• 0

Zip & Rar program


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

winRAR is free...??

oh, and even with the trial you get everything, and when expired...after the register message comes up just click ok, or whatever, and you can continue to use the program. Though, the register message comes up everytime winRAR is used after trial expiration, but hey, its free and works well...

  • 0

I don't think many -- if any -- free programs, other than WinRAR, will allow you to create RAR archives. Many will be able to extract files from RAR archives though.

I've never found the need to create RAR archives when others such as 7-Zip, Tar, and plain old ZIP, will suffice.

TUGZip is my favourite program. You can create archives using about ten different compression formats with it.

  • 0

I don't think many -- if any -- free programs, other than WinRAR, will allow you to create RAR archives. Many will be able to extract files from RAR archives though.

I've never found the need to create RAR archives when others such as 7-Zip, Tar, and plain old ZIP, will suffice.

TUGZip is my favourite program. You can create archives using about ten different compression formats with it.

I use TUGZip to, and it is VERY good. I even think it is better than WinRAR...

I just have to add that it actually can compress rar-archives with a plugin (that is official).

My second choice in packaging (TUGZip is the first) is FILzip, so that is sure worth checking out to, and than use the one you like best :)

Good luck

  • 0

I have used both TugZip and 7-Zip. TugZip has a better UI. However, I've noticed 7-Zip to run better under certain conditions (heavy load, tricky formats, handling corrupted files, etc.).

Both are very, very good programs and either would serve you well. Hats off to those developers for their efforts.

  • 0

Another vote for Tugzip. Cannot understand what would make people use anything else....

And another. TugZip all the way. :yes:

@sundayx No, WinRAR isn't free, but the trial lasts [virtually] forever. When it expires a message pops up each time you open it, but you can still use it by just pressing Ok.

  • 0

Well...WinRAR isn't free at heart, but you can use it well past the trial period. Whats nicer is that it won't bother you like WinZIP does. You can freely extract and compress using the context menu items without being bothered. Its only when you use the interface that you are presented with a window asking you to pay up, which you can easily click out of.

However if trial software which doesn't expire isn't your thing, you have a few choices in my eyes:

ZipGenius

TUGZip

7Zip

In terms of interface:

1-ZipGenius

2-TUGZip

3-7Zip

In terms of features:

1-TUGZip (I only rate it higher than ZipGenius because you can use plugins to let it compress RAR and ACE filetypes...otherwise ZipGenius is much better with features)

2-ZipGenius

3-7Zip

In terms of all the file types it can create:

1-ZipGenius (RPM and FrontPage Packages it can create...that is like...the ULTRA "WTF?" factor)

2-TUGZip

3-7Zip

ZipGenius does 7zip better than 7zip itself.

7zip compresses the files into a 7z file, and winrar cant read the individual compression of each file inside the 7z file.

ZipGenius, using the same 7zip dll file, compresses to a 7z file and winrar can read the compression of each file no problem.

I think that ZipGenius will probably give you most, if not all the same features you have come to enjoy in WinRAR...and is therefore the best free archiving program you can get.

Thats not to say TUGZip or 7Zip are bad. I just think that ZipGenius is better.

  • 0

Zipgenius won't even extract when you just drag the file away from it, it's interface is complete crap, except that it's skinnable I believe. Tugzip can extract .iso and compress to .rar. Zipgenius and 7zip can only do one of those.

TUGzip can't do it natively. It requires that you install WinRAR and copy over the RAR.exe executable.

Just because a program can DO .iso extraction doesn't mean you will actually use it.

I know WinRAR does it, but I have never once used it.

Its interface is awesome, I'm not sure what you are smoking. Its more XP-ntaive than TUGzip.

Mind I note I have tried and used both programs...

Give me a minute to find some info and I will have a complete list of all the archive types these programs support reading and extracting.

  • 0

OK this is quite amazing...

I have an old excel comparison of zip programs...

I have to update the compression data (since I did the test in late September and new versions of the software have surfaced since...besides the data not including ZipGenius. I only found the program a week ago), but the first sheet is the tell all which is a comparison of what each program supports in terms of what it can extract from and what it can compress to. I just added ZipGenius to that sheet a few minutes ago. The results are astonishing.

ZipGenius literally smokes all the programs...

Totals, Extraction:

1) ZipGenius - 45 file formats

2) TUGZip - 28 file formats

T-3) WinACE - 20 file formats

T-3) WinZIP - 20 file formats

5) WinRAR - 16 file formats

6) 7-Zip - 14 file formats

7) Windows XP - 1 file format (ZIP)

Totals, Compression:

1) ZipGenius - 23 file formats

2) TUGZip - 13 file formats

3) WinACE - 8 file formats

4) 7-Zip - 5 file formats

T-6) WinRAR - 2 file formats

T-6) WinZIP - 2 file formats

7) Windows XP - 1 file format (ZIP)

Here, see for yourself: comparison_formatsupdated.zip

I installed each program, and checked out what file types the OPEN window (for extraction) and NEW window (for compression) would let me choose between.

ZipGenius can extract ISO and RAR, but can't create either. TUGZip can't create them either, but RAR creation can be done only if you copy over the RAR.exe file as I said. I know you can UNINSTALL WinRAR, but its one extra program you have to go out of your way to get if you want the RAR compression feature. But ZipGenius makes is all back by supporting the compression and extraction of more file formats.

ZipGenius can read and write RPM, read and write Frontpage Web Packages (FWP), read Windows Media Player skin packages (WMZ), WinAMP 3 skin packages (WAL), FireFox XPI's, and it can create ARJ and ARC, all of which TUGZip can't do.

Edited by Tokar
  • 0

I had IZArc for awhile and it worked nicely, but had some issues with rather big 7z file not uncompressing at all. Though the same file uncompressed with no problems with 7zip. Also i like the IZArc icon. :)

Currently testing out Tugzip. So far so good. Just hope i can change than icon. :)

  • 0
Zipgenius won't even extract when you just drag the file away from it...

Are you really sure? ;)

You don't have to install winrar. You can uninstall it after you have a copy of rar.exe. I also used both programs. What bothers me is that you can't select what to extract and just drag and drop them wherever (in zipgenius). Plus tugzip is extremely fast, from what I've seen.

Which version of ZipGenius are you running?

OK this is quite amazing...

I have an old excel comparison of zip programs...

I have to update the compression data (since I did the test in late September and new versions of the software have surfaced since...besides the data not including ZipGenius. I only found the program a week ago), but the first sheet is the tell all which is a comparison of what each program supports in terms of what it can extract from and what it can compress to. I just added ZipGenius to that sheet a few minutes ago. The results are astonishing.

ZipGenius literally smokes all the programs...

Thank you :D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
    • If you don’t get lucky with Valve’s Steam Machine reservation system, you can make your own Steam Machine instead. Valve says that “starting with the SteamOS 3.8 release, you can put together your own Steam Machine using whatever PC parts you want.” SteamOS 3.8.10 launched last week with a slew of updates, including “improved compatibility with recent Intel and AMD platforms.” Alongside that improved compatibility, Valve is giving gamers the green light to install SteamOS on their own desktops. In an interview with The Verge, Valve’s Pierre-Loup Griffais said Valve has been “rolling out improvements to [SteamOS] so it’s more compatible with desktop hardware,” including eventual support for Nvidia graphics. Griffais says Valve has “a growing team” working on Nvidia driver support for SteamOS, adding, “We’re collaborating with Nvidia very closely.” While he mentioned that Nvidia support might not come this year, Griffais emphasized that “it’s certainly something that we’re working on in the background.”     Subscription not needed: https://archive.fo/Tssfc Subscription needed: https://www.theverge.com/games/953411/valve-steamos-desktop-nvidia
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      452
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!