Recommended Posts

I think Ive narrowed my next digital camera purchase down to the:

Canon SD550

or

Casio EX-S600

I was originally looking at the Nikon D50, but have decided Im just not going to get enough proper usage out of a D-SLR to justify the price.

So since im back at compact point-and-shoot, which do you guys think I should go for? Right now im leaning towards the Canon, as the image qauliy seems to be better, but the Casio has better asthetics. Oh dilema, dilema :).

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/415777-canon-sd550-or-casio-ex-s600/
Share on other sites

So you considered DSLR, I agree they are pricy.

Have you considered the super zoom range? For example Canon PowerShot S2 IS or a camera from Panasonic or Sony?

They might just justify the price.

I bought the Canon PowerShot S2 IS last summer and I am happy that I didn't go for a real point-and-shoot type of camera. This thing is a bit more expensive but it is well worth it.

Feels more robust and has a wide range of features that makes it the ideal camera for me.

So you considered DSLR, I agree they are pricy.

Have you considered the super zoom range? For example Canon PowerShot S2 IS or a camera from Panasonic or Sony?

They might just justify the price.

I bought the Canon PowerShot S2 IS last summer and I am happy that I didn't go for a real point-and-shoot type of camera. This thing is a bit more expensive but it is well worth it.

Feels more robust and has a wide range of features that makes it the ideal camera for me.

ah, im the owner of its rival, the Pansonic Fz5! haha.. :D

My personnal choice is Nikon coolpix P1 (their P models are their highest quality compact camera)

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/compare_po...n_cpp1&show=all

and to add something more, Nikon uses his own battery. Often last longer and also cost less

ok just checked those two cameras. Both the canon and casio have their own positive and negative sides.

if u check this link: http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/compare_po...exs600&show=all then u can see all the specs.

The thing that makes me favor casio model is the manual focus, which canon doesnt have but what makes me in favor of canon is the optical viewfinder which casio doesnt have.

Casio raises its lead with ISO sensitivity also allowing u to take pics @ 1600 ISO settings and casios zoom seems to be slightly better than canon's.

When it comes to shutter then canon does what it does best on the market :p Canon model has superior minimum shutter speed which is 15 (yes i said 15) seconds and casio only has 4 seconds. So if u want nice pics on a tripod and steady objects then canon is the way :) Also with the canon model u can use extra flash.

Damn this seems to be one sided competition :p Canon has a 2,5'' lcd screen while casio has 2,2'' lcd display.

To sum things up. If u are more of an experimental type then go with casio because of the manual focus (big advantage when taking pictures in low light conditions) but if u want a nice partner for just doing everything with just point-and-shoot then go for the canon. :) and if u get tired of those small compacts then get a 12x zoom panasonic fz5 :D

So you considered DSLR, I agree they are pricy.

Have you considered the super zoom range? For example Canon PowerShot S2 IS or a camera from Panasonic or Sony?

They might just justify the price.

I bought the Canon PowerShot S2 IS last summer and I am happy that I didn't go for a real point-and-shoot type of camera. This thing is a bit more expensive but it is well worth it.

Feels more robust and has a wide range of features that makes it the ideal camera for me.

ah, im the owner of its rival, the Pansonic Fz5! haha.. :D

the problem with the Canon Powershot S2 IS is the price. For alittle over $500, Id rather just save up another $100 and grab the Nikon D50.

The Panazonic Fz5 seems more reasonably priced around $400.

Oh, hell I just cant decide...

I mean these compact point and shoots have their benefits, but I cant seem to make my mind up if Id rather have the size and ease-of-use of the compacts, or the quality of the super-zoom or D-SLR.

Canon. Why would you care about aesthetics? If the pictures stink, why does it matter? No professional photographers get their cameras because they look cool. Who cares?

Do you already own a digital camera? If so, and you have a compact already, then get the D50. If not, well, hey, I say get the D50 anyway.

Oh, and I own a Canon S400, and it still rocks.

Edited by King Rilian

Canon. Why would you care about aesthetics? If the pictures stink, why does it matter? No professional photographers get their cameras because they look cool. Who cares?

Do you already own a digital camera? If so, and you have a compact already, then get the D50. If not, well, hey, I say get the D50 anyway.

Oh, and I own a Canon S400, and it still rocks.

well in this case our friend here ck2k01 is deciding whether to get a compact, megazoom or a dslr. now the factor that comes into play is the price.

in my country dslr's like the 350d kit would cost $2000( at the minimum, not sure about D50 ) and yea, i could only afford a Fz5 which costed me $800( plus some free goodies ).

but since ck2k01, you did say you bought a S2 IS, why not wait up a bit and save for a dslr? or get accesories for your S2, im sure there's plenty of em.

well in this case our friend here ck2k01 is deciding whether to get a compact, megazoom or a dslr. now the factor that comes into play is the price.

in my country dslr's like the 350d kit would cost $2000( at the minimum, not sure about D50 ) and yea, i could only afford a Fz5 which costed me $800( plus some free goodies ).

but since ck2k01, you did say you bought a S2 IS, why not wait up a bit and save for a dslr? or get accesories for your S2, im sure there's plenty of em.

oh no no, i never bought a s2 is. ive actually got a canon a70 which is starting to show its age.

the whole idea behind my thinking is, although I would really love to have a magazoom or dslr, im just thinking a nice compact would be more practical in my case.

if it was up to me, id buy a compact and a d50, but i dont know if i can justify spending that much.

oh well, thanks for all the input guys, it basically sounds like i know what to buy for each type of camera. now i just need to make up my mind and deside on which type i want :laugh:

but the only question left is, if i do decide to go for the magazoom or dslr, is the D50's $200 price increase enough to warrant it over the Panazonic Fz20?

Edited by ck2k01

I think Ive narrowed my next digital camera purchase down to the:

Canon SD550

or

Casio EX-S600

I was originally looking at the Nikon D50, but have decided Im just not going to get enough proper usage out of a D-SLR to justify the price.

So since im back at compact point-and-shoot, which do you guys think I should go for? Right now im leaning towards the Canon, as the image qauliy seems to be better, but the Casio has better asthetics. Oh dilema, dilema :).

I'd go Canon, but I've never had any good experience with either camera.

I've heard nothing but great things about Canon's, same with this SD550 model. IMO it is THE best compact digicam on the market.

I have another Casio camera (EX-P600) and it's caused me hassles & has had problems. Personally, I'd go with the Canon and don't think twice about it. You know what you're getting with a Canon.

FZ20 or D50 guys... what do you all think?

Is the $200 extra for the D50 really worth it?

:yes:

Get the canon - the lense will be better and canon cameras are generally more reliable.
obviously, you have no idea what you are talking about. Just to enlight us, do you have any comparisons, reviews and articles of what you are saying?
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!