• 0

Zip & Rar program


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
winrar for me, never tried anything else cuz frankly, i dont think all those extras are needed for 99% of all compressed files.

You are right, but if you download a free software with all those extra, nobody forces you to use all those features ;)

Plus, WinRAR is not free, even if you can click CLOSE to hide the nag screen:

post-4032-1140074315.png

After 40 days you must purchase a regular license.

  • 0

You are right, but if you download a free software with all those extra, nobody forces you to use all those features ;)

Plus, WinRAR is not free, even if you can click CLOSE to hide the nag screen:

post-4032-1140074315.png

After 40 days you must purchase a regular license.

You must purchase a license? Only ethically. There is nothing to physical stop someone from not purchasing a license.

  • 0

I am not english but I can understand what the nag screen shows up: "After a 40 day trial period you must either buy a license or remove it from your computer". What does this mean? It surely doesn't mean "use WinRar as long as you want without paying".

WinRar is a great tool and their developers deserve to earn money from their product; if people doesn't want to pay, they have to look for a free program.

  • 0

I am not english but I can understand what the nag screen shows up: "After a 40 day trial period you must either buy a license or remove it from your computer". What does this mean? It surely doesn't mean "use WinRar as long as you want without paying".

WinRar is a great tool and their developers deserve to earn money from their product; if people doesn't want to pay, they have to look for a free program.

I know what it says. But there is no physical limitation that disables WinRAR. So, yes, after 40 days, the person can continue to use WinRAR as long as they want without paying. Is this ethical? No. Is this legal? Probably not. But that's just the way it is.

  • 0

They didn't put an automatic lock in their software because they don't allow other developers to put RAR compression in their own applications. That's why I suggest using 7-zip compression format even in ZipGenius F.A.Q. page: it's open source and performs just like RAR (or better, in some cases).

Let's talk about WinAce... Is anybody still using it? Uhm... Not as much as some time ago.

Why ZIP became so popular? Because Phil Katz has never filed a patent request on this algorhythm and he made PKZIP (the DOS compression tool) available to everybody, so people has been enabled to freely compress files into ZIP format.

Igor Pavlov, 7-zip developer, deserves more popularity for his work: if people in the underground (read as P2P networks) would start using .7z archives, the RAR files may start to get less popularity and 7-zip would become de facto the new standard compression format.

  • 0

The guy who programmed WinRAR for some reason let the software work past the trial period.

It seems to have the same functionality as WinZIP in this respect. Except WinRAR only nags you when you open the interface.

When using the context menu items there are no nag screens. In WinZIP is shows the nag screens in both cases.

Considering how most shareware software is programmed its amazing he didn't set it up to stop functionality after 40 days.

But thats the way its been since...forever. Ive been using WinRAR since the pre 3.0 days, nothing has changed.

As you said, 7Zip is better than RAR for certain file types.

That was the purpose of that excel file :).

7Zip performs better for more filetypes than WinRAR, but it seems combining all filetypes into one big file it would see WinRAR would output an overall better compression.

Then again, my test chose only 21 file types...so its not exactly a GREAT test...but its a decent one to get a good idea of performance. There are probably thousands of filetypes all of which compress differently...I only chose 21 rather popular ones.

I dont know what to tell ya...i dont know where compression will be in a few years...but i dont think rar is going anywhere anytime soon.

I think its mostly because the underground scene uses RAR and ZIP.

If the underground started to use 7zip then you would probably see a larger following of it.

Since at that point, everyone would want to trade files in 7z's....WinRAR cant compress to 7z and thats a problem. Where is where programs like ZipGenius would come in.

:p

  • 0

see, the nice thing about rar files is that since it's not an open standard that anyone can just create a plugin for, it is harder to create an extension or a script for a server that will scan compressed files for various content if they are in rar format. zip and rar arent that different in compression for the most part, but since zip is older, it's better documented and pretty much anything can extract a zip file.

i think if there was a move to 7z by the underground community, it would be short lived because the compression methods are open source and the code is all there and can be easily adapted into whatever someone would need if they were looking for illegal content in a cluster of compressed files.

see, the nice thing about rar files is that since it's not an open standard that anyone can just create a plugin for, it is harder to create an extension or a script for a server that will scan compressed files for various content if they are in rar format. zip and rar arent that different in compression for the most part, but since zip is older, it's better documented and pretty much anything can extract a zip file.

i think if there was a move to 7z by the underground community, it would be short lived because the compression methods are open source and the code is all there and can be easily adapted into whatever someone would need if they were looking for illegal content in a cluster of compressed files.

  • 0

see, the nice thing about rar files is that since it's not an open standard that anyone can just create a plugin for, it is harder to create an extension or a script for a server that will scan compressed files for various content if they are in rar format. zip and rar arent that different in compression for the most part, but since zip is older, it's better documented and pretty much anything can extract a zip file.

i think if there was a move to 7z by the underground community, it would be short lived because the compression methods are open source and the code is all there and can be easily adapted into whatever someone would need if they were looking for illegal content in a cluster of compressed files.

see, the nice thing about rar files is that since it's not an open standard that anyone can just create a plugin for, it is harder to create an extension or a script for a server that will scan compressed files for various content if they are in rar format. zip and rar arent that different in compression for the most part, but since zip is older, it's better documented and pretty much anything can extract a zip file.

i think if there was a move to 7z by the underground community, it would be short lived because the compression methods are open source and the code is all there and can be easily adapted into whatever someone would need if they were looking for illegal content in a cluster of compressed files.

besides posting the content twice in one post...I didn't understand one point you were making.

I dont exactly see how RAR being close source and 7z being open source has any effect on whether the underground uses it.

I think the reaosn they use it is because RAR was the first major compression type to allow users to make mutlivolumed archives. WinZIP in its early days didn't allow that...I dont know if that is still the case, though. And at the time 7zip didnt exist to my knowledge.

WinRAR worked well for all the underground people releasing huge softwares, since it allows them to split it up into smaller files.

I think that onces a group of people start using one standard it is hard to get them to change, even if a newer one is better.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I forgot to add on my comment that when robots will take physical jobs, it's when they become more cheaper to manufacture and sell. That will be the starting point of the end to lanscaping, trash pickup, factory jobs, etc.
    • How many people can actually use a 2.5gig ethernet port? Most people do not have more than a 1gig internet connection, heck most have less than that. Most people at home do not have a switch that has multiple 2.5gig ports either.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!