AutoPatcher XP December 2005


Recommended Posts

Wow thax man, I will rwmove the bloody sec update :yes: :)

Hey

When I remove even one tweak from security tweaks, I get prerequisite/parent error when loading AP, so I either have to remove them the all or none. ????!!!!

Is it possible than no one from the development team doesn't know the solution!!!???

What tweak do you want to remove?

Hi; I'm a new user with 'AutoPatcher'. I hope it's not too silly of a question, but I still am not sure: In the window, some of the items are blue and others are black. Which ones are the ones that are especially supposed to be installed? Are black ones representing things that are not of the most importance (or things that are detected to be already installed)? Thanks.

Hi; I'm a new user with 'AutoPatcher'. I hope it's not too silly of a question, but I still am not sure: In the window, some of the items are blue and others are black. Which ones are the ones that are especially supposed to be installed? Are black ones representing things that are not of the most importance (or things that are detected to be already installed)? Thanks.

3rd from bottom in the FAQ: https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=410347

Thanks for the info about what the colors (black/blue) meant. I sure am glad to have found this; for reasons I can't explain, the windows update just doesn't work for me. When I do it, the files download and each installation of anything always fails. 'AutoPatcher' works fine; so, it's good that I can still keep my machine pretty-much up to date.

This is sorta off-topic, but BlazingAngel, I've noticed that for months now a lot of the IMG tags that you use are using parentheses instead of the brackets, so the images don't show up. I'm sure you don't mean to do this on purpose, so you may want to consider fixing that up. ^_^

Thanks a lot for AutoPatcher! Been using it for many months now and am always happy with it! Happy New Year!

Edit: Um... and a refresh of the page shows the pictures. Wow. It's not you, it's my copy of Firefox! Well, nevermind then! ^_^

Edited by Eddy Da KillaBee
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Guess it's one of those things best used by devs to thoroughly test stuff.
    • is it all upside down there? traffic lights reverted too?
    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!