Recommended Posts

So will IE7 make Maxthon obsolete? Or will Maxthon's plug-ins still make it a better tabbed-IE browser?

I think there will be no need for Maxthon. Personally I never thought there was after Firefox.

On top of that Maxthon has a small user base when compared to IE or Firefox or Opera.

Maxthon is just a stupid shell anyway. Not even a real browser.

I think there will be no need for Maxthon. Personally I never thought there was after Firefox.

On top of that Maxthon has a small user base when compared to IE or Firefox or Opera.

Maxthon is just a stupid shell anyway. Not even a real browser.

You think wrong...

Maxthon as a company is growing fast, and thats REALLY fast. It's a freeware browser and for the past couple of months they have hired... They have 6-7 coders working there now. That must mean they are doing something really right. They were even financed by one of the guys that started the funding on Skype.

Maxthon has 48 million downloads...

Maxthon is activly recomended by Microsoft...

Maxthon 2.0 will make Maxthon even more popular... (Yes, I know what I'm talking about, I'm beta testing 2.0)

Definition of browser:

A web browser is a software application that enables a user to display and interact with text, images, and other information typically located on a web page at a website on the World Wide Web

I like IE7, but I refuse to use it because it was no better han IE6 at ACID2 and it's security isn't as good as other browsers (Active X).

If anyone can put me at ease with those problems then I may use it in preference to Opera or Firefox.

carpediem,

It's a shell that uses the IE rendering engine. I don't consider something that uses another browsers rendering engine to be a browser.

It would be different if Maxthon built their own rendering engine. Maxthon is more like an "extension" for IE. Kind of like how Firefox has extensions that enable more things and add ons.

Maxthon may be recomended by MS sure. IT's because when you use Maxthon it's identified as IE when you surf.

carpediem,

It's a shell that uses the IE rendering engine. I don't consider something that uses another browsers rendering engine to be a browser.

It would be different if Maxthon built their own rendering engine. Maxthon is more like an "extension" for IE. Kind of like how Firefox has extensions that enable more things and add ons.

Maxthon may be recomended by MS sure. IT's because when you use Maxthon it's identified as IE when you surf.

pfftttt all I can say

IE is NOT following web standards and you calling it a browser?

lame

I like IE7, but I refuse to use it because it was no better han IE6 at ACID2 and it's security isn't as good as other browsers (Active X).

If anyone can put me at ease with those problems then I may use it in preference to Opera or Firefox.

You can disable activex, you know

pfftttt all I can say

IE is NOT following web standards and you calling it a browser?

lame

So what browser do you use then? I've got to hear this one....

I have a couple of problems:

1. The "Customize Your Settings" page keeps launching at startup. I've tried to save my settings but I get an "Error applying settings!" page. If I hit "Got to homepage and don't show this again", it launches again at startup.

2. My favorites menu doesn't work. I can get to my favorites in the "Favorites center", but the links won't open and I can't import them to go to the menu.

Any help on either of these issues would be greatly appreciated. And as for my opinion. It seems at least as quick as IE 6, but the interface will take getting used to. It's alot different than IE 6 or Firefox

To be honest, I only used IE7 for about 5min, coz it kept disconnecting my dialup connection, and deleting it. I couldnt even dial until i uninstalled it. Points for perfect restore of settings!!

But i'm impressed with the little i have seen. It may not be revolutionary, but for the average people who just use IE, this is a HUGE step. Your average user wouldnt be able to tell the difference between IE5 and IE6sp1/sp2. They're different on the inside, but a lot of things are just as difficult/user-unfriendly to do.

The infamous "cannot find server" page is replaced with a nice page that has USEFUL info on why the hell you're not on the net.

Tabs, the previews, the printing page, easy page zoom, built in search, icon overhaul, shows that MS is tyin to do a total overhaul, and who do we thank? Firefox/Safari/Maxthon/Opera, as they have developed superior browsers to MS, so MS is forced to do somethin.

Browser wars are good. Soon all the computers i'm forced to use will have somethin better, not the old IE that forced me to switch to firefox.

carpediem,

It's a shell that uses the IE rendering engine. I don't consider something that uses another browsers rendering engine to be a browser.

It would be different if Maxthon built their own rendering engine. Maxthon is more like an "extension" for IE. Kind of like how Firefox has extensions that enable more things and add ons.

Maxthon may be recomended by MS sure. IT's because when you use Maxthon it's identified as IE when you surf.

Firefox is just a shell that uses the Gecko rendering engine.

Firefox is just a shell that uses the Gecko rendering engine.

You are wrong there my friend.

A browser is built on a redering engine (Gecko - Firefox, Trident (MSHTML) - IE, KHTML or Webkit - Safari). It isn't a shell of it.

Using your theory IE is a shell on top of Trident (MSHTML). Browsers like Maxthon are shells because they need the main browser installed for them to work.

Maxthon is just a stupid shell anyway. Not even a real browser.

By your logic: FireFox is just a stupid shell anyway. Not even a real browser.

Same for Safari.

I like IE7, but I refuse to use it because it was no better han IE6 at ACID2 and it's security isn't as good as other browsers (Active X).

ACID2 is NOT a standards compliance test . Last I knew, no browsers could pass it.

How does support for hosting ActiveX controls make it less secure???

...

Also, can someone please correct the title?

IE7 Beta 2 doesn't exist yet. This is a review of a pre-beta release.

Using your theory IE is a shell on top of Trident (MSHTML). Browsers like Maxthon are shells because they need the main browser installed for them to work.

IE is a shell around SHDocView - which is a wrapper around Trident. So is Maxthon.

If you delete iexplore.exe - Maxthon won't care. But if you delete mshtml - both of them will.

By your logic: FireFox is just a stupid shell anyway. Not even a real browser.

Same for Safari.

ACID2 is NOT a standards compliance test . Last I knew, no browsers could pass it.

Safari can pass it. Konquerer can pass it. Soon Opera will be able to pass it. It is not that no browser can pass it. It is that the IE team is lazy. Microsoft's CEO is yelling "Developers! Developers! Developers!" yet the IE team is saying that because it is a wishlist, they are not going to comply with it and instead are going to listen to "feedback." So much for listening to developers.

really dont get half the posts in this thread, why use a browser that will render many pages on the web incorrectly? no one will ensure their site is working correctly untill ie7 is final. and as for passing acid2... that means absolutly nothing. it doesnt ensure that all standards are follow 100%, it doesnt mean it full supports css2, it means nothing in the real world. im sure pretty much every browser developer out there could hack it so that acid2 works. but developers would rather it was more compliant in a whole than to just be hacked in.

Safari can pass it. Konquerer can pass it. Soon Opera will be able to pass it. It is not that no browser can pass it. It is that the IE team is lazy. Microsoft's CEO is yelling "Developers! Developers! Developers!" yet the IE team is saying that because it is a wishlist, they are not going to comply with it and instead are going to listen to "feedback." So much for listening to developers.

Lazy???

Grow up. If you have a specific feature that you want IE to implement, then tell them. But if you're just going to whine that it doesn't pass some arbitrary "test" (neither does Firefox, and I think you're wrong about Safari/Konqueror's released versions), don't bother.

How is passing ACID2 going to make it a better browser?

And while we're on the subject - why are Safari/Konqueror missing so many important features for web developers?

Why don't they offer proper DHTML event and object model support (specifically, the OnLoad event for SCRIPT tags)? IE has had it for ages. So does FireFox.

Just look at Live.com - a site that makes heavy use of DHTML and Javascript. That team tried to support Opera and Safari/Konqueror, but found that they were too lacking in necessary functionality. At least the Opera folks are working with them to make version 9 better. But so far I haven't heard of any effort from the KHTML community to improve their support for popular "AJAX" technologies.

I'm loving it so far. There are some bugs here and there but in the end overall it's a great reliable browser. Loving the new look ribbon bars up there. Easy to use and not as bloated as default IE 6 was. The thumbnail view rules!

Here are the problems I've encountered so far:

- The scrolling is a bit sluggish. But the fast scrolling (using the cruise buttons on my MX1000) is smmmmooooth.

- I'd wish I would wheel-click on the home button to make it load in a new tab.

- When opening a new tab after clicking the home button, it shows a blank page. I'd like it to load my start page which is full of links.

- The new tab button need to show the new tab icon permenantly.

- The ability to remove the Stop and Go/Refresh buttons, as well as the search button. I know to press enter or press F5.

Although other than those problems, it's an excellent browser after all, depite the security concerns, Microsoft is going in the right direction. :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!