Recommended Posts

you guys must understand... that what they did wasnt wrong. Hey I love VistaXp and KoL theme I mean check my sig, but the reason for it being taken off was the new startmen which wasnt in the public release which microsoft had released and that is why they requested it to be removed. It wasnt until ver 3.1 that they blocked it, check the new startmenu.

No, I haven't played Halo on the Xbox.
Then you played it on the PC. That would require Windows, aside from the fact that Halo is a Microsoft product itself.

And don't even try and say you've never played Halo. You wouldn't have the Master Chief as your avatar if that were the case.

you guys must understand... that what they did wasnt wrong. Hey I love VistaXp and KoL theme I mean check my sig, but the reason for it being taken off was the new startmen which wasnt in the public release which microsoft had released and that is why they requested it to be removed. It wasnt until ver 3.1 that they blocked it, check the new startmenu.

Son, Ur gunna get hit wit a warn

Hang on. Someone uses microsoft materials - which are ?.

Get's told to remove the visual style.

That's fair.

Kol didn't "make" the visual style, it was just copied from the Windows Vista product.

So I don't really understand why a company protecting it's ideas and design is seen as the evil one here?! :unsure::

Actually what's really immature is people threatening not to buy Microsoft software anymore because of all this. Sheesh.

You took this thing too far man. It's not as if MS sued Kol or something :p Stop using ms' products because they asked someone to remove a single visual style and THEY AGREED TO DO IT? What if he said no? Would you also boycott ms? There is not much logic in the follow up to your actions.

I'll keep to my word:

I'll only blame KoL if he actually ripped parts of the skin, even one tiny little bitmap, from any Aero.msstyles distributed with a Windows Vista Beta (such as the Start Menu button in the WindowBlinds theme). Otherwise, I don't see this as a valid reason for a C&D for the theme because this would've been the creator's original work, basing it off of the skin and not actually trying to depict it in any way, which I may contradict as to say that was its original purpose.

I don't see this as a valid reason for a C&D for the theme because this would've been the creator's original work

So if I get a book, and instead of photocopying the pages, I typed them all out, that would be fine? I could put my "original" book up on the Internet for anyone to have? You don't see anything wrong with that?

I just read the front news post, and everyones a little " :rolleyes: " because it's been 5 months since he first released. I seriously doubt theyve known about the skin for 5 months, not that it really matters anyway. Remember when that guy was selling themes on EBAY? How long do you think he was doing it before you all caught him. What if he had said "but I've been doing this for months..."

Would you say "oh...ok then"? Don't think so.

I just read the front news post, and everyones a little " :rolleyes: " because it's been 5 months since he first released. I seriously doubt theyve known about the skin for 5 months, not that it really matters anyway. Remember when that guy was selling themes on EBAY? How long do you think he was doing it before you all caught him. What if he had said "but I've been doing this for months..."

Would you say "oh...ok then"? Don't think so.

They knew about the theme even when the theme was Longhorn "5203". They asked Frogboy to remove the theme from WinCustomize a while ago (like the first month that I released the theme) Frogboy did it. But Microsoft never contacted me, deviatnART or any other site that I uploaded the theme. Frogboy put back the theme online because the issue is selective enforcement. They can’t just pick on a skin or a site simply because they casually learned about it. In November happened the same think but in December I got the e-mail from them. They wait after 5 month to take down the skin and they knew about it.

These ports are like fan art. Like all fan art you see out, Disney, Harry Potter, Spiderman etc. People even sell copyright material, trademarks or trade dress. Every violation of intellectual property is wrong but contrary to small guys like me big companies don’t have anything to lose. That's even free promotion to their products. Contrary to that small guys have everything to lose. Let’s say someone create a wallpaper or an icon set and them another guy rip it. No one will know that that work is from another guy, just the people that he shares his work.

Those Apple or Microsoft ports do more good than harm to their companies. A lot of people started using Mac port and a lot of them are now Mac user, including me.

I still say that they took my skin down because the popularity and they notice the skin. If the skin wasn’t that popular the skin would be online on WinCustomize, deviatnART and GetSkinned.

I bet all of you that Microsoft are not going to do anything to all Vista skins out there. Here's a quick list of some of the skin that I found only on deviantART and WinCustomize. In some minutes I found all those themes and there are a lot more all over the net.

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/25958655/

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/25906402/

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/25272836/

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/25005300/

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/25495627/

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/24533120/

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/24533120/

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/24304388/

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/22445663/

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/22150948/

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/21237264/

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/21229873/

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/21101461/

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/20903764/

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/20664808/

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/20604210/

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/19519681/

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/25937446/

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/23303209/

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/23049068/

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/22694060/

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/22286431/

http://www.wincustomize.com/ViewSkin.aspx?...ID=5456&LibID=1

http://www.wincustomize.com/ViewSkin.aspx?...ID=5440&LibID=1

http://www.wincustomize.com/ViewSkin.aspx?...ID=5347&LibID=1

http://www.wincustomize.com/ViewSkin.aspx?...ID=5311&LibID=1

http://www.wincustomize.com/ViewSkin.aspx?...ID=5383&LibID=1

http://www.wincustomize.com/ViewSkin.aspx?...ID=5314&LibID=1

http://www.wincustomize.com/ViewSkin.aspx?...ID=5297&LibID=1

Companies don’t care about it. Yes Apple took some two Aqua themes some years ago, they were popular themes back then but have they done anything to take down all the Aqua skin that are now online??? NO. Apple took down Yz Dock because it was popular. What happen with Objecdesktop, Mobydock??? They were available at the same time Yz Dock was. They didn’t take those down. Now we have a lot of themes and docks that are more similar to the OSX interface that those that Apple took down some years ago and are they doing somthing to protect their IP, NO. Big companies don’t care.

Edited by KoL

It's so pointless that they ask to remove VistaXP, yet Stardock is free to distribute the Arrow skin which also copies Windows Vista (albeit an inferior clone than the one by KoL). Also the real shocker in this thread to me is that Stardock are co-developing the Vista UI. With their reputation for ugly bloated interfaces I sure hope Vista will include a Windows Classic look. :p

They knew about the theme even when the theme was Longhorn "5203". They asked Frogboy to remove the theme from WinCustomize a while ago (like the first month that I released the theme) Frogboy did it. But Microsoft never contacted me, deviatnART or any other site that I uploaded the theme. Frogboy put back the theme online because the issue is selective enforcement. They can?t just pick on a skin or a site simply because they casually learned about it. In November happened the same think but in December I got the e-mail from them. They wait after 5 month to take down the skin and they knew about it.

These ports are like fan art. Like all fan art you see out, Disney, Harry Potter, Spiderman etc. People even sell copyright material, trademarks or trade dress. Every violation of intellectual property is wrong but contrary to small guys like me big companies don?t have anything to lose. That's even free promotion to their products. Contrary to that small guys have everything to lose. Let?s say someone create a wallpaper or an icon set and them another guy rip it. No one will know that that work is from another guy, just the people that he shares his work.

Those Apple or Microsoft ports do more good than harm to their companies. A lot of people started using Mac port and a lot of them are now Mac user, including me.

I still say that they took my skin down because the popularity and they notice the skin. If the skin wasn?t that popular the skin would be online on WinCustomize, deviatnART and GetSkinned.

I bet all of you that Microsoft are not going to do anything to all Vista skins out there. Here's a quick list of some of the skin that I found only on deviantART and WinCustomize. In some minutes I found all those themes and there are a lot more all over the net.

Companies don?t care about it. Yes Apple took some two Aqua themes some years ago, they were popular themes back then but have they done anything to take down all the Aqua skin that are now online??? NO. Apple took down Yz Dock because it was popular. What happen with Objecdesktop, Mobydock??? They were available at the same time Yz Dock was. They didn?t take those down. Now we have a lot of themes and docks that are more similar to the OSX interface that those that Apple took down some years ago and are they doing somthing to protect their IP, NO. Big companies don?t care.

I know what you're saying, and I agree to an extent, but you can't be bitter about your skin getting picked on 'cos it was popular. Maybe they're using yours as an example, send the message out that they want these skins gone, or maybe there was something about yours that was too close the the original for comfort. Or maybe they really don't know about those other skins, customization really isn't a popular thing on the net. The only thing you can really do is email MS back and give them those same links, or just let it go.

Whatever the reason, they want it down. When they first requested it all those months ago, frogboy should have kept it down. Just because MS doesn't track down every other place it was uploaded, or contact you specifically (maybe they thought the skin was wincustomize's property?) doesn't mean that it's ok to ignore their request and carry on. You did anyway, and you brought out a great skin. It's a shame that its really gone, but you can't really blame MS or anyone else. Especially since they requested it pulled down months ago, that's really not a defense.

I feel your pain, VS's are hard work, and it's all gone down the ****ter because some big company said "Oh no." but you gotta move on, and accept some degree of responsibility. It was a port without permission, no different than a guy porting your Kuantam skin or whatever to OSX and not telling you about it. I know you get that, and you say you don't have an issue with it, but then you go on to talk about fanart/big companies/little men. Just let it go.

I've got loads of respect for KoL but I think I'm going to be siding with Microsoft on this one. It's no different than the skinning community - wouldn't you be ****ed if you're paying people to make this design specifically to be a "new thing" that's not even publicly available yet, and it gets ported to the PC? Although he made the graphics completely from scratch, it doesn't matter, because esentially it's a clone of the Vista GUI.

Nothin' against ya KoL, you did a great job with it, but I believe Microsoft had every right to do this..

Saying that, does that mean we as mac users can serve these letters for our themes that we make, and before released windows users are porting and distributing it without permission also??

Also the real shocker in this thread to me is that Stardock are co-developing the Vista UI. With their reputation for ugly bloated interfaces I sure hope Vista will include a Windows Classic look. :p

I know You didn't notice, but it is not Stardock doing skins You dislike. They do the software. And of course the 1269th Tiger or classic clone is so much more inventive than the skins that windowblinda authors invented themselves. If You want to see a really ugly interface go open Your StyleXP.

I know what you're saying, and I agree to an extent, but you can't be bitter about your skin getting picked on 'cos it was popular. Maybe they're using yours as an example, send the message out that they want these skins gone, or maybe there was something about yours that was too close the the original for comfort. Or maybe they really don't know about those other skins, customization really isn't a popular thing on the net. The only thing you can really do is email MS back and give them those same links, or just let it go.

Whatever the reason, they want it down. When they first requested it all those months ago, frogboy should have kept it down. Just because MS doesn't track down every other place it was uploaded, or contact you specifically (maybe they thought the skin was wincustomize's property?) doesn't mean that it's ok to ignore their request and carry on. You did anyway, and you brought out a great skin. It's a shame that its really gone, but you can't really blame MS or anyone else. Especially since they requested it pulled down months ago, that's really not a defense.

I feel your pain, VS's are hard work, and it's all gone down the ****ter because some big company said "Oh no." but you gotta move on, and accept some degree of responsibility. It was a port without permission, no different than a guy porting your Kuantam skin or whatever to OSX and not telling you about it. I know you get that, and you say you don't have an issue with it, but then you go on to talk about fanart/big companies/little men. Just let it go.

Microsoft have done that to Stardock and WinCustomize in the past several times and Frogoboy wasnt going to allow that again. That's why he put the skin back.

I talk about fanart/big companies/little men like you say becasue I want. That's my opinion and I want to share it with everyone.

Also the real shocker in this thread to me is that Stardock are co-developing the Vista UI.

Of which I am still waiting for documented evidence of. I asked for some earlier in the thread, none came forth, and nor can I find any on the web. I just find it too hard to believe, given that there are companies who are far superior and much more well known for Interface design. To my knowledge Stardock don't have any Interface Design credentials, though I could be wrong on that.

Every violation of intellectual property is wrong but contrary to small guys like me big companies don’t have anything to lose.
That is such a wrong statement, on so many different levels.

Of course they have things to lose. When I make a design, I, as the author, own the distribution rights for it. I and I alone, decide where, when, and how it can be distributed. For a large company, the ramifications of this must be huge. You are, like it or not, stealing their rights from them. Sorry to get personal here for a moment but, I know some see you as a design God who should praised, but I see you as little more than a common thief of other people's work, creativity, ideas, and efforts. That, to me, is shameful, not something to be celebrated. This action by MS is long overdue in my opinion. Moreso as, as has already been stated by others, if someone did it to you, you would be crying foul. As would those who seem to be blindly defending you now. You can't have it both ways. It's either wrong, in which case it's as wrong for you to do it as it is for anyone who steals your work, or it's right, in which case, you have just signed away any rights to pursue copyright infringements of any future 'original' work you might create. So really, which is it?

The fact that they picked on you and not the next person is completely and utterly immaterial to anything that defines the right or wrong of this whole affair. That's just bad-luck on your part.

Edited by SniperX

KoL you are by far one of the best, if not THE best, skinner out there. What Gates & Co. should do is get you to Redmond and put you to work. HELLO MICROSOFT are you reading this???? Give him a job and let him do some real magic with Windows, don't squash talent , please!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
    • I'm not sure how old the school is, but they've been doing this since GTA 3. Back in those days we'd be lucky for game companies to release on the PC at all. And with the current state of Sony (or Microsoft) their gaming wing won't be getting a penny from me.
    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!