Will Apple Adopt Windows?


Recommended Posts

John C. Dvorak-not exactly a writer to be taken seriously

I don't know a lot about Apple, but I know that Apple switching to Intel was said to most likely happen way before he ever said anything. It was bound to happen sooner or later.

John C. Dvorak and Paul Thurrott. Two people who really shouldn't be taken seriously. Especially little PT. I can't stand that guy he does nothing but kiss MS ass. He wanted to boycott IE 7 when beta 1 came out. The IE team has a little talk with him and a week later he's drooling over IE 7 :rolleyes: Acts as if he's this good little innocent guy that just reviews MS software. Get to know the guy for a while and he'll leak something to you in a heartbeat. He acts as if he's special and knows everything when it comes to Microsoft.

End of my rant. Sorry I just can't stand PT. The guys a fake and I can't stand people who act like that

Edited by NightmarE D
I don't know a lot about Apple, but I know that Apple switching to Intel was said to most likely happen way before he ever said anything. It was bound to happen sooner or later.

Yes, but if you do a search for those Apple/Intel-related threads, you'll see some familiar screennames saying strikingly similar things and ending up being glaringly, unapologetically wrong. :whistle:

The day that Apple adopts Windows is the day I buy a Mac. No doubt many other people are like me; Mac OS X despiser, but Apple design lover.

Either that, or PC laptop makers start putting some creative flair and style into their laptop design.

Honestly, Apple might actually get increased sales from shipping Macs with Windows on them.

So you hate all *nix OSes? You are trying to tell us that you like their cases? You are entitled to your opinion I guess but I think you are a really really small niche. That niche may see large on sites like this but in terms of the general population of computer users, it is miniscule.

Most people don't care what OS their computer runs on as long as it runs the apps they need. The only reason most people run windows is because they are not aware of any alternatives.

There was a version of NeXTStep which ran on some generic hardware back in the day and BeOS was also targeting generic PCs but both companies faced artificial stumbling blocks caused by OEMs being threatened by MSFT. Remember the anti-trust lawsuit? Remember the lawsuit MSFT lost to Be Inc? Unfortunately, the latter was settle after the demise of Be Inc when it had already been bought by Palm.

What do you hate about it? The stability? The lack of compatibility with malware and viruses? I guess you could classify that as "software".

:laugh:

Yes, but if you do a search for those Apple/Intel-related threads, you'll see some familiar screennames saying strikingly similar things and ending up being glaringly, unapologetically wrong. :whistle:

Do you realize that hardware and "software" are completely different things? Everyone is aware that linux runs on multiple platforms but at the time it seemed that the intel switch was unlikely especially considering the source it was coming from.

Dvorak seems to think that Apple is just a hardware company but he does not realize that it is the software that makes the hardware so valuable.

As for software that Apple makes check out:

http://www.apple.com/ca/software/

:whistle:

the evn show, I think you are getting caught up in the details of what .NET and Cocoa are. They are both API's for connecting to the underlying OS in an Object oriented way. You could also say that Carbon and Win32 are somewhat analogous as they are both C based with kind of messy syntaxes.

I don't want to get into a nerd contest with you especially since I'm recovering from bronchitis. You don't need to prove how smart you are. I've written plenty of code to interface with Win32 at work and I'm sure you have too.

From a very high level, both .NET and Cocoa + the Core frameworks help developers concentrate on writing applications instead of interfacing with low level OS APIs or implementing basic network and file I/O.

Regardless of which one you happen to prefer or what features one has over the other, the fact remains that Apple and third-party developers use Cocoa and the Core frameworks to a large extent these days. Switching to Windows would throw all that functionality out the window or it would have to be ported to Windows. I think it would destroy Apple as we know it.

Essentially, this Dvorak fantasy is not going to happen. Apple might be working on providing some sort of compatibility libraries to speed up porting of windows Apps to OS X.

What do you hate about it? [referring to Unix OSes] The stability? The lack of compatibility with malware and viruses? I guess you could classify that as "software".

You're being really one-sided here. I said I didn't like Mac OS X, not Unix. Also, you're asking a rhetorical question; one that only lists the good things about using Unix. What about the bad things? Like, incompatibility with Windows programs?

You know, I actually don't like the Mac OS X GUI. The OpenGL effects are nice, but seriously, that Finder bar at the top is stupid, IMO. I prefer my menubars within the app windows itself, which is the way every other OS does it. Also, the dock is another stupid idea. What happens when I have more than 300 or so programs, like I do on my Windows laptop?

Oh wait, I forgot. It's impossible for a Mac to have that many programs. After all, there aren't that many apps written for it, is there?

Sure, I don't like Linux, but I know that it makes a good server; I would know, I run one.

In my opinion, Linux looks horrible. But what do I care, when it's a server? I don't need eye candy there.

You're being really one-sided here. I said I didn't like Mac OS X, not Unix. Also, you're asking a rhetorical question; one that only lists the good things about using Unix. What about the bad things? Like, incompatibility with Windows programs?

First of all, I use windows XP (including Visual Studio) 37.5 Hours a week at work. I was a windows a windows 2000 and XP beta tester at home and I was a home windows user a lot longer than I've been a mac user.

You mention incompatibility with windows programs as if it was a bad thing. Most "free" software for windows is infested with spyware or adware.

You know, I actually don't like the Mac OS X GUI. The OpenGL effects are nice, but seriously, that Finder bar at the top is stupid, IMO. I prefer my menubars within the app windows itself, which is the way every other OS does it.

That is a matter of person personal preference but window specific menus are not only a no no according to Fitts law but they waste valuable screen space and contribute to screen clutter. Amiga OS Workbench, Gem, Atari TOS and GEOS are all example of OSes/GUI's that had menus at the top of the screen.

Also, the dock is another stupid idea. What happens when I have more than 300 or so programs, like I do on my Windows laptop?

Oh wait, I forgot. It's impossible for a Mac to have that many programs. After all, there aren't that many apps written for it, is there?

Nice troll I have about 200 some odd applications in my laptop. The Dock is somewhat analogous to the quicklaunch bar. Do you keep all 300 applications on your quicklaunch?

Application in OS X are kept in /Applications (Applications folder off the root of your main drive) and Developer tools are kept in /Developer. That sort of like the programs folder off the start menu but they actual applications instead of shortcuts. If you was a startmenu, drag the Applications folder to the dock and it will create a menu with items and subfolders that automatically reflects the contents of the Applications folder because it is a link to.

Software:

http://www.apple.com/software/

http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/

http://www.versiontracker.com/macosx/

http://www.macupdate.com/

http://osx.freshmeat.net/

http://sourceforge.net/softwaremap/trove_l...hp?form_cat=309

You are entitled to your opinion but please stop trolling out of ignorance and educate yourself a bit about that which you would be so quick to dismiss or criticize.

It is not about who has the best OS/Software or hardware!!! It's about who has the best marketing machine!! And that is....you guessed it right..Microsoft!!

The only reason for Mac to be alive is because Microsoft has to. They are not allowed to take a monopoly so they keep Mac alive for some "competition"

Don't get me wrong, I like the Mac, I like how it looks, I like the simplicity. But as I am a hardcore gamer, the only choice of OS is Windows and gaming is still the main reason we have PC's at home. If I was only surfing the internet, doing some office work and emailing, I would buy a Mac. Even in the graphics department Mac ain't the only party to choose (look at the ADOBE creative suit 2 for windows).

So IMHO it would be VERY possible for Mac to adopt Windows!!!

You mention incompatibility with windows programs as if it was a bad thing. Most "free" software for windows is infested with spyware or adware.

It most obviously IS a bad thing! LOTS of software (that is free, useful AND clean) is Windows only. Not to mention the commercial software that's available- and what do you say to gamers?

Does my Windows laptop of three years have spyware or adware? No! It really does depend on your user knowledge level. If you know what you're doing, you don't really need any firewalls, antivirus scanners, malware scanners, etc.

So you hate all *nix OSes? You are trying to tell us that you like their cases? You are entitled to your opinion I guess but I think you are a really really small niche. That niche may see large on sites like this but in terms of the general population of computer users, it is miniscule.

Also, that 'niche' is not small. Given an ugly laptop, and a nice looking one, both running Windows, which one would YOU buy?

It most obviously IS a bad thing! LOTS of software (that is free, useful AND clean) is Windows only. Not to mention the commercial software that's available- and what do you say to gamers?

The arguments you're using are getting old and have been answered many times before.

The soul of the Mac is the OS. I believe Steve Jobs said that once at a conference. Apple won't adapt Windows as its main OS. Not now, not ever. However, things can change but I highly doubt it.

@Leddy, what's with the argument that OS X is not compatible with Windows programs, why does it have to be ? OS X is compatible with Windows in many ways.

IMHO, the day that apple announce that it will ditch OS X for Windows, that's the day I will stop using computers at home. Unfortunately I have to use a Windows box at work.

I was a windows user for many years, but switched to mac last year. Also, 3 friends switched at the same time.

We couldn't be happier. I'm not going to talk about there are no viruses for OS X, that was not the reason that made me switch, but instead the stability of OS X was the real deal. I was sick of formatting my hard drive every 6 months, getting the famous blue screen of death, and so on.

I've been using my Imac for 2 months now and I've only restarted it once. That's right, ONCE.

Are you sure that Apple will switch to Windows knowing that every user will have to reformat the hard drive because windows gets slower with time?. Don't think so.

lol, what is this guy smoking :s

didnt he do any research into apple and how they make their money? people buy mac osx for the amazing os not the extremely average and overpriced hardware.

why would anyone choose a mac over any other manufacturer if the os was the same? and dont say design because the vast majority of mac users wouldnt pay $100's for "design"

the writer should have actually done some research before writing an article thats still the general rule isnt it???

lol, what is this guy smoking :s

Dvorak is one of the biggest trolls ever. They keep him around to cause commotion. I'm almost sure he does it on purpose (or he is just really really thick but they leave him there).

He's not going to go away unless people ignore him.

I see no reason why they wouldn't Apple make the majority of their money from Hardware and not software. If they sold Windows with nice shiney, high spec computers then I think they could be like a new Alienware.

Hardware rakes more money in, not by selling copies of OS X.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google Pixel 11 series: Here's what to expect by Hamid Ganji Google Pixel 10 series In recent years, Google has successfully turned its Pixel devices into worthy contenders in the smartphone market. The search giant is now preparing to launch the Pixel 11 series in just a few months, and many Pixel fans are likely wondering what Google has in store for them this year. The next lineup of Google smartphones includes four devices: the Pixel 11, Pixel 11 Pro, Pixel 11 Pro XL, and Pixel 11 Pro Fold. This year, we don’t expect Google to bring revolutionary upgrades to its handsets, and the Pixel 11 series is likely to receive modest hardware improvements alongside a slew of AI-powered features. Here are the rumored specifications of the Google Pixel 11 series ahead of its official debut: When will the new Pixel phones be unveiled? The last two generations of Google Pixel phones (Pixel 9 series and Pixel 10 series) were launched in August, unlike the previous three generations that debuted in October. With that in mind, we expect Google to unveil the Pixel 11 series sometime in August 2026. The exact launch date has yet to be confirmed. Google Pixel 11 CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines How much will the Pixel 11 series cost? Predicting the final price of upcoming smartphones has become increasingly difficult. As you may know, RAM and memory prices are rising sharply, leading to significant increases in the cost of consumer electronics. Recently, Apple CEO Tim Cook said that price increases for some future Apple products are unavoidable, suggesting that the iPhone 18 series could become more expensive. Google has remained tight-lipped about any potential price increases for the Pixel 11 series. If the company manages to maintain last year’s pricing structure, here’s what the lineup could cost: Pixel 11: $799 Pixel 11 Pro: $999 Pixel 11 Pro XL: $1,199 Pixel 11 Pro Fold: $1,799 Given current market conditions, it may be difficult for Google to avoid raising prices unless it adopts cost-saving measures, such as equipping the base model with 8GB of RAM. Google Pixel 11 series anticipated specs: We expect the Google Pixel 11 series to debut with a new Tensor G6 processor as well as an upgraded camera system. The overall design, however, is expected to remain largely unchanged across the lineup. Specifications Pixel 11 Pixel 11 Pro Pixel 11 Pro XL Pixel 11 Pro Fold Display 6.3-inch LTPO AMOLED / 120Hz refresh rate / up to 3100 nits of brightness 6.3-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 6.8-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 8-inch inner screen and 6.4-inch outer display, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness RAM & Processor Tensor G6 / 8-12GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 16GB of RAM Storage options 128GB or 256GB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB Camera 50MP main sensor, 13MP ultra-wide, 10.8MP 5x telephoto, 10.5MP front camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 10.5MP ultra-wide camera, 10.8MP telephoto camera, 10MP front camera, 10MP inner camera Battery 4,840 mAh 4,707 mAh 5,000 mAh 4,658 mAh Software Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 The Pixel 11 series won’t be a major departure from its predecessor, with Google instead focusing on subtle improvements and AI additions such as Gemini Intelligence. However, a patent filed by Google suggests the company is working on a removable battery for its smartphones, and we could see this feature make its way to the Pixel 11 Pro Fold. Given that nearly all smartphones today lack removable batteries, such a feature would be a welcome addition to future Pixel devices. That said, it may not arrive with this year’s lineup after all, and the final decision is yet to be made by Google. The Pixel 11 series could also face an uphill battle in the market. In the Android segment, Samsung is performing well with the Galaxy S26 series, while the Galaxy Z Fold 8 lineup is also expected to launch next month. On the other hand, Apple is preparing to unveil the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max in September alongside its first foldable iPhone.
    • At least AMD is still taking Windows 10 seriously (after the oops) before it consumer extended support ends.
    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!