm sure you may be right, but I'd like to see where this is documented. I can't help thinking that MS would have chosen a company such as The Skins Factory who they use for many other design areas and who have a proven track-record in design, as opposed to StarDock. They may create Windows based apps, but are far from what most would consider designers.

This is bull. Starock emulated the whole goddamn Windows Vista engine (visual). KoL emultated the theme, and just that.

Copyright dont matter as he made the images himself.

It does. I can take a photo of you, and post it on the net. You can sue me. I can also engineer such an image pixel-by-pixel, to look like you, and you can still sue me, because it is obviously an image of you.

I cheer and applaud Microsoft for having the balls to do this. Why the hell should he be allowed to rip off their artwork? He is copying Microsoft's work pixel per pixel. Maybe they feel like the Vsita GUI is a user experience that should only be available to those who purchased Vista. Maybe they don't want anyone to think he is asociated with them. Maybe their graphic artists are just plain prudes. But regardless of the reason, who the hell is anyone here to question this?

It's their copyrighted material. And if I was Apple, I would sue Stardock so bad for ObjectDock that the company wouldn't have any pockets to burn holes in. This isn't some God damn open source, GNU GPL, SourceForge hosted piece of freely distributable code and graphics. This is a copyrighted, patented, closed source, commercial product. And if you're going to create software trying to mimic it, prepare to have to take it down the second they feel you're bad for business, at their discretion.

To the original poster: good luck trying to stop using Microsoft products...

ObjectDock is freeware.

That's horrible.

But it's not like the visual style was harming them, they should be happy that people are interested in there Vista GUI, they come down on someone like KoL, but they forget about all the other crack/warez websites for Windows. (N)

Not good news to the customizing/visual styles community.

-kol will listen to MS. Crack sites can't be persued because- 1. they're not hosted in America, 2. because international governments don't co-operate, 3. because there's no money to be made from suing them.

I am actually stunned that they let it ride for as long as they did. I hope this sends a message out to all modders and skinners who's talent seems to start and end at simply emulating the work of others, that they now need to start really creating. I know that sounds harsh and won't win me friends but I've never been too concerned about that.

If it means that we may now see some originality put back into design, that's a good thing.

Head over to KoLs website. Hes talented; he doesnt just emulate peoples/companies ideas.

You can't help but understand Micrsosoft's perspective here (as much as I otherwise detest them). It must take the shine off a product launch. Hell Vista isn't released yet and, in part thanks to Kol and others who jump on the bandwagon, I'm already sick to death of seeing it. I can't believe I'm the only one.

How does it take the shine off the product launch? What percentage of people do you think will have seen the theme before Vista comes out? The hardcore Windows beta community is a small percentage and not the market share that makes or breaks a Windows product...

I think that the Vista look is the only thing MS has as a selling point next gen to the general public. It would be nice if this dirty secret were made public. Seriosuly MS needs to go down and get some Intel vs AMD type competition. (Yes I know of linux but game publishers largely ignore it).

Head over to KoLs website. Hes talented; he doesnt just emulate peoples/companies ideas.

Now I know you are kidding me, right? Most of his collection is based on the works of others. He's a "porter" yes, but not a designer. Porting is no rocket science. Most of the work and real talent has already been done by others. I have absolutely no respect for it.

What a bunch of bullsh*t! :angry:

I thought Apple was the only company around that would complain when people would compliment there work by creating a visual style that shows of some of finer aspects of the new operating system. Microsoft shouldn't look at KoL's work as a threat; they should see this in a positive light. Having KoL create the Vista XP Visual Style, and WindowBlinds, KoL is opening the door for current XP users to get excited about the interface improvements that are being developed in Windows Vista. Think of KoL like a walking Vista billboard.

It's not like KoL is out trying to program his own version of Vista on Windows XP. He's not out trying to build the live searching feature and other enhancements within the start menu. All he is doing is recreating the visual experience that an XP user could experience in Vista when it is released.

Microsoft's decision to send KoL a 'nice' letter is still a bad PR move. I don't care if it was a threat or if it was a "pretty please will you remove" letter.

Now I know you are kidding me, right? Most of his collection is based on the works of others. He's a "porter" yes, but not a designer. Porting is no rocket science. Most of the work and real talent has already been done by others. I have absolutely no respect for it.

Thank God other people dont think the same way you think and have contacted me to create skins and icons for their companies.

I knew what I was facing when I created VistaXP. Yes, my theme use copyright material but it also have graphics made from scratch. I said it before they send me the letter, I wouldnt have any problem if they ask me to take the skin now. I really didnt thought they were going to contacted me but they did and I repect their wishes. What I think is not fair is that they only took down just one skin when you can find tons of other Vista based skin using the same resources that I used on the net.

Edited by KoL

They did the same thing to Enhanced Labs, and it didn't even look that much like Longhorn.

Besides, I'm sure that everyone who wanted it grabbed it by now. As much as I don't like that Microsoft made him take the skin down, he is copying a style from an officially unreleased OS. That and also I think MS (That's right, not M$) was probably kinda banking on it like someone else said in this thread, they want users to not be so familiar with it when it comes out. They don't worry about those crappy copies because they know no one uses them. So many people downloaded KoL's port it's ridiculous. If he sold that theme he would be laughing on his way to the bank.

Buuuut ya, it's expected that MS would shut this down. After all, it is from an unreleased OS.

It does. I can take a photo of you, and post it on the net. You can sue me. I can also engineer such an image pixel-by-pixel, to look like you, and you can still sue me, because it is obviously an image of you.

Depends if the picture is taken in a public place.

ObjectDock is freeware.

So what? First of all there is a pay version of ObjectDock that has extra features but capitalizes on Apple's dock just as much as the free version. Secondly, even if it were freeware, it doesn't give Stardock the excuse to copy Apple's intellectual property.

What a bunch of bullsh*t! :angry::

I thought Apple was the only company around that would complain when people would compliment there work by creating a visual style that shows of some of finer aspects of the new operating system. Microsoft shouldn't look at KoL's work as a threat; they should see this in a positive light. Having KoL create the Vista XP Visual Style, and WindowBlinds, KoL is opening the door for current XP users to get excited about the interface improvements that are being developed in Windows Vista. Think of KoL like a walking Vista billboard.

It's not like KoL is out trying to program his own version of Vista on Windows XP. He's not out trying to build the live searching feature and other enhancements within the start menu. All he is doing is recreating the visual experience that an XP user could experience in Vista when it is released.

Microsoft's decision to send KoL a 'nice' letter is still a bad PR move. I don't care if it was a threat or if it was a "pretty please will you remove" letter.

That's the biggest load of BS I've ever heard... It's not a "compliment" when someone steals your work and ports it to another system, where you may not want to make it available. And no one is going to get "excited about Windows Vista by being opened this door in Windows XP." If anything, it will only drive away some of the 99% of computer users who don't know anything beyond the interface, and who would get excited about Vista purely because of the pretty interface. KoL is not a "walking Vista billboard", he's a walking "You can get it for free without Vista" board. Obviously Microsoft feels this way, and they have every damn right considering THEY CREATED THIS CONTENT.

And that's right, KoL is not out creating his own code or graphics, that is the problem. If it was his own GUI, Microsoft wouldn't care whether it looked better than Windows or not. That is proven with the hundreds of ORIGINAL skins that currently look better than Windows XP, but Microsoft doesn't care about. KoL is copying Microsoft's graphics pixel per pixel.

Thank God other people dont think the same way you think and have contacted me to create skins and icons for their companies.

I'm sure others do. It just happens that I'm gobby enough to say it. Just to be sure of my view, I just took yet another look at your list of visual styles on your site. The vast majority are based on the works of others. True or false? Unless I'm missing something, it's undeniably true.

My point being that you can't expect to rip, sorry, port the works of others without a bumpy ride. It's not you per se that irritates me, rather the fact that a great many so called "designers" now confuse copying the works of others with design. There's no imagination left, no spark of creativity. It's just the same old rubbish being churned out day after day.

You just happen to be the amongst the most well-known of them. (And no, that's really not an accolade to be proud of.) Nothing personal. I stand by my original comment that I hope others learn from this, and actually start designing again and not just robbing each other!

Edited by SniperX

Apple had all Aqua-like themes removed from the internet a few years ago prior to OS X being released. Now they really don't care. I would expect MS to do nothing less than protect an unreleased product.

:yes:

Agreed, it would be nice to see a theme that doesn't look like a half-a** version of OS X or Vista every twenty minutes. Most real "artists" don't spend their waking lives doing copies of the Mona Lisa.

:yes:

I can understand why Microsoft did this; I would do the same thing under their circumstances. It's not like this is a punch in the stomach for KoL - his other work is fantastic, whether or not it's a port; he's not going to crawl into a hole and die because Microsoft told him to stop porting their VS.

And good luck with that "never buying any Microsoft products again" thing, but I doubt you'll do it. Everybody uses Microsoft products - I mean, name one business that can survive without Office. I'll sure you'll get over this in a few days.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Linux 7.1 arrives with an NTFS overhaul and major hardware performance boosts by Paul Hill The founder of the Linux kernel has just announced the availability of Linux 7.1. This is a stable version of the kernel that will now be tested by various Linux distributions before it is shipped to users through update managers. Some users, like those on Debian, for example, might not get it for a long time, if at all, while Fedora users can expect it in the near future. With Linux 7.1 out on time, the merge window for Linux 7.2 is now open, giving contributors the opportunity to send in major new features that have been waiting for the last two months. Torvalds warned that he is currently travelling and will be in another timezone, so timing for the merge window may be irregular due to timezone differences and limited internet access. Torvalds said that he has already fetched early pull requests to allow him to do some offline work, but the travel could still cause disruption. Right now, he is not planning to extend the release, but did consider it. He said he might later regret not extending, though. In terms of this last week of development for Linux 7.1, Torvalds said there were no major or alarming changes. This week consisted mostly of smaller driver updates to GPU, networking, and sound, networking fixes, trace tooling fixes, and misc minor fixes. The shortlog this week lists fixes for driver bugs, memory leaks, I/O and USB fixes, networking and RDMA fixes, DRM/graphics fixes, and tooling and verification improvements. Specific fixes include USB series heap-overflow and buffer overflow fixes, and multiple use-after-free, memory-leak, and refcount corrections across subsystems such as i2c, zram, gpio, and net. There are fixes for graphics drivers, including amdgpu, i915, and virtio, as well as hypervisor and virtualization tweaks affecting mshv, vmbus, and hyperv. According to Phoronix, anyone running Linux 7.1 should look out for the new NTFS driver, Intel FRED for improved performance on Panther Lake and future CPUs, faster graphics with Intel Arc Battlemage, and improvements for older AMD Radeon GPUs. If you are running Linux on your computer and everything is fine, then you don’t need to worry about updating to Linux 7.1 as a priority; just wait for it to be pushed to you. If you have tried Linux on hardware but it didn’t work properly, trying again with a distro that uses Linux 7.1 could cause Linux to work on your machine, thanks to the new hardware support.
    • you can also do this with this tool: PowerSettingsExplorer made by mbk1969 at 3dguru forum.. I found it by accident researching on modern standby and annoying quirks of it in 2022
    • AB Download Manager 1.9.1 by Razvan Serea AB Download Manager is an open-source, feature-rich download manager designed to accelerate downloads, organize files efficiently, and provide seamless control over downloads. With support for multiple connections, resume capability, and an intuitive interface, it enhances the downloading experience for users seeking speed and reliability. The software integrates with various browsers, enabling quick link grabbing and batch downloading. It supports HTTP, HTTPS, and FTP protocols, ensuring broad compatibility with different file sources. Users can schedule downloads, set speed limits, and categorize files automatically for better organization. AB Download Manager is lightweight yet powerful, making it a great alternative to proprietary download managers. Its open-source nature allows developers to contribute, customize, and improve the software as needed. Whether you're downloading large files, managing multiple downloads at once, or seeking an ad-free experience, this tool offers a practical and efficient solution. Key features of AB Download Manager: Multi-Connection Support – Accelerates downloads by splitting files into multiple segments. Resume Capability – Allows paused or interrupted downloads to be resumed without starting over. Batch Downloading – Supports downloading multiple files at once for improved efficiency. Browser Integration – Captures download links directly from browsers for seamless operation. HTTP, HTTPS, and FTP Support – Ensures compatibility with a wide range of file sources. Download Scheduling – Enables users to automate downloads at specific times. Speed Limiting – Lets users control bandwidth usage for optimized performance. File Categorization – Automatically organizes downloaded files into designated folders. User-Friendly Interface – Simple and intuitive design for easy navigation. Cross-Platform Compatibility – Works on multiple operating systems. Ad-Free Experience – No intrusive ads or tracking for a clean user experience. AB Download Manager 1.9.1 changelog: Added An option to customize notification sounds (#1259) Fixed Ongoing notification was laggy on Samsung One UI devices (#1269) Improved Updated Translations Minor UI/UX improvements Download: AB Download Manager 1.9.1 | Portable | ~80.0 MB (Open Source) Download: ARM64 | Portable ARM64 | Android Links: AB Download Manager Website | Github Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • watching him because of the Mr Klinton cat
    • yup dude, ADS on this website are terrible
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      140
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!