Will Apple Adopt Windows?


Recommended Posts

What happens when I have more than 300 or so programs, like I do on my Windows laptop?

Oh wait, I forgot. It's impossible for a Mac to have that many programs. After all, there aren't that many apps written for it, is there?

I was going to stay out of this thread, but the glaring ignorance in this post made me want to reply.

Firstly, do you truly believe that all your application shortcuts show up in the Dock automatically? Because that's not how it happens. They are voluntarily put there by the user, much like you voluntarily put (or don't put) shortcuts on your Windows desktop. The only difference is the amazing amount of functionality the Dock icons give you, as opposed to the simple function of just launching the program as do the Windows desktop shortcuts.

Secondly, there may be less software available for Mac, but I must say that the average level of quality is better... I have found better quality programs for Mac than I ever have on Windows. Out of all the freeware/shareware apps available for Windows, 90% of them are lackluster and don't perform the function you want at the level of quality you're expecting. For Mac, there were only about 10% of the apps that I found that were developed poorly. I don't know about you, but I'd much rather have quality over quantity.

People who want a pretty laptop have a few choices out there like Alienware, Sony Vaio or those new Titanium Thinkpads. Some people may be drawn to macs by the industrial design of their cases but the majority of mac switcher take the plunged because of the OS.

i orginally took the switch to a ibook over a windows laptop was becuase of its cheap price and battery life for what it is, after getting it i feel in love with macosx i use it now as my primary desktop. If they were to switch to windows i wouldnt bother saving up for a imac or mac mini, i only want them for mac osx

Yeah, Apple does one heck of a job on OS X. IMHO it is the best Operating System to be found. Granted you're paying a premium for it, you'll realize it was worth it with the time you save not reformatting, defragging, etc.

I hardly ever use Windows anymore. The only time I use Windows is for games. The remainder of the time is spent on my mac mini. :)

Two words: HELL NO! :D Mac OS X is the best system out there and demand for the Macs is actually outstripping supply! As a matter of fact, so many people I know of want to switch to a Mac because of the crappy Windows user interface. Chances are, it's more likely that Apple would be forced to allow Mac OS X installations on non-Apple systems if they are not able to keep up with the hardware demand.

the evn show, I think you are getting caught up in the details of what .NET and Cocoa are. They are both API's for connecting to the underlying OS in an Object oriented way. You could also say that Carbon and Win32 are somewhat analogous as they are both C based with kind of messy syntaxes.

I don't want to get into a nerd contest with you especially since I'm recovering from bronchitis. You don't need to prove how smart you are. I've written plenty of code to interface with Win32 at work and I'm sure you have too.

From a very high level, both .NET and Cocoa + the Core frameworks help developers concentrate on writing applications instead of interfacing with low level OS APIs or implementing basic network and file I/O.

Regardless of which one you happen to prefer or what features one has over the other, the fact remains that Apple and third-party developers use Cocoa and the Core frameworks to a large extent these days. Switching to Windows would throw all that functionality out the window or it would have to be ported to Windows. I think it would destroy Apple as we know it.

Essentially, this Dvorak fantasy is not going to happen. Apple might be working on providing some sort of compatibility libraries to speed up porting of windows Apps to OS X.

Actually, more likely, porting OS X apps to *Windows*, not the other way around. However, they *won't* be necessarily for Macs.

Apple is a hardware company that also writes a goodly amount of software. It is also smart enough to look beyond the base of its own hardware to make money. A case in point is QuickTime Pro. While QuickTime authoring software is mostly associated with Apple's Macs, you haven't needed a Mac to author content in QuickTime for the last two major releases (6 *or* 7). Apple, however, is faced with a rather nasty dilemma: the top-drawer photography and HD editing software outside of Avid is written by Apple itself. However, the vast majority of software that *competes* with Apple Logic Express/Logic Pro, FinalCut HD and Motion are not even available for Apple hardware (they are available for that *other OS*). That means that Apple must do one of two things: either be content with their niche market, or port their software to that other OS. Let's be honest: what percentage of iPod sales are going to non-Mac owners? Forty percent? Fifty percent? Even (egads!) *sixty percent*? Personally, I would say that even the sixty-percent figure (iPod sales to non-Mac owners) is actually underestimating the case, considering the number of downloads of iTunes for Windows (even though you can use iTunes with portable devices other than iPods). The fact that people with portable devices that *aren't* iPods (and also don't own a Mac) are using iTunes on Windows obviously means that Apple is doing SOMETHING right when it comes to writing software on Windows. Could it be that Apple (which is, as I said earlier, smart enough to look beyond their own hardware base to make money) is actually looking to port some of the applications (and possibly even development tools) to *Windows*? (One thing that is seriously lacking is a low-cost, or better still, no-cost, entry-level development environment to write managed code in Windows. Xcode, which Apple *gives away* with every copy of OS X, can be used to write managed code. Name *one* thing in Xcode that would prohibit its use to write managed-code-based Windows applications other than the usual cross-OS issues that Apple has dealt with before with QuickTime and iTunes. Xcode could be the way to woo still more developers away from Microsoft.)

Apple moving whole-hog to Windows? Not a chance. Apple porting some of their own *software* to Windows? Why not?

That guy is a ****in retard. He's like the Nostradamus of IT. He sits there and spouts a billion predictions and if one turns out right 10 years later he brags about it. It's like throwing a bunch of **** at the wall and waiting for some of it to stick.

PGHammer, that's not going to happen. Those Pro Apps rely very heavily on OS X specific Core technologies like Core Audio, Quartz extreme, Core Image and Core Video not to mention the rest of Cocoa.

Porting that technology would be like porting .NET and all of the pillars of Longhorn/Vista to OS X. It's not going to happen.

You cannot just recompile and have it run on windows. Cocoa is as alien to windows as Win32 is to OS X.

What many Windows users fail to realize is that there is almost always an alternative program for every program that runs Windows and many of them are much higher in quality and often freeware or shareware (very cheap). This Apple switching to windows bull**** is a load of crap and Dvorak needs to take his crazy pills! More probable would be Microsoft giving up the OS industry and letting Apple take over. Also... someone earlier mentioned that Microsoft has better marketing and I must disagree... Just look at the success of the iPod! Microsoft doesnt have to do anything to sell new copies of windows except to say that there is a new version. The few ads from microsoft I have ever seen were extremely lame at best.

Also... someone earlier mentioned that Microsoft has better marketing and I must disagree... Just look at the success of the iPod! Microsoft doesnt have to do anything to sell new copies of windows except to say that there is a new version. The few ads from microsoft I have ever seen were extremely lame at best.

That's anno 2006. Microsoft did do a better job getting Dos/Windowsto to the masses in the early '90s, something Apple failed to do with Mac OS.

yeah, because he was soooo off the mark when he predicted that Apple would switch to Intel processors...

Actually, he predicted that Apple would switch to the Itanium chip in 2002. Yeah, that happened.

Dvorak spews a lot of crap, it should be taken with a grain of salt.

Apple adopt windows?!? Lol, I think not. They may embrace a situation where it is used in conjunction with OS X on the same Mac or even possibly the Red Box technology but hardly ditch one of the most advanced consumer OS's for something still stuck in the 20th century...

Apple adopt windows?!? Lol, I think not. They may embrace a situation where it is used in conjunction with OS X on the same Mac or even possibly the Red Box technology but hardly ditch one of the most advanced consumer OS's for something still stuck in the 20th century...

Ummm... kinda got it it the wrong way around there... :o

Oh lord, not turning this into another OS X vs Windows thread man, but its true. Evn Show explains it terrifically, wish I could find that post he made a while back. Oh well.

Btw, for those of you who do not know what Red Box is, its the fabled OS X technology that would allow for windows programs to run natively within OS X. Most say that it would spell the end of OS X developed programs but I tend to differ. With extremely advanced technologies such as quartz, core image, cocoa, etc built into the system, I don't think this would have any impact on the developers that use those to make smoother and more efficient programs.

EDIT: Hurray!!!! 2000 posts!!! Yea I know, I'm a loser but when you are bored and its almost midnight, little things like that make you feel good :D

I needed a break from trying to decipher source code due to lack of documentation; the following is not proof read or fact-checked. Beware rampant opinion and speculation.

I could find that post he made a while back. Oh well.

Search is broken for anything more than a couple years back.

Just as a sort of final follow up to Aristotle from that side-topic we were having:

I like Cocoa, OS X, and even XCode just fine. I don't think has been another platform that would let me get nearly as much done as Cocoa and Xcode have?in fairness I've only written for maybe half-a-dozen operating systems so my experience is limited. We got off a bit of a stretch about features of IDEs APIs, and all sorts of nerdery not because I think .Net is leaps ahead of Cocoa (it's not) or because XCode sucks (only compared to VisualStudio) but because I don't agree that Mac developers couldn't have been at least as successful writing Windows Applications.

I also don't think that consumers really give a damn about how good their applications are?the number of them still using crap pretty much seals that one. I think it would be dreadful to lose Carbon and I think applications would suffer?especially small ones like Textmate and Delicious Library?but I don't think that'd effect most companies any worse than trying to sell to < 1/10th of the market does.

As a side bit: Cocoa almost completely abstracts all of the implementation details from a program. Moving an application from Cocoa on OS X to Cocoa running atop Windows may not even require a recompile in some cases. The problem (as always) is getting Cocoa to run anywhere but OS X. We already know that parts of OS X's API are running on Windows just fine (Rendezvous^wBonjour, Quicktime, all of the BSD Subsystem). We also know that OpenStep (Cocoa's grandfather) ran on a number of platforms, including Windows. Maybe Apple's been maintaining a mostly-current stand alone "cocoa runtime" that can be installed on other platforms the way the .Net can, in theory. I doubt they'd be spending the resources on such a project because there's little benefit to be seen from it?which is completely unlike maintaining a platform independent operating system?but nothing apple does surprises me any more.

The whole idea that Apple would ditch their OS as old as the "going out of business" and "apple becomes sony++" and the "switching to <X-brand> processors" rumors, all of which have been circling longer than I've been follow Apple.

Also, for what it's worth: Dvorak talks about this article on This Week In Tech where he makes it pretty clear?to my ears?that this article was written pretty much to put ads in front of your eyes. I haven't read this article specifically (him and Thurrot are little more than well paid trolls as far as I'm concerned) but I can't image there's anything in there that he hasn't said in 2005, 2000, 1995, etc. At the very least this whole the whole argument is pretty weak from what I've seen hear and on Ars. Listening to him try and explain himself on TWiT pretty much sealed the deal for me: this is a non story.

Sure - it's ad. hominem but the guy is talking out his ass?but it's getting a million page views a day so good for him: he's apparently much better at his job than I am at mine.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google Pixel 11 series: Here's what to expect by Hamid Ganji Google Pixel 10 series In recent years, Google has successfully turned its Pixel devices into worthy contenders in the smartphone market. The search giant is now preparing to launch the Pixel 11 series in just a few months, and many Pixel fans are likely wondering what Google has in store for them this year. The next lineup of Google smartphones includes four devices: the Pixel 11, Pixel 11 Pro, Pixel 11 Pro XL, and Pixel 11 Pro Fold. This year, we don’t expect Google to bring revolutionary upgrades to its handsets, and the Pixel 11 series is likely to receive modest hardware improvements alongside a slew of AI-powered features. Here are the rumored specifications of the Google Pixel 11 series ahead of its official debut: When will the new Pixel phones be unveiled? The last two generations of Google Pixel phones (Pixel 9 series and Pixel 10 series) were launched in August, unlike the previous three generations that debuted in October. With that in mind, we expect Google to unveil the Pixel 11 series sometime in August 2026. The exact launch date has yet to be confirmed. Google Pixel 11 CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines How much will the Pixel 11 series cost? Predicting the final price of upcoming smartphones has become increasingly difficult. As you may know, RAM and memory prices are rising sharply, leading to significant increases in the cost of consumer electronics. Recently, Apple CEO Tim Cook said that price increases for some future Apple products are unavoidable, suggesting that the iPhone 18 series could become more expensive. Google has remained tight-lipped about any potential price increases for the Pixel 11 series. If the company manages to maintain last year’s pricing structure, here’s what the lineup could cost: Pixel 11: $799 Pixel 11 Pro: $999 Pixel 11 Pro XL: $1,199 Pixel 11 Pro Fold: $1,799 Given current market conditions, it may be difficult for Google to avoid raising prices unless it adopts cost-saving measures, such as equipping the base model with 8GB of RAM. Google Pixel 11 series anticipated specs: We expect the Google Pixel 11 series to debut with a new Tensor G6 processor as well as an upgraded camera system. The overall design, however, is expected to remain largely unchanged across the lineup. Specifications Pixel 11 Pixel 11 Pro Pixel 11 Pro XL Pixel 11 Pro Fold Display 6.3-inch LTPO AMOLED / 120Hz refresh rate / up to 3100 nits of brightness 6.3-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 6.8-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 8-inch inner screen and 6.4-inch outer display, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness RAM & Processor Tensor G6 / 8-12GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 16GB of RAM Storage options 128GB or 256GB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB Camera 50MP main sensor, 13MP ultra-wide, 10.8MP 5x telephoto, 10.5MP front camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 10.5MP ultra-wide camera, 10.8MP telephoto camera, 10MP front camera, 10MP inner camera Battery 4,840 mAh 4,707 mAh 5,000 mAh 4,658 mAh Software Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 The Pixel 11 series won’t be a major departure from its predecessor, with Google instead focusing on subtle improvements and AI additions such as Gemini Intelligence. However, a patent filed by Google suggests the company is working on a removable battery for its smartphones, and we could see this feature make its way to the Pixel 11 Pro Fold. Given that nearly all smartphones today lack removable batteries, such a feature would be a welcome addition to future Pixel devices. That said, it may not arrive with this year’s lineup after all, and the final decision is yet to be made by Google. The Pixel 11 series could also face an uphill battle in the market. In the Android segment, Samsung is performing well with the Galaxy S26 series, while the Galaxy Z Fold 8 lineup is also expected to launch next month. On the other hand, Apple is preparing to unveil the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max in September alongside its first foldable iPhone.
    • At least AMD is still taking Windows 10 seriously (after the oops) before it consumer extended support ends.
    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!