• 0

CSS: Keeping a set width between boxes

Asked by JMann,

 Share

Question

Grand Master

JMann Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

Hi everyone,

I need what I would of thought to be a quick hand, first let me direct you to this page: Flanking Menu's. Now if you re-size your browser window you will see that the 3 main content boxes in the centre all stay at set height away from each other and the boxes never overflow each other.

Now I am looking at the CSS for that page, and I have a simular layout for the new NeoRequest site and at the moment the main Introduction box overlaps the news box if you browser is under 1024 resolution or the window is resized (screenshot attached) in the CSS on that Flanking menu's page what is the CSS that makes that constant gap between the boxes happen? Because this is what I am failing on at the moment, if you can help.

What I believe to the the offending CSS Code:

#introbox {
	width:98%;
	min-width:1024px;
	background-color:#ECF1FF;
	border:1px solid #C6C6C6;
	padding:4px;
	line-height:1.2;
	position:relative;
	left:5px;
	top:165px;
}
#news {
	width:48%;
	position:absolute;
	top:325px;
	left:5px;
	background-color:#ECF1FF;
	border:1px solid #C6C6C6;
	padding:4px;
}

Thanks,

JMann

post-28082-1137162235.gif

11 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Grand Master

JMann Veteran

Posted
  • Author
  • Veteran
Posted (edited)

Ok, thanks I knew it would be pretty simple. One last problem, and I need to find the best way to do this I so I thought you lot would be the best lot to ask.

Underneath the main Introduction box, I have 2 boxes both taking up 1/2 of the web page and once again I need that little gap in the middle to stay the same when the page gets smaller. So basically how can I make 2 boxes both take up 50% of a web page, and get smaller/bigger when the webpage does and have a little middle gap between them. Just drew a quick picture. :)

post-28082-1137163869_thumb.jpg

Edited by JMann
  • 0
Grand Master

lnmnky

Posted
Posted
  JMann said:

Ok, thanks I knew it would be pretty simple. One last problem, and I need to find the best way to do this I so I thought you lot would be the best lot to ask.

Underneath the main Introduction box, I have 2 boxes both taking up 1/2 of the web page and once again I need that little gap in the middle to stay the same when the page gets smaller. So basically how can I make 2 boxes both take up 50% of a web page, and get smaller/bigger when the webpage does and have a little middle gap between them. I can draw a sample picture if needed...sorry if its hard to understand. :)

Actually, did you mean 50% of the height? Here's the width one....

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<title></title>
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 7.1">
<meta name=ProgId content=VisualStudio.HTML>;
<meta name=Originator content="Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 7.1">
<style>
#content{
	width : 50%;
	border : 1px solid tomato;
	margin-bottom : 5px;
	padding : 5px;
}
#news{
	width : 50%;
	border : 1px solid olive;
	padding : 5px;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>

<div id="content">

blah blah

</div>

<div id="news">

blah blah

</div>

</body>
</html>

for height ....

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<title></title>
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 7.1">
<meta name=ProgId content=VisualStudio.HTML>;
<meta name=Originator content="Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 7.1">
<style>
#content{
	width : 50%;
	height : 49%;
	border : 1px solid tomato;
	margin-bottom : 5px;
	padding : 5px;
}
#news{
	width : 50%;
	height : 49%;
	border : 1px solid olive;
	padding : 5px;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>

<div id="content">

blah blah

</div>

<div id="news">

blah blah

</div>

</body>
</html>

cheat and use 49% each.

  • 0
Grand Master

lnmnky

Posted
Posted

Float : left; on both, or display : inline; on both..

I have some demos, or I'll build one and edit this post.

with % as widths it tricky to get them to add up to 100% when you have margins set. (the margins are and addition to the width so you get scrolling.

but anyway it's fairly close, but could be better. I'll have a think.

I might be able to do something with absolute positioning, but then the margin might not always be fixed. The right hand box would be fixed at the far right corner correctly though

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<title></title>
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 7.1">
<meta name=ProgId content=VisualStudio.HTML>;
<meta name=Originator content="Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 7.1">
<style>
#content{
	width : 49%;
	height : 49%;
	border : 1px solid tomato;
	margin-right : 5px;
	padding : 5px;
	float : left;
}
#news{
	width : 49%;
	height : 49%;
	border : 1px solid olive;
	padding : 5px;
	float : left;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>

<div id="content">

blah blah

</div>

<div id="news">

blah blah

</div>

</body>
</html>

I'll make a copy and show the other version.

  • 0
Grand Master

JMann Veteran

Posted
  • Author
  • Veteran
Posted

Ok it works, but not perfectly this is the current problem: They are both spread across the page 1/2 and 1/2 but I need the to be at a shorter width, but if I change the width from 49% second "news" one disappears. Any idea's? I also changed the float on the Right one, to float:right; Just incase that is important somewhat.

  • 0
Grand Master

lnmnky

Posted
Posted

Both set to 40%, both float:left;

works on IE and FF fine.

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<title></title>
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 7.1">
<meta name=ProgId content=VisualStudio.HTML>;
<meta name=Originator content="Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 7.1">
<style>
body{
	margin : 0px;
	margin-top : 5px;
}
#content{
	width : 40%;
	height : 49%;
	border : 1px solid tomato;
	margin-left : 5px;
	margin-right : 5px;
	padding : 5px;
	float : left;
}
#news{
	width : 40%;
	height : 49%;
	border : 1px solid olive;
	padding : 5px;
	float : left;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>

<div id="content">

blah blah

</div>

<div id="news">

blah blah

</div>

</body>
</html>

I've made a perfect 50% one, probably not what you want now.

I've cheated, as the DIVs come out in the wrong order to what they are displayed..

Dang, FF doesn't like it.

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<title></title>
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 7.1">
<meta name=ProgId content=VisualStudio.HTML>;
<meta name=Originator content="Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 7.1">
<style>
body{
	margin : 0px;
	margin-top : 5px;
	margin-left : 5px;
	margin-right : 5px;
}
#content{
	width : 50%;
	height : 49%;
	border : 1px solid tomato;
	padding : 5px;
	float : right;
}
#news{
	width : 100%;
	height : 49%;
	border : 1px solid olive;
	padding : 5px;
	margin-right : 5px;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>

<div id="content">

blah blah

</div>

<div id="news">

blah blah

</div>

</body>
</html>

post-29476-1137166425_thumb.jpg

  • 0
Grand Master

JMann Veteran

Posted
  • Author
  • Veteran
Posted

Ok, now im getting a little confused. I have one working, this is the code I have at the moment, but upon increase in size, and getting it to align with the other boxes they start to muck up because they don't like being the same size. Confusing stuff.

#news{
	width : 45%;
	height : 49%;
	border : 1px solid tomato;
	margin-top:320px;
	margin-left : 5px;
	margin-right : 5px;
	padding : 5px;
	float : left;
}
#recentwork{
	width : 45%;
	height : 49%;
	border : 1px solid olive;
	margin-top:320px;
	padding : 5px;
	float : left;
}

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to question listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Windows 10 KB5063159 fixes bug that wouldn't let some Microsoft Surface devices boot

      By hellowalkman · Posted

      Windows 10 KB5063159 fixes bug that wouldn't let some Microsoft Surface devices boot by Sayan Sen Microsoft released Windows 10 Patch Tuesday updates for the month last week. The one for Windows 10 under KB5060533 / KB5060531 / KB5061010 / KB5060998 introduced a bug that would not let Surface Hub v1 devices start due to a Secure Boot validation issue. As such, Microsoft had paused the update similar to the compatibility blocks or safeguard holds it applies for major feature updates as well. This bug was uncovered after the update went live, as Microsoft later added it to the list of known issues for that update and it also put up a big notice in bold. It wrote: Earlier today, the company released an out-of-band (OOB) update to address the issue. It has been published under KB5063159 and is only being offered to Surface Hub v1 devices instead of the buggy KB5060533 Patch Tuesday one. In the description of the new OOB update, Microsoft writes: You can find the support article for KB5063159 here on Microsoft's website. It is downloaded and installed automatically but users can also manually download it from the Microsoft Update Catalog website.
    • The official Funny Pictures thread

      By Mindovermaster · Posted

      I thought I saw that one, and yeah, it was awhile ago, too..
    • Acronyms....

      By Mindovermaster · Posted

      Jumping unicorns says that I forgot you. I never grunt.
    • Microsoft can't help break Windows Outlook as even opening an email now sends it crashing

      By hellowalkman · Posted

      Microsoft can't help break Windows Outlook as even opening an email now sends it crashing by Sayan Sen It is no surprise that right now, Microsoft's priority is to move users onto the New Outlook for Windows if they haven't done so already. The company began default-deployment of the new app on fresh Microsoft 365 systems and also made switching between the New app and the classic app easier. At the same time, the company is also trying to improve the new app as it recently added yet another feature that will allow people to use the app without an internet connection, and it also blocked more file types to improve security. Perhaps as a consequence of this relentless pursuit, the classic Outlook app has become quite prone to bugs and issues in recent times as Microsoft may be losing its focus. For example, in April, the downloads for Classic Outlook broke and more recently, this month, the tech giant confirmed that a major Calendar feature upgrade has broken the app in several different ways. Microsoft has provided workarounds for several of the issues so check this article out if you are having problems. And the bugs just keep on coming as Microsoft earlier today confirmed that opening emails or starting a new email will now crash the application, and it affects all channels. The company explains: Opening a mail on an email client is probably the most common and basic functionality a user is expected to do, so it is annoying to see such a bug not getting caught during testing. Again, this perhaps indicates that Microsoft's focus maybe elsewhere at the moment. The company has shared the Windows Event Viewer Log for the crash and the problematic OLMAPI32 DLL file is related to Microsoft Messaging Application Programming Interface (MAPI). The issue reminds us of the similar OLEAUT32 dll issue fix in our recent ReactOS article. The event viewer log notes: Faulting application name: OUTLOOK.EXE, version: 16.0.14334.20090, time stamp: 0x683fe030 Faulting module name: OLMAPI32.DLL, version: 16.0.14334.20090, time stamp: 0x683ff910 Exception code: 0xc0000409 Fault offset: 0x00196e1c Faulting process id: 0x9100 Faulting application start time: 0x01dbdbe04fe54514 Faulting application path: C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Office\root\Office16\OUTLOOK.EXE Faulting module path: C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Office\root\Office16\OLMAPI32.DLL Thankfully, Microsoft has issued a workaround for the problem as it currently investigates the bug by manually creating a FORMS2 folder which should exist at the following address: C:\Users\\AppData\Local\Microsoft\FORMS2. Microsoft explains: You can find the support article for the issue here on Microsoft's official website.
    • Meta says you'll soon be getting ads on WhatsApp

      By Case_f · Posted

      I have no issue with a service not being offered free. That's perfectly understandable. I do have issue with seeing ads literally everywhere these days, though, plastered in layers over every website and in every app. Especially with how annoying they tend to be (hell, many ads these days even promote literal scams). That's why people use ad blockers. Let me choose. Offer an ad-free experience for a couple of bucks (but be reasonable, don't get too greedy) or ads for free access. Don't make it ads or nothing.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      korostelev earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rozermack875 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      oneworldtechnologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Veteran
      matthiew went up a rank
      Veteran
    • Enthusiast
      Motoman26 went up a rank
      Enthusiast

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      688
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      268
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      184
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      177
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      140
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!