[Shell Patcher] Tango Icons for Windows


Recommended Posts

I'm having a small problem with the media icons after installing this, they are all blank

061010220353spooksseries5episode6hqtvripdnc101xw6.png

I have uninstalled the pack, rebuilt the icon cache. Booted into safe mode and installed the patcher from there, booted into windows and rebuilt the icon cache again but they are still blank.

Anyone have any ideas?

I'm having a small problem with the media icons after installing this, they are all blank

061010220353spooksseries5episode6hqtvripdnc101xw6.png

I have uninstalled the pack, rebuilt the icon cache. Booted into safe mode and installed the patcher from there, booted into windows and rebuilt the icon cache again but they are still blank.

Anyone have any ideas?

Hmmm....I don't think htere is a specific Tango icon for .AVI formats. I'm not sure but this could be why. Maybe someone with more smarts like BobP or Vertigosity could answer more specifically.

so when we gonna get us some new icons and update :yes:

I suppose when the Big V gets around to it. I'm honestly looking forward to it because I kinda wanted to see the unpatched explorer icons done (even though they aren't supported by Tango) but that might not even happen. Does this patcher even need to be released every month? It's so great already. Vertigosity, you deserve some wicked gift or award or something for your efforts!!!

On a less suck uppy note, are the .AVI icons supposed to be patched?

I use the STTP on my computer using the Tangerine theme from Ubuntu. I love it, it blends in well with my Luna Element 5 VS and Ubuntu Firefox theme. I was wondering though, can anyone make a reshack patch for AOL Instant Messenger versions 5.0 to 5.9? If you could, that'd be great; I use AIM 5.9 instead of Triton (Triton's too ugly) and I tire of the AIM icons. I know there were some made for Gaim, so you could just use them./quote]I whipped out my old AIM 4.8 installer (I held out using it until the days of AIM 5.6 or so, then I switched to alternating between Trillian and GAIM), and added the main app icon - if all the registry entries, filenames, and resource ordinals line up, it should work on AIM 5.x as well. Of course, it's pretty much useless, since I haven't touched aimres.dll yet - that's a project in and of itself - take a peek at what resources are in it, and you won't blame me one bit for not touching it yet ;)
I suppose when the Big V gets around to it. I'm honestly looking forward to it because I kinda wanted to see the unpatched explorer icons done (even though they aren't supported by Tango) but that might not even happen. Does this patcher even need to be released every month? It's so great already. Vertigosity, you deserve some wicked gift or award or something for your efforts!!!

On a less suck uppy note, are the .AVI icons supposed to be patched?

It doesn't really need a release every month, just every month that I've changed enough to make it worth releasing. I've actually been looking at file modification dates and writing up a more thorough changelog than I had in the past, and by my past standards, I actually did have enough last month to be worth it. I might be looking at releasing The Next Revision sometime later this week, although not today.

Regarding .AVI icons: It depends on what their file type association is set to. If it's set to a something that's been modified to have a Tango icon, then yeah, it should be, but if it's set to something different, (like, for example, VLC), then no, it'd be set to whatever icon your media player set to it. Since the default on XP is WiMP, then for most people, "no, not yet" would hold correct.

Yes, I know the hotfix from MS06-057 contains a new Fusion-managed comctl32.dll variant. It's in, at least for XP SP2.

Ah my bad, I just kinda expected there to be icons for media files
er... well, it should still have the default file-type icon for whatever media player you're using. just not modified or replaced, if it's not something the patcher covers. Edited by vertigosity
I whipped out my old AIM 4.8 installer (I held out using it until the days of AIM 5.6 or so, then I switched to alternating between Trillian and GAIM), and added the main app icon - if all the registry entries, filenames, and resource ordinals line up, it should work on AIM 5.x as well. Of course, it's pretty much useless, since I haven't touched aimres.dll yet - that's a project in and of itself - take a peek at what resources are in it, and you won't blame me one bit for not touching it yet

Ohhhh-ho, don't worry about that. I've done a bit of snooping in aimres.dll meself, and it IS pretty nasty. I just wanted a patch for the main icon, the rest I'd just consider a bonus. XD So, when you release the patch, include the AIM thing or post it up here; I'd love to see what you've done.

Vert, is it possible to include theme packs for every program into the installer, having it auto detect what programs you have installed, and then install the themes?

I think this would be MUCH easier then trying to find every single theme for every program you own and just have it do it automatically.

PossiBility?

Also, don't you think we should start on Vista?

Edited by TEMPNEGROQ

I like it, it's simple like the actual icon was. But it's not up to me, it's up to vert and (I think) Sooper.

Heh, I have no control over icons or anything of the like regarding this shell pack or any other shell pack. I'm just a overexcited fanboy of Vertigosity's :p. I do like the icon though. It's pretty much exactly like the iTunes logo but jusat with the Tango CD and Generic Music icon. Great Job!!!! Now try creating one form scratch. It takes mad skillz (at least for me). Ugh, rat heads.

For instance, I just ****ed up an Open Official install because I have no idea what "update images_industrial.zip with images.zip" means

For OpenOffice, if you're patching the images_industrial.zip file you should have another images_industrial.zip file to replace it. That zip is basically the file with every image OOo uses. I've never used it on Windows so I have no idea how it works but I'd think if you had a replacement file you could just locate it in the OOo folder. Does that make any sense? I usually am a bumbling fool :p

I don't know if Vista is even patchable right now. I mean, nothing is un-patchable (I think) but it'd probably be tedious to patch Vista with all of its complexity. It has stuff going on everywhere.

No, just replacing the file doesn't work....

Strange. I'm assuming (even though one should never assume but oh well) that you are running Ooo on Windows?Maybe some kind of Knowledge Base would have an answer.

Vista is completely patchable. You can open all of it's binaries in ResHacker. I installed RC2 today and extracted icons and such with ease.

I need to try and patch some of the binaries with Tango. Maybe later..

How are you liking it? I'm afraid my computer (which I proudly bought with what little money I had at Wal-Mart. Yay for poor people!) doesn't like Vista and I can't run it well but from what I did get to test I was actually quite impressed. Tango icons would make the whole OS look so much cooler :p. Awesome that you got it opened up and are patching stuff. I suppose I spoke to soon ;)

I already formatted and uninstalled Vista (I installed it temporarily on my new PC, just to test, XP now :)), but there are quite a few new things.

a) They use PNGs. There are PNGs in the binaries. Doesn't get much easier than that for patching!

b) They use alphaBMPs. Microsoft uses mad-hax 32-bit bitmaps. Awesome as well!

c) The new 256x256 icons work with ResHacker, as long as you don't try and view the 256x256 on its own. If you go save --> Icon Group, it will produce a perfect .ico.

I actually have a PC with decent horsepower now (heh heh) so I might try my hand at Inkscaping. On the other hand... maybe not.

I totally haven't even bothered looking into how WFP has been EnhancedForMyProtection in Vista yet, myself; I know that in Beta 2, it wasn't exactly as it was in Win2k/XP. I really haven't been able to run Vista as my Primary OS yet, it's got some pretty bits, but every time I actually try to USE it it just gets on my nerves. Given that I have a "3.4" machine and no desire to spend any money on a Vista Ultimate license (and it would have to be Ultimate, since I love my VMs)... I'll be sticking with XP for quite some time.

Eh, I'll update the wording of the OOo 2.x installation sometime. Basically, by "update," I mean, take the files extracted from Lokheed's archive, and add them to your own, not overwriting. You'll need to restore your original; I think the OOo 2.x installer will let you do "repair" installs, and heck, 2.04 is out anyways.

Edit @ BobP: Hah. I've used Inkscape pretty well on machines much slower than your "spare" machines. :rofl:

Edited by vertigosity

Thanks vert, I'll see if that method works.....so is it possible you can do this tango-applications installer with the normal one?

Thanks vert, I'll see if that method works.....so is it possible you can do this tango-applications installer auto detect or checkmarks with the normal one?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!