Latest Japanese Hardware Sales


Recommended Posts

New numbers are up.

April 17 - 23, 2006

Nintendo DS Lite - 168,809

PSP - 32,323

PS2 - 25,763

Game Boy Micro - 18,390

Game Boy Advance SP - 11,044

Nintendo DS - 8,051

X360 - 3,990

GameCube - 1,106

Game Boy Advance - 58

Xbox - 16

Original DS slips down, DSlite still dominating.

Yea but if you look at the sales of regular xbox back a few months it wasnt any better. The 360 numbers are starting to go up but the ps2 is still dominating even though its on its last legs.

16 though? :| Something is screwy there.

Ninety-Nine Nights failed to do much for the 360, it only increased by 2,000 units.

Ah, so it was released that week. The game didn't get any great reviews other than in Famitsu 360 (I think that's what it's called) so I didn't expect it to do much. I did expect it to make more of an impact than Rumble Roses, though :wacko:

Ah, so it was released that week. The game didn't get any great reviews other than in Famitsu 360 (I think that's what it's called) so I didn't expect it to do much. I did expect it to make more of an impact than Rumble Roses, though :wacko:

Sex sells :p

Ah, so it was released that week. The game didn't get any great reviews other than in Famitsu 360 (I think that's what it's called) so I didn't expect it to do much. I did expect it to make more of an impact than Rumble Roses, though :wacko:

It did come in 11th for software sales.

I would think that PS2 would rule the western stats if there were any. :)

Im not sure about USA, but both xbox consoles have dominated the market in Australia. Seems wierd how they made Australians wait so long.

I dont have any console im a poor man. :(

Im not sure about USA, but both xbox consoles have dominated the market in Australia. Seems wierd how they made Australians wait so long.

That's not really true. Microsoft did very well with Xbox over here (probably one of their strongest markets per capita), but Sony are still in the lead by a fair bit, in hardware and software sales. Just look at last weeks sales for Australia:

Top%2010%20All%20Full%20Priced%20Gam.gif

Nintendo are doing the worst in Australia with the GameCube coming in last position. DS is doing pretty well though.

Ok genius... which dating sims are selling like hotcakes and pushing systems. Because as far as I last checked (according to the Media Create sales records), it was the aforementioned games (Animal Crossing, Brain Training, Mario Kart to an extent) that were really pushing systems.

11472650683281fd.th.jpg

bit late but you did ask oh yeah forgot to mention dateing sims are fan made so heh

watch 360 sales fly after the E3...499? and 599?...its wayyyy too expensive...i think lotta people, like me, are gonna go ahead and get a 360...its just not worth the wait or the freaking price...i dont think BR movies will be worth man...great picture sure...but i bareley watch movies on HD anyways...

This is freakin ridiculous! Hehe Combined DS+DSL sales are gonna round out at what..3/4 of a million units per month?! GODDAMN! PS2 is also amazingly strong, considering most people that wanted one already bought them..The fact that so many PS2 are being sold right now is good news for the upcoming PS3, guys.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
    • I'm not sure how old the school is, but they've been doing this since GTA 3. Back in those days we'd be lucky for game companies to release on the PC at all. And with the current state of Sony (or Microsoft) their gaming wing won't be getting a penny from me.
    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!