[Review] Windows Live Messenger


Recommended Posts

The new Windows Live Messenger.

Worth the upgrade? Better than MSN Messenger? Easier to use?

N.B: For you review critics out there I'm aware Windows Live Messenger is in pre-release beta stages, and that this review may not reflect an opinion of the final product.

I’ve decided to write up a review on Windows Live Messenger (Beta). Overall it’s ‘Okay’, and has some cool new features like Offline Messaging but I prefer MSN Messenger 7.5.

New Contacts Window

The contacts Windows has had some changes applied to it:

• You can change the colour of the personal settings area at the top of the contacts list.

• A new search bar at the top of the contacts list allows you to easily find contacts on your list.

• When hovering over contacts in the contact list, you get more details about the specific contact and have new shortcut buttons to send emails and start video conversations. This feature can be turned off.

• The advertisement window is located slightly higher up on the contacts window, making it more noticeable.

Verdict: In personal opinion I think the new contact window is a little bloated, and I prefer the user interface of MSN Messenger. 7 out of 10

contactlist7vh.th.jpg

New Conversation Window

There are not any significant changes with the conversation window when comparing it to MSN Messenger 7.5. Its appearance and layout is a little more simplistic, however less compact. The MSN Messenger conversation window seemed more spacious.

Verdict: I think the conversation window MSN Messenger has a larger messaging area which is important when having conversations. Needs improvement, 5 out of 10

convwindow1xr.th.jpg

New Add Contact Window

Whatever happened to the simple ‘Type e-mail address and click add’ concept?

I guess it’s a similar idea but now you’ve a lot of additional options; such as typing notes about the contact, and their additional contact details such as telephone number and address.

Verdict: I prefer simple and streamline. I don’t even think I’d use all these extra features. 5 out of 10

Connectivity

Unfortunately I’ve been disconnected from Messenger on many occasions, usually when I’m idle. I’ve had a few connectivity issues with MSN Messenger 7.5, but it was no where near as bad as Windows Live Messenger. Hopefully this won’t occur in the final version. :sleep:

I think the beta versions of MSN Messenger 7 were more stable than Windows Live Messenger beta.

Additional New Features:

Video Carousel

Instead of having plain JPEG and animated GIF’s in the advertisement window, you can have a much larger video-based advertisement instead! Luckily you have the option disable this feature.

Time-Stamp Messages

Some messenger users might find this feature useful. Windows Live Messenger can stamp the time when a message is received to the message in the conversation window. Again, you can turn this feature off.

Offline Messages

Very neat! Send and receive messages when your (appearing) offline. When receiving offline messages, you have the option of having your offline messages appear instantly or stored until you click on a button in the contacts list window. Offline messages can be sent to contacts using MSN Messenger 7.

Overall

It looks good, it’s a bit bloated and there better be mess patch to remove the advertisements when Windows Live Messenger becomes final. Oh and the new Windows Live Messenger icon is sexy. lol. :whistle:

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/435750-review-windows-live-messenger/
Share on other sites

only real diffrence that i can see between the builds is the look

i disabled the File Sharing as it wasnt getting used ( only 1 of my contact's has WLM )

*Edit *

The Offline messaging is mainly for sending messages to people offline ( aka ICQ), as if you send a msg when your showing as offline, and they get it, well, they will know your online

post-36462-1140711284_thumb.jpg

can someone tell me without a doubt, if you can/cannot send an offline message to someone who has blocked you?

i mean if you can, does that not completly null and void even being able to block someone?

i can't actually test this one out myself but i'd like to think the messenger team would keep it as a 'actually offline'/'appearing offline' feature and have them bank up if the person has you blocked.

lol, this is a early buggy build, so you cant really rate it, + its a beta so you again cant rate it to its full potential?

So how have you given it a rating?

N.B: For you review critics out there I'm aware Windows Live Messenger is in pre-release beta stages, and that this review may not reflect an opinion of the final product.

In future, how about you read the first few sentences of the post before replying? :rolleyes:

can someone tell me without a doubt, if you can/cannot send an offline message to someone who has blocked you?

i mean if you can, does that not completly null and void even being able to block someone?

i can't actually test this one out myself but i'd like to think the messenger team would keep it as a 'actually offline'/'appearing offline' feature and have them bank up if the person has you blocked.

I'd be interested to know too. Whats stopping you from testing it but? Just ask a friend to block you for 60 secs in which time send them some messages and ask them if they received them. Nothing to hard about that???

its not released yet, it will be sometime tonight

It was indeed, just got my update this morning. Man they are going backwards instead of forward. I am not going to nag about the main window/conversation window (i could go on for hours) but the systembar icons are just the old again! :( I loved the new ones.

The rollover thing in your contactsmenu is also gone, I loved that feature to. I want to downgrade. :(

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
    • Another devilish issue surrounding these certificates is what can happen with old, unsuspecting PCs that nevertheless have Secure Boot enabled. In my case, it was a Dell with a 3rd-gen Core chip (so about 13 years old). As of the last few weeks, it was suddenly BSOD'g within about 5 minutes of booting. Turns out it was because of MS's "Secure-Boot-Update" scheduled task, which is scheduled to run 5 minutes after login. It's explained in gory detail here (this is not my post, but it was where I found the answer), but the short version is that this legacy system would need fairly elaborate, manual certificate intervention since MS's automatic cert update method cannot work. How to do that is linked late in the thread. https://www.bleepingcomputer.c...od-caused-by-scheduled-task Secure Boot wasn't at all important for this particular PC, so I disabled it to be done with the problem.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      95
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!