[Shell Patcher] Tango Icons for Windows


Recommended Posts

niceeeeee

BTW

any tango thunderbird icon?

I haven't tweaked one up yet... the icon included in Tango-materia is just the normal one, you don't need to bother with that unless you want it as a PNG, and it'd almost be simpler (at least, from the perspective of a guy with no bandwidth who already has the tool for doing it) just to convert Thunderbird's normal icon to PNGs. Hylke's looks like it'd be a nice start, but they seem somewhat oversimplified to me as well (he claims that the guidelines made him do it), but he's afraid of Mozilla's army of fire-breathing lawyers and declares his for private use only, so I'm not touching it. I'm not going to drop my own logo edit unless I either hear from Mozilla's army of fire-breathing lawyers, or stumble across a mailing list / forum / etc post from someone more official to Mozilla policy stating that sort of thing. Edited by vertigosity

Here's my "mockup." And by "mockup," I mean, "finished product."

^ I've needed to do that for a nice long while.

I like this a lot. I'm just wondering. How would the standby icon look like; if it was just the moon and stars, and not the computer monitor around it.

I like this a lot. I'm just wondering. How would the standby icon look like; if it was just the moon and stars, and not the computer monitor around it.
The background's too light for it, really... I'd have to at least reverse the colors. I think it works pretty well the way I've got it right now, honestly. I think the drawing looks too simple to be used on its own, as well.
please make the turn off icon like the log off on log off dialog

this white one looks not that cool imo

Yeah, it's not that great, but it IS authentic. If I were going to replace it, I'd borrow the icon from gnome-icon-theme2.

The background's too light for it, really... I'd have to at least reverse the colors. I think it works pretty well the way I've got it right now, honestly. I think the drawing looks too simple to be used on its own, as well.Yeah, it's not that great, but it IS authentic. If I were going to replace it, I'd borrow the icon from gnome-icon-theme2.

i actually kinda like the turn off icon, its very practical and somehow links the computer work back to the basics of functionality.

Best.Icon.Set.Ever

The only thing i think should be put as high priority is a new installer with the option of picking say Firefox/Thunderbird and so on icons.

I know this has been said a million times, but i just thought id say thanks and know that ive done all i can do :)

Keep up the excellent work man

i actually kinda like the turn off icon, its very practical and somehow links the computer work back to the basics of functionality.
Yep - lightswitch. It sorta takes a second to figure out - viewed straight-on, there's not really enough perspective.
Anyone got a a Hi-Res Internet Explorer tango icon?
SVG available here. How high-res do ya want it?
The only thing i think should be put as high priority is a new installer
Yeah, work on my own installer's pretty much on hold for a while - time contraints, real life getting in the way. I can piddle with icons and vectors in my free time, but coding in a real language sorta requires a nice big block of time. I might have a few creative ideas for wrapping batch scripts, environment variables, and a simple VB app up in a box, though :wacko: Edited by vertigosity
ever since i installed this program this has been happening to my computer

i tried the un hack program or whatever but it did nothing. please help me out here, its getting pretty annoying

What's happening? You're getting notifications that the firewall has been disabled, and it won't turn on, or you're getting notifications and you have turned the firewall off intentionally? If it's the latter, simply turn the notifications off. If it's the former, I suspect the cause to be related to something else; I've seen this kind of behavior on machines that've never even seen a reference to my shell patcher, and I don't have any good leads on the cause. The shell patcher does not modify the registry in any way, so if it is a result of the patcher, the original file restoration script should have reversed it, and if it failed to, then having Windows restore its files from the original copies (using the sfc /scannow command that I never can seem to shut up about) should fix it.

I'm not doing any GUI/native-coded stuff, and that's final. Working with VB6 to do ANYTHING makes me feel as if I'm smashing my forehead into a brick wall repeatedly, and VB6 is the only native-Windows language I am familiar with and have development tools for. I can do magic in Java, but that's really not appropriate as it isn't native code, and requires massive runtimes that not everyone has. It's pretty much an explicit requirement for this project of mine that any external dependency not included with the OS is assumed to be absent. I'm keeping the batch scripts, as I've said several times before less authoritatively, and if that bugs anybody, I'll just make more and scarier disclaimers for the problems they have. Yeah, I'm getting kinda Bant-y, but working with VB puts me in that sort of mood.

What's happening? You're getting notifications that the firewall has been disabled, and it won't turn on, or you're getting notifications and you have turned the firewall off intentionally? If it's the latter, simply turn the notifications off. If it's the former, I suspect the cause to be related to something else; I've seen this kind of behavior on machines that've never even seen a reference to my shell patcher, and I don't have any good leads on the cause. The shell patcher does not modify the registry in any way, so if it is a result of the patcher, the original file restoration script should have reversed it, and if it failed to, then having Windows restore its files from the original copies (using the sfc /scannow command that I never can seem to shut up about) should fix it.

no look at the text, its all some kind of gibberish (or another language :D ) i dont know what to make of it. the file restoration script does nothing. when i run it there are still some icons chnged, and the wierd text is still there. the other day i system restored and it was gone but had to un restore for some reason. i tried doing that again today but it didnt work, what is this sfc /scannow command? im sorry if im being a bit of trouble. i love the look of the icons and everything but im just frustrated with this unwanted effect its having on my computer.

thanks for the help so far

no look at the text, its all some kind of gibberish (or another language :D ) i dont know what to make of it. the file restoration script does nothing. when i run it there are still some icons chnged, and the wierd text is still there. the other day i system restored and it was gone but had to un restore for some reason. i tried doing that again today but it didnt work, what is this sfc /scannow command? im sorry if im being a bit of trouble. i love the look of the icons and everything but im just frustrated with this unwanted effect its having on my computer.

thanks for the help so far

Wow... yeah, I noticed that, but assumed it was actually the correct language. It looks like it could be Polish, or maybe one of the Cyrillic languages (ie, Russian), except mis-printed in the Latin character set. I have to say, this is the first time I've seen... anything like this ... AT ALL! New bug, I'm impressed.

Give sfc /scannow a shot - if you feed your machine a proper Windows CD, and run "sfc /scannow" from say, the run dialog, it'll recopy the original Windows files. It's incredibly useful for situations when you need to recover the original set of system files when they've been mangled for one reason or another, such as, if say, some idiot's shell patcher didn't uninstall properly :whistle: but don't want/don't need/can't use the full-system treatment of System Restore. One caveat: It does restore to the version of the file from the CD, so you'd need to redownload any interim hotfixes.

I'm not doing any GUI/native-coded stuff, and that's final. Working with VB6 to do ANYTHING makes me feel as if I'm smashing my forehead into a brick wall repeatedly, and VB6 is the only native-Windows language I am familiar with and have development tools for. I can do magic in Java, but that's really not appropriate as it isn't native code, and requires massive runtimes that not everyone has. It's pretty much an explicit requirement for this project of mine that any external dependency not included with the OS is assumed to be absent. I'm keeping the batch scripts, as I've said several times before less authoritatively, and if that bugs anybody, I'll just make more and scarier disclaimers for the problems they have. Yeah, I'm getting kinda Bant-y, but working with VB puts me in that sort of mood.

What about some kind of 'reload' script to apply after Windows updates? Is it possible to identify the files which have changed since the original patch was done?

I really liked this when I was using XPize.

Go to the run box and type:

sfc /scannow

And let it go. If that's happening because of modified system files, this utility will find it and replace it. It may ask for you XP disk.

Also, what VS are you using?

What about some kind of 'reload' script to apply after Windows updates? Is it possible to identify the files which have changed since the original patch was done?

I really liked this when I was using XPize.

That was almost all of the point behind porting the patcher to a full programming language - It'd need to be able to compare modified file dates. If I had a small tool that read a the file modification date and dropped it into an environment variable in a format with no sorting required (YYYYMMDDHHMMSS), it'd almost be trivial to implement in my perverse language of choice (NT batch scripts), but I haven't found such a tool, and haven't tried to learn enough C and get a C compiler set up to say it's something I could make.

If you don't want to make your own: post-108441-1150252844.png :alien:

Yeah, but don't forget the low-res icons in that. Attachment has it done right :shifty: As an aside, the mass-renaming I did a while back was done partly with the idea of maybe doing a "hi-res" fork later on, when I have SVGs for everything. I'm actually getting pretty close to being there, although I honestly think having all those high resolution icons in system files is just begging for trouble. Edited by vertigosity

That was almost all of the point behind porting the patcher to a full programming language - It'd need to be able to compare modified file dates. If I had a small tool that read a the file modification date and dropped it into an environment variable in a format with no sorting required (YYYYMMDDHHMMSS), it'd almost be trivial to implement in my perverse language of choice (NT batch scripts), but I haven't found such a tool, and haven't tried to learn enough C and get a C compiler set up to say it's something I could make.

I will see what I can do. That shouldn't be so hard to realize in C.

Just to make it clear:

A guiless (DOS) program which reads the file modification date and time of a given file, converts the date and time to "YYYYMMDDHHMMSS" and writes this value to an env variable called for example TANGOMODIFIED?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know The ONLY thing I need to know is the price, which I know will be way higher than I (and most people) are willing to pay for a phone... so basically nothing here I need to know. PS: Nice job getting that Apple reference to a non-existent and unrevealed product as "competition" in there. Cheque is in the mail.
    • Well I really think the repasting helped if your higher clocks have returned, maybe the next thing to look at is if there is a problem with your case airflow? I guess this because your 3080 has returned to optimal state, but is still staying too warm, which might suggest it was thermal throttling before you repasted, of which the only logical conclusion could be outside factors.
    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know by Hamid Ganji Galaxy Z Fold 7 - Image via Samsung The next generation of Samsung foldables is set to be unveiled next month at the second Unpacked event of the year. Samsung’s 2026 foldables are not expected to offer significant upgrades over their predecessors, with the Korean firm instead focusing on design refinements and conventional upgrades such as faster processors and better cameras. However, Samsung is reportedly planning to unveil an all-new passport-style foldable this year to rival Apple’s first foldable iPhone, which is expected to debut this September. Here’s a roundup of everything we know about Samsung’s upcoming foldable devices ahead of their official debut. When can we expect Samsung’s new foldables? The Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Z Flip 7 series were unveiled in July, and Samsung is expected to maintain this timeframe in 2026. Based on previous reports from Korean sources, Samsung will hold its Unpacked event on July 22 in London, UK, to pull back the curtain on the Galaxy Z Fold 8 series. The devices are also expected to hit the shelves a few weeks after launch. However, Samsung has yet to announce an official date. A new naming scheme? One of the most interesting changes we might see this year is a new naming scheme for Samsung’s latest foldables. SamMobile reported that since Samsung is expected to unveil three foldables this year, it has adopted a new naming strategy to simplify product identification for customers. Accordingly, the standard Galaxy Z Fold 8 will reportedly be called the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and will serve as the direct successor to last year’s Galaxy Z Fold 7. The “Ultra” suffix suggests the phone could feature higher-end specifications, such as additional rear camera modules. Samsung’s new passport-style foldable is expected to carry the Galaxy Z Fold 8 name without any suffix. This model is reportedly equipped with two rear cameras. No major changes are expected for the Flip model. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 anticipated specs Rumors over the past few months suggest Samsung is preparing several upgrades for its upcoming foldables, although the devices may continue to rely on larger batteries and faster charging speeds rather than dramatic design changes. The primary focus this year is expected to be the Galaxy Z Fold 8 and its wide-screen design. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here are the anticipated specifications for the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra based on previous leaks: 6.5-inch outer display and 8-inch inner display, 120Hz refresh rate, and 2,600 nits peak brightness Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, paired with 12GB or 16GB of RAM and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB of storage 4.1mm thickness when unfolded and a weight of 210g 200MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, 10MP or 12MP telephoto camera, 10MP cover camera, and 10MP selfie camera 5,000mAh battery with 45W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 As for the Galaxy Z Flip 8, the device is not expected to be a major departure from its predecessor, although it could become slightly slimmer. Expected specifications include: Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 or Exynos 2600 processor 12GB of RAM with 256GB and 512GB storage options 6.9-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X inner dispaly and 4.1-inch Super AMOLED outer dispaly 50MP main camera, 12MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera 4,300mAh battery with 25W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 Samsung’s foldables are also expected to launch with Gemini Intelligence, Google’s AI suite for automating tasks in Android ecosystem. Moreover, given current memory and component costs, some Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 variants could see a price hike. Galaxy Z Fold 8 adopts a wide-screen design The centerpiece of the upcoming Unpacked event could be the Galaxy Z Fold 8, previously rumored as the Galaxy Z Fold Wide. This model adopts a passport-style form factor and is expected to compete directly with Apple’s iPhone Fold. Galaxy Z Fold 8 official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here’s what to expect: 7.6-inch primary OLED display and 5.4-inch cover display, 120Hz refresh rate, 2,600 nits peak brightness, and 4:3 aspect ratio Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, 12GB or 16GB of RAM, and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB storage options 4,800mAh battery with 45W wired charging 50MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera Android 17 and One UI 9 The three new foldable phones are unlikely to be the only devices unveiled at Samsung’s Unpacked event. The company is also expected to introduce the Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 and the Galaxy Watch 9 series.
    • Thanks
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      140
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!