Trophy Integrity question.


Recommended Posts

Does anyone think that the clips of the players holding the Lombardi Trophy shouldn't be allowed? I mean, I dont think you should get to touch the trophy until you win it. It should be a special moment, that only those who win the superbowl should get to touch it?

Am I just being silly? I mean, does everyone get to play with the Stanley Cup before the championship? I dont even think the players can see it before the series.

I just think that it cheapens it a little, by allowing both teams to hold the trophy and pose with it.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/429366-trophy-integrity-question/
Share on other sites

no trophy is like the stanley cup. i think they should be allowed to do whatever they want....but it just shows how much more revered the stanley cup is. nothing will ever compare to it. even kids when they are young won't touch just in case they ever get the chance to play for it when they are older.

I must concur with yisman as well. You should only touch such trophy if you win it, not before you play for it.

Also, bigblue, you are correct with your statement. They put way more Pittsburgh players with it than they did with Seattle. Basically, everyone wanted Pittsburgh to win and apparently, so did the officials

no trophy is like the stanley cup. i think they should be allowed to do whatever they want....but it just shows how much more revered the stanley cup is. nothing will ever compare to it. even kids when they are young won't touch just in case they ever get the chance to play for it when they are older.

And once they win it, they bash the snot out of it....or even lose it? Doesn't sound so revered to me.

they bash the snot out of it? Please elaborate...

Is the VL Trophy 1 of a kind or do they make duplications of it for every Super Bowl?

I remember a Sports Illustrated article after the Rangers won the cup...they followed it around with each player, and they made mention on what all the players did to the cup...use it for this and that, and by the end of the trip, the cup was dinged up all over....and this included one player losing it for a short period.

Granted that was in '94, but it didn't sound as if it was revered.

Yes, each superbowl a trophy is given out, so the team can have something in their trophy case forever.

Whups! title Edited, as I am sure quigley doesn't mean SuperBowl 15. :)

by agreement with the NHL and the Hockey Hall of Fame, each player of the winning team of the Stanley Cup is allowed to take the Cup home with them for 1 day to display it. Usually players have a little hometown parade. There are tonnes of stories that players have had their kids baptised in the Cup, one of the mothers of a player didn't know what the Cup was and used it as a flower pot. They also drink champagne out of it...

Anyways, thast part of the tradition with winning the Cup. It is afterall 100+ years old, its the same trophy carried around on the ice by hockey legends Wayne Gretzky, Mario Lemieux, Maurice Richard, Bobby Orr, Gordie Howe etc.. It also has every players name who's won the cup engraved onto it, along with the team name and management. Sure its succumb to some accidents, im sure the many replicas of the NBA or NFL trophy that players have taken home have fallen or been banged up. Its not like theyre completly inedestructable. The thing weighs 30-40lbs and the tradition is to carry it over ur head, of course things are going to happen, but no other sports trophy has the prestige the Stanely Cup has. No single major sports trophy has existed for 100+ years, no trophy has all the players' name engraved on it and no sport allows its players to take the trophy home with them for display (not including reproductions).

I don't think they should have had those pictures, it was cool to hear the guys talk about it but they shouldn't had done the pictures they did. Then again everything is about marketing anymore and they don't care if the players should or shouldn't. But yeah i agree holding the trophy should be earned.

haha, superbowl 15. Thanks Boog! :)

Yeah, the stanley cup has been at the bottom of a swimming pool, had cereal eaten out of it, a dog has drank water out of it, but still no one gets their pictures taken with it before winning it!

I just think it cheapens the winning of the trophy some. thats all.

I remember a Sports Illustrated article after the Rangers won the cup...they followed it around with each player, and they made mention on what all the players did to the cup...use it for this and that, and by the end of the trip, the cup was dinged up all over....and this included one player losing it for a short period.

Granted that was in '94, but it didn't sound as if it was revered.

Yes, each superbowl a trophy is given out, so the team can have something in their trophy case forever.

Whups! title Edited, as I am sure quigley doesn't mean SuperBowl 15. :)

That's the entire point of the Stanley Cup, BOOG. Each player gets to spend a day with it. It's supposed to be something extremely special. One player had his newborn son baptized in it, if I remember correctly. Steve Yzerman took it to a hospital to show kids who had cancer and were literally on their deathbeds. Another player took it to the top of a mountain with him (can't remember the mountain). Most players take it on a parade or show it off some other way.

If you mean to tell me the Lombardi trophy has more of a tradition than that, then I would call you crazy.

I would never say it has less tradition, the point was brought up at how revered the trophy was....when I was trying to point out that it doesn't seem so revered when people goof off with it.

Just my $0.02

I agree that whoever goofed around with it obviously didn't "revere" it, but you have to understand how many generations the trophy's been through. It was bound to happen eventually. The Lombardi Trophy hasn't even been around 1/2 as long, if I remember correctly (or maybe even 1/3 as long). And I'm sure that if the same situation applied to the Lombardi Trophy, that far worse would happen than a ding or two.

i forgot what the lombardi trophy was called until you just pointed it out. for that matter, i don't know what the nba or baseball trophies are called either...

you can ask just about anyone what the stanley cup is, and they will say hockey. that's what is cool to me.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The sweet release of death has never looked more appealing.
    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Doesn't DDG mainly use Bing?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      485
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      70
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      58
    5. 5
      neufuse
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!