[Shell Patcher] Tango Icons for Windows


Recommended Posts

Oooh, that does look shiny. It's gotta be 16 colours, though, and that's a heck of a lot more restrictive on what you can do. I've been working on trying to get the flag dealiased and sanely dithered, but PSP and Gimp aren't being particularly helpful, so I'll probably end up re-doing it in an old DOS image editing app I used to use on my 286 (its dithering/gradienting support makes perfect sense for low-color indexed images). The general idea isn't what I need inspiration for, it's the "actually getting around to doing it" part that confounds me :p

The bootscreen and logonui have been put on the back burner relative to real-life projects around the house and refitting the XPize installer for Tango. But hey, if anyone wants to try what I'm calling the "Beta 1" release of it, grab it from darkt.net or benpbrown.com. I think I've got all the bugs in my fresh new code (as opposed to code that's tried, tested, and from XPero unmodified) worked out, but you might want to back up your Important Stuff and be ready to run a repair install of Windows, just in case. It kinda goes without saying, but make sure to restore away the old patcher before trying this, as the new installer architecture seemlessly maintains backups on upgrade, and has an incremental reloader for post-Windows-Updating.

Edited by vertigosity

i lvoe your icons! so nice a relxing and not ugly....dont know if u remeber me but anwyas i kinda have a quick personal question. (this is for all you modders who are tens times better than me) How do you change the default icon that microsoft word uses for its documents to the one u have in ur !extras folder? ive been searching online but i still cant find anything. any tips or answers?

I really like where this Shellpatcher is heading. Very comfortable to use and new icons with every release.

But I have a little problem. The icons in the marked area are changed on my Laptop whereas they aren't on my Desktop PC. I can only guess of one thing that might make the difference. On my Laptop I run a german Win XP Home opposing to an english Win XP Pro on my Desktop PC. Any ideas how to fix this?

i lvoe your icons! so nice a relxing and not ugly....dont know if u remeber me but anwyas i kinda have a quick personal question. (this is for all you modders who are tens times better than me) How do you change the default icon that microsoft word uses for its documents to the one u have in ur !extras folder? ive been searching online but i still cant find anything. any tips or answers?
I typically use regedit to do it so I can export it to reg files to back it up, but the Folder Options control panel has a file types tab which lets you do it fairly simply. Fire it up, hit advanced, change icon, find it, and you're good. Unless of course, MS Office does something screwy (which, being a Microsoft product, it would), in which case, I can't really help you as I haven't pirated a copy.
I really like where this Shellpatcher is heading. Very comfortable to use and new icons with every release.

But I have a little problem. The icons in the marked area are changed on my Laptop whereas they aren't on my Desktop PC. I can only guess of one thing that might make the difference. On my Laptop I run a german Win XP Home opposing to an english Win XP Pro on my Desktop PC. Any ideas how to fix this?

What's the "marked area" (missing screenshot)? Home and Pro keep their icons in the same places, and I doubt the language is relevant - I tweaked the scripts to be language-agnostic a while back, and I'm doing all my testing on an English machine, so it'd be odd to work on German and not English :wacko:

Thank you!!!!!!!!YES!!!! wow i never knew that....time to change some more icons...mwuahhahaha!! ok stop being such a kid...

on second thought....anything tangoey for pdf? im ok with the default one but to have something else tango, now thatll make me the happiest man alive... :)

Edited by whizbt77

vertigosity :

Does the "latest" version of the Tango shell patcher (not including XPero) patch 93 different files?

I overwrote version [unknown] with the latest version and I am trying to update H:\documents\tango\patch\Super Turbo Tango Patcher\original with the original backed up files (for restoration purposes) so.. does the latest version patch 93 different files, and does the version before that patch 80 different ones?

Oh yeah, I apologize if that last bootscreen mockup is "stealing your thunder" or something. :)

0.7.2b did 4 possible instances of comctl32, 75 normal system files, and 3 third-party app files, in that order

0.7.2b did 4 possible instances of comctl32, 88 normal system files, and 3 third-party app files, in that order.

The numbers are derived from the order that they're listed in the script, though, so it's not just a straight count. IE, numbers 1 and 2 are the XPSP2 comctl32s, 3 and 4 are the 2003SP1 comctl32s (which'll be skipped on XP), and it picks back up again with 5 being shell32. And I did make a habit of inserting resources into the list at what might look like random points, so you'll probably need to do a quick visual scan to get the numbers right.

Just for the record, not counting the incredibly feeble start to including Git2, the XPize installer "Beta 1" is 0.7.2c+1, I haven't been hitting the resources much lately. It'll be in "beta" until I have a release-worthy amount of resources to release, which'll give plenty of time for testing :whistle:

Don't worry about the bootscreen, it's just a mockup (and can't be done properly without some heavy modification), we all have to get those out of our systems from time to time, and besides, nobody will remember it by the time I've gotten around to doing it myself :laugh:

Edited by vertigosity

Hope you don't mind this... but I kinda did a website mockup... yeah.. I do need to get a life...

Everything on the site is my original work except for the text (stolen from darkt.net) and the help image (a Tango icon)

Oh yeah, and I looked after your post, and yes, my numbers are correct (because of spaces ;))

hkdjnoycu.png

Edited by bobp

Bored much :p? I think the Wiki layout/template/stylesheets that they actually use is available under one of the Creative Commons licenses as well... I had been thinking of trying to Web 2.0ifty my page, but I can't really be bothered.

The bootscreen and logonui have been put on the back burner relative to real-life projects around the house and refitting the XPize installer for Tango. But hey, if anyone wants to try what I'm calling the "Beta 1" release of it, grab it from darkt.net or benpbrown.com. I think I've got all the bugs in my fresh new code (as opposed to code that's tried, tested, and from XPero unmodified) worked out, but you might want to back up your Important Stuff and be ready to run a repair install of Windows, just in case. It kinda goes without saying, but make sure to restore away the old patcher before trying this, as the new installer architecture seemlessly maintains backups on upgrade, and has an incremental reloader for post-Windows-Updating.

I installed the beta 1 yesterday evening and everything worked flawlessly. I got a few WFP warnings though (which I didn't get with the latest script versions).

Patching Firefox did not work for me because my Firefox is not installed in %PROGRAMFILES% (or %PROGRAMDIR%). With the scripts I had the possibility to correct this myself. Maybe there is another possibility to check where Firefox is installed? There is a reg entry for this (PathToExe).

Before the installation I uninstalled some relevant Windows updates and disconnected my PC from the LAN. After my PC was updated again, repatching worked without problems.

Ah. I forgot. Patching beta 3 of IE 7 does not work. The icon is not changed.

Those are changed to tango for me

On my Laptop they are changed. The screenshot is from my Desktop PC. Recently I switched from an PATA to a SATA II hard disk. Since then I ran into a few problems concerning customization. The uxtheme.dll multipatcher didn't work anymore (tried 2.5.1, which has worked so far, and 4.0 without success. I didn't find out that there's a version 5.0 until a few days ago) so I had to use Replacer instead. Next problem was the Shellpatcher not changing those icons. I have absolutely no explanation why this is happening since the upgrade.

I your screen shot - why is the "My Network Places" text cut off?

Happens to me with all visual styles. Windows Classic however behaves absolutely normal.

no tango pdf filetype? :(
It's something to make. I'm pretty busy right now, but I've pushed it onto the stack, I'll pop it off eventually. I think Gnome uses the standard x-office-document icon for it, although that feels wrong even there.
In your screen shot - why is the "My Network Places" text cut off?
I think it's just the font in the VS and the Recent and Network icons having such long names, nothing sinister. My fresh completely non-tweaked XPSP1 VM does the same thing with Luna.
Sorry. Forgot to include the screenshot. This is what I mean.
That's comctl32.dll, which has been one of the trickiest DLLs to replace. The first thing I can think of: what service pack of XP are you running? I haven't had support for that DLL before the recent beta version, so if you're running SP1, that's a nice easy answer for me.

i also dont get those buttons skinned......

BTW

now using the beta and it works really fine, good work

Is the beta skinning those buttons as part of its "really fine"? If it is and the previous versions didn't... SP1?

Sweet deal.

EDIT: I just found a tut for changing SP2 bootscreens with the palettes. ( I would try it myself, but I don't have a pc to mess around with

http://www.geocities.com/thejjoelc/XPbootcolors.html

Edited by tehmemories
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!