Recommended Posts

This is so typical of Microsoft. They continue to use older technology and simply slap an (arguably) prettier face on it. Forget about the Intel Mac's - this is simply Microsoft deliberately holding people back from the future. We've all waited nearly 6 years for Vista - the very least Microsoft could do it use technology that isn't two decades old. It's pathetic.

And can someone please clear something up for me; is it just the Longhorn Server that won't support 32-bit machines, or Vista as a whole?

If anything, MS wants Windows on Mac's, that then increases their market share to PC and Mac users, making them more money.

Exactly what I was going to say. :yes:

And I care why ? Vista sucks anyways. I can assure you vista will cause people to move to mac. Apples move to intel doesn't exactly help Vista in anyway either. I personally made about 20 people switch to OS X in the past week or so. Is this huge, yes, yes it is. Why is this huge to me? Thats 20 people that are stuck in the s**t hole know as Windows. They can do everything on a mac that they can do on a PC, but in a more productive, less stressful enviroment. Now this is just indivdual users. I have made two small businesses switch aswell. So far, they love it. One is even buying me a MacBook Pro, which should be here soon. So what do I say to Microsoft killing the EFI support? Idiots, instead of slacking, start working. I know developers on the Vista team that agree Vista is crap, also Paul Thurrot, which I had a mini interview with while playing COD2 on 360, agreed that Vista is complete s**t from the ground up.

/end rant.

Sorry about that, a bit offtopic but I am totally chocked at Microsoft lately, it's constant cut this, cut that, take to much time and get no where crap. What has Vista done for Windows? Nothing! It's just XP with some pretty graphics and a side bar, and oh ya, that annoying, CAN I OPEN CONTROL PANEL, PERMIT, ALLOW, crap! ITS CONTROL PANEL, YOUR OWN APP!!!, JESUS CHRIST!111! Not to mention you can disable that, which, well, can be disabled with a batch script. Doesn't that render that pointless? If CMD is enabled, a batch can run... That service can be disabled, now a virus or malicous software can run. Wow nice and secure Microsoft (Y).

This is definitely political. They want to push WMP 11 and are afraid that dual booting macs would take away from potential market share in music sales as people would have access to a fast native version of iTunes in OS X and games through booting into windows.

I know of several people who would have bought macbooks and only booted into Vista to play games.

There is still hope of an OS X port of cedga for games and darwine X86 for applications. You could always run apps in a virtual environment. Here's hoping for VMware on OSX soon.

this is pretty depressing how they can't get it to work.....i mean it didnt take that long for tiger to do it..

I guess you missed this part:

It is responsible for initialising hardware in the PC, and importantly, device drivers are stored in the EFI flash memory rather than being loaded by the operating system. It is a major change for the PC industry and both PC makers and Microsoft have been slow to make the switch. Because the Apple Intel Mac platform is entirely new, it does not have any legacy support concerns.

I guess you missed this part:

I guess you missed the part where Apple switched from Bios to EFI between 10.4.3 (intel transition kits with bios) and 10.4.4 (Intel Core Duos with EFI)? Apple was able to quickly switch over.

They could have included drivers and bootloader for both and installed the appropriate on during installation.

I guess you missed the part where Apple switched from Bios to EFI between 10.4.3 (intel transition kits with bios) and 10.4.4 (Intel Core Duos with EFI)? Apple was able to quickly switch over.

They could have included drivers and bootloader for both and installed the appropriate on during installation.

haha that's exactly what i was going to say :p

Besides dual booting OSX, EFI have numerous advantages for users (PC users) such as faster booting, system independent drivers, etc.

MS simply will launch a feature incomplete OS just not to slip the 2006 release date without this one & some others.

This is just disappointing :(

IMO all fundamental features like EFI, WinFS should be in inital release; not to come with a service pack later.

Service packs should be just for bugfixes, improve stability & maintenance...

Besides dual booting OSX, EFI have numerous advantages for users (PC users) such as faster booting, system independent drivers, etc.

MS simply will launch a feature incomplete OS just not to slip the 2006 release date without this one & some others.

This is just disappointing :(

IMO all fundamental features like EFI, WinFS should be in inital release; not to come with a service pack later.

Service packs should be just for bugfixes, improve stability & maintenance...

Service Packs shouldn't have to exsist.

I had written a blog entry for the story but I am more dissapointed in both comapnies. Also Microsoft is not all to blame as OS X also uses a custom implementation of EFI and Im sure they are being less than forthcoming for details.

What has Apple to do with the fact Windows Vista won't boot natively on any EFI system?

People are forgetting one thing in the "OSX has it, why not Windows?" argument. That OSX is designed to run on a fairly minimal amount of hardware, where as Windows is designed to run on every possible configuration of computer... old or new.

I was quite looking forward to this EFI stuff, although I know little about it.

People are forgetting one thing in the "OSX has it, why not Windows?" argument. That OSX is designed to run on a fairly minimal amount of hardware, where as Windows is designed to run on every possible configuration of computer... old or new.

I was quite looking forward to this EFI stuff, although I know little about it.

Yes, but to support a wide range of hardware, you normally have to support things, not remove support for them. :p

there is nothing stopping Windows from supporting EFI and classical BIOS, this just means Vista wont run on native, EFI only (no CSM) systems.

is anyone getting these error messages? its driving me nuts!

when i click on a post on the home page it redirects me to this:

IPB WARNING [2] Invalid argument supplied for foreach() (Line: 3525 of /sources/ipsclass.php)

then nothing.

so i have to go to the message boards and this is at the header:

IPB WARNING [2] Invalid argument supplied for foreach() (Line: 3525 of /sources/ipsclass.php)

IPB WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/neowin/public_html/forum/init.php:269) (Line: 445 of /sources/classes/class_display.php)

IPB WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/neowin/public_html/forum/init.php:269) (Line: 446 of /sources/classes/class_display.php)

IPB WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/neowin/public_html/forum/init.php:269) (Line: 447 of /sources/classes/class_display.php)

People are forgetting one thing in the "OSX has it, why not Windows?" argument. That OSX is designed to run on a fairly minimal amount of hardware, where as Windows is designed to run on every possible configuration of computer... old or new.

I was quite looking forward to this EFI stuff, although I know little about it.

Then forget about OSX and talk about Linux, which runs on far more hardware architectures than Windows and supports EFI.

Running on more hardware is certainly not the reason why they're dropping this feature.

Call me crazy, but I think this is all politics.

I think this has something to do with the Intel Macs and the fact that many people were going to purchase them only because they could run both OS X and Windows.

Does anybody else feel like this is just a stab at Apple from MS? It seems so... Before, MS had every intention to do it, then the craze set in that people would be able to run Vista on their shiny new Intel Macs, and now MS isn't going to support it...

Strange, very strange.

Exactly what I was thinking! The people who were waiting since a long time to get an Intel Mac was so that they can dual boot.. if they did not care so much, they could have gotten an iBook or a Powerbook. They want Windows and they know it. This will hurt Apple's business a little bit imo...

I don't know if anyone mentioned this already, but I believe Vista, and XP64, and possibly Server 2003 already or will natively support booting with EFI on 64-bit chips. The problem is that the Mac implementation boots with a 32-bit chip, so it isn't as much as Vista scrapping or not having features as it is that the Mac isn't using 64-bit chips.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The sweet release of death has never looked more appealing.
    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Doesn't DDG mainly use Bing?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      485
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      70
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      58
    5. 5
      neufuse
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!